GitHub user davies opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15154
[SPARK-17494] [SQL] changePrecision() on compact decimal should respect
rounding mode
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Floor()/Ceil() of decimal is implemented using
Github user davies commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15154
cc @JoshRosen @chenghao-intel
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15090#discussion_r79496929
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/AnalyzeColumnCommand.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,159 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15090#discussion_r79496528
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/AnalyzeColumnCommand.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,159 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15146
@viirya does this improve performance?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15146#discussion_r79487809
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SubquerySuite.scala
---
@@ -76,6 +76,23 @@ class SubquerySuite extends QueryTest with
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15090#discussion_r79492362
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/StatisticsSuite.scala ---
@@ -101,4 +101,47 @@ class StatisticsSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15090#discussion_r79492145
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/AnalyzeColumnCommand.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,159 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15090#discussion_r79491476
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/AnalyzeColumnCommand.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,159 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user sethah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15149
Why does the sum need to be less than one? That is not the case for R's
randomForest "cutoff" parameter.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15047
**[Test build #65615 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65615/consoleFull)**
for PR 15047 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15046
**[Test build #65616 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65616/consoleFull)**
for PR 15046 at commit
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15090#discussion_r79489925
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/StatisticsSuite.scala ---
@@ -101,4 +101,47 @@ class StatisticsSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user koeninger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15132
I personally wouldn't encourage people to use receivers unless they had a
very specific reason to. The kafka-0-10 submodule doesn't even have a way
to create receiver based streams, so I'm
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15147
@nbeyer I manually checked the method call before and it seems that is
currently only called when reading/inferring CSV/JSON (but I'd like you confirm
this to double check in case).
---
If
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14803#discussion_r79488089
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/DataSource.scala
---
@@ -197,10 +197,13 @@ case class DataSource(
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14803#discussion_r79488934
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/FileStreamSourceSuite.scala
---
@@ -608,6 +608,34 @@ class FileStreamSourceSuite extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15047
**[Test build #65614 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65614/consoleFull)**
for PR 15047 at commit
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15071#discussion_r79489276
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/benchmark/BroadcastHashJoinBenchmark.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user tejasapatil commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15047
@hvanhovell Done with all changes. Ready for review.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15071#discussion_r79488945
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/benchmark/BroadcastHashJoinBenchmark.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15152
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15152
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65609/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15152
**[Test build #65609 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65609/consoleFull)**
for PR 15152 at commit
Github user jnadler commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15132
Are you comfortable with the inconsistency this creates between Direct
Stream and Receivers? I don't need a receiver-based solution personally. It
does occur to me that it might be desirable
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1
**[Test build #65613 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65613/consoleFull)**
for PR 1 at commit
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user l15k4 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11490
@zsxwing Done, thanks :
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-17600
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15082
What's the status of this issue? I see that it's currently targeted for
2.0.1 in JIRA and wanted to ping to make sure that this doesn't miss the cut in
case we prepare an RC soon.
---
If your
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14634
@yhuai, @cloud-fan What's the status of this issue? Should this still be
targeted for 2.0.1 (which it is currently in JIRA)?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15064
**[Test build #65612 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65612/consoleFull)**
for PR 15064 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15034
**[Test build #3279 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3279/consoleFull)**
for PR 15034 at commit
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15034#discussion_r79485256
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/LDA.scala ---
@@ -354,6 +361,39 @@ private[clustering] trait LDAParams extends Params
with
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15034
Thanks @hhbyyh !
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user sitalkedia commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15064
Rebased with latest master. cc - @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11490
@l15k4 could you create a JIRA to discuss the issue? A closed PR is not a
good place to discuss.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user brkyvz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15153
cc @marmbrus @yhuai
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15153
**[Test build #65611 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65611/consoleFull)**
for PR 15153 at commit
GitHub user brkyvz opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15153
[SPARK-17599] Prevent ListingFileCatalog from failing if path doesn't exist
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The `ListingFileCatalog` lists files given a set of resolved
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15051#discussion_r79482668
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -695,17 +695,15 @@ setMethod("predict", signature(object =
"KMeansModel"),
#' @note spark.mlp since 2.1.0
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15151
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15151
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65606/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15151
**[Test build #65606 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65606/consoleFull)**
for PR 15151 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15046#discussion_r79481517
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/DataSource.scala
---
@@ -318,24 +319,28 @@ case class DataSource(
Github user sethah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14547
So, taking a look at the current patch, the API for this "loss-based"
impurity feels clunky and a bit confusing. To enumerate, we have the following
scenarios:
**1. Completely decoupled
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15103
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user davies commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15103
Merging into master and 2.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15103
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15054
**[Test build #65610 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65610/consoleFull)**
for PR 15054 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14926
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65607/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15103#discussion_r79479009
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/joins.scala
---
@@ -109,7 +109,9 @@ object EliminateOuterJoin extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14926
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14926
**[Test build #65607 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65607/consoleFull)**
for PR 14926 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15054#discussion_r79478675
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/AnalyzeTableCommand.scala
---
@@ -37,7 +38,9 @@ case class
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15054#discussion_r79478609
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/SessionCatalog.scala
---
@@ -246,30 +246,42 @@ class SessionCatalog(
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15103#discussion_r79477760
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/joins.scala
---
@@ -109,7 +109,9 @@ object EliminateOuterJoin extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15122
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15122
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65605/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15122
**[Test build #65605 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65605/consoleFull)**
for PR 15122 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15122
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65604/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15122
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15122
**[Test build #65604 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65604/consoleFull)**
for PR 15122 at commit
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15150#discussion_r79468787
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/feature/Word2Vec.scala ---
@@ -580,7 +581,11 @@ class Word2VecModel private[spark] (
ind +=
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15144
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65608/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15144
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15144
**[Test build #65608 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65608/consoleFull)**
for PR 15144 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15152
**[Test build #65609 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65609/consoleFull)**
for PR 15152 at commit
Github user hhbyyh commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15150#discussion_r79466262
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/feature/Word2Vec.scala ---
@@ -580,7 +581,11 @@ class Word2VecModel private[spark] (
ind +=
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15152
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15152
add to whitelist
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15151#discussion_r79465795
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SparkSession.scala
---
@@ -937,7 +938,7 @@ object SparkSession {
}
/**
- *
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15151#discussion_r79465827
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SparkSession.scala
---
@@ -359,6 +359,7 @@ class SparkSession private(
*
* WARNING:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15152
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user dhruve opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15152
[SPARK-17365][Core] Remove/Kill multiple executors together to reduce RPC
call time.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
We are killing multiple executors together instead of
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14959#discussion_r79461443
--- Diff: python/pyspark/java_gateway.py ---
@@ -50,13 +50,18 @@ def launch_gateway():
# proper classpath and settings from spark-env.sh
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15144
**[Test build #65608 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65608/consoleFull)**
for PR 15144 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15106
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user zero323 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15144
@BryanCutler Sure, here you are. Actually both `Sparse` and `Dense` had to
be fixed.
Note: Technically speaking this can is a breaking change if someone expects
`ValueError`.
On
Github user davies commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15106
Merging this into master and 2.0, thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user l15k4 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11490
This is still causing problems in `2.0.0` standalone, `SPARK_PUBLIC_DNS`
works well for Driver WebUI, it doesn't seem to have any effect on Worker or
Master UI.
I tried to set all of these :
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15150
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15150
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65603/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15150
**[Test build #65603 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65603/consoleFull)**
for PR 15150 at commit
Github user maver1ck commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15106
LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15106
If @maver1ck is OK with it I am, sure.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15120
/cc @zsxwing
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user davies commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15106
@srowen Could you left an `lgtm` here?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14659#discussion_r79457356
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/ApplicationMaster.scala ---
@@ -196,8 +198,13 @@ private[spark] class ApplicationMaster(
Github user dhruve commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14926
I rebased to get changes and the PR has the additional commits. Will close
this one and open a new one.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14926
**[Test build #65607 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65607/consoleFull)**
for PR 14926 at commit
Github user dhruve closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14926
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14659#discussion_r79457084
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -2420,6 +2420,44 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
}
}
Github user eyalfa commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1
@cloud-fan can you please review the fix and retest?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13863
What do we need to do to push this forward? I probably wouldn't create a
new top level package just for this api.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user BryanCutler commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15140
Just one minor suggestion, otherwise LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user BryanCutler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15140#discussion_r79454288
--- Diff: python/pyspark/tests.py ---
@@ -409,13 +409,22 @@ def func(x):
self.assertEqual("Hello World!", res)
def
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15151
**[Test build #65606 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65606/consoleFull)**
for PR 15151 at commit
GitHub user wangmiao1981 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15151
[CORE][DOC]: Fix errors in comments
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
While reading source code of CORE and SQL core, I found some minor errors
in comments such as extra
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15001
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user andrewor14 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15001
LGTM, merging into master 2.0 thanks @zsxwing!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
201 - 300 of 480 matches
Mail list logo
