Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11336
**[Test build #66911 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66911/consoleFull)**
for PR 11336 at commit
[`445407c`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/4
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14690
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14690
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66906/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14690
**[Test build #66906 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66906/consoleFull)**
for PR 14690 at commit
[`3a072bd`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15307
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15416
@yangw1234 can you fix the scala styles?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enab
Github user ericl commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15460
LGTM if tests pass :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15397
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15460
A bunch of mysterious failures ...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled an
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15469
**[Test build #66910 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66910/consoleFull)**
for PR 15469 at commit
[`f712dd4`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/f
Github user ericl commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15460
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15397
Thanks! Merging to master and 2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15469
Graduate a list of Spark SQL APIs to stable
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch graduates a list of Spark SQL APIs and mark them stable.
The following are marked
Github user tdas commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15307
@marmbrus @brkyvz @zsxwing @koeninger Thank you very much for your
feedback. I am going to merge this to master. I will open a different PR to
merge this to branch 2.0
---
If your project is set up
Github user ericl commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14690
> Ok. I'm looking into the org.apache.spark.sql.hive.ParquetSourceSuite
failure.
I think that was caused by the p => pQ change
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this ema
Github user mallman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14690
> Btw, I noticed that this suite was failing in jenkins only.
>
> [info] - partitioned pruned table reports only selected files *** FAILED
*** (610 milliseconds)
>
> That's pretty wei
Github user ericl commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14690#discussion_r83302513
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/DataSourceScanExec.scala
---
@@ -230,13 +230,21 @@ case class FileSourceScanExec(
va
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15460
cc @ericl
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the fe
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13713
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66909/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13713
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13713
**[Test build #66909 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66909/consoleFull)**
for PR 13713 at commit
[`7195c6e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user koeninger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15397
LGTM, thanks for talking it through
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabl
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15044#discussion_r83300104
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/CatalystTypeConvertersSuite.scala
---
@@ -61,4 +63,39 @@ class CatalystTypeConverters
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15397
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15397
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66908/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15397
**[Test build #66908 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66908/consoleFull)**
for PR 15397 at commit
[`7986f18`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14690
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66903/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13713
**[Test build #66909 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66909/consoleFull)**
for PR 13713 at commit
[`7195c6e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14690
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14690
**[Test build #66903 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66903/consoleFull)**
for PR 14690 at commit
[`d48ff10`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user drcrallen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13713#discussion_r83297642
--- Diff:
mesos/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/MesosSchedulerUtils.scala
---
@@ -369,9 +369,11 @@ trait MesosSchedulerUtils exten
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14690
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14690
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66899/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14690
**[Test build #66899 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66899/consoleFull)**
for PR 14690 at commit
[`adeddbf`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user marmbrus commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15307
This LGTM as a first cut. Thanks for working on it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14690
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66898/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14690
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14690
**[Test build #66898 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66898/consoleFull)**
for PR 14690 at commit
[`afb3340`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user fidato13 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15327
@rxin, The support for openCostInBytes, similar to SQL has now been added
for the affected binaryFiles case. Can I please seek for your review and
valuable suggestion for taking this forward and me
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14547
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66907/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14547
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14547
**[Test build #66907 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66907/consoleFull)**
for PR 14547 at commit
[`b7d66df`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15397
**[Test build #66908 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66908/consoleFull)**
for PR 15397 at commit
[`7986f18`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105#discussion_r83287789
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/JsonProtocol.scala ---
@@ -722,6 +722,7 @@ private[spark] object JsonProtocol {
val value = Utils.
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105#discussion_r83273608
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/AccumulatorV2.scala ---
@@ -42,18 +60,43 @@ private[spark] case class AccumulatorMetadata(
* `OUT` sh
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105#discussion_r83290175
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/ShuffledRDD.scala ---
@@ -104,10 +105,26 @@ class ShuffledRDD[K: ClassTag, V: ClassTag, C:
ClassTag](
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14547
**[Test build #66907 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66907/consoleFull)**
for PR 14547 at commit
[`b7d66df`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/b
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14690
**[Test build #66906 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66906/consoleFull)**
for PR 14690 at commit
[`3a072bd`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105#discussion_r83280578
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/AccumulatorV2.scala ---
@@ -136,15 +179,76 @@ abstract class AccumulatorV2[IN, OUT] extends
Serializable {
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105#discussion_r83271510
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContext.scala ---
@@ -1314,27 +1347,54 @@ class SparkContext(config: SparkConf) extends
Logging with Execu
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105#discussion_r83287564
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/AccumulatorV2.scala ---
@@ -136,15 +179,76 @@ abstract class AccumulatorV2[IN, OUT] extends
Serializable {
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105#discussion_r83284254
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/AccumulatorV2.scala ---
@@ -136,15 +179,76 @@ abstract class AccumulatorV2[IN, OUT] extends
Serializable {
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105#discussion_r83271825
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContext.scala ---
@@ -1343,7 +1403,25 @@ class SparkContext(config: SparkConf) extends
Logging with Execut
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105#discussion_r83287419
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/AccumulatorV2.scala ---
@@ -42,18 +60,43 @@ private[spark] case class AccumulatorMetadata(
* `OUT` sh
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105#discussion_r83271147
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/Accumulable.scala ---
@@ -56,15 +61,26 @@ class Accumulable[R, T] private (
@transient private val init
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105#discussion_r83291225
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/TaskContextImpl.scala ---
@@ -126,4 +126,14 @@ private[spark] class TaskContextImpl(
taskMetrics.regist
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105#discussion_r83272894
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/MapPartitionsRDD.scala
---
@@ -34,8 +35,29 @@ private[spark] class MapPartitionsRDD[U: ClassTag, T:
ClassT
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105#discussion_r83279340
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/AccumulatorV2.scala ---
@@ -136,15 +179,76 @@ abstract class AccumulatorV2[IN, OUT] extends
Serializable {
Github user markhamstra commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15335#discussion_r83289400
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGScheduler.scala
---
@@ -1255,27 +1255,46 @@ class DAGScheduler(
s"longer r
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15397#discussion_r83289086
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/KafkaSource.scala
---
@@ -270,7 +281,7 @@ private[kafka010] case class Kafk
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15397#discussion_r83289072
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/KafkaSource.scala
---
@@ -256,8 +269,6 @@ private[kafka010] case class Kafk
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11336
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11336
**[Test build #66905 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66905/consoleFull)**
for PR 11336 at commit
[`0691c32`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11336
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66905/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11336
**[Test build #66905 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66905/consoleFull)**
for PR 11336 at commit
[`0691c32`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14963
@Stibbons however the problem is the virtualenv that gets created when a
user is in a conda enviroment is partially broken.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and hav
Github user jrshust closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15446
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is en
Github user jrshust commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15446
yep.
Closing since the fix is a duplicate of #15375.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user ericl commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14690
MiMa is supposed to detect binary incompatible changes. Looking at the
console output though, it seems like MiMa just crashed.
Running `./dev/mima` locally worked though, so maybe it was some
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15468
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66904/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15468
**[Test build #66904 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66904/consoleFull)**
for PR 15468 at commit
[`870c644`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15468
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15397
> My main point is that whoever implements SPARK-17812 is going to have to
deal with the issue shown in SPARK-17782, which means much of this patch is
going to need to be changed anyway.
@k
Github user mallman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14690
> This patch fails MiMa tests.
I've never seen this before. What does this mean?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as we
Github user vlad17 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14547#discussion_r83285393
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/regression.py ---
@@ -1003,20 +1003,20 @@ class GBTRegressor(JavaEstimator, HasFeaturesCol,
HasLabelCol, HasPredictionCol,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15468
**[Test build #66904 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66904/consoleFull)**
for PR 15468 at commit
[`870c644`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/8
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15468
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15468
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66902/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15468
**[Test build #66902 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66902/consoleFull)**
for PR 15468 at commit
[`9a57147`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15009#discussion_r83277627
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkSubmit.scala ---
@@ -710,7 +724,12 @@ object SparkSubmit {
printWarning("Subclasses of sc
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15009#discussion_r83280861
--- Diff: yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/Client.scala ---
@@ -1189,6 +1217,10 @@ private[spark] class Client(
private object Client exte
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15009#discussion_r83281329
--- Diff: yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/Client.scala ---
@@ -1197,12 +1229,22 @@ private object Client extends Logging {
// Set an
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14690
**[Test build #66903 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66903/consoleFull)**
for PR 14690 at commit
[`d48ff10`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15468
**[Test build #66902 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66902/consoleFull)**
for PR 15468 at commit
[`9a57147`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/9
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14690
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66900/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14690
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14690
**[Test build #66900 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66900/consoleFull)**
for PR 14690 at commit
[`bf6f46f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15464
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15464
Merging to master. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and w
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15467
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66897/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14788#discussion_r83280122
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/datetimeExpressions.scala
---
@@ -916,21 +931,26 @@ case class ToDate(chi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15467
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15467
**[Test build #66897 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66897/consoleFull)**
for PR 15467 at commit
[`5d78d01`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15468
**[Test build #66901 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66901/consoleFull)**
for PR 15468 at commit
[`8b38531`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15468
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15468
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66901/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15468
**[Test build #66901 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66901/consoleFull)**
for PR 15468 at commit
[`8b38531`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/8
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15457
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user vlad17 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14547#discussion_r83278154
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/util/GBTSuiteHelper.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,271 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user vlad17 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14547#discussion_r83278169
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/util/GBTSuiteHelper.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,271 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
301 - 400 of 595 matches
Mail list logo
