Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15743
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15743
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68082/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13065
**[Test build #68091 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68091/consoleFull)**
for PR 13065 at commit
[`7b7fa6e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105#discussion_r86461055
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/AccumulatorV2.scala ---
@@ -42,18 +60,43 @@ private[spark] case class AccumulatorMetadata(
* `OUT` s
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15743
**[Test build #68082 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68082/consoleFull)**
for PR 15743 at commit
[`f8aee5d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105#discussion_r86460868
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/ShuffledRDD.scala ---
@@ -104,10 +105,26 @@ class ShuffledRDD[K: ClassTag, V: ClassTag, C:
ClassTag](
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15760
**[Test build #68090 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68090/consoleFull)**
for PR 15760 at commit
[`d76c37e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d
Github user sameeragarwal commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15760
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105#discussion_r86460332
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/AccumulatorV2.scala ---
@@ -306,18 +428,19 @@ class LongAccumulator extends AccumulatorV2[jl.Long,
jl.Lon
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15760
cc @srinathshankar @sameeragarwal
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabl
GitHub user hvanhovell opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15760
[SPARK-18259][SQL]Do not capture Throwable in QueryExecution
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`QueryExecution.toString` currently captures `java.lang.Throwable`s; this
is
Github user jnadler commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15132
Testing has gone well. It's clearly successful in applying separate
maxrates to our 2 topics. Works as expected with backpressure enabled;
backpressure throttles both streams proportionally, no
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15757
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15757
Merging in master/branch-2.1.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wis
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15697
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15758
ah you meant the assert in save itself.
I don't think we should remove it, since it is largely noop and might be
useful once we allow bucket in save...
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15759
**[Test build #3412 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3412/consoleFull)**
for PR 15759 at commit
[`8764e36`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15758
where's the assert?
```
private def getBucketSpec: Option[BucketSpec] = {
if (sortColumnNames.isDefined) {
require(numBuckets.isDefined, "sortBy must be used to
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15697
merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15363
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15363
**[Test build #68089 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68089/consoleFull)**
for PR 15363 at commit
[`c21de3e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15363
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68089/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user jaceklaskowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15758
Thanks @rxin for looking into it. While reviewing that code I noticed the
call and thought I'd push it for review here since...`getBucketSpec` is
superfluous given `assertNotBucketed("save")`
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14426
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68088/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14426
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14426
**[Test build #68088 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68088/consoleFull)**
for PR 14426 at commit
[`539782d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15757
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15757
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68080/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15757
**[Test build #68080 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68080/consoleFull)**
for PR 15757 at commit
[`e75f4a5`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15754
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15754
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68078/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15739
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68079/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15739
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15754
**[Test build #68078 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68078/consoleFull)**
for PR 15754 at commit
[`95ad783`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user erenavsarogullari commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15326
Hi @kayousterhout and @markhamstra,
This PR is ready for review if it is possible.
All feedbacks are welcome and thanks in advance ;)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15739
**[Test build #68079 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68079/consoleFull)**
for PR 15739 at commit
[`164a082`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15593
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68084/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15593
**[Test build #68084 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68084/consoleFull)**
for PR 15593 at commit
[`210e1d3`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15593
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15737
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15697
@felixcheung Any comments?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user marmbrus commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15737
Thanks, merging to master and 2.1!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15737
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68087/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15737
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15737
**[Test build #68087 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68087/consoleFull)**
for PR 15737 at commit
[`3c9bd75`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15737
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68085/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15737
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15737
**[Test build #68085 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68085/consoleFull)**
for PR 15737 at commit
[`0efd4e9`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15725
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68076/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15363
**[Test build #68089 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68089/consoleFull)**
for PR 15363 at commit
[`c21de3e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15725
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15725
**[Test build #68076 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68076/consoleFull)**
for PR 15725 at commit
[`b1e912b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15658
Yeah I see what you've done, but the example still doesn't suggest what the
output is. I think it's OK if the example has to be run to show the output,
but, I think the documentation needs to exhibit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15627
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14426
Resolve the conflicts.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wi
Github user tgravescs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15627
+1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the featu
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14426
**[Test build #68088 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68088/consoleFull)**
for PR 14426 at commit
[`539782d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/5
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15652
**[Test build #3409 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3409/consoleFull)**
for PR 15652 at commit
[`3964609`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15743
**[Test build #68086 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68086/consoleFull)**
for PR 15743 at commit
[`4c867f1`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/4
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15737
**[Test build #68087 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68087/consoleFull)**
for PR 15737 at commit
[`3c9bd75`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12904
**[Test build #3410 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3410/consoleFull)**
for PR 12904 at commit
[`c7aa4aa`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15627
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68083/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15759
**[Test build #3412 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3412/consoleFull)**
for PR 15759 at commit
[`8764e36`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15754
**[Test build #3411 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3411/consoleFull)**
for PR 15754 at commit
[`95ad783`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15627
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15627
**[Test build #68083 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68083/consoleFull)**
for PR 15627 at commit
[`51eefa5`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15733
**[Test build #3408 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3408/consoleFull)**
for PR 15733 at commit
[`8ee3d80`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15700
**[Test build #3407 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3407/consoleFull)**
for PR 15700 at commit
[`11b6568`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user marmbrus commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15737
Yeah, I'd rather just keep it the same. Failures here should be uncommon.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15737
**[Test build #68085 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68085/consoleFull)**
for PR 15737 at commit
[`0efd4e9`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15759
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
GitHub user wojtek-szymanski opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15759
Bug fix: Pipeline.copy does not create an instance with the same UID
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Motivation:
`org.apache.spark.ml.Pipeline.copy(extra: P
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15758
Why is this the right thing to do?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled an
Github user koeninger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15737
Good catch, I just mistakenly changed to AsMS in one place but not both.
On the test changes, do you want tests waiting up to 2 minutes * however
many kafka calls are being made? If so I
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15756
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15756
**[Test build #68077 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68077/consoleFull)**
for PR 15756 at commit
[`2717f79`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15756
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68077/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15327
**[Test build #3406 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3406/consoleFull)**
for PR 15327 at commit
[`18a8554`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15327
triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the f
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15593
**[Test build #68084 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68084/consoleFull)**
for PR 15593 at commit
[`210e1d3`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/2
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15593#discussion_r86434451
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -489,13 +485,14 @@ class LogisticRegression @Since("1.2.0")
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15593#discussion_r86433115
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -1486,57 +1489,75 @@ private class LogisticAggregator(
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15593#discussion_r86436188
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -1486,57 +1489,75 @@ private class LogisticAggregator(
Github user marmbrus commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15737
Two comments:
- I think `sc.conf.getTimeAsSeconds("spark.network.timeout",
"120s").toString` is still wrong. The suggestion is to make it the following:
```scala
val pollTimeoutMs
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15743
**[Test build #68082 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68082/consoleFull)**
for PR 15743 at commit
[`f8aee5d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/f
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15627
**[Test build #68083 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68083/consoleFull)**
for PR 15627 at commit
[`51eefa5`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/5
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15758
**[Test build #68081 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68081/consoleFull)**
for PR 15758 at commit
[`2162bfb`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/2
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15743#discussion_r86435578
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskInfo.scala ---
@@ -54,7 +52,7 @@ class TaskInfo(
* accumulable to be updated multiple t
GitHub user jaceklaskowski opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15758
[MINOR] Remove calculation of bucket spec when not expected
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Remove calculation of bucket spec when asserted not to have one earlie
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15743
Jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and w
Github user fidato13 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15327
ping @rxin @srowen @zsxwing Can you please have a look and advise Jenkins
to retest . In this latest commit fixed "SPARK-12527, it is discarded unused.
You may specify targets with meta-annotations
Github user ajbozarth commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15742
Nice catch, from a quick look this seems good. My issue is one of
consistency, in previous changes I've made I've used a setter rather that
declaring a var on the scala side. I think using a defau
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15743
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15743
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68075/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15743
**[Test build #68075 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68075/consoleFull)**
for PR 15743 at commit
[`f8aee5d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15754
Thank you for review and approving, @srowen .
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15757
**[Test build #68080 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68080/consoleFull)**
for PR 15757 at commit
[`e75f4a5`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e
Github user marmbrus commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15757
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feat
Github user krishnakalyan3 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15755
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the featur
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15757
[SPARK-18257][SS] Improve error reporting for FileStressSuite
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch improves error reporting for FileStressSuite, when there is an
error in
201 - 300 of 558 matches
Mail list logo
