Github user yssharma commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17467
@felixcheung : would love to get more review comments to improve the patch.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17734
Thanks for checking, guys! yea, I also think the double-checking is needed
there.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17346
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17346
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76081/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17346
**[Test build #76081 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76081/testReport)**
for PR 17346 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17733
**[Test build #76083 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76083/testReport)**
for PR 17733 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17733
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17734
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76082/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17734
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user lw-lin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17346
Rebased to master to resolve conflicts
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17734
oh, yea, I'll fix soon. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17735
**[Test build #76080 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76080/testReport)**
for PR 17735 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17682
Merged to master/2.2
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17733
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76084/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17733
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17733
**[Test build #76084 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76084/testReport)**
for PR 17733 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17733
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76083/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17733
**[Test build #76084 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76084/testReport)**
for PR 17733 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17734
**[Test build #76079 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76079/testReport)**
for PR 17734 at commit
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17734
IIUC I listed up the PRs that it is worth closing. Cloud you check this?
(I pinged you cuz you opened possibly similar PRs) cc: @srowen @HyukjinKwon
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17734
Oh @maropu, BTW, does just "Close" work too? I haven't tested the merge
script but I thought it should be "Closes".
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17734
**[Test build #76082 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76082/testReport)**
for PR 17734 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17735
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76080/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17735
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17682
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17734
**[Test build #76082 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76082/testReport)**
for PR 17734 at commit
GitHub user lw-lin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17735
[WIP][SS] Within the same streaming query, one StreamingRelation should
only be transformed to one StreamingExecutionRelation
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
(Please
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17735
**[Test build #76080 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76080/testReport)**
for PR 17735 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17733
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17733
**[Test build #76078 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76078/testReport)**
for PR 17733 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17346
**[Test build #76081 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76081/testReport)**
for PR 17346 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17733
**[Test build #76083 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76083/testReport)**
for PR 17733 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17733
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76078/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user yssharma commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17467
@budde - Added changes for the minor review comments and docs.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17734
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17734
**[Test build #76079 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76079/testReport)**
for PR 17734 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17734
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76079/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17556
That's good info. It's a tough call -- matching a known package is always
nice. However I agree that a weighted split is a little more theoretically
sound (don't have a reference on that though).
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17467#discussion_r112841794
--- Diff:
external/kinesis-asl/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kinesis/KinesisBackedBlockRDD.scala
---
@@ -135,7 +139,8 @@ class
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17467#discussion_r112841862
--- Diff:
external/kinesis-asl/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kinesis/KinesisBackedBlockRDDSuite.scala
---
@@ -101,6 +103,36 @@ abstract class
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17467#discussion_r112841727
--- Diff: docs/streaming-kinesis-integration.md ---
@@ -216,3 +216,7 @@ de-aggregate records during consumption.
- If no Kinesis checkpoint info exists
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17467#discussion_r112841869
--- Diff:
external/kinesis-asl/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kinesis/KinesisBackedBlockRDDSuite.scala
---
@@ -101,6 +103,36 @@ abstract class
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17640
@felixcheung I just came back from vacation. I will make changes now.
Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17712
Why use a map? That's super unstructured and easy to break ...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user sujith71955 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17649#discussion_r112840921
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/inputs/describe-table-after-alter-table.sql
---
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+CREATE TABLE table_with_comment
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17467#discussion_r112841668
--- Diff: docs/streaming-kinesis-integration.md ---
@@ -216,3 +216,7 @@ de-aggregate records during consumption.
- If no Kinesis checkpoint info exists
Github user budde commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17467#discussion_r112839963
--- Diff: docs/streaming-kinesis-integration.md ---
@@ -216,3 +216,7 @@ de-aggregate records during consumption.
- If no Kinesis checkpoint info exists
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17649
**[Test build #76085 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76085/testReport)**
for PR 17649 at commit
Github user sujith71955 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17649#discussion_r112838259
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/results/describe-table-after-alter-table.sql.out
---
@@ -0,0 +1,162 @@
+-- Automatically generated
Github user vijoshi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17731
Thanks, I tried this out - looks like doing a `rm(".sparkRsession",
envir=SparkR:::.sparkREnv)` is a way to prevent the infinite loop situation. If
I need to setup an active binding for
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17649
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17649
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76085/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17649
**[Test build #76085 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76085/testReport)**
for PR 17649 at commit
Github user yssharma commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17467#discussion_r112848401
--- Diff:
external/kinesis-asl/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kinesis/KinesisBackedBlockRDDSuite.scala
---
@@ -101,6 +103,36 @@ abstract class
Github user yssharma commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17467#discussion_r112848762
--- Diff:
external/kinesis-asl/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kinesis/KinesisBackedBlockRDD.scala
---
@@ -135,7 +139,8 @@ class
Github user zero323 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17728#discussion_r112844527
--- Diff: R/pkg/vignettes/sparkr-vignettes.Rmd ---
@@ -308,6 +308,21 @@ numCyl <- summarize(groupBy(carsDF, carsDF$cyl), count
= n(carsDF$cyl))
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17695
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17695
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76086/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user zero323 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17728#discussion_r112844471
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -3642,3 +3642,58 @@ setMethod("checkpoint",
df <- callJMethod(x@sdf, "checkpoint", as.logical(eager))
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17728#discussion_r112845286
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -3642,3 +3642,58 @@ setMethod("checkpoint",
df <- callJMethod(x@sdf, "checkpoint",
Github user anabranch commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17695
Thanks for the info @srowen - this should be better now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17695
**[Test build #76086 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76086/testReport)**
for PR 17695 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17695
**[Test build #76086 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76086/testReport)**
for PR 17695 at commit
Github user zero323 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17728#discussion_r112844452
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -3642,3 +3642,58 @@ setMethod("checkpoint",
df <- callJMethod(x@sdf, "checkpoint", as.logical(eager))
Github user yssharma commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17467#discussion_r112848373
--- Diff:
external/kinesis-asl/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kinesis/KinesisBackedBlockRDDSuite.scala
---
@@ -101,6 +103,36 @@ abstract class
Github user yssharma commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17467#discussion_r112848363
--- Diff:
external/kinesis-asl/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kinesis/KinesisBackedBlockRDD.scala
---
@@ -135,7 +139,8 @@ class
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17467#discussion_r112848595
--- Diff:
external/kinesis-asl/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kinesis/KinesisBackedBlockRDD.scala
---
@@ -135,7 +139,8 @@ class
Github user yssharma commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17467#discussion_r112848855
--- Diff:
external/kinesis-asl/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kinesis/KinesisBackedBlockRDD.scala
---
@@ -135,7 +139,8 @@ class
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17467#discussion_r112849184
--- Diff:
external/kinesis-asl/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kinesis/KinesisBackedBlockRDD.scala
---
@@ -135,7 +139,8 @@ class
Github user zero323 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17729#discussion_r112853256
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/functions.R ---
@@ -3745,3 +3745,55 @@ setMethod("collect_set",
jc <- callJStatic("org.apache.spark.sql.functions",
Github user zero323 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17729#discussion_r112853834
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_sparkSQL.R ---
@@ -1546,6 +1546,40 @@ test_that("string operators", {
expect_equal(collect(select(df3,
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17730#discussion_r112854341
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/CatalogImpl.scala ---
@@ -197,7 +211,11 @@ class CatalogImpl(sparkSession: SparkSession)
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17728
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17728
**[Test build #76090 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76090/testReport)**
for PR 17728 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17728
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76090/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17733
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17733
**[Test build #76087 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76087/testReport)**
for PR 17733 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17733
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76087/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17736
Let's see if it breaks any existing tests.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17736
**[Test build #76091 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76091/testReport)**
for PR 17736 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15125
**[Test build #76088 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76088/testReport)**
for PR 15125 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17480
**[Test build #76089 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76089/testReport)**
for PR 17480 at commit
Github user uncleGen closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17463
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17728
**[Test build #76090 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76090/testReport)**
for PR 17728 at commit
Github user zero323 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17729#discussion_r112853686
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/functions.R ---
@@ -3745,3 +3745,55 @@ setMethod("collect_set",
jc <- callJStatic("org.apache.spark.sql.functions",
Github user zero323 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17729#discussion_r112853719
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/functions.R ---
@@ -3745,3 +3745,55 @@ setMethod("collect_set",
jc <- callJStatic("org.apache.spark.sql.functions",
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17623#discussion_r112856025
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/complexTypeExtractors.scala
---
@@ -111,6 +111,11 @@ case class
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17540
This PR will change the Spark UI.
For a simple query `Seq(1 -> "a").toDF("i", "j").write.parquet("/tmp/a")`,
previously the SQL tab of Spark UI will show
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17708
I have the same question as Reynold asked in the mailing list. Doesn't
common sub expression elimination already address this issue?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17480
**[Test build #76089 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76089/testReport)**
for PR 17480 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17480
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76089/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17480
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user HyukjinKwon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17737
[SPARK-20442][PYTHON][DOCS] Fill up documentations for functions in Column
API in PySpark
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to fill up the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17733
**[Test build #76087 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76087/testReport)**
for PR 17733 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15125
**[Test build #76088 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76088/testReport)**
for PR 15125 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17623#discussion_r112854488
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/complexTypeExtractors.scala
---
@@ -111,6 +111,11 @@ case class
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17736
cc @dbtsai @hvanhovell
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
GitHub user viirya opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17736
[SPARK-20399][SQL][WIP] Can't use same regex pattern between 1.6 and 2.x
due to unescaped sql string in parser
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The new SQL parser is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15125
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76088/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15125
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
1 - 100 of 142 matches
Mail list logo
