Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15131
**[Test build #65705 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65705/consoleFull)**
for PR 15131 at commit
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15131
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15131
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65698/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15131
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15131
**[Test build #65698 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65698/consoleFull)**
for PR 15131 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15175
**[Test build #65704 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65704/consoleFull)**
for PR 15175 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15173
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15173
LGTM. Merging to master. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user Sherry302 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15170
@lresende @rxin Thank for the review. I have created a
[PR](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15175) to branch-2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
GitHub user Sherry302 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15175
[MINOR][BUILD] Fix CheckStyle Error
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is to fix the code style errors.
## How was this patch tested?
Manual.
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14971
**[Test build #65703 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65703/consoleFull)**
for PR 14971 at commit
Github user jisookim0513 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10212
@vanzin could you merge this? Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15170
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15170
I have merged this in master branch.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15170
So this pr actually doesn't merge cleanly into branch-2.0. Can you submit a
new pr for branch-2.0?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user lresende commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15170
Mostly style related changes
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15174
**[Test build #65702 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65702/consoleFull)**
for PR 15174 at commit
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14959
I just fix the unti test, @vanzin @davies @holdenk Mind to help review it
? Thanks
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15173
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15173
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65697/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15173
**[Test build #65697 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65697/consoleFull)**
for PR 15173 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14995
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65695/
Test PASSed.
---
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15174
[SPARK-17502] [SQL] [Backport] [2.0] Fix Multiple Bugs in DDL Statements on
Temporary Views [WIP]
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is to backport
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14995
Build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14995
**[Test build #65695 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65695/consoleFull)**
for PR 14995 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14995
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14995
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65696/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14995
**[Test build #65696 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65696/consoleFull)**
for PR 14995 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14959
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14959
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65699/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14959
**[Test build #65699 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65699/consoleFull)**
for PR 14959 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15171
**[Test build #65701 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65701/consoleFull)**
for PR 15171 at commit
Github user clockfly commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15171
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14917
@hvanhovell In `CheckAnalysis` we have ensured all aggregateExpressions can
be derived from groupingExpressions (refer to function
`checkValidAggregateExpression`), but in optimize stage the
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15131#discussion_r79755939
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContext.scala ---
@@ -1426,7 +1426,7 @@ class SparkContext(config: SparkConf) extends Logging
with
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15131
@felixcheung I totally understand your concern about the naming, but I
found we can not use ```spark.getFileDir``` and ```spark.getFiles```. Since
the ```SparkFiles``` is a term which used to
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14644
**[Test build #65700 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65700/consoleFull)**
for PR 14644 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14644
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65700/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14644
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15059#discussion_r79755313
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/ArithmeticExpressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -170,11 +170,9 @@ class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14959
**[Test build #65699 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65699/consoleFull)**
for PR 14959 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14644
**[Test build #65700 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65700/consoleFull)**
for PR 14644 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15131
**[Test build #65698 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65698/consoleFull)**
for PR 15131 at commit
Github user cenyuhai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15041#discussion_r79754097
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/collection/Utils.scala
---
@@ -30,10 +34,22 @@ private[spark] object Utils {
* Returns the
Github user cenyuhai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15041#discussion_r79753174
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/RDD.scala ---
@@ -1384,14 +1385,15 @@ abstract class RDD[T: ClassTag](
* @param ord the implicit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15102
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65694/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15102
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user zhengruifeng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12819#discussion_r79752969
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/NaiveBayesSuite.scala
---
@@ -150,6 +150,75 @@ class NaiveBayesSuite extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15102
**[Test build #65694 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65694/consoleFull)**
for PR 15102 at commit
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11956
Current PR #13899 does not support a case that an element is null.
For now, I am working for the followings:
1. Support all of types
2. Make structures serializable
3. Support null
Github user clockfly commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14897#discussion_r79752499
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/SessionCatalog.scala
---
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ import
Github user clockfly commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14897#discussion_r79752478
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/SessionCatalog.scala
---
@@ -142,8 +145,12 @@ class SessionCatalog(
//
Github user clockfly commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14897#discussion_r79752423
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/SessionCatalog.scala
---
@@ -142,8 +145,12 @@ class SessionCatalog(
//
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15170
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65691/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15170
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15170
**[Test build #65691 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65691/consoleFull)**
for PR 15170 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15171
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65693/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15171
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15171
**[Test build #65693 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65693/consoleFull)**
for PR 15171 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15173
**[Test build #65697 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65697/consoleFull)**
for PR 15173 at commit
GitHub user jerryshao opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15173
[SPARK-15698][SQL][Streaming][Follw-up]Fix FileStream source and sink log
get configuration issue
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This issue was introduced in the
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14762
"The argument about speed isn't about dead code but that aligned access
ought to be faster even on x86." -- was this validated at all?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15166
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15120
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15120
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65692/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15166
merging in master/2.0. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15172
Can you change the title to say "AES support for over-the-wire encryption"?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15120
**[Test build #65692 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65692/consoleFull)**
for PR 15120 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15090
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65690/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15090
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15090
**[Test build #65690 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65690/consoleFull)**
for PR 15090 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15059#discussion_r79749191
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/ArithmeticExpressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -170,11 +170,9 @@ class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14995
**[Test build #65696 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65696/consoleFull)**
for PR 14995 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14995
**[Test build #65695 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65695/consoleFull)**
for PR 14995 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15171
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13513#discussion_r79747197
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/FileStreamSinkLog.scala
---
@@ -79,213 +76,46 @@ object SinkFileStatus {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15172
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15169
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65689/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15169
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15169
**[Test build #65689 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65689/consoleFull)**
for PR 15169 at commit
Github user winningsix commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15172#discussion_r79746570
--- Diff: common/network-common/pom.xml ---
@@ -97,6 +97,11 @@
slf4j-log4j12
test
+
--- End diff --
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14600
@srowen Do you mind if I ask this is supposed to be closed (as it is merged
into 2.0)?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user winningsix commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15172#discussion_r79746732
--- Diff:
common/network-common/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/sasl/SaslServerBootstrap.java
---
@@ -29,7 +29,6 @@
* authentication.
GitHub user cjjnjust reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15172
[Spark-13331][network] Spark RPC encryption optimization
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
DIGEST-MD5 mechanism is used for SASL authentication and secure
Github user cjjnjust closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15172
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12693
@taoli91 Hi. Maybe we could close this and
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12696 and then start to resolve
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-17591 first step by step? If we
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15172
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user skambha commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15168#discussion_r79746339
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/SQLQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -341,6 +342,25 @@ class SQLQuerySuite extends QueryTest
GitHub user cjjnjust opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15172
[Spark-13331][network] Spark RPC encryption optimization
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
DIGEST-MD5 mechanism is used for SASL authentication and secure
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12696
@taoli91 Would you be interested in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-17591?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12696
@taoli91 Do you mind if I ask rebase this? I would like to support to
verify this PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user clockfly commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14897#discussion_r79744373
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/antlr4/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/SqlBase.g4 ---
@@ -111,7 +111,8 @@ statement
| ALTER TABLE
Github user clockfly commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14897#discussion_r79744336
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/ListTablesSuite.scala ---
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ class ListTablesSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10212
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10212
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65686/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10212
**[Test build #65686 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65686/consoleFull)**
for PR 10212 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15102
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15102
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65685/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15131#discussion_r79743521
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContext.scala ---
@@ -1426,7 +1426,7 @@ class SparkContext(config: SparkConf) extends Logging
with
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15102
**[Test build #65685 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65685/consoleFull)**
for PR 15102 at commit
1 - 100 of 572 matches
Mail list logo
