Github user kevinyu98 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12646#discussion_r120269932
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/stringExpressions.scala
---
@@ -578,39 +583,29 @@ case class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18159
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18159
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77765/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18159
**[Test build #77765 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77765/testReport)**
for PR 18159 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18159
@cloud-fan The screenshot looks like:
https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/68855/26815029/614f13ba-4abc-11e7-9fbf-2248f0b7211d.png;>
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12646#discussion_r120265375
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/stringExpressions.scala
---
@@ -578,39 +583,29 @@ case class
Github user kevinyu98 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12646#discussion_r120261787
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/AstBuilder.scala
---
@@ -1105,19 +1105,26 @@ class AstBuilder(conf: SQLConf)
Github user LantaoJin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17953
@cloud-fan Do you think it should be done in this pull? And where should
add the filter, `CalalogImpl.createTable()` or `ExternalCatalog.createTable()`
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18108
@liu-zhaokun, I would request another test after manually checking the test
failure at least. Does this succeed in your local without a problem?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user liu-zhaokun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18108
@srowen
First,I think the tests which are related to hive went to fail doesn't my
business,right? And then ,the test of
"org.apache.spark.deploy.master.PersistenceEngineSuite" says
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18207
Yep. Right. Then, could you officially resolve
[SPARK-12661](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-12661), too?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17953
**[Test build #77766 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77766/testReport)**
for PR 17953 at commit
Github user LantaoJin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17953
Ahh, found it. Re-generated the golden files.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18207
OK great then we have officially deprecated it, haven't we?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18207
@rxin, as of #17355 Jenkins is using Python 2.7 sourced from a virtualenv
instead of Python 2.6. That patch was merged into master before branch-2.2 was
cut.
---
If your project is set up for
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18205
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18205
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77763/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18205
**[Test build #77763 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77763/testReport)**
for PR 18205 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18159
@adrian-ionescu Thanks for the review. I've addressed the above comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18199
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18199
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77762/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18199
**[Test build #77762 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77762/testReport)**
for PR 18199 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18209
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18159
**[Test build #77765 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77765/testReport)**
for PR 18159 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18207
Jenkins runs with `['python2.7', 'python3.4', 'pypy']` only, doesn't it?
Also, this is a major release cycle with the other big changes. For me,
removing Python 2.6 is not proper with
GitHub user barnardb opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18209
[SPARK-20992][Scheduler] Add support for Nomad as a scheduler backend
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Adds support for [Nomad](https://github.com/hashicorp/nomad) as a
Github user yangw1234 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16820
Sorry I could not find time to finish this pr recently. Close it for now.
If you need this fix, please feel free to base on it and finish it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user yangw1234 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16820
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18193
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18193
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77764/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18193
**[Test build #77764 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77764/testReport)**
for PR 18193 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18207
I believe we still support Python 2.6, given Jenkins runs 2.6... There
seems to be no point in removing that support this late in the release cycle.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18192
I guess it is discouraged to move codes alone as explained but wouldn't it
be better to merge this rather than close if this looks better in any way and
the change is safe?
---
If your
Github user zhengcanbin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18192
@jerryshao Should I close this issue ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17723
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77761/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17723
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17723
**[Test build #77761 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77761/testReport)**
for PR 17723 at commit
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18192
The change should be safe, but usually we don't do such code structure
refactoring alone without a strong reason, so I'm neutral of this change.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user zhengcanbin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18192
@jerryshao It's a tiny change for more reasonable code structure. There
exists three `ShuffleWriter ` implementations, we first use the helper method
`SortShuffleWriter#shouldBypassMergeSort`
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18193
**[Test build #77764 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77764/testReport)**
for PR 18193 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18205
**[Test build #77763 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77763/testReport)**
for PR 18205 at commit
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18199#discussion_r120244321
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/RateSourceProvider.scala
---
@@ -199,13 +199,52 @@ class RateStreamSource(
Github user lianhuiwang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18205#discussion_r120244237
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/PruneFileSourcePartitionsSuite.scala
---
@@ -66,4 +67,33 @@ class
Github user kevinyu98 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12646#discussion_r120243896
--- Diff:
common/unsafe/src/test/java/org/apache/spark/unsafe/types/UTF8StringSuite.java
---
@@ -730,4 +730,58 @@ public void testToLong() throws
Github user kevinyu98 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12646#discussion_r120243912
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/stringExpressions.scala
---
@@ -502,69 +503,232 @@ case class
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18208
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user kevinyu98 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12646#discussion_r120243671
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/stringExpressions.scala
---
@@ -578,39 +583,29 @@ case class
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18208
Thanks. Merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18199
**[Test build #77762 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77762/testReport)**
for PR 18199 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18199#discussion_r120243433
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/RateSourceProvider.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,240 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user kevinyu98 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12646#discussion_r120243013
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/stringExpressions.scala
---
@@ -503,58 +503,63 @@ case class
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18207
Thank you for confirming, @JoshRosen .
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18207
As of #17355 we no longer test against Python 2.6. That doesn't mean that
2.6 won't work today, but there's nothing stopping 2.6 support from breaking in
a future 2.2.x release because we are no
Github user marmbrus commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18207
/cc @joshrosen
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user yssharma commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18029#discussion_r120236128
--- Diff:
external/kinesis-asl/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kinesis/KinesisInputDStream.scala
---
@@ -193,6 +197,21 @@ object
Github user yssharma commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18029#discussion_r120236059
--- Diff:
external/kinesis-asl/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kinesis/KinesisInputDStream.scala
---
@@ -100,6 +103,7 @@ object
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18029#discussion_r120235938
--- Diff:
external/kinesis-asl/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kinesis/KinesisInputDStream.scala
---
@@ -193,6 +197,21 @@ object
Github user yssharma commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18029#discussion_r120235619
--- Diff:
external/kinesis-asl/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kinesis/KinesisInputDStream.scala
---
@@ -193,6 +197,21 @@ object
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17955
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77759/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17955
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17955
**[Test build #77759 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77759/testReport)**
for PR 17955 at commit
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18029#discussion_r120234538
--- Diff:
external/kinesis-asl/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kinesis/KinesisInputDStream.scala
---
@@ -100,6 +103,7 @@ object
Github user yssharma commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18029#discussion_r120234200
--- Diff:
external/kinesis-asl/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kinesis/KinesisInputDStream.scala
---
@@ -100,6 +103,7 @@ object
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18199
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77760/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18199
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18199
**[Test build #77760 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77760/testReport)**
for PR 18199 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18083
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77756/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18083
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18083
**[Test build #77756 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77756/testReport)**
for PR 18083 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18083
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77758/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18083
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17723
**[Test build #77761 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77761/testReport)**
for PR 17723 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18083
**[Test build #77758 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77758/testReport)**
for PR 18083 at commit
Github user gpang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18098#discussion_r120231509
--- Diff:
resource-managers/mesos/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/MesosCoarseGrainedSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -502,6 +521,25 @@
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18203
Hi, @gatorsmile and @cloud-fan .
Could you review this PR when you have sometime?
This will recover the incompatible changes at Spark 2.2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user kevinyu98 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12646#discussion_r120228866
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/stringExpressions.scala
---
@@ -503,58 +503,63 @@ case class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18208
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77755/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18208
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18208
**[Test build #77755 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77755/testReport)**
for PR 18208 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18199
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77757/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18199
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18199
**[Test build #77757 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77757/testReport)**
for PR 18199 at commit
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18199#discussion_r120225704
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/RateSourceProvider.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,240 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user ash211 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17935
@JoshRosen what was the other type of database you were using?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18199#discussion_r120222903
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/RateSourceProvider.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,240 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18199#discussion_r120222158
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/RateSourceProvider.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,240 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user kevinyu98 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12646#discussion_r120220998
--- Diff:
common/unsafe/src/test/java/org/apache/spark/unsafe/types/UTF8StringSuite.java
---
@@ -746,10 +751,6 @@ public void trim() {
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18199#discussion_r120219958
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/RateSourceProvider.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,240 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18199#discussion_r120219455
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/RateSourceProvider.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,240 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user kevinyu98 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12646#discussion_r120218796
--- Diff:
common/unsafe/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/unsafe/types/UTF8String.java ---
@@ -511,7 +511,7 @@ public UTF8String trim() {
}
Github user kevinyu98 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12646#discussion_r120217172
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -2658,17 +2658,17 @@ class SQLQuerySuite extends QueryTest with
Github user kevinyu98 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12646#discussion_r120217123
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -2658,17 +2658,17 @@ class SQLQuerySuite extends QueryTest with
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18180
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user tdas commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18180
Merging this to master and 2.2
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18176
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18176
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77753/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18176
**[Test build #77753 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77753/testReport)**
for PR 18176 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18199#discussion_r120212469
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/RateSourceProvider.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,208 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18199
**[Test build #77760 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77760/testReport)**
for PR 18199 at commit
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17955
LGTM, also cc @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
1 - 100 of 300 matches
Mail list logo
