Github user MLnick commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18620
I'm not understanding why `sorted` is slower than `sortBy` - `sortBy` uses
`sorted` in its implementation:
```scala
def sortBy[B](f: A => B)(implicit ord: Ordering[B]): Repr = sorted(ord
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18655
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user ueshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18655
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18637
**[Test build #79701 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79701/testReport)**
for PR 18637 at commit
Github user srowen closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18635
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18652#discussion_r127903537
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1912,6 +1913,26 @@ class Analyzer(
Github user MLnick commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18620
That would make sense. There must be something else going on. Overall, I
don't think it is compelling enough evidence to make the `poll` change. (Though
as mentioned it's not a huge deal so if
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18513
**[Test build #79699 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79699/testReport)**
for PR 18513 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18632
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18513
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18513
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79699/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user chlyzzo closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18669
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18659#discussion_r127913117
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/arrow/ArrowConverters.scala
---
@@ -132,6 +135,61 @@ private[sql] object ArrowConverters {
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18665
**[Test build #3844 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3844/testReport)**
for PR 18665 at commit
Github user QCTW commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15471#discussion_r127771891
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/backend.R ---
@@ -108,13 +108,27 @@ invokeJava <- function(isStatic, objId, methodName,
...) {
conn <- get(".sparkRCon", .sparkREnv)
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18652#discussion_r127897413
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1912,6 +1913,26 @@ class Analyzer(
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18656
No. I meant if there's a CodegenFallback expression, wholestage codegen
will not be enabled.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user xuanyuanking commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18654
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18633
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18669
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18635
Merged to master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18637#discussion_r127903284
--- Diff: mllib/pom.xml ---
@@ -139,8 +133,38 @@
+
target/scala-${scala.binary.version}/classes
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18652#discussion_r127918499
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1912,6 +1913,26 @@ class Analyzer(
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18639#discussion_r127898848
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rpc/netty/Dispatcher.scala
---
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ import org.apache.spark.util.ThreadUtils
/**
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18652#discussion_r127901508
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1912,6 +1913,26 @@ class Analyzer(
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18667#discussion_r127903964
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/types/LongType.scala ---
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ class LongType private() extends IntegralType {
Github user mpjlu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18620
I am ok to close this. Thanks @MLnick
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18632#discussion_r127904688
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/UnsafeRowWriter.java
---
@@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ public
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18620
My benchmarks locally said poll() is a little faster on moderately large
collections, like 100 elements in the queue. I'm really neutral. If it affords
a little help, that's great. It's a natural
Github user mpjlu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18620
Thanks @srowen , my test also said pq.poll is a little faster on some
cases.
One possible benefit here is if we provide pq.poll, user's first choice may
use pq.poll, not pq.toArray.sorted, which
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18513
**[Test build #79699 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79699/testReport)**
for PR 18513 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18652#discussion_r127903005
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1912,6 +1913,26 @@ class Analyzer(
Github user fxbonnet commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18667#discussion_r127905854
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/types/LongType.scala ---
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ class LongType private() extends IntegralType {
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18652#discussion_r127907280
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1912,6 +1913,26 @@ class Analyzer(
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18652#discussion_r127909294
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1912,6 +1913,26 @@ class Analyzer(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18632
**[Test build #79702 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79702/testReport)**
for PR 18632 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18468
**[Test build #79703 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79703/testReport)**
for PR 18468 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18654
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79695/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user DonnyZone commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18656
Yeah, CodegenFallback just provide a fallback mode.
However, in such case, SortMergeJoinExec passes incomplete row as input to
hiveUDF that implements CodegenFallback.
---
If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12646
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18655
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79696/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18654
**[Test build #79695 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79695/testReport)**
for PR 18654 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12646
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79697/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18652#discussion_r127896217
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1912,6 +1913,26 @@ class Analyzer(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18654
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12646
**[Test build #79697 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79697/testReport)**
for PR 12646 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18655
**[Test build #79696 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79696/testReport)**
for PR 18655 at commit
Github user mpjlu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18620
I also very confused about this. You can change
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18624 to sorted and test.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18652#discussion_r127897096
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1912,6 +1913,26 @@ class Analyzer(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18655
**[Test build #79698 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79698/testReport)**
for PR 18655 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18652#discussion_r127898565
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1912,6 +1913,26 @@ class Analyzer(
Github user ueshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18655
@BryanCutler I'd like to share the motivation of refactoring
`ArrowConverters` and `ColumnWriter`.
For `ColumnWriter`, at first I'd like to support complex types like
`ArrayType` and
Github user mpjlu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18620
My micro benchmark (write a program only test pq.toArray.sorted and
pq.Array.sortBy and pq.poll), not find significant performance difference. Only
in the Spark job, there is big difference.
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18654
**[Test build #79700 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79700/testReport)**
for PR 18654 at commit
GitHub user chlyzzo opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18669
tfidf-new edit
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
i add a TfIdf.scala,it can compute docs tfidf's vector. i hava a case that
is compute docs similarity,so i use the spark
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18669
@chlyzzo close this
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user gczsjdy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18632#discussion_r127907518
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/UnsafeRowWriter.java
---
@@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ public
Github user gczsjdy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18632#discussion_r127908258
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/UnsafeRowWriter.java
---
@@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ public
Github user chlyzzo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18669
closed,
- åå§é®ä»¶ -
å件人ï¼Sean Owen
æ¶ä»¶äººï¼apache/spark
æé人ï¼chlyzzo , Mention
Github user mpjlu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18624
Hi @srowen @MLnick @jkbradley @mengxr @yanboliang
Is this change acceptable? if it is acceptable, I will update ALS ML code
following this method. Also update Test Suite, which are too simple,
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18652#discussion_r127891910
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1912,6 +1913,26 @@ class Analyzer(
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18656
Will CodegenFallback be used in wholestage codegen? I think it's not
supported.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18652#discussion_r127894313
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1912,6 +1913,26 @@ class Analyzer(
Github user xuanyuanking commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18654#discussion_r127888746
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileFormatWriterSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18668
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18652#discussion_r127893543
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1912,6 +1913,26 @@ class Analyzer(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12646
**[Test build #79697 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79697/testReport)**
for PR 12646 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18652#discussion_r127892847
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1912,6 +1913,26 @@ class Analyzer(
GitHub user yaooqinn opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18668
[SPARK-21451][SQL]get `spark.hadoop.*` properties from sysProps to hiveconf
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
get `spark.hadoop.*` properties from sysProps to
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18652#discussion_r127895586
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1912,6 +1913,26 @@ class Analyzer(
Github user DonnyZone commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18656
Hi, @cloud-fan, @vanzin , could you help to take a look?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18652#discussion_r127893995
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1912,6 +1913,26 @@ class Analyzer(
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18652#discussion_r127895248
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1912,6 +1913,26 @@ class Analyzer(
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18652#discussion_r127895399
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1912,6 +1913,26 @@ class Analyzer(
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18652#discussion_r127895419
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1912,6 +1913,26 @@ class Analyzer(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18654
**[Test build #79695 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79695/testReport)**
for PR 18654 at commit
Github user mpjlu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18620
Hi @MLnick , @srowen .
My test showing: pq.poll is not significantly faster than
pq.toArray.sortBy, but significantly faster than pq.toArray.sorted. Seems not
each pq.toArray.sorted (such as
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18655
**[Test build #79696 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79696/testReport)**
for PR 18655 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18652#discussion_r127893174
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1912,6 +1913,26 @@ class Analyzer(
Github user heary-cao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18555
@gatorsmile
Could you please review this code again?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18652#discussion_r127894772
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1912,6 +1913,26 @@ class Analyzer(
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18468#discussion_r127962023
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/vectorized/CachedBatchColumnVector.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,421 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18656
I think the check for `SortMergeJoinExec` in `insertInputAdapter` should be
corrected to:
private def insertInputAdapter(plan: SparkPlan): SparkPlan = plan match
{
case p if
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18652#discussion_r127965749
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1912,6 +1913,26 @@ class Analyzer(
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18652#discussion_r127965550
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1912,6 +1913,26 @@ class Analyzer(
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18468#discussion_r127969028
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/vectorized/CachedBatchColumnVector.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,421 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18654
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79704/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18654
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18641#discussion_r127982825
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/conditionalExpressions.scala
---
@@ -273,12 +274,26 @@ case class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18654
**[Test build #79704 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79704/testReport)**
for PR 18654 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18670
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18670
**[Test build #79706 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79706/testReport)**
for PR 18670 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18670#discussion_r127988207
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/rpc/RpcEnvSuite.scala ---
@@ -624,7 +624,9 @@ abstract class RpcEnvSuite extends SparkFunSuite with
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18654
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18654
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79700/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18305#discussion_r127934107
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -598,8 +598,23 @@ class LogisticRegression
Github user MLnick commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18305
@sethah IMO we should back out the test-related bc var explicit destroy
code as it complicates things. I hear that this _may_ help catch bugs... but
frankly I'm not convinced.
Because the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18632
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79702/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18632
**[Test build #79702 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79702/testReport)**
for PR 18632 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18632
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
1 - 100 of 432 matches
Mail list logo