Hannu, Dino,
On 09 Mar 2010, at 07:53, Dino Farinacci wrote:
>> Hello Dino
>>
>> Just a remark that in the mapping system discussions in the lisp list
>> the strong sentiment is that EIDs must be allocated and administered as
>
> That is not my sentiment. ;-)
>
> A site may have to request mor
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Brian E Carpenter
wrote:
>
> I think you're neglecting what is actually happening now, which
> is a (semi) permanent shift to a dual stack routing network
> with various forms of multiprotocol interworking, including
> but by no means limited to v6/v4 packet level
On Mar 8, 2010, at 4:54 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> On 2010-03-09 00:21, Tom Vest wrote:
>> On Mar 8, 2010, at 12:08 AM, Noel Chiappa wrote:
>>
From: Tony Li IPv4 is done. Over.
Cooked. Fully toast. It will either enter a black market
where we deaggregate and no proposal will
>From: rrg-boun...@irtf.org [mailto:rrg-boun...@irtf.org] On Behalf Of Tom Vest
>To: Brian E Carpenter
>Cc: RRG; Noel Chiappa
>
>> IPv4-only providers will indeed end up as dinosaurs. Funny, really,
>> that it's the incumbent carriers who seem to be at the lowest risk of
>> this.
>>
>> Brian
Russ White allegedly wrote on 03/07/2010 20:57 EST:
> A second thing might be to address mobility. How does each proposal deal
> with host level mobility, since this is obviously a direction in the
> Internet at large (whether we like it or not, mobile phones and other
> such devices are going to r
Robin Whittle allegedly wrote on 03/07/2010 22:00 EST:
> An EID address is not an Identifier and an RLOC
> address is not a Locator. Both kinds of address
> are like any IP address - they play the roles of
> both Identifier and Lo
All,
I'd like to probe for consensus on 2 general statements,
which are listed below.
NOTE WELL:
1) This is a personal note, so results are neither official
nor binding on anyone.
2) Edits, corrections, and discussion are all out-of-scope.
(The RG Chairs might choose to hold an offici
Someone more clever than I suggested setting up a Doodle poll
for this. I've done so at the URL below. Please use that
instead, as it makes counting more obvious.
With Doodle, please only select the box if you are voting "YES"
on that statement. If one disagrees with both, select the box
u
Scott,
> -Original Message-
> From: rrg-boun...@irtf.org [mailto:rrg-boun...@irtf.org] On Behalf Of Scott
> Brim
> Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 10:44 AM
> To: Russ White
> Cc: RRG
> Subject: Re: [rrg] Recommendation and what happens next
>
> Russ White allegedly wrote on 03/07/2010 20:5
Hi Fred,
You wrote:
>> I don't understand the mechanisms by which potentially very large
>> numbers of IRON routers repeatedly and continually register with
>> potentially multiple VP routers. These IRON routers could be
>> anywhere and so could the VP routers. In that message, the most I
>> ca
Short version: TL: Again, we've been trying to have that
debate for three years.
RW: I believe you have not contributed much to
the debate.
TL: The feeling is mutual.
Tony give
Short version: One of the most important benefits of the "LISP"
architecture (or any other CES architecture) is that
it does *not* involve hosts using "Locator /
Identifier Separation".
I suggest renaming the "LISP" architecture
I have updated the Ivip-arch ID to cover the new Distributed Real
Time Mapping (DRTM) system.
This is very different from the system Ivip used until recently. It
does not require any server hold the entire mapping database, or
involve a single globally coordinated mapping distribution system.
As
Hi Robin,
> I regard your unexplained dismissal of my contributions to the RRG -
> and to the report you and Lixia are primarily responsible for - as
> ungracious, unfounded and unbecoming of the position of IRTF Chair.
You're right, I apologize.
Tony
Here's a revised last few words for a paragraph in my previous
message in this thread:
I regard your unexplained dismissal of my contributions to the RRG -
and to the report you and Lixia are primarily responsible for - as
ungracious, unfounded and unbecoming of the position of co-chair.
and some
15 matches
Mail list logo
