Can you be more specific? Where have you seen such references? What
did they say? Is this even an rspec question? If it's about Rails
models, try the rails list. But if you do, be more specific :)
On 9/16/07, David James [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've seen reference to an 'add' method, as in
When you use spec:doc, it does a dry-run, in which case the blocks are
never executed, in which case you get this message for every block
relying on auto-generated names:
describe 5 do
it { 5.should == 5}
end
If you mean to use the specdoc format (i.e. it really runs everything
and you get the
On 9/16/07, Andrew WC Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm going through Peepcode's Rspec Basics for an overview.
He's just doing a simple spec:
class PeepCode
end
describe PeepCode do
it should be awsome do
end
end
So running spec spec/simple_spec.rb should produce according to
On 9/16/07, s.ross [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While the spirit of BDD is to spec first and code second, many of us
have legacy code. Worse, some of us have legacy code without very
good coverage. Recognizing that *I* have such code, I created a
script that grinds through your .rb files and
On 9/17/07, s.ross [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David--
Worse, even though you sell it as a tool for dealing with legacy code
(code without tests), it will end up becoming the tool people use
I think this is the part that is of the most concern. That people will
substitute a tool for good
On 9/17/07, Christopher D. Pratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for all the responses. Unfortunately, I apparently just like being
difficult.
Tom: I installed the new version of rspec on a fresh app, so the first run
of script/generate rspec was from the trunk version ... good idea though,
Have you seen shared behaviours?
On 9/21/07, Yurii Rashkovskii [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Just decided to check whether I am doing something that makes sense
or not. I was thinking about how cool would it be to re-use examples
(just like we reuse story scenarios with GivenScenario). I
Please submit this to the tracker as a patch.
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/index.php?group_id=797
Thanks,
David
On 9/21/07, Trevor Squires [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey,
sorry if this is something better suited to another list.
I've encountered a strange problem with the RSpec.tmbundle in
, at 10:49 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
Have you seen shared behaviours?
On 9/21/07, Yurii Rashkovskii [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Just decided to check whether I am doing something that makes sense
or not. I was thinking about how cool would it be to re-use examples
(just like we
On 9/21/07, Yurii Rashkovskii [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then I will have tens of methods that in fact has nothing really
different from reused examples
But, as methods, they are more clearly differentiated for reuse.
The problem is that if I reuse an example, and then decide to change
that
Controller specs are similar to Rails functional tests, except that
they don't render views (unless you tell them to). So rather than
saying:
get notes_path(1,1)
you want to say:
get :show, :writer_id = 1, :note_id = 1
Give that a shot and let us know if it works out.
Cheers,
David
On
On 9/25/07, Luke Galea [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry to bump myself here: But this behavior is really messing my
tests up. If anyone has any insight I'd really appreciate it.
Even in a debugger, the value of response.body is the name of the
template rather than the content, but only in the
On 9/25/07, Matt Patterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there,
I've been working with RSpec for about a week now, and the process of
moving from a Test::Unit + Mocha setup to an RSpec + Mocha
environment has been pretty straightforward.
Except, I'm having problems with using
On 9/25/07, Matt Patterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 25 Sep 2007, at 16:06, David Chelimsky wrote:
On 9/25/07, Matt Patterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there,
I've been working with RSpec for about a week now, and the process of
moving from a Test::Unit + Mocha setup to an RSpec
On 9/25/07, Matt Patterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 25 Sep 2007, at 17:00, David Chelimsky wrote:
Oh - I forgot about that - it actually should work :)
Heh.
Can you give me some pointers on getting the tests to run cleanly?
What platform are you on?
OS X, with Ruby 1.8.6
Me too
On 9/25/07, Matt Patterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 25 Sep 2007, at 17:12, David Chelimsky wrote:
OS X, with Ruby 1.8.6
Me too and I get 100% coverage.
I'm running the mysql.com MySQL 5.0.45 mac intel build, and the
native mysql gem (2.7), if that helps
Are you just getting
On 9/25/07, Matt Patterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 25 Sep 2007, at 17:35, David Chelimsky wrote:
On 9/25/07, Matt Patterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Two things:
1. If you're patching you should be working w/ trunk, not the release.
Yeah, I got the same problem with trunk so I
On 9/25/07, Matt Patterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 25 Sep 2007, at 19:09, David Chelimsky wrote:
I can send you the rcov HTML products if you want...
Zip it up!
I finally looked at the Rakefile to see where the rcov output was,
had a look and... found the problem:
Name
On 9/25/07, Jonathan Linowes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi,
I just started fooling around with story runner, thought I'd start
with a dead simple scenario:
The first thing I do when describing a site to someone is go to the
home page, and begin exploring public pages from there.
So, that
On 9/27/07, Luis Lavena [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/27/07, Christopher D. Pratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I recently post on my blog about setting up a Rails environment with RSpec
in Windows, and someone left a comment saying that it doesn't work in
EdgeRails. I so I played around with it
On 9/28/07, sinclair bain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have the following example:
it 'should have a form with an action attribute' do
response.should have_tag( form[action=?],
'/users/1/machines/1/trouble_tickets')
end
for a form like so:
% form_for( :trouble_ticket,
On 9/30/07, Andrew WC Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My autotest runs but when I make changes to a spec it doesn't reload.
Reload? Do you mean it doesn't re-run that spec?
I checked another application I was building that had 1.0.9 but it was
reloading fine.
How would I debug a problem such
On 10/1/07, Andrew WC Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to spec a view but haven't done much view specing.
This view render different partials depending on authentication of the user:
annon, admin, player
So I I'll write if conditionals in the view with the partials
it should
actually has an attribute called grains_of_salt.
No Lie.
On 10/1/07, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/1/07, Andrew WC Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to spec a view but haven't done much view specing.
This view render different partials depending
On 10/1/07, barsalou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone willing to tar me up the 1.0.8 of rspec and rspec_on_rails?
I'm interested in giving the story runner stuff a try.
1.0.8 doesn't have the story runner in it. I just posted a tar of the
current trunk here:
, Andrew WC Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had reinstalled the plugin yesterday but I reinstalled it and its
revision 2680
It still gives me the error.
On 10/1/07, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/1/07, Andrew WC Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1.0.9
Not yet. Patches welcome!
On 10/2/07, Jonathan Linowes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
does story runner have commandline options ,eg to add color to output?
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
On 10/2/07, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not yet. Patches welcome!
Actually - there's nothing to patch yet - we plan to align the runners
in the near future. So
Not yet. Coming soon!
On 10/2/07, Jonathan Linowes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
does story runner have commandline
Hi all,
For those of you checking out the Rails 2.0 preview release:
RSpec-1.0.8 does not support Rails 2.0.
Unfortunately, we're in the middle of some big changes to the
internals in trunk and won't be in a position to do a release for
another week or so. Therefore, if you are using the Rails
On 10/2/07, Shane Duan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I saw from the thread color output that there is a plan to align
the runner. Is there a place to see what that means? I am just
curious.
I think that there are conversations about this on the rspec-devel
list. Thus far we haven't created any
On 10/2/07, Jonathan Linowes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
feature request:
http://rspec.rubyforge.org/community/contribute.html
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?atid=3152group_id=797func=browse
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
On 10/2/07, Lance Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you saying Rspec was never meant to work with edge rails?
I'm talking about a past release: RSpec-1.0.8.
RSpec's trunk does a pretty good job of keeping up w/ changes in edge
rails, but clearly past releases of rspec are never guaranteed to
sense to run scenarios and examples than stories and
specs).
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 13:06:43 -0500
From: David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [rspec-users] align the runner
To: rspec-users rspec-users@rubyforge.org
Message-ID:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text
On 10/5/07, Cody P. Skidmore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just found this one: http://tinyurl.com/3c3mfa
David, are there any other RSpec books in the works?
Yes!
Alsak and I are writing Behaviour Driven Development in Ruby with
RSpec for the Pragmatic Bookshelf.
It's not yet listed on the
On 10/5/07, Cody P. Skidmore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I recently installed RSpec into a new project and didn't approach the
install the same way. I'm using the same version of Rails and did the
following:
gem install rspec
ruby script/plugin install
On 10/5/07, Andrew WC Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to spec out a render partial collection but I get the following
error
2)
NoMethodError in '/games/_game.rhtml should show game name'
undefined method `body' for ##Class:0x316580c:0x2f1154c
On 10/5/07, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/5/07, Andrew WC Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well when I saw that originally thats what I thought the response was
suppose to come after the render but:
ActionView::ActionViewError in '/games/_game.rhtml should show game name
as they are now
to help you w/ that.
On 10/5/07, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/5/07, Andrew WC Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well when I saw that originally thats what I thought the response was
suppose to come after the render but:
ActionView::ActionViewError in '/games
just to spec the partial.
I only have the one spec in my partial
On 10/5/07, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/5/07, Andrew WC Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well I think my biggest problem I was having was the fact that my
before
block was:
def before
On 10/6/07, Andrew WC Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I made it pass!
Glad to be of help!
I just had to do some stubbing.
@game = mock_model(Game,
:name = 'The Battle for Blaze',
:salt_grains = '500',
:people = '500',
:days = nil,
:created_at =
On 10/8/07, Scott Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 8, 2007, at 11:14 AM, Scott Taylor wrote:
Just ran svn up this morning, and got this (after running ./script/
generate rspec)
escher: ./script/spec spec/models/item_spec.rb
Finished in 8.0e-06 seconds
0 examples, 0
On 10/8/07, Scott Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 8, 2007, at 11:21 AM, David Chelimsky wrote:
On 10/8/07, Scott Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 8, 2007, at 11:14 AM, Scott Taylor wrote:
Just ran svn up this morning, and got this (after running ./script/
generate
On 10/8/07, Andrew WC Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
describe PlayersController, handling GET /saltmines/games/1/players do
before do
@game = mock_model(Game, :to_param = 1)
@game.stub_association!(:players, :find = mock_model(Player))
end
def do_get
get :index, :game_id
'
/Volumes/EXTERNAL/web/omenking.ca/spec/controllers/players_controller_spec.rb:75:
/Volumes/EXTERNAL/web/omenking.ca/spec/controllers/players_controller_spec.rb:63:
On 10/8/07, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/8/07, Andrew WC Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
describe PlayersController
'
/Volumes/EXTERNAL/web/omenking.ca/spec/controllers/players_controller_spec.rb:75:
/Volumes/EXTERNAL/web/omenking.ca/spec/controllers/players_controller_spec.rb:63:
On 10/8/07, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/8/07, Andrew WC Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
describe PlayersController
On 10/8/07, Tom Stuart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8 Oct 2007, at 17:26, David Chelimsky wrote:
On Oct 8, 2007, at 11:14 AM, Scott Taylor wrote:
escher: ./script/spec spec/models/item_spec.rb
Finished in 8.0e-06 seconds
0 examples, 0 failures
./script/spec:4:in `run': wrong number
On 10/8/07, Scott Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 8, 2007, at 2:23 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
On 10/8/07, Borja Martín [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Chelimsky escribió:
On 10/8/07, Borja Martín [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm pretty new to all related to bdd and rspec
On 10/10/07, Alastair Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
Having a problem with the Rspec textmate bundle and having quizzed
the guys in #textmate to no success about the errors, I've been
suggested to try you guys!
When I run the Run Behaviour Description command, I get the
On 10/11/07, George Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm using piston to manage rspec and rspec_on_rails in vendor/plugins.
~/work/simplify_md $ piston st vendor/plugins/
vendor/plugins/rspec
(svn://rubyforge.org/var/svn/rspec/tags/CURRENT/rspec)
co .../trunk/rspec
- svn co .../trunk/RSpec.tmbundle
Cool?
Is this ok?
I'll post all my steps and error messages if I'm still having problems.
Thanks again for the quick response.
Mel
On 10/11/07, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/11/07, Mel Riffe [EMAIL PROTECTED
On 10/12/07, Tasty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fistly, many, many thanks for RSpec and Story Runner.
Minor request to improve readability of output
Given a scenario item with multiple params..
Eg. And the user belongs to, Joe, Acme do |user_name, company_name|
The readability of the
On 10/12/07, Hans de Graaff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 12:47 -0400, Jonathan Linowes wrote:
that works for you?
I'm basically doing the same thing but the
render /pages/_page_menu.html.erb, :locals = { :pages = @foo }
render :partial = 'pages/page_menu', :locals =
On 10/14/07, Zach Dennis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/14/07, Pat Maddox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/14/07, Zach Dennis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does it add any value to even add things like Joe and Acme into a
story part? It seems like that is an implementation detail of your
On 10/14/07, Pat Maddox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think we all know that the readability of steps isn't great right
now, and in fact there's a very recent thread that discusses just
that. It was that recent thread that prompted me to explore this a
bit.
The basic idea is that you define
On 10/14/07, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/14/07, Zach Dennis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/14/07, Pat Maddox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/14/07, Zach Dennis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does it add any value to even add things like Joe and Acme into a
story part
On 10/14/07, Pat Maddox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/14/07, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/14/07, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/14/07, Pat Maddox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think we all know that the readability of steps isn't great right
now
On 10/15/07, Andy Watts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe I'm slow, but I just noticed that the following code..
When 'I login'
When 'I do something else'
You're encouraged to write this as:
When 'I login'
And 'I do something else'
Cheers,
David
...will output as...
When 'I login'
And
On 10/15/07, Tom Stuart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 15 Oct 2007, at 10:25, Wincent Colaiuta wrote:
- The customer/client (not necessarily with any programming
knowledge) writes the stories in a format which is (almost) plain
text.
- The developer then writes custom step matchers; where do
On 10/15/07, Alvin Schur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Message: 7
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 18:04:33 -0500
From: David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [rspec-users] Step matchers
To: rspec-users rspec-users@rubyforge.org
Message-ID:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain
On 10/15/07, Wincent Colaiuta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some prefer top-posting, others bottom-posting (I fall into this
latter group), but I think that whichever way people decide to go,
they would do us all a great service by trimming down the quoted
section to only the relevant parts.
On 10/15/07, Wincent Colaiuta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If the conventions are kept reasonably tight then this concern could
be largely ameliorated with a good automated tool for generating an
.rb file from an .story file, or updating an existing .rb file
from an updated .story file.
So, for
On 10/15/07, Zach Dennis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What are your thoughts about using symbol identifiers rather then
question marks? I think this increases readability and gets rid of
ambiguity at least for me.
step a user named :username do |username|
end
I think that I'm leaning
On 10/15/07, James Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/15/07, Wincent Colaiuta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I really think it's important that this thing, whatever it ends up
looking like, be nice for programmers to use, not just programmer's
customers.
+1
I think what we're proposing
On 10/15/07, Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to write some tests for the ApplicationController as shared
tests that can be run in all of my other controller tests, but am getting
a nil.rewrite error. Below is what I have...
describe AccountController do
it_should_behave_like
On 10/15/07, Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to write some tests for the ApplicationController as shared
tests that can be run in all of my other controller tests, but am getting
a nil.rewrite error. Below is what I have...
describe AccountController do
it_should_behave_like
On 10/16/07, Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007 00:26:13 -0500, David Chelimsky wrote:
Part of the problem is that you're trying to spec something that
already exists. Developing spec-first, you wouldn't likely end up with
this problem because this method would have appeared
On 10/16/07, Alvin Schur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alvin Schur wrote:
On 10/16/07, Alvin Schur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I generated a new rails app then installed rspec and rspec_on_rails
from
trunk.
I then created a sample story:
require File.dirname(__FILE__) + /helper
On 10/16/07, Pat Maddox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
describe Chicken do
it should make only :name and :age attr_accessible do
Chicken.should_receive(:attr_accessible).with(:name, :age)
load #{RAILS_ROOT}/app/models/chicken.rb
end
end
I first saw this technique described by David
On 10/16/07, Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm just curious if there's a reason why rspec doesn't add the various
spec dirs to $: so that requires can be done without specifying the full
path name.
Do you mean the dirs inside rspec, or in the spec directory in your project?
On 10/16/07, Steven Garcia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am getting this same error when I run autotest.
There are a few errors cited in this thread. Which one do you mean?
My system specs
Rails v7945
Rspec Version 1.1.0 (in SVN)
OS 10.4.10
___
On 10/16/07, Steven Garcia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just unfroze my app and am getting the same error.
Gonna reinstall a stable rspec to make sure that the trunk is really the
issue
Try script/generate rspec first :)
___
rspec-users mailing list
On 10/17/07, Jonathan Linowes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
This is weird
All my current spec examples are passing (about 750 of 'em) except a
set of 6 in a specific controller spec. I get the following failure
on each 6 when I run it via
$ rake spec
Do you have --reverse in your
This is mostly theoretical, but ...
I'm starting to use lighthouse (http://llighthouseapp.com) for my
projects at work. I'm organizing iterations as milestones and stories
as tickets tagged to a milestone.
Lighthouse offers an API so that you can write access the data in your
account and write
On 10/17/07, Jonathan Linowes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 17, 2007, at 10:41 AM, David Chelimsky wrote:
This is mostly theoretical, but ...
I'm starting to use lighthouse (http://llighthouseapp.com) for my
projects at work. I'm organizing iterations as milestones and stories
On 10/17/07, Pat Maddox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think you'll BOTH learn more and be far more efficient if you pair
together rather than giving him a bit of theory/tips tricks and then
leaving him to his own devices.
Hear, hear!!!
___
generally) What's the best
book on the subject for someone in my situation?
Behaviour Driven Development in Ruby with RSpec
by David Chelimsky and Aslak Hellesoy
Sadly, not yet in print, but coming soon from the Pragmatic Bookshelf.
In the mean time, you might want to give this one a peek:
http
Versions? RSpec? Rails?
On 10/17/07, Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had posted this on the regular Rails list, but upon trying this in
script/console, it seems like the behavior only exists when running rspec.
I'm getting some weird behavior in one of my models. I have a model
defined
On 10/17/07, Shane Mingins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 18/10/2007, at 8:54 AM, David Chelimsky wrote:
Behaviour Driven Development in Ruby with RSpec
by David Chelimsky and Aslak Hellesoy
Sadly, not yet in print, but coming soon from the Pragmatic Bookshelf.
Will it be released
On 10/17/07, Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 15:41:19 -0500, David Chelimsky wrote:
Please update to the latest rspec trunk and try again. I think this is
due to a bug that was resolved in the 2718 (believe it or not).
Just updated and am at 2719. The problem still
On 10/17/07, Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm running through rake(rake spec:models to be exact). The error is:
'User should be invalid without a password when creating' FAILED
expected: can't be blank,
got: [can't be blank, can't be blank] (using ==)
./spec/models/user_spec.rb:64:
On 10/17/07, Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 16:40:11 -0500, David Chelimsky wrote:
Would you please try running it like this:
script/spec spec -b
and this
script/spec spec/models/user_spec.rb -b
and let us know if it's still happening?
script/spec spec -b
On 10/17/07, Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also I really don't think I'm leaking state. I have before(:each) statements
in my describes that
basically create new instances of the object as required for that
behavior. So they are fresh each time, correct? Further, even though rails
clears
On 10/17/07, Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 21:31:19 -0500, David Chelimsky wrote:
This all may be true but I can't help you diagnose the problem without
looking at the code. If you'd kindly pastie the spec and model, I'll
be glad to look at them. Otherwise I'm just
Hi all,
I committed a first cut at blockless Givens/Whens/Thens to RSpec's trunk:
cd /path/to/rspec/project
svn up
cd rspec
bin/spec examples/story/calculator.rb
Take a look at examples/story/calculator.rb to see what's going on.
Needs docs
Thoughts welcome.
I've also got a cut at the
On 10/18/07, Cyril Ucron David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
I'm just wondering what the overall game plan is here. Right now when
I use rails 2.0 pre release with rspec trunk, I run into a LOT of
problems (lot is not an understatement here).
We've got trunk passing all specs against
On 10/18/07, Wincent Colaiuta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
El 18/10/2007, a las 10:33, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
escribió:
Take a look at examples/story/calculator.rb to see what's going on.
Needs docs
Thoughts welcome.
Could this:
step_matcher(:given, an addend
On 10/18/07, Pat Maddox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/18/07, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/18/07, Wincent Colaiuta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
El 18/10/2007, a las 10:33, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
escribió:
Take a look at examples/story/calculator.rb to see
On 10/18/07, Pat Maddox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
step_matchers(arithmetic) do
given_matcher(an addend of $addend) do |addend|
@adder ||= Adder.new
@adder addend.to_i
end
when_matcher(they are added) do
@sum = @adder.sum
end
then_matcher(the sum should be $sum) do |sum|
On 10/18/07, Wincent Colaiuta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
El 18/10/2007, a las 18:42, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
escribió:
Easier to type, sure. I'm not in love w/ the names yet though because
they sound like verb phrases - given matcher, when matcher, then
matcher.
How about
of this briefly on #rspec with
David (chelimsky) (I'm swombat), but would love more opinions about
it, and it seems that all the fun stuff happens on the mailing
list :-)
Thanks for any feedback,
Daniel
http://www.inter-sections.net/
(swombat on freenode#rspec
On 10/19/07, Ben Mabey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Chelimsky wrote:
On 10/19/07, Ben Mabey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would think that something like this should be worked into
rpsec_on_rails. Because it makes testing AR behavior very easy and
painless. One line of code = One line
On 10/19/07, Wincent Colaiuta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another alternative combining your suggestion with what Pat
mentioned:
step_matchers do |match|
match.given ...
match.when ...
match.then ...
end
That's nice, except we don't want methods named when and then as
On 10/18/07, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/18/07, Keith McDonnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there,
Is it just me or do many other rspec / rpsec_on_rails users spend more
time than they would like feeding the framework ?
Don't get me wrong, I love rpsec, but I seem
On 10/18/07, Keith McDonnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there,
Is it just me or do many other rspec / rpsec_on_rails users spend more
time than they would like feeding the framework ?
Don't get me wrong, I love rpsec, but I seem to spend about 2/3 hours
per week hunting down rspec
On 10/20/07, Russell Norris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i'm having problem with a form_for situation where i'm trying to DRY
out the repeated parts of my forms and put them in common/form and
render the form elements via another partial in controller_name/_form.
Here's the first form
#
On 10/20/07, Ashley Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Recently I sent a modified version of the GetBundle bundle to
textmate-dev. It was failing because the RSpec bundle was from
another repo (ie RubyForge). One of the replies said that the RSpec
bundle was now in the MacroMates repo,
On 10/20/07, Pat Maddox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/19/07, Scott Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Following up on the last idea: One thing that I don't think is yet
widely understood is that there is no such thing as a unit or
integration test - test happen on a continuum (the
On 10/20/07, Daniel Tenner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 20 Oct 2007, at 17:34 20 Oct 2007, David Chelimsky wrote:
The distinction we make between stories and specs is that stories
describe how a system behaves in terms of a user's experience, whereas
specs describe how an object behaves
On 10/20/07, Tim Heighes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Back in August David Chelimsky wrote:
FYI - I tried using the unit_record gem and there are some changes
required in rspec to make it work, but they are trivial and it works
great. The only trick is that the prevention of DB access is global
On 10/20/07, Scott Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
These two specs are basically the same, and I can tell you that I
would likely NOT write the first one, but I would very likely write
the second one. This means that my decision is based on the
implementation, which might bug our purist
101 - 200 of 2985 matches
Mail list logo
