Re: [rt-users] mandatory subject

2010-10-06 Thread testwreq wreq
] Sent: 05 October 2010 18:17 To: Steve Anderson Cc: rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com Subject: Re: [rt-users] mandatory subject I meant don't create a ticket, if there's no subject. I'd like bounce the request back to sender asking to create it again with some subject. On Tue, Oct 5, 2010

[rt-users] mandatory subject

2010-10-05 Thread testwreq wreq
We receive most of our RT tickets via email. Is there a way to enforce mandatory subjects on tickets opened via email? thanks much, vm RT Training in Washington DC, USA on Oct 25 26 2010 Last one this year -- Learn how to get the most out of RT!

Re: [rt-users] mandatory subject

2010-10-05 Thread Konstantin Khomoutov
On Tue, 5 Oct 2010 12:59:10 -0400 testwreq wreq testw...@gmail.com wrote: We receive most of our RT tickets via email. Is there a way to enforce mandatory subjects on tickets opened via email? Check this thread [1] as at some point it moves to discussing this very problem. 1.

Re: [rt-users] mandatory subject

2010-10-05 Thread Steve Anderson
Depends what you mean by mandatory. If you mean a default, if the inbound email doesn't have a subject, should be possible to have a create scrip that sets the ticket's title, if it doesn't have one. Something like a scrip with the on create condition, then something like the following in the

Re: [rt-users] mandatory subject

2010-10-05 Thread testwreq wreq
I meant don't create a ticket, if there's no subject. I'd like bounce the request back to sender asking to create it again with some subject. On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Steve Anderson steve.ander...@bipsolutions.com wrote: Depends what you mean by mandatory. If you mean a default, if

Re: [rt-users] mandatory subject

2010-10-05 Thread Steve Anderson
: 05 October 2010 18:17 To: Steve Anderson Cc: rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com Subject: Re: [rt-users] mandatory subject I meant don't create a ticket, if there's no subject. I'd like bounce the request back to sender asking to create it again with some subject. On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 1:11 PM

Re: [rt-users] mandatory subject

2010-10-05 Thread testwreq wreq
::Gateway, to check for a subject, before it's accepted. Steve Anderson From: testwreq wreq [mailto:testw...@gmail.com] Sent: 05 October 2010 18:17 To: Steve Anderson Cc: rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com Subject: Re: [rt-users] mandatory subject I meant don't create a ticket

Re: [rt-users] mandatory subject

2010-10-05 Thread Steve Anderson
: Re: [rt-users] mandatory subject We are using mail alias with sendmail. On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 1:21 PM, Steve Anderson steve.ander...@bipsolutions.commailto:steve.ander...@bipsolutions.com wrote: As with the thread mentioned by Konstantin, a lot of it will depend on how you bring the email

Re: [rt-users] mandatory subject

2010-10-05 Thread Mathieu Longtin
Anderson Cc: rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com Subject: Re: [rt-users] mandatory subject I meant don't create a ticket, if there's no subject. I'd like bounce the request back to sender asking to create it again with some subject. On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Steve Anderson steve.ander

Re: [rt-users] mandatory subject

2010-10-05 Thread testwreq wreq
@lists.bestpractical.com Subject: Re: [rt-users] mandatory subject I meant don't create a ticket, if there's no subject. I'd like bounce the request back to sender asking to create it again with some subject. On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Steve Anderson steve.ander...@bipsolutions.com wrote: Depends

[rt-users] Mandatory Subject - EMail

2010-09-08 Thread Peter Barton
I have seen the RT-Extension-MandatorySubject plugin and this is great for opening tickets via the web interface. However, my company opens at least 90% of its tickets via email. Is there anything out that can enforce mandatory subjects on tickets opened via email? -- Peter Barton

Re: [rt-users] Mandatory Subject - EMail

2010-09-08 Thread Raed El-Hames
Peter, I have seen the RT-Extension-MandatorySubject plugin and this is great for opening tickets via the web interface. However, my company opens at least 90% of its tickets via email. Is there anything out that can enforce mandatory subjects on tickets opened via email? How would

Re: [rt-users] Mandatory Subject - EMail

2010-09-08 Thread Emmanuel Lacour
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 09:16:11AM -0500, Peter Barton wrote: I would actually like to bounce the email back notifying the sender that the subject is required. You can hack lib/RT/Interface/Email.pm::Gateway, add a test on $Subject after the test of $Authstat and use MailError in the same

Re: [rt-users] Mandatory Subject - EMail

2010-09-08 Thread Kenneth Marshall
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 09:16:11AM -0500, Peter Barton wrote: I have seen the RT-Extension-MandatorySubject plugin and this is great for opening tickets via the web interface. However, my company opens at least 90% of its tickets via email. Is there anything out that can enforce

Re: [rt-users] Mandatory Subject - EMail

2010-09-08 Thread Jason A. Smith
On 09/08/2010 10:16 AM, Peter Barton wrote: I have seen the RT-Extension-MandatorySubject plugin and this is great for opening tickets via the web interface. However, my company opens at least 90% of its tickets via email. Is there anything out that can enforce mandatory subjects on

Re: [rt-users] Mandatory Subject - EMail

2010-09-08 Thread Konstantin Khomoutov
On Wed, 8 Sep 2010 09:04:35 -0500 Peter Barton pbar...@iesi.com wrote: I have seen the RT-Extension-MandatorySubject plugin and this is great for opening tickets via the web interface. However, my company opens at least 90% of its tickets via email. Is there anything out that can enforce

Re: [rt-users] Mandatory Subject - EMail

2010-09-08 Thread Jason A. Smith
On 09/08/2010 10:48 AM, Kenneth Marshall wrote: In principle, an informative bounce is okay. Unfortunately, it can be taken advantage of by unscrupulous mailers to send SPAM messages to other E-mail addresses with the consequent impact to your mail reputation and ability to send E-mail from

Re: [rt-users] Mandatory Subject - EMail

2010-09-08 Thread Kenneth Marshall
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 11:19:35AM -0400, Jason A. Smith wrote: On 09/08/2010 10:48 AM, Kenneth Marshall wrote: In principle, an informative bounce is okay. Unfortunately, it can be taken advantage of by unscrupulous mailers to send SPAM messages to other E-mail addresses with the consequent