Re: [rt-users] Web interface

2008-09-04 Thread chaim . rieger
Permissions for the html noauth dir Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile -Original Message- From: Nick Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 04:18:10 To: Subject: [rt-users] Web interface ___ http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/m

[rt-users] Web interface

2008-09-04 Thread Nick Price
Hell I have done 2 installs rt-3.8.1 exactly the same with the same confgis except one is on fedora 7 and the other is on fedora 9 both with all the updates installed the fedora 9 works web as it should do On the fedora 7 the program works ok except the web interface gives everything in t

[rt-users] Privileges not honored for Everyone after 3.8.1 upgrade

2008-09-04 Thread RT
rt-users, I recently upgraded from 3.6.5 (MySQL 4.0.21) to 3.8.1 (MySQL 5.0.45), using the following -- /opt/rt3/sbin/rt-setup-database --dba root --action upgrade perl etc/upgrade/schema.mysql-4.0-4.1.pl rt3 (and applying the output) Everything appears to be fine with respects to incoming ticke

Re: [rt-users] Quick Search in 3.8.1 doesn't include Resolved Status

2008-09-04 Thread jmoseley
Jessie, I guess it just depends on the size of the organization, how many queues they have, and how many open tickets are open at a given time. In our environment, we have over 30,000 resolved tickets while we usually have no more than a few dozen open in any given queue. It makes much more sense

Re: [rt-users] Quick Search in 3.8.1 doesn't include Resolved Status

2008-09-04 Thread Jesse Vincent
On Sep 4, 2008, at 8:42 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > We are the same, much prefer searching for all unresolved and resolved > tickets in the quick search. The change has caused quite a bit of > abuse > at the sysadmin (me). > As I sad before, I'd love to take a patch :) Best, Jesse > Gordon

Re: [rt-users] Quick Search in 3.8.1 doesn't include Resolved Status

2008-09-04 Thread gordon
We are the same, much prefer searching for all unresolved and resolved tickets in the quick search. The change has caused quite a bit of abuse at the sysadmin (me). Gordon Helmuth Ramirez wrote: > On our end when we're searching for a ticket, > 99% of the time its to look for something that's

Re: [rt-users] Quick Search in 3.8.1 doesn't include Resolved Status

2008-09-04 Thread Helmuth Ramirez
Thanks Greg for the tip. That does work :) And I completely understand where you're coming from. On our end when we're searching for a ticket, 99% of the time its to look for something that's already been done/resolved (end users calling for status, etc). Thanks Helmuth -Original Messa

Re: [rt-users] Quick Search in 3.8.1 doesn't include Resolved Status

2008-09-04 Thread Greg Evans
They can still search resolved by using a format like ' resolved' I have the same issue, in which we need to search resolved tickets as it makes it much easier to find someone since most of the people that call us don't have a clue what their email is (hard to believe I know) or have 10 different e

Re: [rt-users] Editing Comments or Replies

2008-09-04 Thread Jesse Vincent
> > I don't really see a business reason for comments/replies not to be > editable, as long as a record of edits were kept. You can argue that > the > content of a reply or comment is data, not an audit trail entry. If RT has sent it out by email, it can't be taken back. Ticket replies or com

Re: [rt-users] Editing Comments or Replies

2008-09-04 Thread Jesse Vincent
> > Sorry, but I've gotta ask: without disturbing this list's fitness > for family viewing, what found its way into your RT instance that > shouldn't have? I've had a few in my day. In one case, it was a personal attack against another staff member. In another, it was a spreadsheet listing

Re: [rt-users] Quick Search in 3.8.1 doesn't include Resolved Status

2008-09-04 Thread Helmuth Ramirez
I'd love to say I'd write the patch, but sadly Perl (or any coding for that matter) is not my strong point. Not from a lack of trying though, I went out and bought a Perl book just to help me understand RT better :) Unfortunately I haven't used it yet :( Oh well, I'll tell them they'll have to u

Re: [rt-users] Quick Search in 3.8.1 doesn't include Resolved Status

2008-09-04 Thread Jesse Vincent
On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 05:53:41PM -0400, Helmuth Ramirez wrote: > Hi everyone, > > A couple of my users noticed our newly upgraded version of RT (3.8.1) > handles the quick searches differently from past versions (3.6.3). When > they perform a Quick Search, it does not search on Resolved tick

[rt-users] Quick Search in 3.8.1 doesn't include Resolved Status

2008-09-04 Thread Helmuth Ramirez
Hi everyone, A couple of my users noticed our newly upgraded version of RT (3.8.1) handles the quick searches differently from past versions (3.6.3). When they perform a Quick Search, it does not search on Resolved tickets anymore. The quick search was how we were able to quickly pull up histori

Re: [rt-users] Extension CommandByMail

2008-09-04 Thread Shawn M Moore
On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 01:59:06PM -0300, Reginaldo Russinholi wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm using RT 3.6.6 and I'd like to use the extension CommandByMail. > > Well, I downloaded the source and follow the instrunctions to install, > but I didn't understand in what file and in what part of that file

Re: [rt-users] [patch] GPG inbound decrypt/verify problems in RT 3.8.1

2008-09-04 Thread Tim Wilde
Tim Wilde wrote: [ snip ] > Is it possible that all of this has something to do with specifying the > passphrase in the config (verified multiple times to be the correct > passphrase for the secret key for the queue, by the way) rather than > using the agent? [ snip ] Greetings again all! Ding di

[rt-users] Extension CommandByMail

2008-09-04 Thread Reginaldo Russinholi
Hi all, I'm using RT 3.6.6 and I'd like to use the extension CommandByMail. Well, I downloaded the source and follow the instrunctions to install, but I didn't understand in what file and in what part of that file I have to put the CommandByMail configuration. Any help? Regards, Reginaldo

[rt-users] RT upgrade from 3.6.2 - 3.8.1 - No longer seems to be looking at the Requestor Permisions

2008-09-04 Thread Kris Lindgren
Hello, We have had a couple queues that have been setup and working fine for a while now, however after the upgrade to 3.8.1 we have ran into an issue. Anyone can open a ticket in the queue via email, however once they have opened the ticket they cannot reply to the ticket. The permissions on

Re: [rt-users] canned replies with attachment

2008-09-04 Thread Jerrad Pierce
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 11:46, Ruben Lehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi > > Is it possible to have attachments directly attached to a template. So if I > choose this template as canned reply the attachment will be > attached as well? > I would suggest that the proper way to handle this is to p

[rt-users] canned replies with attachment

2008-09-04 Thread Ruben Lehmann
Hi Is it possible to have attachments directly attached to a template. So if I choose this template as canned reply the attachment will be attached as well? Thanks Ruben Monzoon Networks AG Ruben Lehmann -- Nomadic Workers - hotspot.monzo

Re: [rt-users] Separate permission

2008-09-04 Thread Kenneth Crocker
Kevin, My situation is that these queues are completely seperate support groups and very seldom do they work on the same issue. This is for those tickets where one support group needs another group to complete their work in order for the first group to complete theirs. The "DependsOn"

Re: [rt-users] automatic take

2008-09-04 Thread Tim Cutts
On 4 Sep 2008, at 4:05 pm, Joshua N Pritikin wrote: > Suppose there is a new unassigned ticket. Suppose I reply to the > ticket > via email. Is there some way for my RT account to automatically take > the > ticket? If so, how? We have this set up. You need to add a Scrip to do it. We have

[rt-users] automatic take

2008-09-04 Thread Joshua N Pritikin
Suppose there is a new unassigned ticket. Suppose I reply to the ticket via email. Is there some way for my RT account to automatically take the ticket? If so, how? If this is a bad idea, why? ___ http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo

[rt-users] GPG inbound decrypt/verify problems in RT 3.8.1

2008-09-04 Thread Tim Wilde
Greetings all! I've been running into a very strange decrypt/verify problem with inbound GPG mail in RT 3.8.1. The problem seems to be the same with both PGP/MIME and inline PGP, though I've been mostly testing with inline PGP. RT gets the inbound message, and all of the GPG infrastructure appea

Re: [rt-users] Charset issues after upgrade to 3.8.1

2008-09-04 Thread F350
Here is a sample of my custom fields table schema: CREATE TABLE `CustomFields` ( `id` int(11) NOT NULL auto_increment, `Name` varchar(200) default NULL, `Type` varchar(200) character set ascii default NULL, `MaxValues` int(11) default NULL, `Pattern` text, `Repeated` smallint(6) NOT NU

Re: [rt-users] Charset issues after upgrade to 3.8.1

2008-09-04 Thread F350
Are u sure it is the way to do ? In the Upgrading.mysql help file, they say that the default charset should not be utf-8. In my database, all my tables are set as utf-8 but the default charset of the database is latin1. Gian Luca Gobbi wrote: > > Hi, > you must add/change this lines in your my.

Re: [rt-users] urgent: Connect Failed received invalid response to SSL negotiation

2008-09-04 Thread Emmanuel Lacour
On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 12:20:00PM +0200, Hakan Kaya wrote: > Please help me, I am not a perl nor Pg expert. After a restart, > request-tracker 3.6.1 on Debian etch stopped working. The complete error > message is this: > Connect Failed received invalid response to SSL negotiation: F\n\n at > /usr/

[rt-users] urgent: Connect Failed received invalid response to SSL negotiation

2008-09-04 Thread Hakan Kaya
Please help me, I am not a perl nor Pg expert. After a restart, request-tracker 3.6.1 on Debian etch stopped working. The complete error message is this: Connect Failed received invalid response to SSL negotiation: F\n\n at /usr/share/request-tracker3.6/lib/RT.pm line 176\n I have tried to figure

Re: [rt-users] Missing dependencies in RT3.8.1?

2008-09-04 Thread Jason Doran
Hi Paul, From memory on my CentOS machine I had to make sure that I had following: rpm -qa|grep graphviz graphviz-devel-2.20.2-1.el5 graphviz-perl-2.20.2-1.el5 graphviz-2.20.2-1.el5 I then configured RT with: --enable-graphviz Turns on support for RT's GraphViz dependency charts --

Re: [rt-users] Charset issues after upgrade to 3.8.1

2008-09-04 Thread Gian Luca Gobbi
Hi, you must add/change this lines in your my.cnf: [client] default-character-set = utf8 [mysqld] default-character-set=utf8 character_set_server=utf8 collation_server=utf8_general_ci init_connect='SET collation_connection = utf8_general_ci' init_connect='SET CHARACTER_SET utf8' init_connect='