Hi all,
We're running RT on Ubuntu 8.04...so it's time to get with the times. :-) A
new CentOS server has been prepared for us. The database is actually running
on a separate machine that is newer and there isn't a plan to upgrade it at
this point.
My question...is RT 4.0.17 itself old
Could you use a separate queue for each client company?
Then have a group for each client company, and each group has the rights needed
to work with tickets only on their queue. Each person at the client company
who wants to hear about new issues can be made a queue watcher.
And Sam is a
[mailto:rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com] On Behalf Of Beachey, Kendric
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 9:55 AM
To: rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com
Subject: [rt-users] mailgate is suddenly antisocial
Something changed in our network in the last day or so, or at least that is my
suspicion
Something changed in our network in the last day or so, or at least that is my
suspicion. Following whatever it was, it has been possible to create a
ticket through the web interface, but not through the email interface.
The box running RT can still *send* email OK, so if you create a ticket
That being said, I can attest that the bigger the jump, the more tricky the
landing. :-)
--
Kendric Beachey
From: rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com
[mailto:rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com] On Behalf Of Max McGrath
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2014 10:37 AM
To: Tim Wilson
Cc:
It looks like what you need to do is send an email (with any subject line and
any content) to your aliased address, which would be:
r...@rtbox.yourdomain.commailto:r...@rtbox.yourdomain.com
One suggestion...you might consider using alias names that matches your queue
name, so you can have more
If you haven't started yet and it is at all possible, you should get a newer
version of Ubuntu going. Support for 9.10 ended about two years ago.
12.04 is a long term support release that will keep getting updates until
late 2017. By that time you will hopefully have upgraded to 14.04, which
After googling and looking at various old threads (especially one from Kim
Covil and Ruslan in April 2010), I've taken all the advice I could find about
making RT use our desired time zone.
* RT_SiteConfig.pm contains Set($Timezone, 'America/Chicago');
* /usr/share/zoneinfo/America/Chicago is
-
From: rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com
[mailto:rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com] On Behalf Of Beachey, Kendric
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2013 1:54 PM
To: rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com
Subject: Re: [rt-users] Upgraded from 3.6.5 to 4.0.17, and mailgate has lost
its way
Someone
...@lists.bestpractical.com] On Behalf Of Beachey, Kendric
Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2013 11:07 PM
To: rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com
Subject: [rt-users] Upgraded from 3.6.5 to 4.0.17, and mailgate has lost its way
I upgraded from 3.6.5 to 4.0.17 today. The 3.6.5 had been installed the Ubuntu
way (meaning
Someone asked about my RT_SiteConfig, so here it is. (with passwords **ed
out)
--
Kendric
-Original Message-
From: rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com
[mailto:rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com] On Behalf Of Beachey, Kendric
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2013 11:04 AM
I upgraded from 3.6.5 to 4.0.17 today. The 3.6.5 had been installed the Ubuntu
way (meaning, /etc/request-tracker3.6, /usr/local/share/request-tracker3.6 and
so forth, and perl modules installed one by one via apt-get), but the 4.0.17
has been installed the tarball-and-CPAN way (meaning
-purposed it into the account I
needed. This worked just fine...and is probably what I should have done in the
first place!
--
Kendric Beachey
-Original Message-
From: rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com
[mailto:rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com] On Behalf Of Beachey, Kendric
I need to create an account for a catch-all email address that will be sending
requests to our RT from a separate workflow. No matter which user triggers the
action, the email will appear to come from product.sup...@company.com.
When I try to use the GUI to create the user, it fails...looking
Point them to the web view of the ticket? The attachment should be there in
the ticket history, so they can download/view it at their leisure.
(assuming you don't have a security policy that would prevent this)
--
Kendric Beachey
-Original Message-
From:
Hi everyone,
I'm investigating what will be necessary to do an upgrade from our installation
of RT 3.6.5 to the latest version.
Currently installed versions of some items we are not looking to upgrade...are
we safe here?
* mysql 5.0.51a
* perl 5.8.8
* Ubuntu 8.04 (yes, I know that's way old)
Hi Rick,
It's possible things have changed since the version of RT we're running (3.6.5)
but I do searches like this from the web interface, with the magic box
checked...
[rt.search.for.disabled.users.png]
HTH,
Kendric Beachey
From: rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com
Hi all,
This is kind of a weird one. We've had RT 3.6.5 up and running great for over
three years (and version 2.something for probably 8 years before that) and just
today we've seen a change in how emails to queue watchers come across.
Previously, any email RT sent out when a ticket was
Hi all,
We're running RT 3.6.5, authenticating against AD. When people login, they get
this error...
---
error: DBD::mysql::db selectall_hashref failed: Unknown column
'disabled' in 'field list' at
: Zhang,Jun [mailto:jhzh...@mdanderson.org]
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2012 11:49 AM
To: Beachey, Kendric; rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com
Subject: RE: Transitory error on login (LDAP against AD)
I got the same error and I understand this must be minors, since my AD user is
authenticated. The Users table
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Sibley [mailto:t...@bestpractical.com]
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2012 1:18 PM
To: rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com
Cc: Beachey, Kendric
Subject: Re: [rt-users] Transitory error on login (LDAP against AD)
On 03/02/2012 02:05 PM, Beachey, Kendric wrote:
HEY
Of Agnislav
Onufrijchuk
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 1:06 AM
To: Beachey, Kendric
Cc: rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com
Subject: Re: [rt-users] Read-Only global switch?
Beachey, Kendric wrote:
I'm about to (finally) migrate our 2.0.11 installation to 3.6.5 and
would like to have the 2.0.11
I'm about to (finally) migrate our 2.0.11 installation to 3.6.5 and
would like to have the 2.0.11 installation stay up for a few months or
so in a read-only capacity.
Is there (or was there as early as 2.0.11) an easy way to make RT be
read-only in a global sense? I mean, I can run through all
Beachey
-Original Message-
From: rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com
[mailto:rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com] On Behalf Of Beachey,
Kendric
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 8:59 AM
To: rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com
Subject: [rt-users] Can't load a principal in initial
-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com] On Behalf Of Beachey,
Kendric
Sent: Monday, June 08, 2009 10:08 AM
To: rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com
Subject: [rt-users] How do you reset an RT database to freshly
installedstatus?
I'm working on converting from an old RT2 to a 3.6.x vintage RT3. So
far, mostly
I'm working on converting from an old RT2 to a 3.6.x vintage RT3. So
far, mostly pretty successfully. I got the new one set up to
authenticate off of our Active Directory, and also to create new RT
accounts from AD. And I got the email interface up and running.
I downloaded the latest
I'm working on an upgrade from 2.0.11 to 3.6.5 (that's what the admins
gave me) and getting all the pieces in place.
Sometimes our users include urls in their replies, and our old 2.0.11 RT
automatically turns these into clickable hyperlinks. The new one is not
doing this. Is there a config
27 matches
Mail list logo