Martin Krauskopf wrote:
BTW it seems that there will be something like jruby-debug soon. I hope
I will have enough time to participate a lot on this piece. Might be
another debug-commons child or jruby-extras, does not matter to much.
jruby-debug would be good - BTW: yesterday I found out
Mirko Stocker wrote:
On Friday 27 April 2007 16:39:04 Werner Schuster (murphee) wrote:
When you do the Rename in the Ruby perspective, does your
refactoringParticipant get notified?
No, unfortunately not..
Could you post the extension code for refactoringParticipant (from your
howdy,
any plans yet for getting the word about RDT 0.9.0 out @ release time?
EclipseZone is a good venue for an article and/or a little screencast (I
know that they would like to publish an article on the RDT 0.9.0 goodies).
Features like TypeInference enhanced AutoComplete, Mark Occurrences,
Christopher Williams wrote:
murphee,
I just ran a quick smoke test on launching a Test::Unit testcase and I
didn't see the problem you're mentioning. Can you send along the file
(and
make sure you're using the latest from svn).
Yes, I'm using the latest version from svn.
What does your smoke
howdy,
there seem to be some problems in the current head:
- Test:Unit launches seem to be missing
IRubyLaunchConfigurationConstants.ATTR_FILE_NAME attributes;
This causes the launch to fail and a error dialog Main type not
specified to pop up;
I guess the
Found this extensive comparison:
http://tnlessone.wordpress.com/2007/02/28/ruby-rails-ide-comparison-idea-netbeans-radrails
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and
Christopher Williams wrote:
Outside of this work do we have any other outstanding stuff to be
looked at
for the 0.9.0?
I'm not perfectly up to date with the SVN (from a few days) but I
remember that the HyperlinkDetector code wasn't activated in the plugin.xml.
Also, in my local copy, the
Mirko Stocker wrote:
@the other developers: If someone can provide me with some hints how to do an
AST based coloring, I'd be glad to look at it. Especially the problems with
here documents are frustrating me...
Well, Step 1 would be updating an AST (reparsing) after keystrokes or
bursts
Ricardo Trindade wrote:
Since there's no apparent way to select jruby as the interpreter, I
usually run jruby apps with a java run, specifying jruby's main as the
main class, and the current selected file as the argument (via
${resource_loc}). Setting breakpoints in ruby code in this
Christopher Williams wrote:
We're having a few people trip over this. We expect the directory which
contains bin/ruby and lib underneath it. So for most unix installs, the
right directory to choose is /usr or /usr/local.
This'll be a usability problem, so how about this:
Windows: No problem,
Martin Krauskopf wrote:
Thomas E Enebo wrote:
I would write this specification using unit/test API compatiable tests.
This could still serve as a specification and plug straight into our
testing framework (we (JRuby) are moving to miniunit/test/unit tests).
Having small pass/fail tests
Christopher Williams wrote:
On 1/22/07, Werner Schuster (murphee) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
VM - I have two (Standard, JRuby) and was surprised that the OK
button wouldn't get activated - until I chose something from the
combo box;
The Add VM Dialog seems a bit too strict about having
Chris and all RDTers,
is there any standard way of getting from an Editor - JRuby AST?
I am basically just getting the String from the Editor/Document, and
then running the Ruby Parser on it...
but this happens for various systems (Outline, Syntax Coloring, Realtime
Lint, etc), it'd be convenient
Christopher Williams wrote:
The interpreter / Command Executor stuff should now be relatively
stable. I
overhauled it to look and feel like the JDT's IVMInstall/IVMInstallType
stuff. If you're looking to add more proper support for JRuby, I strongly
suggest you look into creating a JRuby
Christopher Williams wrote:
So for those of you who care about wonky stuff like this, there's a
lot of
new stuff under the hood of the RDT nightly builds now. It'll be a little
shaky for a little while while I work out the kinks, but I should now be
able to start getting the Ruby libraries
Ricardo Trindade wrote:
Hi,
Any relationship between http://www.eclipsedltk.org/ and RDT ? They
are supporting ruby now.
DLTK is a new(ish) project that tries to be a base for Dynamic Language
support in Eclipse. Basically, if you start work on Eclipse support for
a new dynamic
Ricardo Trindade wrote:
Hi,
I've been following the rdt mailing list for a while, and I'm glad
to see that RDT seems to be very active. I'm particularly interested in
jruby, since I'm using it and the lack of a debugger is a big pain. So
I'm just wondering if we're getting closer to
Mirko Stocker wrote:
On Wednesday 06 December 2006 17:59, Christopher Williams wrote:
I vote strongly for migrating the refactoring and other work you've done to
RDT
Ok :) I think I'd prefer that too. If the migration to the latest JRuby isn't
too complicated, we can probably
Christopher Williams wrote:
I haven't been considering any talks about RDT yet - maybe it's my
fear of
giving a talk, who knows.
Seems like RDT can have some presence at EclipseCon.
(BTW with EclipseCon, it's possible to vote on talk proposals (just need
to sign up for their site), so folks
Mirko Stocker wrote:
We have some refactorings (mainly rename) we'd like to present in the context
menu of the outline view, but I haven't found an extension point for that..
could someone give me a hint?
Hmm... I guess you'd like to add Rename... to all RubyElement objects.
You could try
howdy,
has anyone here considered submitting a LongTalk about RDT for
EclipseCon 07?
http://eclipsezilla.eclipsecon.org/
http://www.eclipsecon.org/2007/index.php?page=submissions/
The deadline is 1. December 2006 (LongTalk speakers get free
registration, unlike Demos).
murphee
-- Blog @
Mirko Stocker wrote:
Currently, we are analyzing the RDT-code and are looking for a point where we
can add our extensions. Can anybody give us some advice?
I'm wondering how you're planning to do the analysis; work directly with
the JRuby AST or use some abstraction?
Using something like
22 matches
Mail list logo
