rpora.
Jari, how do your counts look?
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873
On Sun, 12 Aug 2012, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 8/12/2012 12:34 AM, John Hardin wrote:
It's still vastly underreporting my corpora.
Is this what it is reporting?
ls -al *jhar* | grep Aug | grep -v \~ | awk '{print $9;}' | xargs wc -l
241 ham-bb-jhardin.log
s possible that the changes that have been made to the
masscheck system may have broken this. This may even be related to the
rsync permissions problem...?
Something else to look into.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic #1117
so, that's not
valid and might be worthy of a rule.
Can you post how that hostname actually appears in the message?
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4
appearing in
spam, then they might be worthy of a rule.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
BenP, could you contact me directly? I have a question about a message in
your masscheck corpus.
Thanks!
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C
# Switches: '--reuse --cache "--cachedir=/tmpfs/aicache_nightly" "--restart=500"
"ham:detect:/export/home/bbmass/uploadedcorpora/jhardin/ham/*" "--after=-15552000" "--tail=5"
"spam:detect:/export/home/bbmass
/uploadedcorpora/jhard
st of my logs
spam-axb-generic 189MB
spam-axb-fraud 670MB
It has never earlier required this much of waiting state. I posted 12
hours ago... And usually the "green" state has been "final".
The numbers are up now. 751k spam, 175k ham
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ
ort/home/corpus-rsync/corpus/spam-net-danmcdonald.log: not tagged with a
revision, ignored
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822
18:03
/export/home/corpus-rsync/corpus/spam-mmiroslaw-spam.log
On 11/22/2012 11:47 PM, John Hardin wrote:
danmcdonald, mmiroslaw: please check your logs, they don't appear to be
properly generating and are being ignored...
LOG: starting rsync slow reports (15202) at Fri Nov 23 04:41:31
e localized one...
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-
On Fri, 23 Nov 2012, John Hardin wrote:
On Fri, 23 Nov 2012, Marc Andre Selig wrote:
Mmiroslaw has a localized time stamp in the first line of his logs that
some tool is probably misunderstanding/unable to interpret. IMHO that's
a bug in either mass-check (for localizing the time
alled "swap" mounted as a real filesystem is making me
twitch. Is that some sort of ramdisk?
This was likely a transient problem.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E7
r going to
make it in time. There was no additional output in the mail from cron,
it was just dead slow.
Are you willing to enable the HitFreqsRuleTiming and see if a particular
rule stands out?
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.org
r going to
make it in time.
I can't see any rule changes in SVN in the last 48 hours that would
explain this.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411
On Sat, 8 Dec 2012, Marc Andre Selig wrote:
On Sat, Dec 08, 2012 at 12:13:15PM -0800, John Hardin wrote:
Are you willing to enable the HitFreqsRuleTiming and see if a
particular rule stands out?
Sure. Sorry if this is a dumb question, but how do I do that?
I've added
if [ &
On Sat, 8 Dec 2012, Marc Andre Selig wrote:
On Sat, Dec 08, 2012 at 01:32:58PM -0800, John Hardin wrote:
On Sat, 8 Dec 2012, Marc Andre Selig wrote:
So how do I enable HitFreqsRuleTiming for masscheck?
Guessing: I think it has to go in a .pre file, try adding it to
~/masscheckwork
: singular - corpus, multiple - corpora)
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6
long runtimes?
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
On Wed, 12 Dec 2012, Axb wrote:
On 12/12/2012 07:18 PM, Axb wrote:
On 12/12/2012 07:16 PM, John Hardin wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Dec 2012, bugzilla-dae...@issues.apache.org wrote:
>
> > Bug 6872, fix breakage introduced by my previous change - DNS replies
> > with no answe
change checked in. Please try again.
If it still misbehaves, I'd suggest a manual "svn up ; make" just to see
if the masscheck scripting isn't updating the code properly for some
reason, which would be a different problem.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www
Check was last updated in
October.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822
On Thu, 13 Dec 2012, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
On 12/13, John Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 13 Dec 2012, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
On 12/13, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
I think this is very good. We need to get masscheck unified so
everyone is using the same version. Alex, did you ever get
x27;m sure someone here will be able to explain this in detail.
It actually appears that way in the email?
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C
On Sat, 9 Mar 2013, Marc Andre Selig wrote:
Again, I think SpamAssassin should be able to handle this without
flagging an error message.
Agreed. In fact, errors of that nature should be exposed so that a score
can be attached to them.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp
HORT,__TOCC_EXISTS,__TVD_BODY,__TVD_MIME_ATT_TP,__URI_MAILTO,__URI_MAILTO,__XM_MSOE6,__XM_MS_IN_GENERAL,__XM_OUTLOOK_EXPRESS,__XPRIO
time=1328426401,scantime=0,format=f,reuse=no,set=0
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic #1
multiple boxes and masscheck them in parallel - simply
treat them as separate corpora with separate result sets, each box
masschecking one sub-corpus and reporting results when completed.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic #11174
older, or under my account home dir(s)? I
don't recall precisely how it was set up.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76
_\s]
Examples:
Manage_advertising_preferences_here
To_remove_yourself_from_this_admail,_please_do_so_here
Be_removed_from_this_important_offer
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB
ing now, but I suspect you'll have to send me a new password as well.
My rsync is not currently using ssh + pubkey access.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
k
received 80485 bytes 116364.15 bytes/sec
total size is 132331046 speedup is 174.96
rsync error: some files/attrs were not transferred (see previous errors)
(code 23) at main.c(1052) [sender=3.0.9]
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.org
On Sat, 14 Jun 2014, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 6/13/2014 8:00 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Fri, 13 Jun 2014, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> Rsync is using a secrets file and is not tied to the system users.
OK, yes, I can get in, however there are errors:
sending incremental file l
On Sun, 15 Jun 2014, John Hardin wrote:
On Sat, 14 Jun 2014, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
Thanks for testing this. These permissions on the server are just crap.
Unraveling what they did and why is difficult when it's an anathema to me
to use chmod 777 to fix things.
For the time being,
On Mon, 16 Jun 2014, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 6/16/2014 12:22 AM, John Hardin wrote:
Successful corpora upload, no errors.
Thanks for the feedback!
The ruleqa web page is still stale, I assume that's on the list to be
repaired as well? If not, here's a reminder... :)
xpanded arguments or associated word list.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507
server for uploaded corpora...?
Also, is the sought-fraud generator working? I'm still maintaining and
uploading my corpora for that, and I get a pretty steady flow of the
damned things.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic
On Thu, 3 Jul 2014, Axb wrote:
On 07/03/2014 06:14 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 3 Jul 2014, Axb wrote:
> Guys,
>
> I'm working on replacing the SOUGHT rule generation-
Yay!
> Comments, suggestions?
I don't run local masschecks, I upload my (relatively s
On Thu, 3 Jul 2014, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 7/3/2014 4:19 PM, Axb wrote:
On 07/03/2014 08:50 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> On 7/3/2014 2:25 PM, John Hardin wrote:
> >
> > What's the current channel for the SOUGHT_FRAUD rules? It seems that
> > even though the
On Thu, 17 Jul 2014, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Kevin A. McGrail skrev den 2014-07-17 16:40:
Still shy on Spam.
i wish i could send my hand verifyed spam to help :(
You can upload your spam corpora for central checking.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin
On Thu, 17 Jul 2014, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On 17. jul. 2014 17.38.30 CEST, John Hardin wrote:
You can upload your spam corpora for central checking.
with a rescore account ?, or how ?
I'm not sure if the same account will serve for both uploading masscheck
results and uploading co
?mclog=ham-dwarren
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
--
letting me know.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
---
a custom
header) and your collection system would restore that as the original
envelope sender after receipt for corpus analysis so that your internal
trap policies don't affect the quality and accuracy of your corpora.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jh
he health of the project in
general.
The rules are updated nightly
I checked the cron logs (which likely I am one of the few people getting)
and there has been a rule update every day in September. I didn't check
farther back.
You might find adding a ruleset like my KAM.cf will hel
On Mon, 22 Sep 2014, John Hardin wrote:
Formatting error, sorry. Should be:
jhardin@davinci ~/develop/spamassassin/sa-updates $ cd 1626540
jhardin@davinci ~/develop/spamassassin/sa-updates/1626540 $ tar zxvf
../1626540.tar.gz
{list of rules files extracted}
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ
erformance against the masscheck corpora. The base rules are much more
static, they generally only change for bugfixes or addition of new
capabilities (like my recent commit to add more UTF-8 variants to the
ReplaceTags letter tags).
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.
?
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
---
...the Fates
On Thu, 30 Oct 2014, John Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 30 Oct 2014, Jari Fredrisson wrote:
On 30.10.2014 18:27, Axb wrote:
> On 10/30/2014 05:14 PM, Jari Fredrisson wrote:
> > On 30.10.2014 17:00, Jari Fredrisson wrote:
> >
> > I can also send these specimens unaltere
51119-r1714950-n
axb-8mile axb-coi-bulk axb-generic axb-ham-misc kam-ninja [+]
Looks like date logic is screwy somewhere, two dates on masschecks of the
same revision?
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic #11174 pg
On Thu, 19 Nov 2015, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
Seems that mass check has not worked for a 2 days now, and fails on the rsync
request. Can't pull down anything.
I just uploaded my corpora (I don't do local checks) successfully.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.
On Thu, 19 Nov 2015, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 11/19/2015 3:57 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 19 Nov 2015, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
> Seems that mass check has not worked for a 2 days now, and fails on the
> rsync request. Can't pull down anything.
I just uploaded my corpo
hours spamassassin_role
promotions validated
jhardin@davinci ~/develop/spamassassin/sa-updates $ dig +short TXT
0.4.3.updates.spamassassin.org
2.3.3.updates.spamassassin.org.
"1717726"
Kevin, is something wedged?
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.imps
On Sat, 19 Dec 2015, John Hardin wrote:
On Sat, 19 Dec 2015, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
SpamAssassin version 3.3.0 has not had a rule update since 2015-12-04.
SpamAssassin version 3.3.1 has not had a rule update since 2015-12-04.
SpamAssassin version 3.3.2 has not had a rule update
.
And the weekly was starved, so we'll be a week recovering, at least.
(Thanks for reminding me of that aspect, Kevin. I'd totally forgotten.)
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impse
pache committer...
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-
On Sat, 9 Jan 2016, Dave Warren wrote:
On 2016-01-07 18:14, John Hardin wrote:
Due to bug 7286, there's some suspicion of the large S/O of
__GATED_THROUGH_RCVD_REMOVER, which is primarily due to dwarren's corpus.
Is he subscribed to this list? Kevin, are masscheck co
On Sat, 9 Jan 2016, John Hardin wrote:
On Sat, 9 Jan 2016, Dave Warren wrote:
On 2016-01-07 18:14, John Hardin wrote:
> Due to bug 7286, there's some suspicion of the large S/O of
> __GATED_THROUGH_RCVD_REMOVER, which is primarily due to dwarren's
> corpus.
>
&
ou
could instead synthesize a local Received header for them instead... :)
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C
On Mon, 11 Jan 2016, Dave Warren wrote:
On 2016-01-11 08:27, John Hardin wrote:
In your case that's probably safe. All of your spam hits and all but one
of your ham hits are the "no Received headers at all" case.
I'm not 100% sure if I am interpreting this correctly, b
le below the threshold, but checking back later showed it
above the threshold.
I assume this means somebody got their results in just a bit too late to
be included in the update decision making process.
Do we need to push the cutoff back a bit to allow more time for
submissions?
--
Joh
RS FOUND: 9 (required 10)
SPAM CONTRIBUTORS FOUND: 9 (required 10)
Insufficient ham corpus contributors; aborting.
Exit Status 6 is not zero for do-nightly-rescore-example
What the heck? It doesn't seem to see my uploaded corpora now.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://w
On Sat, 24 Dec 2016, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 12/23/2016 11:19 AM, John Hardin wrote:
What the heck? It doesn't seem to see my uploaded corpora now.
You appear to have the wrong SVN revision on your logs. Timing issue or
date??
That would point to SVN issues on the central mass
is tool is important and
still maintained.
Thanks,
Dave
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6
that this tool is important and
still maintained.
Thanks,
Dave
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6
On Tue, 16 May 2017, UpdatesD Cron wrote:
Exit Status 127 is not zero for do-nightly-rescore-example.
Whoohoo!
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411
On Tue, 16 May 2017, Dave Jones wrote:
On 05/16/2017 10:07 AM, John Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 16 May 2017, UpdatesD Cron wrote:
> Exit Status 127 is not zero for do-nightly-rescore-example.
Whoohoo!
I am still working on this but hope to have it working very soon.
Dave
Getting an er
How do you guarantee all the contributors can perform the checks within an
hour?
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76
On Thu, 1 Jun 2017, David Jones wrote:
From: John Hardin
On Thu, 1 Jun 2017, David Jones wrote:
I am working pretty hard to get the ruleqa processing going
again on our new server. We are so close to having enough
contributors and ham/spam to get some new rules generated:
This is from
On Fri, 2 Jun 2017, David Jones wrote:
On 06/01/2017 07:52 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 1 Jun 2017, David Jones wrote:
> I have not found enough details yet on the central masscheck so I have
> started with getting the remote masscheck processing working first so
> we c
oes into the nightly 72_scores.cf?
The masscheck score generation process. Running the "what hits"
distributed part of masscheck is only part of it. There's another phase
that takes that data from everybody and calculates rule scores.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZht
With the masscheck server rebuild, this no longer works:
wget "http://buildbot.spamassassin.org/updatestage/${REV}.tar.gz";
That URL 404s.
Is that a detail that got overlooked in the rebuild, or is the host/path
different now?
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ
On Sat, 17 Jun 2017, Dave Jones wrote:
On 06/17/2017 12:08 PM, John Hardin wrote:
With the masscheck server rebuild, this no longer works:
wget "http://buildbot.spamassassin.org/updatestage/${REV}.tar.gz";
That URL 404s.
Is that a detail that got overlooked in the rebu
On Thu, 19 Oct 2017, David Jones wrote:
John Hardin said in an earlier mail: "The problem is 72_scores has
explicit bad scores in it.". Is this true? If so you override some rules
which do get generated in the ~56 set?
I am not sure what John meant as an action item from that
t minimizes the changes needed when rule scoring
is fixed.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822
sh servers and found
that some of my old private keys were no longer being accepted because DSA
was deprecated (IIRC) and I had to generate new ones.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.
result sets are coming in so I have no idea how the cutoff
would be adjusted.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507
On Thu, 17 May 2018, Dave Jones wrote:
On 05/17/2018 04:09 PM, John Hardin wrote:
I notice from the RuleQA website that the masschecks from giovanni and
llanga are consistently reported separately from everybody else's.
I wonder whether this is affecting the quality of masscheck - is
On Tue, 22 May 2018, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
On 05/18/18 00:53, John Hardin wrote:
[...]
Yes, but that's not clear as to whether they are pulling the wrong rev or are
just late.
SVN tagged rev in nightly_mass_check: 1831759
New masscheck submission listings in the past day:
1831759
at their masscheck environment and see whether
that rule is indeed present?
Any idea why its results wouldn't be showing up on the ruleqa website? Is
ruleqa perhaps having SVN issues and isn't seeing the new rule even though
it is present in results?
--
John Hardin KA
On Sun, 10 Jun 2018, David Jones wrote:
On 06/10/2018 02:53 PM, John Hardin wrote:
Folks:
I recently added a test subrule to my sandbox...
(__JS_HTML_OBFU_01, see:
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/trunk/rulesrc/sandbox/jhardin/20_misc_testing.cf?r1=1832875&r2=1833128&diff_
On Tue, 22 May 2018, John Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 22 May 2018, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
On 05/18/18 00:53, John Hardin wrote:
[...]
Yes, but that's not clear as to whether they are pulling the wrong rev or
are just late.
SVN tagged rev in nightly_mass_check: 1831759
New masscheck submi
;= 3.004001
...so that it doesn't cause problems with older installs if this rule gets
published.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 13
On Tue, 10 Jul 2018, John Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jul 2018, Steven Ihde wrote:
Hi all,
Starting Friday I noticed the mass-check is producing thousands of lines of
output like this:
invalid check_freemail_replyto option: Disposition-Notification-To at
/dev/shm/masscheckwork
On Tue, 10 Jul 2018, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
On 07/10/18 20:37, John Hardin wrote:
...wait - it passes lint but I do get the same error in a test run:
Jul 10 10:43:22.343 [13247] warn: invalid check_freemail_replyto option:
Disposition-Notification-To at lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin
On Fri, 6 Jul 2018, Tom Hendrikx wrote:
On 06-07-18 16:13, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
On 07/03/18 21:38, John Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 22 May 2018, John Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 22 May 2018, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
On 05/18/18 00:53, John Hardin wrote:
[...]
Yes, but that's not clear
On Fri, 14 Sep 2018, Henrik Krohns wrote:
Since ruleqa keeps lots of history, probably only last week should be
cached? Or few days. Does anyone actually browse ruleqa?
I'd keep at least one full week, preferably at least two.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impse
ruleqa regardless.
run_all_masschecks() {
### sample: single corpus ###
run_masscheck single-corpus \
--after=-174182400 ham:dir:/path/to/Maildir/.Ham/ \
--after=-4838400 spam:dir:/path/to/Maildir/.Spam/
What are those values in terms of? delta seconds from now?
--
John
perly used so that I can avoid FPs in that
rule...
Thanks!
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507
dropping the cumulative corpora below the publication
threshold.
mmiroslaw, llanga:
Could you check your masscheck schedules and durations again?
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key
check scheduling?
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873
On Sun, 28 Oct 2018, Marcin Mirosław wrote:
W dniu 2018-10-26 o 16:38, John Hardin pisze:
On Fri, 26 Oct 2018, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
20181025: Spam or ham is below threshold of 150,000:
http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/?daterev=20181025
20181025: Spam: 96744, Ham: 376566
It looks
Could thendrikx get in touch with me privately? I'd like to request a
corpus check.
Thanks!
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76
ve added a test with a
bad regex?
Potentially, yes. I just took another look at a rule I added for eval from
a list member and it has a (complex)* part - changing that to {0,x} to
limit backtracking...
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@
On Wed, 5 Dec 2018, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
It looks this now: http://snpy.in/27fice
Can you post that using something that doesn't require a tool download and
install? Thx.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic #
On Wed, 5 Dec 2018, John Hardin wrote:
On Wed, 5 Dec 2018, Steven Ihde wrote:
My corpus is similar in size, but it hangs around 30%.
I took a backtrace with gdb this morning; result below. I think it's
just spinning in a regex match, but this is the first time I've looked
On Wed, 5 Dec 2018, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
John Hardin kirjoitti 5.12.2018 kello 19.59:
On Wed, 5 Dec 2018, Steven Ihde wrote:
My corpus is similar in size, but it hangs around 30%.
I took a backtrace with gdb this morning; result below. I think it's
just spinning in a regex match
On Wed, 5 Dec 2018, John Hardin wrote:
On Wed, 5 Dec 2018, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
John Hardin kirjoitti 5.12.2018 kello 19.59:
On Wed, 5 Dec 2018, Steven Ihde wrote:
My corpus is similar in size, but it hangs around 30%.
I took a backtrace with gdb this morning; result below. I think
at it is the cause...
...done. Try again if you wish.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873
On Wed, 5 Dec 2018, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
John Hardin kirjoitti 5.12.2018 kello 22.51:
On Wed, 5 Dec 2018, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
It’s running now and remains to be seen how it goes.
But unfortunately the process stalled again in the end! I just runs two threads
and will not end. The
On Thu, 6 Dec 2018, Tom Hendrikx wrote:
On 05-12-18 22:03, John Hardin wrote:
On Wed, 5 Dec 2018, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
John Hardin kirjoitti 5.12.2018 kello 22.51:
On Wed, 5 Dec 2018, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
It’s running now and remains to be seen how it goes.
But unfortunately the
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
