I did a similar calculation for a talk last october. I used wc -l for the
total lines and sloc for the single lines of code. On Sage 6.3 i got the
following:
Language Total Lines Single lines of code
Python 1117979 598043
Cython439495218669
Le 09/01/2015 12:30, Jean-Pierre Flori a écrit :
That is easy to fix.
Just add gmp to the linked libraries in module_list.py for these files.
Indeed, this is very easy, and works like a charm. After this,
everything compiles, and a lot of things are working! (well, a lot of
things are also
Sorry, when i wrote sloc i meant sloccount.
El lunes, 12 de enero de 2015, 10:55:11 (UTC+1), mmarco escribió:
I did a similar calculation for a talk last october. I used wc -l for the
total lines and sloc for the single lines of code. On Sage 6.3 i got the
following:
Language Total
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 04:47:55PM +0530, Nathann Cohen wrote:
Hello Thierry !
What about checking that there is nothing wrong without a hashsum ?
1) Download the author's .tar.bz2 file
2) Use the sage-src script to generate the .tar.bz2 file yourself
3a) If the hashed match you are done
On Sunday, January 11, 2015 at 5:22:12 AM UTC-5, Nathann Cohen wrote:
Hello everybody !
The constructions document is meant to answer some questions along
the line 'How do I construct ... in Sage?'
http://www.sagemath.org/doc/constructions/index.html
In principle, this document
The best outcome would be to have a true how do I do *** in Sage document
that keeps being updated;
A small remark: in combinatorial designs and graphs the anser to How
do I build *** is rather well answered by graphs.tab,
digraphs.tab, designs.tab. It gives a nice entry point for the
functions
I am trying to build Sage from the current master branch but it errors in
installing ecm.
I've attached the log file.
System Info:
Linux version 3.5.0-57-generic (buildd@tipua) (gcc version 4.6.3
(Ubuntu/Linaro 4.6.3-1ubuntu5) ) #84~precise1-Ubuntu SMP Thu Nov 6 06:09:35
UTC 2014
--
You
-1 to remove the tutorial
+1 to updating and improving it
I never thought people would seriously consider deleting the main overall
tutorial for Sage.
That is because nobody did. This thread is entitled Remove 'A tour of
Sage' and it is about whether we should remove A tour of Sage.
Which
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 8:46 AM, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday, January 11, 2015 at 5:22:12 AM UTC-5, Nathann Cohen wrote:
Hello everybody !
The constructions document is meant to answer some questions along
the line 'How do I construct ... in Sage?'
Hopefully it's becoming stable enough that
we should start shipping it as part of Sage?
At first I thought so, too. But now I'm no longer sure: if you ship it
with Sage, then it will be difficult to use it if you want to work with
a patch from an older branch.
So we
I never thought people would seriously consider deleting the main
overall
tutorial for Sage.
That is because nobody did. This thread is entitled Remove 'A tour of
Sage' and it is about whether we should remove A tour of Sage.
Which is this document:
A small remark: in combinatorial designs and graphs the anser to How
do I build *** is rather well answered by graphs.tab,
digraphs.tab, designs.tab. It gives a nice entry point for the
functions that build something, and from there the classes/functions
doc is sufficient in our case.
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 8:58 AM, Nathann Cohen nathann.co...@gmail.com
wrote:
The best outcome would be to have a true how do I do *** in Sage
document
that keeps being updated;
A small remark: in combinatorial designs and graphs the anser to How
do I build *** is rather well answered by
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 8:42 AM, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
We already have many documents that can contain all kind of stuff like:
- the Constructions manual
- the Tutorials manual
- the Thematic Tutorials manual
The difference between the last two is not precisely obvious (if you
We already have many documents that can contain all kind of stuff like:
- the Constructions manual
- the Tutorials manual
- the Thematic Tutorials manual
The difference between the last two is not precisely obvious (if you
look for something, where will it be ?)
The Tutorial is
Hi,
it is advised to distribute unmodified upstream tarball at much as
possible, so that the end-user should be able to check that the tarball
shipped by Sage has the same hash that upstreams. However, when size can
be reduced by a huge factor, integrity arguments become pretty weak and we
Hi, here's a reply from a PolyBoRi developer:
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: [Polybori-discuss] Fwd: Re: [sage-devel] Re: Python 3 focused
SageDays
Date: Saturday 10 Jan 2015, 22:19:16
From: Alexander Dreyer adre...@t-online.de
To: Martin Albrecht
The question has been asked before but I think it is not possible to make
links like that. Only links *to the reference manual* are currently
possible.
Okay :-/
Then I will use http links. While trying to be a bit smart and use
relative links, so that they still work when you are offline (and
Hello Thierry !
What about checking that there is nothing wrong without a hashsum ?
1) Download the author's .tar.bz2 file
2) Use the sage-src script to generate the .tar.bz2 file yourself
3a) If the hashed match you are done
3b) If they do not match, extract them both and compare their content
On 2015-01-11 11:56, Nathann Cohen wrote:
Hello everybody !
Sorry if this question was already asked (I was not able to find it)
but I wondered how to make link in our doc between documents ?
The question has been asked before but I think it is not possible to
make links like that. Only links
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 9:27 AM, Nathann Cohen nathann.co...@gmail.com
wrote:
Let me add here that removing A tour of Sage also means removing all
of its translations. And bear in mind that some (few) sections of this
document do not exist elsewhere and need to be moved to some other
document
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 10:08 AM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 8:58 AM, Nathann Cohen nathann.co...@gmail.com
wrote:
The best outcome would be to have a true how do I do *** in Sage
document
that keeps being updated;
A small remark: in combinatorial
Let me add here that removing A tour of Sage also means removing all
of its translations. And bear in mind that some (few) sections of this
document do not exist elsewhere and need to be moved to some other
document (how to cite Sage - FAQ, Background jobs - tutorial).
I began to do the work,
I have been thinking of converting polybori to distutils the same way that
cvxopt does
thing. It may turn out not to be possible without a bit of auto tools because
of polybori
builds proper libraries not just python extensions.
But at best it is a band aid as no more development will be done.
On Thursday, January 8, 2015 at 4:34:22 PM UTC+1, William wrote:
Hi,
Would anybody be interested in helping me to organize a bug days
workshop sometime in the next few months?
I have plenty of funding for this for US people and can scrounge up
some funds for some non-US people.
Hi,
Also compression programs sometimes improve (without changing the
decompression routine), and/or their default parameters might be
machine-dependent.
On Monday, January 12, 2015 at 3:22:53 PM UTC+1, Thierry
(sage-googlesucks@xxx) wrote:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 04:47:55PM +0530, Nathann
On 2015-01-12, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't even know if there any group theorists at all that use Sage...
Lots of *users* of group theory use Sage, though.
My impression is that group theorists use GAP but not necessarily Sage.
--
You received this message because you are
2015-01-12 16:08 UTC+01:00, William Stein wst...@gmail.com:
By the way, yesterday at the Sage booth at the Joint Math meetings somebody
walked up and said, can you use Sage to enumerate the groups of order 16?
For a group theorist, this is a very natural basic question. I tried
I'm on OS X 10.9.2, Macbook Pro, tar --version returns
bsdtar 2.8.3 - libarchive 2.8.3
For me, your last line resulted in:
tar: Option --mtime=1970-01-01 01:00 is not supported
David
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 5:59 AM, Thierry sage-googlesu...@lma.metelu.net
wrote:
Hi,
it is advised to
Lots of *users* of group theory use Sage, though.
My impression is that group theorists use GAP but not necessarily Sage.
I don't count group theorists as users of group theory (or at least, not
only). My point was this is useful even if all group theorists use GAP
only; lots of
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Nathann Cohen nathann.co...@gmail.com
wrote:
What is the argument for removing the tour? I have seen absolutely no
arguments at for removing it, except maybe the first section of that
manual
is also named A guided tour.' That's not a compelling argument.
On 01/12/2015 05:59 AM, Thierry wrote:
In order to try such possibility on the next matplotlib update, could some
people (especially someone using OSX) give me (with minimal info on their
OS, arch, and tar --version) the result of:
wget
This is a circular import error. If you look at the chain of imports,
you'll see that earlier you're in the file sage/rings/all.py, and the
error occurs when you later try to import sage.rings.all.
A brief glance at your code doesn't reveal the cause of the problem for me,
though it could be
Setting the effective group to the same as the group on the build directory
did allow pynac to compile. I am now stuck on an error in
conway_polynomials-0.4.p0.
ImportError: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.20' not found
(required by
On Monday, January 12, 2015 at 4:13:33 PM UTC-8, François wrote:
I agree with you that it is not deterministic. What is really important is
that the
checksums and the tarball come from a source you trust and are in
agreement.
The checksum of the file itself is simply a way of
It looks like something has gone wrong with LD_LIBRARY_PATH co. This means
that libstdc++ found when running sage is from older version of gcc than the
one used
to compile sage. Here you find libstdc++ from the system (gcc-4.3.4 I presume)
rather
than whatever you used to compile.
I assume
If the problem is that packaging is not deterministic... what if we run the
hash check on the unpacked files instead of the tarball?
El lunes, 12 de enero de 2015, 11:59:53 (UTC+1), Thierry
(sage-googlesucks@xxx) escribió:
Hi,
it is advised to distribute unmodified upstream tarball at
On Monday, January 12, 2015 at 7:16:23 PM UTC+1, Simon King wrote:
If its purpose is to explain Sage for those who know other CAS, somehow
explaining the differences and common points between various Ma* and
Sage, then it should perhaps be kept under a different name?
A First Taste of
I agree with you that it is not deterministic. What is really important is that
the
checksums and the tarball come from a source you trust and are in agreement.
It is a simple security measure and I am not sure there is value in making it
deterministic. I have a feeling that if you want to do
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 3:00 AM, Simon King simon.k...@uni-jena.de wrote:
Hi!
On 2015-01-11, Nils Bruin nbr...@sfu.ca wrote:
On Sunday, January 11, 2015 at 12:54:56 AM UTC-8, Martin von Gagern wrote:
On 11.01.2015 09:38, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
Hopefully it's becoming stable enough that
On 2015-01-13, Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, January 12, 2015 at 7:16:23 PM UTC+1, Simon King wrote:
If its purpose is to explain Sage for those who know other CAS, somehow
explaining the differences and common points between various Ma* and
Sage, then it should
What is the argument for removing the tour? I have seen absolutely no
arguments at for removing it, except maybe the first section of that
manual
is also named A guided tour.' That's not a compelling argument. A
piece of our documentation has a target audience (or audience) and a goal
You are assuming that the only target audience of the constructions guide
is a person actively using an interactive Sage session, but that is not the
only target audience. Google searches, especially from people who might
have never heard of Sage, are a big target audience for the
In
http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17626
the group class should have a newly created monoid class as a base. At
the moment the group and the monoid parent do not have much in common
(but their elements have).
I've started implementing this, but have a rather strange problem. See
below the
What is the argument for removing the tour? I have seen absolutely no
arguments at for removing it, except maybe the first section of that
manual
is also named A guided tour.' That's not a compelling argument. A
piece of our documentation has a target audience (or audience) and a goal
about
Interesting. A lot of this should go in the Tutorial or FAQ, I think.
Okay. I will write a patch for that, but I will wait before the other
patches are reviewed as I worry about conflicts. Many things are being
rewritten and moved around in all directions.
Nathann
--
You received this
Hi!
On 2015-01-12, David Joyner wdjoy...@gmail.com wrote:
Depends on the group:
...
The simplest explanation would be to use the small groups database
which can be installed into Sage, but it is not open-source licensed.
For example:
sage:
47 matches
Mail list logo
