If you just recorded the smallest primitive roots I'll bet the database
would get a lot smaller:-) Do you need all the prim roots in the
CrypTool tutorial for a particular purpose, eg discrete logs?
I'd guess a database of the smallest prim roots mod p for all primes
out to a million (for
Hello everyone,
1) Protection from the harm of project leaders or some key people in the
project being vanished could be organized, I would suggest, in the
following way:
The project sets up some place where the important information is being
kept and maintained by the key people of the
Most older # theory textbooks (or newer editions thereof) have a list
of smallest primitive roots of p for small p, as well as tables of
indices for index calculus. I'm not sure whether that is quite as
useful now, since any individual discrete log problem might be solved
(slowly) by finding a
The version of MPIR in Sage does build on t2 properly with
/usr/local/gcc-4.2.4-sun-linker/bin/gcc. In fact, it builds with all
versions of gcc on t2.
I can't say about the version in trunc, and cant easily check myself
at the minute.
2009/7/31 Jason Moxham ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com:
On Friday 31 July 2009 14:25:02 David Kirkby wrote:
The version of MPIR in Sage does build on t2 properly with
/usr/local/gcc-4.2.4-sun-linker/bin/gcc. In fact, it builds with all
versions of gcc on t2.
I can't say about the version in trunc, and cant easily check myself
at the minute.
I
2009/7/31 Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 1:14 PM, Minh Nguyennguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
This is the first release candidate for Sage 4.1.1. Source and binary are at
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mvngu/release/sage-4.1.1.rc0.tar
2009/7/28 William Stein wst...@gmail.com:
Perhaps a
naming convention for them too. Should they all start SAGE_ for
example? That would seem most sensible, despite I've already
implemetnted on that does not start SAGE_.
Obviously some part of you found that not sensible. Personally I
Dear sage-devel team,
I have tried to install sage4.1 on ubuntu 8.04 by following the steps
described in the readme file, i.e. I downloaded the source code from
the Berlin server, unzipped it to the subdirectory sage/sage-4.1 in my
home directory, and started make from there. This has ended up
Hi,
I wrote a patch for sampling from a general discrete probability
distribution but I can't get the reference manual to format correctly.
The pyx file is the problem.
The patch is here: http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6662
The examples in the manual are formatted as normal
I was just looking at the code for multiplicative_order in
finite_field_element.py, and noticed that it factors the group order,
and find the cofactors corresponding to each prime power dividing
the order (which is really the only algorithm that I know to do
this). To avoid repeating this
Minh Nguyen wrote:
Hi folks,
As of Sage 4.1.1.alpha1, the compilation of Sage now dies when it
comes to compiling MPIR. The full log is up at
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mvngu/patch/install-freebsd64.log
Here's a relevant snippet from my attempt:
/usr/local/bin/bash
Minh Nguyen wrote:
Hi folks,
So far in the 4.1.1 release cycle, David Kirkby has added Solaris (on
the machine t2) build support for about 7 packages. That is very
impressive work for an individual porter. Out of curiosity, I compiled
Sage 4.1.1.alpha1 from source on t2. Now the
Jason Moxham wrote:
Building mpir svn trunk (which for the Sun's is the same as mpir-1.2.2)
./configure make -j make -j check
ld.so.1: t-modlinv: fatal: /usr/local/gcc-4.2.4-sun-linker/lib/libgcc_s.so.1:
wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS32
/bin/bash: line 1: 25188 Killed
Hi Victor,
On Jul 31, 3:59 pm, VictorMiller victorsmil...@gmail.com wrote:
I was just looking at the code for multiplicative_order in
finite_field_element.py, and noticed that it factors the group order,
and find the cofactors corresponding to each prime power dividing
the order (which is
- Original Message -
From: Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net
To: sage-devel@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, July 31, 2009 4:02 PM
Subject: [sage-devel] Re: status of FreeBSD 64-bit support
Minh Nguyen wrote:
Hi folks,
As of Sage 4.1.1.alpha1, the compilation of Sage now
Hi all, I was just playing around with permutations, when something
puzzled me:
sage: G = SymmetricGroup(4)
sage: H = G.normal_subgroups()[1]
sage: H
Permutation Group with generators [(1,3)(2,4), (1,4)(2,3)]
sage: G.quotient_group(H)
Permutation Group with generators [(1,2)(3,6)(4,5),
Maybe I don't understand your question. It seems you are claiming that
if G is a permutation group and H is a normal subgroup then
the quotient G/H embeds into G. Are you sure that is true?
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 11:36 AM, Robert Schwarzm...@rschwarz.net wrote:
Hi all, I was just playing
Carlo Hamalainen wrote:
The pyx file is the problem.
The patch is here: http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6662
The examples in the manual are formatted as normal paragraph text
instead of code blocks. Any ideas?
Try inserting a blank line after EXAMPLES:::
def
Hi David,
On Jul 31, 4:47 pm, David Joyner wdjoy...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe I don't understand your question. It seems you are claiming that
if G is a permutation group and H is a normal subgroup then
the quotient G/H embeds into G. Are you sure that is true?
...
Where do the 5 and 6
On Jul 31, 11:47 am, David Joyner wdjoy...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe I don't understand your question. It seems you are claiming that
if G is a permutation group and H is a normal subgroup then
the quotient G/H embeds into G. Are you sure that is true?
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 11:36 AM,
I'm just editing the subject line to attract attention from people
like Mike Hansen who might have done overlapping work.
-Marshall
On Jul 31, 11:03 am, Marshall Hampton hampto...@gmail.com wrote:
I am trying to make an spkg for 4ti2, but I am having trouble getting
it to recognize GMP. I'm
kstueve wrote:
On Jul 27, 3:11 am, David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
But for reserach purposes, symbolic results is a niche interest area
and one where I feel Sage could be a 'must have' tool. But for general
circuit simulation, I believe the tool shown is too limited.
Would
Hi!
On Jul 31, 5:11 pm, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
...
Though I agree that this could be confusing, the good part is that
this creates (an isomorphic) group without having to talk about which
element of the coset you pick each time. It would be misleading to
say that (1234) was an
Simon, Thanks. I think that in order for this to work, that finite
field should have a new method, something like
@cached_method
_cofactor_information(self):
N = self.order()
return [ (N//p**r,p) for p,r in arith.factor(N)]
which would factor the order, and then return all the cofactors
javier wrote:
On Jul 31, 4:47 pm, David Joyner wdjoy...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe I don't understand your question. It seems you are claiming
thatif G is a permutation group and H is a normal subgroup then
the quotient G/H embeds into G. Are you sure that is true?
In general, no it isn't. We
If that you want are the cosets you can get them simply using
cosets = Set([Set([h*g for h in H]) for g in G])
or if you want to get a representative of each coset you can then use
reps = [x[0] for x in cosets]
this should work even if H is not normal, the only issue being that
the set of
javier wrote:
If that you want are the cosets you can get them simply using
cosets = Set([Set([h*g for h in H]) for g in G])
or if you want to get a representative of each coset you can then use
reps = [x[0] for x in cosets]
this should work even if H is not normal, the only issue
Marshall Hampton wrote:
I am trying to make an spkg for 4ti2, but I am having trouble getting
it to recognize GMP. I'm sure many people on this list are more
qualified than I am to figure that out.
t4i2 requires the linear programming package glpk, which I think I did
succeed in making an
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
Marshall Hampton wrote:
I am trying to make an spkg for 4ti2, but I am having trouble getting
it to recognize GMP. I'm sure many people on this list are more
qualified than I am to figure that out.
t4i2 requires the linear programming package glpk, which I think I
Hi everyone,
The problem was exactly as predicted - missing newlines and using
single colons. Thanks!
--
Carlo Hamalainen
http://carlo-hamalainen.net
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 6:50 AM, wom wo.mac...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear sage-devel team,
I have tried to install sage4.1 on ubuntu 8.04 by following the steps
described in the readme file, i.e. I downloaded the source code from
the Berlin server, unzipped it to the subdirectory sage/sage-4.1
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 8:59 AM, slabbe sla...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, I think that if, someday, you know you want to go AWOL for a
while, you should think about it a long time before. Something like a
year before. You should make sure that all the knowledge you have
(right access to all the
On Jul 31, 3:50 pm, wom wo.mac...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there an easy way to install sage 4.1 on ubuntu 9.04?
Bruce Cohen told me recently [1] in sage-support that the debian lenny
version works fine in ubuntu hardy. It works for me too!
[1]
I agree, that doesn't sound good. At the moment, I just want to check
out the sandpile functionality, so I don't think I will wade in and
try to improve glpk, or bug the author to do so.
On the positive side, I think I now have packages that install
correctly, at least on my own mac. They are
Marshall Hampton wrote:
I agree, that doesn't sound good. At the moment, I just want to check
out the sandpile functionality, so I don't think I will wade in and
try to improve glpk, or bug the author to do so.
On the positive side, I think I now have packages that install
correctly, at
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 2:04 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
david.kir...@onetel.netwrote:
Marshall Hampton wrote:
I agree, that doesn't sound good. At the moment, I just want to check
out the sandpile functionality, so I don't think I will wade in and
try to improve glpk, or bug the author to do
There is such a search right here:
http://groups..google.com/group/sage-devel
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
Yes. I meant I love that Sage has a google search. I wish the nauty
list had a google search, but I can't seem to find any search for their
archives at all!
I'm not disagreeing, I just don't know how to quickly change that. If
someone can give me some tips I will at least patch the spkgs.
-Marshall
On Jul 31, 4:21 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 2:04 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
david.kir...@onetel.netwrote:
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 01:18:58PM -0700, Marshall Hampton wrote:
I agree, that doesn't sound good. At the moment, I just want to check
out the sandpile functionality, so I don't think I will wade in and
try to improve glpk, or bug the author to do so.
On the positive side, I think I now
Marshall Hampton wrote:
I'm not disagreeing, I just don't know how to quickly change that. If
someone can give me some tips I will at least patch the spkgs.
-Marshall
There may be no quick fix, though the code did not look very large, so I
doubt it would be a huge job to do it properly.
Thanks for pointing that out. I am somewhat disturbed by the positive
review for that becoming a standard package, which seems inconsistent
with previous policy. In #6663 I am merely suggesting 4ti2 and glpk
as experimental packages, with the idea of transitioning them to
optional, and then
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 7:10 PM, Marshall Hamptonhampto...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for pointing that out. I am somewhat disturbed by the positive
review for that becoming a standard package, which seems inconsistent
I don't know where you got that. I was the reviewer and I clearly said
Hi Georg,
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 9:35 PM, gswgeorgswe...@googlemail.com wrote:
SNIP
sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/modules/vector_real_double_dense.pyx
**
File /home/mvngu/usr/bin/sage/devel/sage-main/sage/modules/
I got from Minh's comment:
Once #6502 gets positive review, this SPKG could then be merged in
the Sage standard packages repository.
-Marshall
On Jul 31, 6:20 pm, David Joyner wdjoy...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 7:10 PM, Marshall Hamptonhampto...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for
On an intel mac running 10.4.11 I get:
The following tests failed:
sage -t devel/sage/sage/parallel/decorate.py
sage -t devel/sage/sage/symbolic/expression.pyx
Total time for all tests: 5865.0 seconds
I assume these are known problems.
-Marshall
On Jul 29, 10:14 pm, Minh
Hi Marshall,
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 9:32 AM, Marshall Hamptonhampto...@gmail.com wrote:
I got from Minh's comment:
Once #6502 gets positive review, this SPKG could then be merged in
the Sage standard packages repository.
That was a typo on my part. It should be optional instead of
Hi Marshall,
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 9:35 AM, Marshall Hamptonhampto...@gmail.com wrote:
On an intel mac running 10.4.11 I get:
The following tests failed:
sage -t devel/sage/sage/parallel/decorate.py
sage -t devel/sage/sage/symbolic/expression.pyx
Total time for all
Thanks for trying this Marshall. Unfortunately, your spkg, and the
older experimental spkg,
for 4ti2, both fail to install on my amd64 ubuntu 9.04 machine. I have
N Cohen's version of the
glpk spkg installed.
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 12:18 PM, Marshall Hamptonhampto...@gmail.com wrote:
OK,
Can you put the source of the failure up at
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6663?
Thanks for trying it out!
Marshall
On Jul 31, 7:06 pm, David Joyner wdjoy...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for trying this Marshall. Unfortunately, your spkg, and the
older experimental spkg,
for 4ti2,
Hi,
I just uploaded a new pynac package and patches which fix
#6404 conjugate typesetting
#6401 typesetting real and imag
#6243 fderivative hash collision
#6377 exp evaluation at infinity
on trac. The package is here:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/burcin/pynac/pynac-0.1.8.p2.spkg
It
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 12:54 PM, Burcin Erocalbur...@erocal.org wrote:
Hi,
I just uploaded a new pynac package and patches which fix
#6404 conjugate typesetting
#6401 typesetting real and imag
#6243 fderivative hash collision
#6377 exp evaluation at infinity
on trac. The package is
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 8:26 PM, Marshall Hamptonhampto...@gmail.com wrote:
Can you put the source of the failure up at
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6663?
This failure I had was fake! Here's what I did. I first tried the evil
experimental
4ti2*.spkg. That deleted N Cohen's good
William Stein wrote:
So, dear William Stein, how much do you know that nobody else know?!
The only thing I can think of along these lines is the login credentials
for GoDaddy.com, from whom I rent the sagemath.org http://sagemath.org
and sagenb.org http://sagenb.org domain names.
53 matches
Mail list logo
