On Nov 29, 1:51 pm, Michael Brickenstein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi!
Hi Michael,
The program is located on a local disc, it is just my home on a NFS
file system.
I tried linking .sage to /tmp/blupper (I hope, that is not a
trademark)
and everything worked.
Then I removed the link
Michael,
there is an issue with sqlite on NFS, specifically from
http://www.sqlite.org/faq.html:
SQLite uses reader/writer locks to control access to the database.
(Under Win95/98/ME which lacks support for reader/writer locks, a
probabilistic simulation is used instead.) But use caution: this
On Nov 30, 12:05 am, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dortmund.de wrote:
Michael,
there is an issue with sqlite on NFS, specifically
fromhttp://www.sqlite.org/faq.html:
SQLite uses reader/writer locks to control access to the database.
(Under Win95/98/ME which lacks support for reader/writer
On Nov 30, 12:11 am, Justin C. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 29, 2007, at 6:41 AM, joel wrote:
I mostly operate from the command line, so all the installation was
done from a macosx bash shell. tar is GNU tar version 1.14.
I downloaded sage-2.1.13-osx10.4-i386-Darwin.tar.gz
On Nov 30, 12:31 am, Justin C. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 29, 2007, at 3:17 PM, mabshoff wrote:
On Nov 30, 12:11 am, Justin C. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 29, 2007, at 6:41 AM, joel wrote:
The tarball seems to be the culprit. I can't see how this will work
On Nov 28, 1:38 am, trio123 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Renaming $HOME/.sage did not help and I've upgraded to
2.8.14.
I still get the same error message.
Kelly
Hello Kelly,
sorry I couldn't be more help, but I am out of ideas then. Hopefully
somebody else will have a clue what is wrong.
On Nov 28, 12:18 pm, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dortmund.de wrote:
On Nov 28, 1:38 am, trio123 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Renaming $HOME/.sage did not help and I've upgraded to
2.8.14.
I still get the same error message.
Kelly
Hello Kelly,
sorry I couldn't be more help, but I am
On Nov 28, 8:32 pm, Kate Minola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
William,
Hello Kate,
Using gcc-4.2.2, sage-2.8.14 builds and passes all tests on my
x86-Linux (pentium4-fc6) box.
***
On ia64-Linux, it fails to build with an Internal Compiler Error
when compiling
On Nov 28, 9:00 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 28, 2007 11:44 AM, mabshoff
SNIP
Odd. What happens if you do export SAGE_CHECK=yes and then rebuild
mpfr.spkg? Does the test suite pass?
RQDF has nothing to do with mpfr. It's the quaddouble*.spkg which is 100
Ok, #1324 it is.
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
On Nov 26, 11:03 pm, Jonathan Hanke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Hello Jon,
I just cloned one of my sage 2.8.12 branches (which worked), but it failed
to build the new branch. The old one builds fine. I have a Mac Book with
OS 10.4, and the error message is below. I also tried a sage
SAGE 2.8.14:
At least the following people contributed to this release:
- Michael Abshoff
- Martin Albrecht
- John Cremona
- Alexander Dreyer
- Bill Hart
- David Joyner
- Josh Kantor
- William Stein
- Carl Witty
Feedback and testing by Andrzej Giniewicz and Simon King, Jaap Spies,
On Nov 24, 5:11 pm, Alexander Dreyer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello William and Michael,
This looks like a 64 bit SuSE 10.1 box - am I correct?
Yes.
Also, do you have GMP installed system-wide? It could be
some broken weird GMP that confuses the mpfi build
script.
Yes, GMP
:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/
sage-2.8.14.rc2.tar
Try only the flint spkg in the release candidate. The whole
release candidate
won't build for you, since building the cremona spkg in there is
currently
broken on OS X.
Yep, it broke on both 10.4.11 and 10.5.1
On Nov 23, 8:58 pm, trio123 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Hello,
I'm running SAGE 2.8.12 on Ubuntu 6.06 built from source and I can't
seem to get notebook() to run.
Any ideas?
Just a hunch: can you rename $HOME/.sage to something else and start
Sage again? It seems odd that you are
On Nov 23, 2:27 pm, Gregory Vanuxem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Le vendredi 23 novembre 2007 à 04:47 -0800, mabshoff a écrit :
[...]
g++ -c -fPIC -g -O2 -DNEW_OP_ORDER -DUSE_PARI_FACTORING -I../include -
DNTL_ALL -I/opt/sage/local/include -I/opt/sage/local/include tsat3.cc
Andrzej Giniewicz wrote:
Hi,
Hello Andrzej
I seen in announcement that it fails for cremona.spkg fails to
compile on Linux/Itanium with older gcc and also Solaris. - but my
system doesn't fall to that category I think so I decided to report...
Excellent that you report this. It seems
On Nov 23, 9:15 am, Alexander Dreyer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Alexander,
sage-2.8.13 fails to build on the following system:
Linux node179 2.6.16.27-0.6-smp-perfctr #2 SMP Thu Oct 11 10:04:48
CEST 2007 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
This looks like a 64 bit SuSE 10.1 box - am I
On Nov 23, 9:15 pm, John Cremona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am currently making sure that my code compiles ok with gcc 4.2.1 and
will upload a patch so this will be fixed soon.
John Cremona
Ok, an updated spkg that merges John's changes is at
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff
On Nov 23, 4:05 am, Dustin Pluta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Hello Dustin,
I ran across a graph and partition for which it takes the search_tree
function 6 hours on my machine to complete, and I was wondering if
this is something to be expected, or a possible bug. I've been
working
Sorry to reply to myself this quickly, but this issue is now ticket
#1247, see
http://www.sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/1247
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group,
On Nov 22, 4:06 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 21, 2007 11:34 PM, D. M. Monarres [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
When trying to upgrade from 2.8.12 installed from binaries downloaded
from the web, I am getting the following error after restarting what
looks like
Hello,
Hannes Schönemann has fixed the issue upstream. It took so long
because he was unable to reproduce the issue locally :(, but he
finally tracked it down and fixed it :).
Martin, will you package this or alternatively extract the fix and
apply it to the Singular.spkg?
Cheers,
Michael
Hello Dan,
On Nov 15, 10:05 pm, Dan Shumow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In sage I typed upgrade()
exited sage, tried to start, got this error message.
exited, typed make, tried again, got the problem again.
What happens when you type in make form SAGE_ROOT? Could you gzip up
install.log and
On Nov 12, 9:54 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 12, 2007 8:48 PM, mabshoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You should try 7zip (which is open source) or a trial edition of
Winzip. Another, more likely possibility is that you have a FAT32
formatted drive which can limit file
On Nov 13, 12:48 am, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sage: hg_sage.commit()
cd /home/wdj/sagestuff/sage-2.8.7.rc1/devel/sage hg diff | less
cd /home/wdj/sagestuff/sage-2.8.7.rc1/devel/sage hg commit
emacs: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/libcairo.so.2: undefined symbol:
On Nov 12, 4:11 pm, David Joyner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi:
Hello David,
I am trying to create a patch for the permgp bug Carlo H reported
last week. In 2.8.12, I
(1) created a clone and added a few lines to permgp.py
that seemed to fix the problem.
(2) ran sage -b (no problems)
(3)
On Nov 12, 7:40 pm, rdl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Hello Roberto,
I've got extremely happy when I've found out about this cool project,
it was time that some powerful 'mathematica-like' open source package
would see the light :-)
:)
I've installed successfully SAGE on my linux
On Nov 8, 8:57 pm, Paul Zimmermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Paul,
Onhttp://sagemath.org/doc/html/ref/module-sage.calculus.calculus.htmlone
can read:
sage: var('x, u, v')
(x, u, v)
sage: f = expand((2*u*v^2-v^2-4*u^3)^2 * (-u)^3 * (x-sin(x))^3) # not
tested -- trac #946
On Nov 7, 5:33 pm, John Cremona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello John,
Isn't there a problem with this:
the latter for resources used by those of its
children that have terminated and have been waited for.
Yep, that is indeed a problem.
We want to add up the time used by child
On Nov 7, 5:08 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 7, 2007 4:34 AM, John Cremona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is true that the cpu time does not include any of the child
processes, and also that in many cases most of the computation is done
by those.
In this case the
On Nov 7, 5:29 pm, Simon King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Michael,
On Nov 7, 4:22 pm, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Simon,
snip
This is indeed non-trivial! Even when i compute maxideal(19), which
takes a couple of seconds, singular.cputime(t) only returns 0.001. I
On Nov 7, 4:17 pm, Simon King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Martin,
Hello Simon,
Actually, for Singular it is trivial:
sage: R=singular.ring(0,'(x(1..10))','dp')
sage: t= singular.cputime()
sage: singular.eval('ideal G = maxideal(14)')
sage: singular.cputime(t)
This is indeed
On Nov 4, 2:49 pm, Simon King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear John,
Hi Simon,
On Nov 4, 1:45 pm, John Cremona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it recomputing a Grobner basis for the new ideal? That could be slow.
No, it is simply
singular.eval( I.name()+'[%d]' = '%(sz)+p.name())
[CC to Hannes Schönemann]
On Nov 3, 7:05 am, Ursula Whitcher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Ursula, Hannes,
I can reproduce this issue with the Singular shipped with Sage 2.8.11,
but originally it happened with Sage 2.8.10, also. The log is from
sage.math, i.e. and x86-64 Linux box.
William
On Oct 31, 7:34 am, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
try using the tiger binaries, since they work in leopard also.
A remark: I just noticed that the leopard binary is about 53 mb
smaller than the tiger binary, and that seems to indicate that
something went wrong with the tiger
On Oct 31, 7:40 am, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dortmund.de wrote:
On Oct 31, 7:34 am, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
try using the tiger binaries, since they work in leopard also.
A remark: I just noticed that the leopard binary is about 53 mb
smaller than the tiger
On Oct 24, 7:15 pm, marko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I am quite new to SAGE but I think I've found a problem with the
latex(math-expression) command. I've tried with version 2.8.6, 2.8.7
and 2.8.8.1:
The problem seems to be the abs() command. Take any function like
f(x)=2*abs(x)
On Oct 23, 4:14 pm, Luis Garcia-Puente [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Sage team,
Hello Luis,
I was running Singular on top of Sage but it kept crashing with a
message of no more memory. After looking at the activity monitor (I am
running sage on a Mac Pro with OS X 10.4.10) I saw that
On Oct 23, 3:58 am, Justin C. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 20, 2007, at 23:53 , William Stein wrote:
Hello,
I've released sage-2.8.8. Get it athttp://sagemath.org, as usual,
or just do sage -upgrade.
This release benefited hugely from work of Martin Albrecht, Michael
On Oct 23, 6:19 am, Justin C. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, Michael,
On Oct 22, 2007, at 20:10 , mabshoff wrote:
On Oct 23, 3:58 am, Justin C. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 20, 2007, at 23:53 , William Stein wrote:
I'm building 2.8.8.1 from scratch on a 8x3GHz Xeon Mac
On Oct 14, 2:37 am, Simon King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear William,
you wrote:
This question belongs in the cython or pyrex mailing lists,
rather than sage-support, so I've forwarded it there.
After posting my question, i found an answer to my question in the
web:
Pyrex 0.9.6
On Oct 4, 9:33 pm, Simon King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Michael,
you wrote:
snip
I did sage -f linbox-package name, and soon i obtained:
WARNING
WARNING
using frickin' slow GSL C-blas
WARNING
WARNING
This is a bug. You should try
export
On Sep 30, 10:32 pm, David Stahl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SAGE suddendly stopped running on my machine and I did not do
anything. I am running SAGE 2.8 with Win2000 using the notebook. I
have reset vmware, upped the memory available to the max recommended,
rebooted my machine. All to no
On Sep 15, 12:19 am, Simon King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Professor Stein,
Well, he is known as William around here :)
SNIP
The binaries work fine, that was not the problem. Simply i wanted to learn
to build SAGE by myself, and when i found that make finished but did not
yield a
On Sep 15, 12:20 am, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dortmund.de wrote:
On Sep 15, 12:19 am, Simon King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Professor Stein,
Well, he is known as William around here :)
SNIP
The binaries work fine, that was not the problem. Simply i wanted to learn
to build
it!
This is now trac ticket #640:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/640
Hello,
I posted a new python spkg that fixes the issue at
http://fsmath.mathematik.uni-dortmund.de/~mabshoff/sage/python-2.5.1.p7.spkg
The difference is ln -s python-2.5/ python vs the older ln -s
python-2.5 python
Hi Kiran,
On Sep 6, 2:38 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 5, 11:08 am, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: First, does
the file stdint.h exist on your machine? If so
does the following program compile and run or not, and
if so, what does it output:
#include
On Sep 5, 5:08 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/5/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When building any of the 2.8.3.x releases on my 64-bit Opteron 246
running RHEL5, I encounter the following error during the compile of
the
sage-2.8.3.x module.
...
In
On Sep 5, 7:59 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/5/07, David DeGeorge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Developers
I am running Suse 10.1 and
sage-2.8.3-32bit-linux-suse10-i686-Linux
I can't get lie to build. It complains about not finding -lcurses.
libcurses.a is
not
On Sep 5, 9:40 pm, Kate Minola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
William,
I attempted to build sage-2.8.3.4 from source
using the gcc-4.2.1 compiler suite.
On both my x86-Linux and x86_64-Linux machines
the build succeeded, but 'make test'
hung at
sage -t
On Sep 4, 5:10 pm, Markus Fraczek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
it seems there is a bug in the implementation of complex numbers. Defining a
number with imaginary part bigger or equal 1E8 gets an exception error.
Best,
Marek
SNIP
Hello Marek, (or is it Markus?)
thanks for the report,
On Sep 1, 6:43 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/1/07, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- all info about Bug Day 2 can be found athttp://www.sagemath.org:9001/bug2
including info about joining #sage-devel on IRC.
- I will particiapate and concentrate on memory leaks
On Sep 1, 3:32 am, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(This is really from Michael Abshoff.)
Hello folks,
Sage's Bug Day 2 is almost upon us -- It will happen on Friday September 7th,
2007. We usually start about 10am pacific standard time, but feel free
to drop by the IRC channel
John P. Burkett wrote:
Working on an i686 machine running under Gentoo Linux, I tried to
upgrade SAGE from 2.8.2 to 2.8.3 by using the command sage -upgrade.
The resulting messages ended as follows:
Finished extraction
sage: After decompressing the directory gmp-4.2.1.p8 does not exist
Hey Kate,
On Sep 1, 8:39 pm, Kate Minola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
William,
I can get sage-2.8.3 to build and pass its test suite on
x86-Linux (pentium4-fc6)
x86_64-Linux (again fc6)
On ia64-Linux, sage-2.8.3 builds, but when I do
%./sage
I get
% ./sage
Hello Eze,
On Aug 28, 3:50 pm, Eze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been trying to install SAGE in my computer. I have downloaded
the newest version of WMwareplayer and following the instructions.
Despite having the required space, when i double click on the sage.vmx
i get the message that
Ted Kosan wrote:
The n() method is not currently defined for rational numbers:
x = 1/2
x.n()
Exception (click to the left for traceback):
...
AttributeError: 'sage.rings.rational.Rational' object has no attribute 'n'
Would it be possible to add it?
I am sure it will happen. I put
On Aug 28, 1:20 am, gsage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you do a pwd in $SAGE_ROOT and post the output here. Please also
try moving $SAGE_ROOT to /tmp and try again.
moved folder sage-2.8.2 to /tmp and did a pwd:
input
pwd
output
/tmp/sage-2.8.2
running sage in tmp produces same
On Aug 23, 10:45 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
system: iBook G4 MacOS X.4.10 sage 2.8.2
Your response to part 1 (using hg_sage) worked for 2.8. With 2.8.2 I
get the error:
SNIP
Failed to load application: No module named gnutls.interfaces.twisted
SNIP
Will the same
On Aug 23, 2:27 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Michael:
Tried both, no change. (soft sobbing).
David
Hey David,
please do a tar xjf gnucryptolib-20070821.spkg in spkg/standard and
try to build each one of the five spkgs inside the
gnucryptolib-20070821 directory. If you
On Aug 23, 6:04 pm, David Joyner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi:
Hello David,
I'm wondering if the following is correct behavior:
sage: x,y=PolynomialRing(QQ,2,xy).gens()
sage: f = 5*x+y-5
sage: f(1,1)
1
sage: type(f(1,1))
type
On Aug 21, 1:16 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
MacOS X 4.10
iBook G4
opening sage in Terminal yields:
$sage -notebook
--
| SAGE Version 2.8, Release Date: 2007-08-12 |
| Type
On Aug 21, 1:25 pm, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dortmund.de wrote:
On Aug 21, 1:16 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SNIP
Hello David,
that is a know problem (Ticket #437 -
seehttp://www.sagemath.org:9002/sage_trac/ticket/437
) and should be fixed either in 2.8.2 or 2.8.3.
Sorry
SNIP
This is just what I did and now the compilation was successful.
Jean-Marc Drézet
I made this Ticket #455 so it doesn't get lost. Fix seem non-difficult
by adding the right -L $SAGE_LIB flags in the right places.
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
On Aug 13, 5:47 pm, Alex Ghitza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Hello,
I'm trying to compile sage-2.8 and it breaks down on linbox_wrap, with
the message:
checking for correct ltmain.sh version... no
configure: error:
***
On May 28, 11:15 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/28/07, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All have their specific advantages, I would just go with screen.
It might be worthwhile to offer an option for SAGE to demonize itself.
That's a great idea; I've added it as
http
On May 27, 5:53 pm, davedo2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ooops, color me red of face. The very slow time was for an install of
SAGE
under a VM module of Kubuntu that I had previously built. I just tried
the SAGE
VM module (not the latest) and it only took 50+ secs for the same
image. I am
601 - 668 of 668 matches
Mail list logo
