ma...@mendelu.cz wrote:
You can use commands orderless and ordergreat in Maxima to change the
default behavior.
For the record, I recommend against that; it's not really the right
way to resolve this problem. I'll post another message with a
different resolution.
Robert Dodier
philabuster wrote:
This ordering makes it extremely difficult to do index association
from the j-th term of the expansion back into constituent indices of
each sum (i0,i1,i2,i3);
Well, Sage punts to Maxima (for the moment, anyway) to compute
the expansion. The terms are computed in the order
+1 for a 'smart' auto backup system. I don't know whether it was the
snapshot saving or what did it, but I never bothered saving notebooks
while working with them and never lost any data after crashes. It is
such a great peace of mind not to have to remember to save your work
regularly and
It looks like this notebook no longer uses jsMath to render the result
of var('n m'), so I can't reproduce the problem you describe. I do
know that jsMath was used earlier when we were looking at the IE font
issue. Did this change as a result of the Sage update that you did,
or is it something
dpvc wrote:
It looks like this notebook no longer uses jsMath to render the result
of var('n m'), so I can't reproduce the problem you describe. I do
know that jsMath was used earlier when we were looking at the IE font
issue. Did this change as a result of the Sage update that you did,
or
I like the way the proposed patch wipes the slate fairly clean. But I
sort of hope it is temporary and at some point a rational autosave
strategy of some sort is implemented. There was an attempt to not
The only issue is that there is no guarantee that the autosave, in
some rational
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 5:51 AM, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
I like the way the proposed patch wipes the slate fairly clean. But I
sort of hope it is temporary and at some point a rational autosave
strategy of some sort is implemented. There was an attempt to not
The only
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 12:35 AM, Stan Schymanski schym...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 for a 'smart' auto backup system. I don't know whether it was the
snapshot saving or what did it, but I never bothered saving notebooks
while working with them and never lost any data after crashes.
When a
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 5:51 AM, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
I like the way the proposed patch wipes the slate fairly clean. But I
sort of hope it is temporary and at some point a rational autosave
strategy of some sort is implemented. There was an attempt to not
The only
Hi all,
I am new to Sage and I don't quite understand how to convert my code
to cython code to speed up my program. I am doing a lot of symbolic
manipulations and using the PolynomialRing object. Below I have some
of my code so that you can see the types of manipulations I hope to
speed up:
Hi Dylan,
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 12:47 PM, drupel dylanru...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I am new to Sage and I don't quite understand how to convert my code
to cython code to speed up my program. I am doing a lot of symbolic
manipulations and using the PolynomialRing object. Below I have
Thanks Mike,
Is it possible to do the symbolic computations with Cython?
If not, I will wait until Sage 4.0 comes out and see what happens.
Dylan
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 1:40 PM, drupel dylanru...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Mike,
Is it possible to do the symbolic computations with Cython?
Yes, you can do them from within Cython, but it's not going to give
you the speed up that you might think / want. Making code faster is
almost entirely
Is there a way of searching for functions which contain a particular
string in their names? Yesterday I was trying to find the extended
Euclidean algorithm (xgcd); my search would have been trivial if I
could have searched for all functions containing the string gcd. As
it was I found it almost
On Apr 24, 10:49 am, Mikie thephantom6...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Just installed Sage on CentOS 5.3 server. Local system. I am getting
sage-sage: line 197 6520 Illegal instruction sage-ipyth $@ -i.
Any help would be appreciated.
What Sage release precisely are you using, i.e. version,
On Apr 24, 1:42 pm, Alasdair amc...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a way of searching for functions which contain a particular
string in their names? Yesterday I was trying to find the extended
Euclidean algorithm (xgcd); my search would have been trivial if I
could have searched for all
Version 3.4 for CentOS rel 5_2. Before I get the error below it says
Warning; Sage was built on a machine that does not support
instructions for this computer. Processor flags not on this
computer: pni
On Apr 24, 3:04 pm, mabshoff michael.absh...@mathematik.uni-
dortmund.de wrote:
On Apr
Sage is trying to modify the file sage-flags.txt.
On Apr 24, 3:29 pm, Mikie thephantom6...@hotmail.com wrote:
Version 3.4 for CentOS rel 5_2. Before I get the error below it says
Warning; Sage was built on a machine that does not support
instructions for this computer. Processor flags not
On Apr 24, 2:33 pm, Mikie thephantom6...@hotmail.com wrote:
Sage is trying to modify the file sage-flags.txt.
It should open it read only, but let me check.
On Apr 24, 3:29 pm, Mikie thephantom6...@hotmail.com wrote:
Version 3.4 for CentOS rel 5_2. Before I get the error below it says
I sent a copy of my code and a few samples of what I would like to do
with it to your gmail.
Thanks for your help,
Dylan
On Apr 24, 1:48 pm, Mike Hansen mhan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 1:40 PM, drupel dylanru...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Mike,
Is it possible to do the
Thanks - that's just what I wanted to know. Wouldn't be nice if Sage
had something like Matlab's lookfor command, which gives you the
name of all functions containing that substring, and a very brief
(half line) description.
-A.
On Apr 25, 7:29 am, John H Palmieri jhpalmier...@gmail.com wrote:
Notice first and second are very similar except for the cos() and exp
().
Why first one ok but second bombs?
sage: numerical_integral(sin(pi*cos(x/2)),0,2)[0]
0.85397903781471396
sage: numerical_integral(sin(pi*exp(x/2)),0,2)[0]
On Apr 24, 7:03 pm, Chris Seberino cseber...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Notice first and second are very similar except for the cos() and exp
().
Why first one ok but second bombs?
sage: numerical_integral(sin(pi*cos(x/2)),0,2)[0]
0.85397903781471396
I guess you are using Sage 3.4?
Works
Hello all. hope all is well w/ all of u. anywho, when ever i try to
use the sage program by writing note as it instructs me to do so, it
doesn't appear to work. i am getting an error which states,
sh: cannot create notebook.log: Permission denied echo: write erro:
Broken pipe
Does any one kno
Dear Minh, dear Michael,
thanks a lot.
Thanks to Minh for this simple but fine idea to compile in a command
line session!
Meanwhile the RAM I had bought has arrived and with the now available
more than 300 MB I let the compiler run once again. This time it
seemed to freeze at the same point
25 matches
Mail list logo
