On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 7:26 PM, Jason Grout
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Justin C. Walker wrote:
On Oct 27, 2008, at 17:32 , Jason Grout wrote:
Justin C. Walker wrote:
Thanks, William,
On Oct 27, 2008, at 4:26 PM, William Stein wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 4:23 PM, Justin C. Walker
2008/10/28 John Cremona [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
It should not be difficult to convert the power series over GF(p) to
pari. If you do
sage: R.x=PowerSeriesRing(GF(5),x)
sage: f = x^2+1
and then
sage: f._pari_??
you will see the comment that converson of power series from Sage to
pari is
Hi Jason,
This is most interesting, as the web page claimed it was a pre-
compiled binary! I did what you said, renamed the 'README' to
'install' and executed it, but I got quite a few error messages,
starting with 'tcsh: /bin/ls: No match.' I put them up at
Thank you for you answer Robert
Just the alternative to fetch_int I needed.
The problem was that if you try to use fetch_int on a field of larger
size than GF(5^5) e.g. GF(3^42), then SAGE will switch to PARI finite
field objects and then the fetch_int will not work. But you small
alternative
Just to add another view, I can never remember all the different
function names, so I find it very convenient to have namespace
pollution as Martin Rubey calls it. If I look for a certain plot
function, I would like to be able to type plot and then hit the tab
button to see all the possible
2008/10/28 Stan Schymanski [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Just to add another view, I can never remember all the different
function names, so I find it very convenient to have namespace
pollution as Martin Rubey calls it. If I look for a certain plot
function, I would like to be able to type plot and
Dear team,
On Oct 27, 12:15 pm, Simon King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
So, it seems to me that theleakmight come from other compiled
components.
Libsingular? This is what I'm using most frequently.
Now i am sure that the leak is in libsingular.
I produced an F5 version that thoroughly
On Oct 27, 10:42 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 9:15 PM, Sameer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to port sage 3.1.1 to an IBM Power5 AIX system. After
I install gap (in 32 bits), I get:
So how far did you get building Sage? If GAP is the
Stan Schymanski wrote:
Hi Jason,
This is most interesting, as the web page claimed it was a pre-
compiled binary! I did what you said, renamed the 'README' to
'install' and executed it, but I got quite a few error messages,
starting with 'tcsh: /bin/ls: No match.' I put them up at
UPDATE:
The command 'y.subs(a)' as used above does not do what I thought. It
just substitutes the variable that comes first in the alphabet with
the definition for a!!!
In this case it did the right thing coincidentally, but not in the
below case:
Stan Schymanski wrote:
Hi Jason,
Sorry about this. For some reasons, it didn't work for me, either, but
now I re-applied the permissions and it seems to work again. Could you
try it again? ftp://ftp.bgc-jena.mpg.de/pub/outgoing/sschym/qepcad_errors1
If it doesn't work, try the base
Stan Schymanski wrote:
Hi Jason,
Sorry about this. For some reasons, it didn't work for me, either, but
now I re-applied the permissions and it seems to work again. Could you
try it again? ftp://ftp.bgc-jena.mpg.de/pub/outgoing/sschym/qepcad_errors1
You could also try emailing Chris Brown
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 8:24 AM, Stan Schymanski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jason,
Thanks for trying to help. I suppose that Chris Brown is in a similar
situation as you and does not have an osx box to compile his code. It
would probably be more efficient if someone with an osx box and
I get the following very weird result:
sage: A=axiom.series(z,z=0)
sage: A
sage: A
z
sage: B = (1/(1-A^2))
sage: B
246810 11
1 + z + z + z + z + z + O(z )
sage: A
246810 11
1 + z + z + z + z + z + O(z )
sage: A
z
sage:
Bill Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Expect.__init__(self,
name = 'axiom',
prompt = '\([0-9]+\) - ',
command = sh -c 'axiom -nox -noclef | cat',
Apart from modifying axiom.py, do I have to do anything else? Compiling,
On Oct 28, 9:31 am, Martin Rubey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Martin,
Bill Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Expect.__init__(self,
name = 'axiom',
prompt = '\([0-9]+\) - ',
command = sh -c 'axiom -nox -noclef | cat',
On Oct 28, 9:55 am, Martin Rubey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SNIP
After changing axiom.py in the $SAGE_ROOT/devel/sage tree run ./sage -
b from $SAGE_ROOT. Note that you are changing the main Sage library
and that the repo then has outstanding uncommitted changes. Upgrading
such an
On Oct 28, 10:06 am, Martin Rubey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Oct 28, 9:55 am, Martin Rubey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SNIP
After changing axiom.py in the $SAGE_ROOT/devel/sage tree run ./sage -
b from $SAGE_ROOT. Note that you are changing the
mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Oct 28, 9:55 am, Martin Rubey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SNIP
After changing axiom.py in the $SAGE_ROOT/devel/sage tree run ./sage -
b from $SAGE_ROOT. Note that you are changing the main Sage library
and that the repo then has outstanding
mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hm, not really. For my students, it's a site wide installation (and I'm not
root) and it was already quite an effort to get sage running in the first
place.
All you need to do is
./sage -i fricas-1.0.3.p0
This doesn't touch anything outside
On Oct 28, 10:23 am, Martin Rubey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hm, not really. For my students, it's a site wide installation (and I'm
not
root) and it was already quite an effort to get sage running in the first
place.
All you need to do is
On Oct 27, 2008, at 1:02 PM, Martin Rubey wrote:
David Joyner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 1:59 PM, Martin Rubey
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear William,
thanks for your quick answer, even though it doesn't make me too
happy. I'm
having a hard time here, I must
mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You need to have write permission to the $SAGE_ROOT tree to install
any spkg.
Would be really nice, if this could be changed in future. Suppose university
provides sage, but without package SupiDupi, which is really super trooper.
Then I need to install all
On Oct 28, 10:44 am, Martin Rubey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You need to have write permission to the $SAGE_ROOT tree to install
any spkg.
Would be really nice, if this could be changed in future. Suppose university
provides sage, but without package
On Oct 27, 2008, at 2:15 PM, cesarnda wrote:
is there a way to do that in a fancy way in pure cython?
No, the cartesian_product_iterator will still work in the context of
Sage though, as will Georg's solution.
If I needed to do this loop super fast for an arbitrary number of k,
I might
2008/10/28 Robert Bradshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Oct 27, 2008, at 2:15 PM, cesarnda wrote:
is there a way to do that in a fancy way in pure cython?
No, the cartesian_product_iterator will still work in the context of
Sage though, as will Georg's solution.
If I needed to do this loop
On Oct 28, 2008, at 12:38 PM, John Cremona wrote:
2008/10/28 Robert Bradshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Oct 27, 2008, at 2:15 PM, cesarnda wrote:
is there a way to do that in a fancy way in pure cython?
No, the cartesian_product_iterator will still work in the context of
Sage though, as will
Jason Grout [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
var(t)
y=function('y',t)
solve(diff(y,t,2)-2*diff(y,t)+diff(y,t)==3, y(t))
to solve for y(t).
Doesn't Axiom work this way?
Yes. (well, FriCAS is what I'm developing) Actually, one thing which is really
nice about FriCAS is that it's very
Silly me!
I used
sudo ./sage -optional
and everything work fines.
It was all about write permissions.
Thanks for your answers
On 28 Οκτ, 03:06, nostart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 28 Οκτ, 02:45, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dortmund.de wrote:
On Oct 27, 5:44 pm, nostart [EMAIL
-- Forwarded message --
From: pong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 9:42 PM
Subject: Re: Bug in ploting odd roots?
To: William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi William,
I have a similar problem and found this old post. Is there a less
complicated solution by now?
30 matches
Mail list logo
