Greetings ...
I have an FC1 installation with all the updates. I have a few of
these, but one of my installations has just freaked out. None of my
users can login.
I have tried ...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# smbclient -L //richardsbay -N
protocol negotiation failed
Which is odd. I
| Hope I can get some help on printing problems.
| I have samba 3.0.0-15 as a PDC and printer server for
| a small netwrok - Win98, XP and 2000.
| I installed printer drivers on my server using cups
| 1.1.20 (and ghostscript ESP 7.07) but I have a few
| problems with the clients. XP downloaded the
Greetings ...
I'm using the cupsaddsmb to upload the CUPS printer drivers onto
my Samba server, but seem to be having problems with new printer
queues. I find if that I reload Samba, the upload works fine, otherwise
I get result was WERR_INVALID_PRINTER_NAME, which I think maybe Samba
Thanks for your quick responce ...
I'm using the cupsaddsmb to upload the CUPS printer drivers onto
my Samba server, but seem to be having problems with new printer
queues. I find if that I reload Samba, the upload works fine,
otherwise I get result was WERR_INVALID_PRINTER_NAME, which I
Greetings ...
Let's keep the list in on this, other people might be able to get
info from this too ...
Wendell Wilson wrote:
Still more clues! Partially 'fixed.'
Okay ...
doing ` net rpc user -S domain name info user name `
I can't get this to work ... it just does not return any
Greetings ...
Has anyone ever got command line only Windows 95 DOS to connect to a Samba
machine? I can connect to an NT machine no problem using net use ..., but
the only machine the DOS machine will see on the network is the NT machine;
all of the others, including my Linux machines and a
it ... so I really don't know ...
Mailed
Lee
Wendell
C.Lee Taylor wrote:
Greetings ...
I hope somebody can explain this to me, or give me a help to fix
this problem ...
On my Samba server ( 3.0.2rc2 ) I am getting ...
Feb 9 17:31:21 eastrand smbd[2113]: [2004/02/09 17:31:21, 0
Greetings ...
I hope somebody can explain this to me, or give me a help to fix
this problem ...
On my Samba server ( 3.0.2rc2 ) I am getting ...
Feb 9 17:31:21 eastrand smbd[2113]: [2004/02/09 17:31:21, 0]
rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_pipe_netsec_process(1371)
Feb 9 17:31:21 eastrand
Greetings ...
I saw a question about this go out a little while ago, I was
wondering, if they are bad, or if I can just ignore them?
I am using a Samba 3.0.2rc1 if that makes a differance ...
Thanks
Mailed
Lee
Jan 29 09:58:09 nasrec smbd_audit[19242]: rmdir ./ failed: Invalid argument
Greetings ...
Thanks again for your responce ... it currently feels like I am
banding my head against a M$ Wall ...
Now if we use winbind, we can't setup the Linux servers as PDC.
This is incorrect. Winbind runs perfectly fine against Samba 3.0.
No, what I mean, if you enable
Greetings ...
If I setup a trust between my Samba 3.0.2rc1 domain and a Win2K3 AD
domain, plus I enable kerbros which points to the Win2K3 server, would
that let users in using my unix id?
Because if I browse my Samba server from the Win2K3 server and
access a share, I see that my Samba
Greetings ...
Thanks for you reply Andrew, I think I will try and explain again
what I am trying to do, maybe I am just going at this the wrong way ...
I'm not sure what you mean here.
We have two applications which will be distributed by Citrix. I
would like to have one username and
Greetings ...
Andrew Bartlett wrote:
I am posting here, because I believe this a little more technical than
I can't get my server work? ...
This is still not the place. Samba technical is not technical
support, it's technical development of Samba.
Okay, sorry ... done ...
Sorry
Greetings ...
Downloaded and recompiled for my installation Samba 3.0.2pre1, tested
and all is working. I am able to access the shares with the server name
fine.
Thanks
Mailed
Lee
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
[2004/01/05 18:42:30, 1] smbd/sesssetup.c:reply_spnego_kerberos(172)
Failed to verify incoming ticket!
Is there any special configuration I have to do on Active
Directory to
become AD authentication available to Samba ?
Almost certainly, you are running version 3.0.1, which as best
The results so far are:
183 responses
96% use Samba for File and Print
73% use Samba for Domain Control
Does this mean there is only 183 people using Samba? No, maybe just a
little hard to find the survey, it did not stand out. Did you get a
page hit count for the
Fernando Ruza wrote:
Still with the problem. I have tested with the version 3.0.0 and right,
I can see the shares however cannot connect to the home shares or shares
with valid users option in smb.conf. Besides this version cannot
substitute correctly the %D %u %U %S variables. I have written them
Greetings ...
please file a bug for me and we'll work on
Still waiting for an account ... sorry, I don't have time to wait
around, I have to fix this problem chop chop ... ;-}
getting this resolved. This is the 3rd report
of the same symptoms. Thanks.
Okay, first I throught that
Greetings ...
Sorry for the long post, but I prefer to keep a copy of what I think
is need for this thread ...
As requested, here are my smb.conf ... I have left in my comment to
show what I have been changing and see if it makes a differance ... plus
some shares ( not all that I use )
Greetings ...
I just scanned several lists and HOWTOs for the problem
with valid users = %S in 3.0.1
I know this works, I have tested ... ;-)
where he suggests to use 'valid users = %D+%S' instead,
but this doesn't work, either.
Okay, I think this has to do with winbind, is so the '+' needs to
Greetings ...
where he suggests to use 'valid users = %D+%S' instead,
but this doesn't work, either.
Okay, I think this has to do with winbind, is so the '+' needs to be your
winbind separator, in my case or using the default '\', which let me work ...
Sorry, but I can't
Greetings ...
It seems I have really got myself confused ...
I have a Win2K3 ADS domain, I have two FedoraCore systems, one with
Samba 3.0.0 and the other with Samba 3.0.1. Both give me the same problem.
If I try access the Samba shares from Win2K3 using the host number,
I get
Greetings ...
please file a bug for me and we'll work on
I hate doing that, I always get lost ... but I am doing it now ...
this things I do in the name of OpenSource ... ;-)
getting this resolved. This is the 3rd report
of the same symptoms. Thanks.
I have seen the reports, but they
Greetings ...
Does anyone know of a document that gives details on how to set up Bind
9 and DHCPD 3.x so that dns is updated when clients log on?
I saw this is not in the howto collection
(http://www.bibsyst.no/samba/docs/man/DNSDHCP.html#id2981727) so I was
kind of hoping someone else has
Redirecting My Documnets isn't a tricky one.
Please don't take this discuss off the list ... I have an interest
in see what other people have done.
Thanks
Mailed
Lee
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
Greetings ...
2003/12/11 14:54:19, 3] libads/kerberos_verify.c:ads_verify_ticket(308)
~ ads_verify_ticket: enc type [23] failed to decrypt with error Decrypt
integrity check failed
[2003/12/11 14:54:19, 3] libads/kerberos_verify.c:ads_verify_ticket(316)
~ ads_verify_ticket: krb5_rd_req
Marc Perkel wrote:
| So - how about some Fedora binaries in your
| redhat collection?
I'm working on it. We will have them ready for 3.0.1.
Excellent ...
Thanks for the great work.
Mailed
Lee
I have got my ADS/Win2K3 system and Samba3 using winbind. I am
able to do getent passwd, which returns users out of ADS.
My problem is that I wish to have a Samba box at a remote
location, which I currently have, using user accounts stored in LDAP,
but have not choice but to move to
Greetings ...
When i try a getent passwd or getent group, i don't have the windows
users.
I had a same problem, and found that if I had winbind trusted domains only = yes or domain logons = yes then getent passwd would not work, change them both to no and it work fine ...
I looked at you
Greetings ...
Okay, I was going to send this to Tech, but throught better of it.
I have got my ADS/Win2K3 system and Samba3 using winbind. I am able
to do getent passwd, which returns users out of ADS.
My problem is that I wish to have a Samba box at a remote location,
which I
wbinfo --set-auth-user=Administrator%password
NEVER do this.
There is never a good reason to do this. The wbinfo command is for NT4
trusted domains, that are running 'restrict anonymous'. If you are
joined with ADS, and there are ADS trusts to these machines, then Samba
can use
Installed the rpm from Samba.org for RedHat 9, and found the same problem ... removing valid users = %S from [home] gettings it working, but I do remember somebody explaining that this option makes things a little more secure.
Is this true, and is this a bug or is there something better to
jean-marc pouchoulon wrote:
Thanks for your answer.
My pleasure ...
But it didn't work.
Was this, to do with winbind and getent passwd?
There is no ldap request except for user with posix account. ( I can see
these users using getent )
I don't think there will be any LDAP requested
Greetings ...
Installed the rpm from Samba.org for RedHat 9, and found the same problem ... removing valid users = %S from [home] gettings it working, but I do remember somebody explaining that this option makes things a little more secure.
Is this true, and is this a bug or is there something
Greetings ...
Have a question, was is the advantages of use pam_winbind verses
pam_krb5 for Samba user authentaction?
I mean, if I point my Linux box Kerberos to a Win2003 AD server, I
am able to authenticate my users out of AD, but at the moment still
having problems with winbind and
Brian C Otto wrote:
I've had it in that situation.
So I am not alone ... I want to thank some dite, but think it best
not too ...
it means winbind is querying properly, but that the winbind-nsswitch/pam
stuff isn't. Are you using pam?
That seems to be the problem ... put pam stuff in
Brian C Otto wrote:
Hmm. you're doing a 'net ads join -U administrator' ?
Actually, I do ...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]#kinit -V [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Password for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Authenticated to Kerberos v5
then
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# net ads join -U Administrator
Administrator
Brian C Otto wrote:
Damn. Sounds like all the ducks are in order.
That's what I throught ...
hmm. I'll try and remember any more 'gotcha's' I might have encountered.
Thanks, if you do, you have my e-mail ...
Sorry I've not been much help.
I disagree, you have at least put me at
Greetings ...
Once again I have spent a day tring to get winbind doing what I
believe it should be doing, but with no luck, so I am asking if anybody
would be able to help me ...
I have checked admin details, with kinit -V and they are fine. Then
join by Samba box to AD domain, done an
Using winbind for authentication through PDC.
Problem: Some users do not get access to the samba share and some do.
When I do wbinfo -u the users who cannot access show up but when I do
getent passwd, they are not there. What does this mean?
It means that you likely do not have in your
Robert A Wooldridge wrote:
I have tried both ways for groups. With files winbinded and without.
It makes no difference to this problem.
Myself ... having problems with winbind and can't seem to work them
out ...
I don't understand the 2nd question you have here.
Well, running getent
Greetings ...
When I used the command ./net ads join -U ADMINISTRATOR it asked
me for the password, after I entered the password it came back
with a responce of:
[2003/08/22 08:53:16, 1] libsmb/clikrb5.c:ads_krb5_mk_req(267) krb5_cc_get_principal
failed (No credentials cache found)
Greetings ...
When I run ./wbinfo -t it returns with a error of :
checking the trust secret via RPC calls failed
error code was (0x0)
Could not check secret
Whats wrong?
Had the same problem on a RedHat 9 install. Can't tell you what is wrong, but I grab the src.rpm from RedHat's RawHide,
Greetings ...
I am tring to setup a domain controlled by a Win2K3 ADS servers.
Using my Linux boxs as domain members and other network services to
provide file and print sharing. I have download and compile 3rc1 and
seem to have hit a brick wall.
I can get the idmap in winbind to work,
Installed Samba 3.0.0rc1, and seem to be having problems with winbind.
First question, shouldn't wbinfo -t return success? I have wbinfo
I grab the RawHide src and updated to 3rc1 and wbinfo -t now works, seems like a problem with mkrpm in 3rc1. I will look further once I have my system
Greetings ...
i've been trying to get samba 3 to join my AD domain, and have gotten stuck.
So have I ...
when I wbinfo -t it returns Could not check secret
Had a similar problem ... but mine was complaining that it could not use rpc for the check ...
I download RawHides src.rpm and updated,
Greetings ...
Installed Samba 3.0.0rc1, and seem to be having problems with winbind.
First question, shouldn't wbinfo -t return success? I have wbinfo
-u, wbinfo -g, wbinfo -p and wbinfo --sequence returning what
seems to be valid information.
Second, where does winbind keep the
Chee Wai Yeung wrote:
Hi,
Greetings ...
try to look for an RPM for perl_ldap.
Downloaded three differant srpms and tried to compile them myself
before asking on the list if I need this to run. I still have this
problem on test box. I think this might be a problem with RedHat 9,
Greetings ...
Download and created an rpm with my changes that I will use, but why
am I getting a
Failed dependencies:
perl(Net::LDAP::LDIF) is needed by samba-3.0.0beta1-1lnx1
Should I need this, and I can't seem to find an rpm for this. I
have tried to make a few, but they just
Greetings ...
Just got bitten in the ass by not been able to join the domain with 2.2.7a
Correct me if I am wrong, Jerry did give me a quick explaination. It
has to do with usernames and what allowable characters in it for security.
Now, I need to fix this, does anybody have a patch/fix
Just got bitten in the ass by not been able to join the domain with
2.2.7a
Correct me if I am wrong, Jerry did give me a quick explaination. It
has to do with usernames and what allowable characters in it for security.
Now, I need to fix this, does anybody have a patch/fix or tell
Robert Adkins wrote:
Unless your users are using Outlook (or virtually any E-mail client for
that matter) I have a few users with .PST files that are over 1Gig in
size. This is due to the regular amount of data files that we are sent. I
have discussed with them the need to trim those
Now, where my problem is, when I have some users who have huge
documents folder, this log on and log off takes a long time, not mention
the problems I have run into when their computer is turn off
incorrectly. I am sure this is a Micro$oftism, but is there a way to
use roaming profiles, but have
Bart wrote:
Or ju put the documents on the home drive and change the target of the
'my documents' folder to this home drive.
that way you have security all the docs on a mounted drive.
We did that with Win98SE, and found that some times it would change
back or to something that should cause
John H Terpstra wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, C.Lee Taylor wrote:
Bart wrote:
Or ju put the documents on the home drive and change the target of the
'my documents' folder to this home drive.
that way you have security all the docs on a mounted drive.
We did that with Win98SE, and found
Greetings ...
I have a quick question, which I hope will get a straight and quick answer.
I am moving my system from flat files to LDAP. I have had my users in
LDAP for a while, but then found that my computer accounts for Win2K in
still in passwd. My question is, what are the bare minume
Greetings ...
This is a stupid question which have been wanting to ask for awhile,
and hope somebody can help me.
Profiles, if I understand it correctly come in two forms, local and
roaming? Now local in on the computer the user uses and roaming is one
that is download from the server when
I am moving my system from flat files to LDAP. I have had my users in
LDAP for a while, but then found that my computer accounts for Win2K in
still in passwd. My question is, what are the bare minume LDAP attribs
that I need for them to contiune to work?
AFAIK, just sambaAccount and related
Ignacio Coupeau wrote:
http://www.unav.es/cti/ldap-smb/ldap-smb-2_2-howto.html#patches
Tested the rebind stuff with ldap in round robin (master/slave)
Some fixes
Applied, compiled and will test ... Thanks.
Tar and diff -uRn textfiles available:
Thanks for the work ...
But I have a quick question ... is it needed to make two functions
which look the same except for the function name ... is it not better
just to have the two parm and three parm call #if def?
I think that you might have this in if there is a problem and the
functions
((uid=machine_)(objectclass=sambaAccount))
where it should have been like this:
((uid=machine$)(objectclass=sambaAccount))
This is the alpha_strcpy() stuff again trying to remove unsafe shell
characters.
I am sure, but I am sure that I did a Machine Account add with 2.2.7,
is this a change
Buchan Milne wrote:
OK, I stayed a bit late, waiting for things to finish compiling etc ...
You should not work that hard ... ;-)
and did some tests. It seems to work. What I did was just point the
production DC at a slave server, and then
Kewl ...
1)try and change my password
a)while
2.2.* doesn't support referrals at all :-(
It is on a production server, so it is 2.2.7a.
but in the 3.0alpha21 and in HEAD/CVS it should work :-)
Don't just give up on 2.2, I am try and testing the patch
http://www.unav.es/cti/ldap-smb/ldap-smb-2_2-howto.html#patches it
But if you are
I'm also changing/testing the patch in the samba_3 fashion to catch/wrap
the correct version/arguments and so.
You talking about autoconf stuff for testing weather two or three
parameters for ldap_set_rebind_proc?
Thanks, compiles (with warning):
Compiling passdb/pdb_ldap.c
passdb/pdb_ldap.c: In function `ldap_connect_system':
passdb/pdb_ldap.c:289: warning: passing arg 2 of `ldap_set_rebind_proc'
from incompatible pointer type
Will see if I can actually get it working later today (if I can devise
an easy
Seems I was wrong (left out ldap switch ...), it doesn't compile on
cooker, here is the error:
Compiling passdb/pdb_ldap.c
passdb/pdb_ldap.c: In function `ldap_connect_system':
passdb/pdb_ldap.c:289: warning: passing arg 2 of `ldap_set_rebind_proc'
from incompatible pointer type
Standard Samba 2.2.7 does not rebind to do updates. This is a
problem when using LDAP and a replicated directory.
I did try this on the normal mail-list, but got no responce so I hoped
to try here.
I found http://www.unav.es/cti/ldap-smb/ldap-smb-2_2-howto.html,
which has a patch to
Herb Lewis wrote:
You might want to check out the code in the head branch as this already
I would, but I am not a programmer, and downloading head would take
almost forever here in the middle of the sticks.
has a test for ldap_set_rebind_proc having either 2 or 3 parameters.
The rest of your
Standard Samba 2.2.7 does not rebind to do updates. This is a
problem when using LDAP and a replicated directory.
I did try this on the normal mail-list, but got no responce so I hoped
to try here.
I found http://www.unav.es/cti/ldap-smb/ldap-smb-2_2-howto.html,
which has a patch to
Greetings ...
Been away a little so, please forgive me if this has been discussed
... I did search the archives and googled the net and this is what I
came up with ...
Standard Samba 2.2.7 does not rebind to do updates. This is a
problem when using LDAP and a replicated directory.
Greetings ...
Been away a little so, please forgive me if this has been discussed ...
I did search the archives and googled the net and this is what I came up
with ...
Standard Samba 2.2.7 does not rebind to do updates. This is a problem
when using LDAP and a replicated directory.
I
ping windows_machine_name
I personal use dnsmasq with dhcp, search freshmeat.net. It's almost a
dynamic dns solution, but with alot less head archs ( it took me a long
time to get dhcp+bind to do ddns )
The only thing that is a little differant, is you will have to use the
full hostname or
Greetings ...
A quick question more to confirm a few things reguarding SMB passwords,
which I hope might be able to look at for password aging.
I saw some discussion on samba-tech list, but nothing conclusive.
LM and NT hashs don't have a salt? Do they? ... In other words, a
password
Each winNT user has a drive mapped to their home directory. Therefore, Fred
has H:\ mapped to the linux /home/fred/samba share, and Russel has H:\ mapped
to the linux /home/russel/samba share (remember is is all on the same box).
However, when Fred logs off, and Russel logs on, Russel is
Greetings ...
I am seeing a funny and would just to point it out ... I have a Samba 2.2.5
running in a server with two ethernet interfaces.
I have in my smb.conf
interfaces = eth1:1
bind interfaces only = Yes
But I am still seeing traffic over
To make a long story short, cross-domain and cross-subnet browsing will not
work with samba. especially if domains are limited to one subnet. That's it.
If anyone is willing/capable of helping me with this, I'd be grateful.
However since my original mail received no responses at all,
Everyone,
Greetings ...
Here are the plans for getting 3.0 ready for release and the
maintainence plans for SAMBA_2_2. Comments welcome.
Great ...
I would love to see this out sometime during the Fall of this
year. Of course, none of this will get done without
I know it is possible to use map archive to keep track of archive
bits, but this is not very useful if you have real UNIX users. I.e. I
can't have samba arbitrarily playing with the execute bits.
Agreed ...
Does anyone know of any attempted implementation of archive bits through
Greetings ...
Quick question, is the Cascaded VFS system applied to cvs?
I don't remember seeing it been applied, but I might have missed it. If I
wish to work with it, should I download the cvs or should I download the
lastet head alpha tar ball and apply 1.1 patch that
Greetings ...
I remember a little while ago about someone talking about storing the DOS
attribs in ext2 EA using a VFS module ... has any one taken this any further?
Thanks
Mailed
Lee
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
Greetings ...
After a little research (somebody did a bit or work ;-O ) with google and
the replies to my questions, this what I think I understand and will test
very soon ( Hope not to make an ass of myself. )
Andrew Bartlett wrote:
Samba 2.2 supports being trusted by NT. Its a bit
(Embedded
image moved C.Lee Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to file: 06/06/2002 01:54 PM
pic26037.pcx
(Embedded
image moved C.Lee Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to file: 06/06/2002 01:54 PM
pic05180.pcx
Thanks all for responding, it seems my digest samba mail had a virus, so I
did not get to read all the reply (I am sure there were many ;-) )
Andrew Bartlett wrote:
Sylvestre Taburet wrote:
Le Mardi 4 Juin 2002 15:23, C.Lee Taylor a écrit :
Greetings ...
Please could someone confirm
Greetings ...
Please could someone confirm that Samba 2.2.x and Samba 3.0 ( Head ) does
not support Trusts between domains.
Thanks
Mailed
Lee
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Greetings ...
I am getting alot of messages in my log ... I don't mind the
messages, it's just they don't look like good messages ...
Are these messages something to worry about? ... Is there a
way to get the logs to display the NETBIOS name of the
computer that it is
Greetings ...
Hoping that somebody could help me ...
We just found file corruption on our Redat Linux 7.2, only on
our Samba share drive ...
Is it possilbe for Samba to corrupt the FS?
Details of our installation ...
Celeron 900MHz
256MB Ram
87 matches
Mail list logo
