Hi,
I have a new Canon Lide 220.
If I try to scan a 150 dpi grey file, the output is unreadable.
150dpi color is ok
300 dpi grey is ok
an example:
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/xmd5axjxn0n07z7/AADMt_fuQ98i6m3aZbSKPNbJa?dl=0
The scanner is doing on any scan a calibration (?) or something,
2017-03-20 22:20 keltezéssel, grepnoid írta:
> Thank you for that. I did get it to work under Linux using xsane and genesys
> driver. Details of how to do it are here
> http://gsusmonzon.blogspot.co.uk/2015/06/canon-lide-220-in-ubuntu-1404.html
> My comment explains that I was using an old
Thank you for that. I did get it to work under Linux using xsane and genesys
driver. Details of how to do it are here
http://gsusmonzon.blogspot.co.uk/2015/06/canon-lide-220-in-ubuntu-1404.html
My comment explains that I was using an old Ubuntu with a probably-too-old
genesys driver. A compile
2017-03-20 14:54 keltezéssel, viruxx írta:
> hi here, if you want, i can write you a little java program
> like i made with my ricoh aficio unsupported scanner
>
> just need the usblyser report of scans in differents modes
>
> color 100 dpi
> grayscale 100 dpi
>
> color 300 dpi
> grayscale 300 dpi
hi here, if you want, i can write you a little java program
like i made with my ricoh aficio unsupported scanner
just need the usblyser report of scans in differents modes
color 100 dpi
grayscale 100 dpi
color 300 dpi
grayscale 300 dpi
maybe one with 600
i just need the start and the end of
Kind scanner
companions... and separate respect for the experts of the topic!
More, than half I try to use it eaten Lide Canon with 220 types
my scanner: vainly...
I received a council looking like much good one, but so much
were most
Xsane error message...
Hiba = Error
Nem sikerült beindítani a lapolvasót. = He did not manage to start the
scanner
Hiba az eszköz B/K alatt = Mistake the device in/out under
Bezárás = Close
--
sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
2016-11-28 11:25 keltezéssel, Gerrit Borgers írta:
> I made 3 further pictures to show, what to do: You have to CREATE
> the *40-libsane.rules* with yout texteditor "as superuser"
>
> 1.) open your terminal write "su" (without "")
>
> 2.) write your superuser-password (you use it for updates)
>
>
Hello,
it is not yet working, here is what I did so far:
In /etc/udev/rules.d/55-libsane.rules:
# Canon LiDE 220 USB Scanner
ATTR{idVendor}=="04a9", ATTR{idProduct}=="190f", ENV{libsane_matched}="yes",
RUN+="/tmp/canon_script.sh"
In /tmp/canon_script.sh:
#! /bin/bash
date > /tmp/canon.txt
env
Hello,
On Jan 8 16:44 Torsten Mohr wrote (excerpt):
I bought the Canon LiDE 220, it is documented that it is
fully supported by the genesys backend:
http://www.sane-project.org/sane-mfgs.html#Z-CANON
It is documented to be supported by
the current SANE release 1.0.25.
Hello,
I bought the Canon LiDE 220, it is documented that it is fully supported by
the genesys backend:
http://www.sane-project.org/sane-mfgs.html#Z-CANON
All the following steps I did as root to get around access right problems.
lsusb gives me VID / PID as 0x04A9 / 0x190F,
so i added one
Hi Stef,
On 23 March 2016 at 07:22, Stef wrote:
> On 17/03/2016 08:56, Jonathan Liu wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have opened the following ticket for 4800 dpi scanning on Canon LiDE
>> 220:
>>
>> https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail=315339_id=30186=410366
>>
>> I
Just to add, faking the 220's USB ID to map to the 200 gives the same result.
--
View this message in context:
http://sane.10972.n7.nabble.com/Canon-LiDE-220-tp18977p20698.html
Sent from the SANE - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
sane-devel mailing list:
The thing is, it IS listed in the supported devices list! That's why I
bought it.
sane-find-scanner gives its chip as GL848+ though the list says it's a
GL124+.
There is no source file gl848.c as there are for GL124, GL647 etc.
I have a feeling that Canon have a history of breaking
Hi,
thanks for the answer
unfortunately the scanner is still not stable
I use this command:
scanimage -t 50 -l 80 -x 35 -y 5 -v -p --resolution=4800 --format=tiff >
pic.tif
it makes some noise, little movement than it stops forever
after ca 10 sec I do ctrl-c, it is saying " trying to stop
On 17/03/2016 08:56, Jonathan Liu wrote:
Hi,
I have opened the following ticket for 4800 dpi scanning on Canon LiDE 220:
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail=315339_id=30186=410366
I just want to confirm, does this scanner support 4800 dpi x 4800 dpi
scanning as indicated in
Hi,
I have opened the following ticket for 4800 dpi scanning on Canon LiDE 220:
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail=315339_id=30186=410366
I just want to confirm, does this scanner support 4800 dpi x 4800 dpi
scanning as indicated in the manufacturer specification? I was
John S. Weber writes:
> I am having one issue which seems like a driver bug. Using Xsane
> through gimp, set to grayscale 300 and 1200 dpi, the scan is fine. At
> 600dpi the pixel dimension of the scan is correct, but the lengthwise
> aspect ratio is stretched so that only maybe 2/3 of a
On 31/08/2015 17:38, Ron Bean wrote:
John S. Weber writes:
I am having one issue which seems like a driver bug. Using Xsane
through gimp, set to grayscale 300 and 1200 dpi, the scan is fine. At
600dpi the pixel dimension of the scan is correct, but the lengthwise
aspect ratio is stretched so
On 07/01/2015 10:47 PM, stef wrote:
On 01/07/2015 19:23, John Weber wrote:
On 06/29/2015 01:57 PM, Stef wrote:
Hello,
I was expecting something like that.
All DBG_io2 a mere traces, and I don't see how much they slow down
things. Since I don't have this kind of problem on
On 07/01/2015 10:47 PM, stef wrote:
Hello,
the file to modify is backend/genesys_low.c
For instance, line 251 turn :
DBG( DBG_io2, sanei_genesys_read_hregister(0x%02x)=0x%02x\n,reg,*val);
into:
DBG( DBG_data, sanei_genesys_read_hregister(0x%02x)=0x%02x\n,reg,*val);
On 06/29/2015 01:57 PM, Stef wrote:
Hello,
I was expecting something like that.
All DBG_io2 a mere traces, and I don't see how much they slow down
things. Since I don't have this kind of problem on my hardware, I need
your help. I don't see no other approach than trial and
On 01/07/2015 19:23, John Weber wrote:
On 06/29/2015 01:57 PM, Stef wrote:
Hello,
I was expecting something like that.
All DBG_io2 a mere traces, and I don't see how much they slow down
things. Since I don't have this kind of problem on my hardware, I need
your help. I don't
On 06/29/2015 01:57 PM, Stef wrote:
On 23/06/2015 16:08, John Weber wrote:
On 06/22/2015 10:40 PM, Stef wrote:
Hi Stef,
Debug levels are defined like this for genesys_low:
genesys_low.h:#define DBG_io 6/* io functions */
genesys_low.h:#define DBG_io2 7/* io
You still have to 'make'.
allan
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 11:03 AM, John Weber jwebe...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/29/2015 01:57 PM, Stef wrote:
On 23/06/2015 16:08, John Weber wrote:
On 06/22/2015 10:40 PM, Stef wrote:
Hi Stef,
Debug levels are defined like this for genesys_low:
I did 'make'. I wouldn't have backend/.libs/libsane-genesys.so
otherwise, right?
$ ls -l backend/.libs/libsane-genesys.so
lrwxrwxrwx 1 jweber jweber 25 Jun 30 08:25
backend/.libs/libsane-genesys.so - libsane-genesys.so.1.0.25*
$ ls -l backend/.libs/libsane-genesys.so.1.0.25
-rwxrwxr-x 1 jweber
On 30/06/2015 19:06, John Weber wrote:
I did 'make'. I wouldn't have backend/.libs/libsane-genesys.so
otherwise, right?
$ ls -l backend/.libs/libsane-genesys.so
lrwxrwxrwx 1 jweber jweber 25 Jun 30 08:25
backend/.libs/libsane-genesys.so - libsane-genesys.so.1.0.25*
$ ls -l
On 23/06/2015 16:08, John Weber wrote:
On 06/22/2015 10:40 PM, Stef wrote:
Hi Stef,
Debug levels are defined like this for genesys_low:
genesys_low.h:#define DBG_io 6/* io functions */
genesys_low.h:#define DBG_io2 7/* io functions that are
called very often */
On 06/22/2015 10:40 PM, Stef wrote:
Hi Stef,
Debug levels are defined like this for genesys_low:
genesys_low.h:#define DBG_io 6/* io functions */
genesys_low.h:#define DBG_io2 7/* io functions that are
called very often */
genesys_low.h:#define DBG_data8
On 21/06/2015 23:04, John S. Weber wrote:
Hi,
I recently purchased a Canon LIDE 220 as it was claimed to be support
by sane. I put the USB code (04a9:190f) into the Scanner Search
Engine at the sane.org http://sane.org and it yielded this page
which says support is complete.
Hi,
I recently purchased a Canon LIDE 220 as it was claimed to be support by
sane. I put the USB code (04a9:190f) into the Scanner Search Engine at the
sane.org and it yielded this page which says support is complete.
http://www.sane-project.org/cgi-bin/driver.pl?manu=model=bus=anyv=04a9p=190f
On 15/03/15 07:43, Stef wrote:
what is needed is a log recorded when doing a preview when running
windows O/S. The log tool to use is usbpcap http://desowin.org/usbpcap/ .
Would a Wireshark log help, while running Windows in VirtualBox?
I have such a log, however, am not able to generate
On 14/03/2015 18:12, Jochen wrote:
Hi Stef, I understand you're asking for a log from somebody with a LiDE
120 doing a preview. Me, I'd be happy to see my LiDE 120 supported by
SANE. So if you tell me what to do and how to even make my LiDE 120 do
anything loggable, I'll see if I can provide
Hi Stef, I understand you're asking for a log from somebody with a LiDE
120 doing a preview. Me, I'd be happy to see my LiDE 120 supported by
SANE. So if you tell me what to do and how to even make my LiDE 120 do
anything loggable, I'll see if I can provide that. Unfortunately, I am
not much of a
That is amazing. You're awesome.
So, since this is my first scanner with linux, I have to ask a stupid
question: Is there a development repo or do I need to use git to get a
sane version with these updates (when they're ready of course)?
On 02/26/2015 09:35 PM, Stef wrote:
Hello,
while
On 28/02/2015 17:00, Rafe DiDomenico wrote:
That is amazing. You're awesome.
So, since this is my first scanner with linux, I have to ask a stupid
question: Is there a development repo or do I need to use git to get a
sane version with these updates (when they're ready of course)?
On
Great work Stef!
Lot of thanks for your effort
Regards.
El 26/02/15 a las 21:35, Stef escribió:
Hello,
while comparing logs between LiDE 210 and LiDE 220, I noticed they
were only differing by the ck1map value. After changing this value I
had color scan mode working from 75 to 4800 dpi.
Hello,
while comparing logs between LiDE 210 and LiDE 220, I noticed they
were only differing by the ck1map value. After changing this value I had
color scan mode working from 75 to 4800 dpi.
I'm going to add this model properly, and fix some LiDE 110 related
bugs.
But
On 12/02/2015 19:18, Martin Heitmann wrote:
Dear Stef
It is so great to here that you are working on the lide 220. Have the
same problem. Bought it without checking first the availability of
sane backend drivers :(
You said that it will take quite some time. Please don't get this
wrong, I
Hey Stef,
That is great news and thanks for letting us know.
Let me know if I can help. I have the scanner with Ubuntu 14.04.
Michael
On 11/02/15 21:42, Stef wrote:
On 09/02/2015 12:04, Rafe DiDomenico wrote:
Hi all,
So I sort of messed up and picked up this scanner. Now I#m debating
On 09/02/2015 12:04, Rafe DiDomenico wrote:
Hi all,
So I sort of messed up and picked up this scanner. Now I#m debating
whether to return it or not. If there's hope for support in the (not
so distant) future, I'll hold off and wait. I'm just touching base to
see what sort of prospects there
Agreed. Awesome news. I don't have a whole lot of time, and no
programming experience since like freshman year, but if I can help with
something let me know--sniffing or testing or whatever.
On Feb 11, 2015 9:42 PM, Stef stef@free.fr wrote:
On 09/02/2015 12:04, Rafe DiDomenico wrote:
Hi
Hi all,
So I sort of messed up and picked up this scanner. Now I#m debating
whether to return it or not. If there's hope for support in the (not so
distant) future, I'll hold off and wait. I'm just touching base to see
what sort of prospects there are since this model isn't even listed as
Hey there,
I've just caught up on the 'Canon LiDE 220' about that scanner not yet
being supported.
Stef said:
it is a new genesys chip revision. Not datasheet known for this one.
This work would be complicated.
I'm not familiar with sane development so am wondering if you can expand
on
~~~
RE: Canon LiDE 220 on linux mint 13 (maya) mate
Out of the box unfortunately this printer is not found by SimpleScan or
Xsane
$ lsusbreturns
Bus 001 Device 007: ID 04a9:190f Canon, Inc.
$ sane-find-scanner returns:
found USB scanner (vendor=0x04a9 [Canon],
Hi,
The guy in the shop said I could either have a LiDE 220 today or a LiDE 210
on Monday. I choose the LiDE 220 without checking first if it works on
Linux (bad idea).
So to make a long story short here is the link to my Wireshark Dumps:
Hi Stef,
i have bought the same scanner (lide 220) by mistake, have now ordered the
20 because i need a working one quick, however im going to keep the
lide 220 as well, so i can help to get it working.
it seems to have the GL848 chip..
what does 'sane-find-scanner' reports ? You could also
On 21.09.2014 21:28, Stef wrote:
what does 'sane-find-scanner' reports ? You could also send data form
lsusb.
Apart from what Alex already wrote (Chip GL848+), I tried a naive
approach of duplicating the Genesys_Model canon_lide_200_model and
registering it according to the device ID. It was
On 22/09/2014 15:51, Alex wrote:
Hi Stef,
i have bought the same scanner (lide 220) by mistake, have now ordered the
20 because i need a working one quick, however im going to keep the
lide 220 as well, so i can help to get it working.
it seems to have the GL848 chip..
what does
On 22/09/2014 19:35, Andreas Schneider wrote:
On 21.09.2014 21:28, Stef wrote:
what does 'sane-find-scanner' reports ? You could also send data form
lsusb.
Apart from what Alex already wrote (Chip GL848+), I tried a naive
approach of duplicating the Genesys_Model canon_lide_200_model and
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 09:15:30PM +0200, Stef wrote:
Hello,
re,
was 'sane-find-scanner' from SANE 1.0.23 ? Detection has been improved since.
1.0.24 actually.. (was the same output on arch and debian)
Could you send the output
of lsusb -v -d 04a9:190f ?
Regards,
Stef
..sure:
$
On 23/09/2014 02:58, Alex wrote:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 09:15:30PM +0200, Stef wrote:
Hello,
re,
was 'sane-find-scanner' from SANE 1.0.23 ? Detection has been improved since.
1.0.24 actually.. (was the same output on arch and debian)
Could you send the output
of lsusb -v -d 04a9:190f ?
On 20/09/2014 19:57, Andreas Schneider wrote:
Hello,
I just bought a Canon LiDE 220 not fully realizing, that it is so new,
that SANE currently doesn't support it.
What would (most likely) be needed, to add support? Is there any
information I can provide?
Thanks and best regards,
Andreas
Hello,
I just bought a Canon LiDE 220 not fully realizing, that it is so new,
that SANE currently doesn't support it.
What would (most likely) be needed, to add support? Is there any
information I can provide?
Thanks and best regards,
Andreas
--
sane-devel mailing list:
54 matches
Mail list logo