On 2016-03-31 02:53, Tom H wrote:
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 12:10 AM, Benjamin Lefoul
wrote:
But sed -i ALSO changes the inode, and as I said it doesn't work:
root@hoptop:~# touch a
root@hoptop:~# ls -i a
9700011 a
root@hoptop:~# sed -i 's/q/a/g' a
root@hoptop:~# ls
On 2016-03-30 20:35, olli hauer wrote:
On 2016-03-31 05:02, Yasha Karant wrote:
On 03/30/2016 06:56 PM, jdow wrote:
On 2016-03-30 10:59, Yasha Karant wrote:
...
Yasha, you may find you have to modify the virtual box settings so that they
are not trying to use a network connection
On 2016-03-30 10:59, Yasha Karant wrote:
On 03/30/2016 09:14 AM, Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
On Wed, 30 Mar 2016, Benjamin Lefoul wrote:
Hi,
I have set monitor-connection-files=true in my
/etc/NetworkManager/NetworkManager.conf
It works fine (in fact, instantly) if I edit
ransaction.
Original Message
From: jdow
Sent: Friday, March 4, 2016 23:35
To: scientific-linux-us...@fnal.gov
Subject: Re: snooping windows 10 - how to stop it on a linux gateway?
That windows update server is a relay for the "snoop" messages. About the only
way to totally stop the snoop me
using squid
and an external Perl regex filter script or other filter application, but you
will take a latency hit because you will have to inspect every transaction.
Original Message
From: jdow
Sent: Friday, March 4, 2016 23:35
To: scientific-linux-us...@fnal.gov
Subject: Re: snooping windows 10
That windows update server is a relay for the "snoop" messages. About the only
way to totally stop the snoop messages is to totally isolate the network
containing Windows machines from the network. Any windows machine can serve as a
relay point for any others.
{o.o}
On 2016-03-04 20:16,
Can't be done economically. ANY machine that can reach Windows Update will also
feed the snooping reports.
The blocking is probably not needed as it consists of error reports after you've
turned off everything in the various settings dialogs. Of course, one must never
run Cortana if one is
# rpm -qa | grep glibc
glibc-2.12-1.166.el6_7.7.x86_64
glibc-2.12-1.166.el6_7.7.i686
glibc-utils-2.12-1.166.el6_7.7.x86_64
glibc-common-2.12-1.166.el6_7.7.x86_64
glibc-devel-2.12-1.166.el6_7.7.x86_64
glibc-headers-2.12-1.166.el6_7.7.x86_64
Already installed with updates as of a day or so ago.
On 2016-01-27 13:23, David Sommerseth wrote:
On 27/01/16 11:13, jdow wrote:
Fascinating. I made a bad "assumption" about network devices. It seems they
are created dynamically without any presence in /dev.
IIRC, *BSD provides /dev nodes for network devices which the user-spa
On 2016-01-26 22:52, Yasha Karant wrote:
On 01/26/2016 09:41 PM, jdow wrote:
On 2016-01-26 05:17, Tom H wrote:
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 10:12 AM, David Sommerseth
<sl+us...@lists.topphemmelig.net> wrote:
On 26/01/16 08:13, Yasha Karant wrote:
As neither VMware player nor VirtualBo
On 2016-01-26 05:17, Tom H wrote:
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 10:12 AM, David Sommerseth
wrote:
On 26/01/16 08:13, Yasha Karant wrote:
As neither VMware player nor VirtualBox seem capable of providing a MS
Win guest with any form of Internet access to an 802.11
There is at least one other sub group around here who value generally quiet
sober support when they have a problem. Ubuntu and many other distros are
quality distros, and perhaps better support what some people want. But the
Ubuntu and Fedora mailing lists and support are unbelievably noisy and
Thanks. I figured I was not the only one; and redundancy helps. (I'm 2000+ miles
from the machine in a hotel room with a raging head cold. Otherwise I'd have
gone looking.)
{^_^} Joanne
On 2014/11/19 07:34, Pat Riehecky wrote:
On 11/19/2014 09:25 AM, jdow wrote:
Latest patches won't
On 2014/02/20 03:21, David Sommerseth wrote:
On 19/02/14 15:08, jdow wrote:
On 2014/02/19 01:59, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 9:29 PM, jdow j...@earthlink.net wrote:
What happened to it? It's really hard to get VirtualBox clients to work
without
OpenGL when you want to use
I figure this is a stupid question; but, is 6.5 really not ready for prime
time yet? I see that the 6.5 repo tree appears to be open for business. But
6x seems to point to 6.4.
{o.o} Joanne
For some time now ddclient has not been working quite right. I made some
changes that finally brought to light the reason for this.
I removed the tweaked ddclient.conf, then yum removed ddclient, yum install
ddclient, and finally edited the ddclient.conf file to make it happy.
I started
On 2013/01/29 10:20, Bluejay Adametz wrote:
target
hard drive. The hard drive on A is /dev/sda, call it Ahd. A is shut down
power off. Bhd is installed into an available bay on A, A is booted, and
Bhd appears as /dev/sdb in A. Using dd on A, clone /dev/sda to /dev/sdb .
Mount on A the
On 2013/01/25 12:28, Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 12:19:14PM -0800, Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
3) nvidia and elrepo make a mess of the information on which cards are
supported by which drivers.
To elaborate:
http://elrepo.org/tiki/kmod-nvidia
The grand total of
On 2013/01/25 13:04, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 12:57 PM, jdow j...@earthlink.net wrote:
the gentlemen at elrepo .
They seem to be basically very good folks.
s/basically//
;-)
By the way there is more than gentlemen on the ELRepo team... but
that's not important
On 2013/01/25 13:31, Lamar Owen wrote:
On Jan 25, 2013, at 3:57 PM, jdow wrote:
To a degree I can sympathize with the elrepo people. Nvidia has screwed up.
This is not the first time nvidia cards have gone 'legacy'. There are now
three supported legacy nvidia driver versions (304.xx, 173.xx
On 2013/01/25 15:04, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 2:48 PM, jdow j...@earthlink.net wrote:
It seems there should have been some way to cozen yum into sending the
administrator email regarding the process that needs to be taken.
snip
I ask once again that all elrepo-related talks
the right to be cranky.
(Or are you telling me old age and guile beat youth and enthusiasm
yet again.)
{^_-}
On 2013/01/25 15:04, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 2:48 PM, jdow j...@earthlink.net wrote:
It seems there should have been some way to cozen yum into sending the
administrator
On 2013/01/23 23:55, Phil Perry wrote:
Here is the announcement I made back in November that the 310.xx series nvidia
drivers were dropping support for older 6xxx and 7xxx based hardware:
http://lists.elrepo.org/pipermail/elrepo/2012-November/001525.html
And how was I to know that and how
On 2013/01/24 01:12, Phil Perry wrote:
On 24/01/13 08:08, jdow wrote:
On 2013/01/23 23:55, Phil Perry wrote:
Here is the announcement I made back in November that the 310.xx
series nvidia
drivers were dropping support for older 6xxx and 7xxx based hardware:
http://lists.elrepo.org/pipermail
Is there a kernel update for SL 6.2 coming up soon?
It seems elrepo released a new set of nvidia modules that don't work
with the 2.6.32-279.19.1.el6.x86_64 kernel. That one only supports
through nvidia 304 and the download is 310.
{^_^}
, jdow j...@earthlink.net
mailto:j...@earthlink.net wrote:
Is there a kernel update for SL 6.2 coming up soon?
It seems elrepo released a new set of nvidia modules that don't work
with the 2.6.32-279.19.1.el6.x86_64 kernel. That one only supports
through nvidia 304 and the download
On 2013/01/23 08:51, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 8:20 AM, jdow j...@earthlink.net wrote:
Is there a kernel update for SL 6.2 coming up soon?
It seems elrepo released a new set of nvidia modules that don't work
with the 2.6.32-279.19.1.el6.x86_64 kernel. That one only supports
On 2013/01/23 19:27, Alan Bartlett wrote:
On 24 January 2013 02:52, jdow j...@earthlink.net wrote:
Um, 4 weeks is a trifle long for no Gnome or KDE. Ah well, I guess
I wait. I seldom use the machine from a GUI anyway.
It seems ElRepo may have screwed up.
{^_^}
I fail to see the significance
On 2013/01/23 20:33, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 8:04 PM, jdow j...@earthlink.net wrote:
On 2013/01/23 19:27, Alan Bartlett wrote:
I fail to see the significance -- or relevance -- of your last sentence.
Please remember this is the main support channel for Scientific Linux
On 2012/10/31 15:40, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
On 31/10/12 18:17, David Sommerseth wrote:
Otherwise, have a look in /etc/yum.repos.d ... and use rpm -qif repo-file to
see where this file came from. If it's something you've added manually, you
won't find a match. Otherwise, it's
Presuming that is the right address for your region on this ball of
dirt, how do you access Google? Google and YouTube share the same
address block, which is addresses 74.125.239.0-74.125.239.14.
Google owns 74.125.0.0/16 for that matter. I don't doubt that they
have other netblocks, too.
{o.o}
Do you mean adjtime by any chance? Unfortunately the values in its
fields do not seem to be well defined. It is part of the initscripts
package.
{^_^}
On 2012/10/02 22:09, g wrote:
greetings.
in unix, there is a file, name of which i do not recall, used as a
'clock factor' and controls the
On 2012/10/03 01:33, g wrote:
On 10/03/2012 06:45 AM, jdow wrote:
On 2012/10/02 22:09, g wrote:
greetings.
in unix, there is a file, name of which i do not recall, used as a
'clock factor' and controls the 'tick rate' for the system clock.
is such a file used in scientific linux and what
On 2012/09/08 18:34, Todd And Margo Chester wrote:
On 09/05/2012 03:34 PM, jdow wrote:
But if the real limit is related to
read write cycles on the memory locations you may find that temperature
has little real affect on the system lifetime.
I did some reliability analysis for the military
On 2012/09/05 11:38, Todd And Margo Chester wrote:
On 09/04/2012 12:21 PM, Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
Cherryville drives have a 1.2 million hour MTBF (mean time
between failure) and a 5 year warranty.
Note that MTBF of 1.2 Mhrs (137 years?!?) is the*vendor's estimate*.
Baloney check. 1.2
On 2012/09/02 20:26, Nathan wrote:
In my experience, I've had more problems with hardware RAID controllers than any
other component (hardware OR software) except for traditional hard drives
themselves. We switched to software RAID (Linux) and ZFS (*BSD and Solaris)
years ago.
But that's
On 2012/08/27 14:37, Todd And Margo Chester wrote:
On 08/27/2012 01:57 PM, Carl Friedberg wrote:
-Original Message-
From: owner-scientific-linux-us...@listserv.fnal.gov [mailto:owner-
scientific-linux-users@listserv.fnal.gov] On Behalf Of Todd And Margo
Chester
Sent: Monday, August 27,
On 2012/08/27 15:32, Todd And Margo Chester wrote:
On 08/27/2012 03:16 PM, jdow wrote:
ifconfig comes to mind.
{^_^}
$ ifconfig virbr0
virbr0Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 52:54:00:EB:2D:7B
inet addr:192.168.122.1 Bcast:192.168.122.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP
On 2012/08/23 01:04, Anne Wilson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 22/08/12 22:40, jdow wrote:
On 2012/08/22 11:08, Anne Wilson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
On 22/08/12 18:17, Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 12:33:09PM +0100
On 2012/08/22 04:33, Anne Wilson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 21/08/12 20:02, Gerald Waugh wrote:
On 08/21/2012 01:50 PM, Anne Wilson wrote:
For reasons not relevant to this list, I've been using GMail to
read my mail for a while, so I hadn't noticed that my local
On 2012/08/22 11:08, Anne Wilson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 22/08/12 18:17, Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 12:33:09PM +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
... procmail appears to be not doing its stuff
What could be wrong?
Why just had a spike of
On 2012/07/19 16:33, Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 01:17:47AM +0200, David Sommerseth wrote:
... even an automatic fsck shouldn't cause much extra delay next time you boot.
With full respect, extra delay being a subjective term, etc,
but do you have any idea how long
Latest clamav update main.cvd is an empty file. It apparently should not be
empty. For two days now I've gotten this message:
ERROR: Corrupted database file /var/clamav/main.cld: Broken or not a CVD file
{^_^}
On 2012/06/27 12:43, S.Tindall wrote:
On Wed, 2012-06-27 at 12:31 -0700, jdow wrote:
Latest clamav update main.cvd is an empty file. It apparently should not be
empty. For two days now I've gotten this message:
ERROR: Corrupted database file /var/clamav/main.cld: Broken or not a CVD file
Ah - nope. all does not work, either.
{^_^}
On 2012/06/15 04:24, Adam Bishop wrote:
Does it work if you take off the .src.rpm?
Adam Bishop
On 15 Jun 2012, at 04:26, jdow wrote:
yum --enablerepo=sl-source list available libusb1-1.0.3-1.el6.src.rpm
Janet is a trading name of The JNT
On 2012/06/15 17:20, Tom H wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 7:52 PM, jdow j...@earthlink.net wrote:
On 2012/06/15 16:36, Tom H wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 6:35 PM, jdow j...@earthlink.net wrote:
On 2012/06/15 05:27, Tom H wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 7:47 AM, jdow j...@earthlink.net
This line returns nothing:
yum --enablerepo=sl-source list available *src.rpm
Loaded plugins: aliases, changelog, downloadonly, fastestmirror, refresh-
: packagekit, security, tmprepo, verify, versionlock
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
* elrepo: elrepo.org
* epel:
On 2012/06/08 05:44, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
And in this day and age with password sniffing going on over
local networks by zombied machines and happening as a matter of government
policy worldwide in data centers, and the historic firewall wackiness with FTP's
2 channel communications, *WHY*
On 2012/06/08 07:46, Dennis Schridde wrote:
Hello everyone!
Am Freitag, 8. Juni 2012, 08:44:35 schrieben Sie:
...
Or are they using FTPS?
So far I found no client that reliably supports FTPS. Especially nothing that
comes with the OS by default (I tried Chrome, Firefox, KDE/Dolphin). Can you
Lately my log has been cluttered with these messages:
Mar 14 12:43:53 me2 fcoemon: error 111 Connection refused
Mar 14 12:43:53 me2 fcoemon: Failed to connect to lldpad
WTF is it, why, and how do I get rid of the messages? Starting or
stopping the fcoe service ddoes not stop the infernal
On 2012/02/25 23:08, Todd And Margo Chester wrote:
On 2012/02/25 19:59, Todd And Margo Chester wrote:
Hi All,
Anyone know of a source of up to date RPMs for Wine?
Many thanks,
-T
On 02/25/2012 09:36 PM, jdow wrote:
It depends on just HOW up to date you mean:
Available Packages
On 2012/02/26 09:25, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
2012/2/26 Łukasz Posadowski lukasz.posadow...@gmail.com
mailto:lukasz.posadow...@gmail.com
Sat, 25 Feb 2012 23:08:20 -0800
Todd And Margo Chester toddandma...@gmail.com
mailto:toddandma...@gmail.com:
I need at least 1.4rc5. See
On 2012/02/26 11:54, Todd And Margo Chester wrote:
On 02/26/2012 04:41 AM, jdow wrote:
On 2012/02/25 23:08, Todd And Margo Chester wrote:
On 2012/02/25 19:59, Todd And Margo Chester wrote:
Hi All,
Anyone know of a source of up to date RPMs for Wine?
Many thanks,
-T
On 02/25/2012 09:36 PM
It depends on just HOW up to date you mean:
Available Packages
wine.i686 1.2.3-1.el6 epel
wine.x86_64 1.2.3-1.el6 epel
wine-alsa.i686 1.2.3-1.el6 epel
wine-alsa.x86_64
Let's think about the read and write advantages with very large block sizes.
With small (default 512 byte) reads you get extreme overhead with modern
disks. With older disks you got one disk block per read transaction. Way
back when the disk read time was actually large compared to the
You are seeing the memory fragmentation effect I mentioned. A 2g allocation
may be possible. But it's going to be a largish number of individual and
smaller allocations within physical memory. Drivers transfer into physical
memory. So really large blocks are a problem. They get broken into many
On 2012/02/06 13:37, Chris Schanzle wrote:
On 02/06/2012 04:02 PM, jdow wrote:
(On a heavily loaded system, just when are you going to find 12 gigabytes
of fully contiguous storage?)
Probably lots of places on the below 1.0 TB Dell R910 box: :-) [no, not heavily
loaded at the moment, so your
Just on a hunch how much does it copy if you give it a BS=1GB?
This might be an uncaught 32 bit int on only the block size value.
{^_^}
On 2012/02/01 09:58, Andrey Y. Shevel wrote:
Hi Stephen,
thanks for the reply.
I am not sure that I do understand you (sorry for my stupidity).
I have
On 2012/02/01 09:28, Yasha Karant wrote:
On 02/01/2012 09:03 AM, Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 08:47:28AM -0800, Yasha Karant wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=636628
[snip]
Anyone with physical access to the machine can walk away with your disks,
or
On 2012/02/01 15:38, Tom H wrote:
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcianka...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Yasha Karantykar...@csusb.edu wrote:
Back to my primary point: the bug in accepting the root password upon a
failed fsck during boot is from TUV and
On 2011/12/30 00:06, MT Julianto wrote:
On 27 December 2011 15:11, MT Julianto mtjulia...@gmail.com
mailto:mtjulia...@gmail.com wrote:
On 27 December 2011 08:57, zxq9 z...@zxq9.com mailto:z...@zxq9.com
wrote:
On 12/27/2011 04:12 PM, MT Julianto wrote:
The machine
On 2011/12/30 00:14, MT Julianto wrote:
On 27 December 2011 21:02, jdow j...@earthlink.net mailto:j...@earthlink.net
wrote:
If the server is not busy that might be an interesting way to keep
hackers out of the machine. It would also make my log files smaller.
Indeed, I found some
On 2011/12/30 17:24, MT Julianto wrote:
On 30 December 2011 14:15, jdow j...@earthlink.net mailto:j...@earthlink.net
wrote:
All possibilities are negative: not power mode issue, not dhcp issue
(see
below), not iptables issue (see below), not hacking issue
(/var/log
On 2011/12/10 12:54, Mark Stodola wrote:
On 12/10/2011 1:49 PM, Andrew Z wrote:
gys,
how can i send the /var/log/messages on a designated terminal?
i remember some many years ago i saw on of SAs having messages file to 11 or
10 terminal from the moment machine booted. The gain - they just
On 2011/12/30 18:05, MT Julianto wrote:
On 30 December 2011 14:22, jdow j...@earthlink.net mailto:j...@earthlink.net
wrote:
On 2011/12/30 00:14, MT Julianto wrote:
Indeed, I found some traces of intruder trying to get root access via
ssh, but
none is succeeded. Now
On 2011/12/30 18:11, MT Julianto wrote:
On 31 December 2011 03:01, jdow j...@earthlink.net mailto:j...@earthlink.net
wrote:
On 2011/12/30 17:24, MT Julianto wrote:
On 30 December 2011 14:15, jdow j...@earthlink.net
mailto:j...@earthlink.net mailto:j...@earthlink.net
On 2011/12/30 19:04, MT Julianto wrote:
On 31 December 2011 03:16, jdow j...@earthlink.net mailto:j...@earthlink.net
wrote:
On 2011/12/30 18:05, MT Julianto wrote:
On 30 December 2011 14:22, jdow j...@earthlink.net
mailto:j...@earthlink.net mailto:j...@earthlink.net
On 2011/12/27 09:13, Bluejay Adametz wrote:
When it fails, does it fail immediately, or does it take a few seconds
before the error shows up?
If it fails immediately, it could be a router or firewall blocking
something or maybe iptables.
It fails immediately, and soon the error message is
(privately) There is another factor I did not mention called IPAHS, Innate
Perversity of Animate Homo Sapiens. We may be faced with that at this time.
{^_-}
On 2011/12/20 17:14, Jason Bronner wrote:
There is something to be said for minimizing downtime, but every time i've tried
getting
First take a complete backup of the md raid.
Then if the laws if Innate Perversity of Inanimate Objects you'll be able to
move the disks and have them just work. Your data is protected. (If you had
no backup IPIO would, of course, lead to the transition failing expensively.)
Even if IPIO does
.
Furthermore I want not do this because then I will have two raids: one raid per
software (md) into one per hardware.. my thoughts are about copying manually the
dirs of the operating system, then modifying configurations.. I think it is a
more secure process.
Thanks for the answer jdow ;)
2011
YUM - security
Error: Package: icewm-1.3.7-1.el6.x86_64 (epel)
Requires: bluecurve-icon-theme
You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem
You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest
I installed it to see what it
On 2011/12/12 02:28, Stephan Wiesand wrote:
On Dec 12, 2011, at 10:49 , jdow wrote:
YUM - security
Error: Package: icewm-1.3.7-1.el6.x86_64 (epel)
Requires: bluecurve-icon-theme
You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem
On 2011/12/10 14:17, Bluejay Adametz wrote:
how can i send the /var/log/messages on a designated terminal?
i remember some many years ago i saw on of SAs having messages file to 11
or 10 terminal from the moment machine booted. The gain - they just switch
to it instead of typing tail .
On 2011/12/06 14:37, Todd And Margo Chester wrote:
On 12/06/2011 02:09 PM, Andrew Z wrote:
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 4:13 PM, Todd And Margo Chester
toddandma...@gmail.com mailto:toddandma...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Todd And Margo Chester
toddandma...@gmail.com
On 2011/12/06 16:38, Todd And Margo Chester wrote:
On 12/06/2011 04:29 PM, jdow wrote:
On 2011/12/06 14:37, Todd And Margo Chester wrote:
On 12/06/2011 02:09 PM, Andrew Z wrote:
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 4:13 PM, Todd And Margo Chester
toddandma...@gmail.com mailto:toddandma...@gmail.com wrote
On 2011/12/06 16:54, Todd And Margo Chester wrote:
On 12/06/2011 04:50 PM, jdow wrote:
On 2011/12/06 16:38, Todd And Margo Chester wrote:
On 12/06/2011 04:29 PM, jdow wrote:
On 2011/12/06 14:37, Todd And Margo Chester wrote:
On 12/06/2011 02:09 PM, Andrew Z wrote:
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 4
[jdow@me2 ~]$ host ftp.scientificlinux.org
Host ftp.scientificlinux.org not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
{^_^} generic Ontario California area
On 2011/12/05 08:53, N.N. wrote:
Hello Vladim.
ftp.scientificlinux.org is on-line.
Alain.
On 12/5/11, Vladimir Mosgalinmosga...@vm10124.spb.edu wrote
Addendum - Thought I'd give host scientificlinux.org a try. It works.
scientificlinux.org has address 131.225.111.32
{^_^}
On 2011/12/05 15:00, jdow wrote:
[jdow@me2 ~]$ host ftp.scientificlinux.org
Host ftp.scientificlinux.org not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
{^_^} generic Ontario California area
It occurs to me that he's locking out an Australian /24 subnet with his
choice of IP there. 10.1.1.1 might be a little better.
{o.o}
On 2011/10/29 16:56, Cristian Ciupitu wrote:
Hi,
Try using something like this if you want to use only server 1.1.1.1:
forward only;
On 2011/10/20 08:10, Tom H wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 4:58 AM, Thomas Bendler
thomas.bend...@gmail.com wrote:
Secure boot is simply a design mistake. Instead of giving everyone the
opportunity to upload own certificates to the certificate store (like
browsers do), they implemented a hard
Somebody ought to complain to the CSUSB and to Verizon about his spam.
Or maybe configure the spam filter being used to block CSUSB until he is
removed. That's a little harsh. But, what is there to do when it's really
easy for him to simply setup a new alias and have more of his fun? (Sadly
Pat, you did send it out on the 12th. 2011/10/12 14:08
{o.o}
On 2011/10/17 06:27, Pat Riehecky wrote:
Apologies,
I apologize for not sending this out on time. I have lots of good sounding
excuses, but they are just excuses and avoid the fact that I didn't do it. The
downtime is completed and
On 2011/10/13 05:45, Vladimir Mosgalin wrote:
Hi jdow!
On 2011.10.12 at 18:28:02 -0700, jdow wrote next:
Is it possible under SL6.1 to run a script (or insert commands in
ifcfg-ethX files) when a nic is up, immediatly after network script
runs?? Like for example it can do with debian
On 2011/10/13 07:15, Tom H wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 8:45 AM, Vladimir Mosgalin
mosga...@vm10124.spb.edu wrote:
On 2011.10.12 at 18:28:02 -0700, jdow wrote next:
Is it possible under SL6.1 to run a script (or insert commands in
ifcfg-ethX files) when a nic is up, immediatly after
On 2011/10/13 21:24, William Scott wrote:
On 14 October 2011 14:13, jdowj...@earthlink.net wrote:
It acts as if the file is not even seen since there are no selinux problems
reported for it. So that makes me think something spooky is going on.
Where did you put your script?
if [ -x
VIA VT1705 Audio Codec
Latest kernel update leads to no sound. Booting old kernels gives no sound.
Modprobe includes
dist-alsa.conf:
install snd-pcm /sbin/modprobe --ignore-install snd-pcm /sbin/modprobe
snd-seq
dist-oss.conf is disabled (for good reason.)
The only new thing is
On 2011/10/07 00:12, Dag Wieers wrote:
On Thu, 6 Oct 2011, Yasha Karant wrote:
On 10/06/2011 04:37 PM, Dag Wieers wrote:
On Thu, 6 Oct 2011, Yasha Karant wrote:
I realise that except for the Fermilab/CERN staff persons, almost all
of the rest of those maintaining material for SL are unpaid
I have the elrepo 64 bit beta flash plugin installed. A 32 bit flash update
is being forced on my system. Here are the error messages.
Transaction Check Error:
file /usr/share/applications/flash-player-properties.desktop from install of
flash-plugin-11.0.1.152-release.i386 conflicts with file
On 2011/10/06 07:38, Dag Wieers wrote:
On Thu, 6 Oct 2011, Vladimir Mosgalin wrote:
On 2011.10.06 at 05:05:05 -0700, jdow wrote next:
Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2011 05:05:05 -0700
From: jdow j...@earthlink.net
To: scientific-linux-us...@fnal.gov
X-Original-To: mosgalin@localhost
Subject: Flash
On 2011/10/06 13:12, Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
On Thu, 6 Oct 2011, Dag Wieers wrote:
On Thu, 6 Oct 2011, Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
On Thu, 6 Oct 2011, Dag Wieers wrote:
RPMforge provides already the (beta) 64bit flash-plugin, so there's no
need to wait for it. In this case the 64bit
On 2011/10/06 17:22, Yasha Karant wrote:
On 10/06/2011 04:37 PM, Dag Wieers wrote:
On Thu, 6 Oct 2011, Yasha Karant wrote:
On 10/06/2011 04:19 PM, Dag Wieers wrote:
On Thu, 6 Oct 2011, Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
On Thu, 6 Oct 2011, Dag Wieers wrote:
On Thu, 6 Oct 2011, Dr Andrew C
, it's already there.
[jdow ~]$ yum list yum-presto
Loaded plugins: aliases, changelog, downloadonly, fastestmirror, refresh-
: packagekit, security, tmprepo, verify, versionlock
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
* elrepo: elrepo.org
* epel: mirror.steadfast.net
* rpmforge
On 2011/09/18 10:00, Yasha Karant wrote:
A small side question: if SL6X happens to be pointing to SL6.m for some m
(currently 2), after the update/enhancement will the target now display SL6.m as
the installed release?
Yes. That is what happened here upgrading from 6.0-6.1 via Yum.
cat
Seriously, I'd suggest you do one thing or the other. But I am not going
to make your decision for you. On one machine (a virtual box machine)
the transition from 6.0 to 6.1 was painless. (Or let's say no more pain
than already existed with SELinux.) On the other machine I had an nVidia
related
On 2011/09/17 01:06, Tanmoy Chatterjee wrote:
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 8:19 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcianka...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Tanmoy Chatterjeebum@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 10:36 PM, Connie Siehcs...@fnal.gov wrote:
On Fri, 16 Sep 2011, Tanmoy
Yum autoupdate sends email to root about updates performed. Perhaps
that is the reason it is looking for mailx. It uses mailx in a scripted
mode to create the messages.
{^_^}
On 2011/09/16 02:33, Dennis Schridde wrote:
Hello!
Line 211 of /etc/cron.daily/yum-autoupdate calls /bin/mail, but
On 2011/09/05 21:38, Franchisseur Robert wrote:
-- Le (On) 2011-09-06 +0200 à (at) 00:53:39 Andreas Petzold écrivit (wrote): --
On Tuesday, September 06, 2011 00:26:22 Valerii D. wrote:
snip
Yes. And the distribution is still the browser 3. 6. 2 without security
updates. And with a
Troy, I'm relatively new here. But it's also highly evident that we're
going to miss you.
I hope it all goes well for you and for us.
{^_^}
On 2011/08/24 11:40, Troy Dawson wrote:
Hi,
I have loved all the years that I have been a developer and architect for
Scientific Linux, but it is time for
On 11:59, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 1:51 AM, Vincent Verhagenvinc...@zijnemail.nl wrote:
Hi all,
As I don't have access to the web site admins email addresses, a heads up
for them via this list :)
I'm having trouble accessing the SL site (http://www.scientificlinux.org).
I get
1 - 100 of 130 matches
Mail list logo