Interesting solution. I really like the idea of an inter-wiki query
however, i.e. using the SMW API. Is RDF the right interchange format?
On 4 November 2015 at 05:46, Tobias Oetterer
wrote:
> Hi Kai
>
> I use Extension:ExternalData for that purpose.
>
> To be a little bit more precise: On W2 #ge
Many thanks for these recommendations James. Can (or have) you
document(ed) them on the wiki for ongoing refinement?
Cheers,
Dan.
On 10 May 2013 12:01, James HK wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> I would like to suggest that unit/functional/integration tests would be the
>> best solution for this. I know it's n
I wonder if it's thoretically possible to use our result formats to
> format sparql queries without rewriting the whole thing?
>
> [1] http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Spark
> [2] https://code.google.com/p/sgvizler/
> -----
> Yury Katkov, WikiVote
>
>
>
> On
This is high on my wish-list too, and I believe it's possible to
implement with 'plumbing'. I had a go a while back with RAP, and was
able to issue sparql queries from within SMW. I don't have good
internet at the moment, or I'd search the archive for you to find that
discussion. Actually, I was us
Thanks for organizing this Yury, can you set up a doodle to try to tie
people to a date? Also, I guess we need to offer a box of chocolate to
each developer who takes part! ;-)
Any confirmed?
Cheers,
Dan.
On 9 May 2013 18:08, Yury Katkov wrote:
> (I've changed the subject name. See previous e-
On 9 May 2013 00:27, Yury Katkov wrote:
> My answers are inline
>
> On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 7:54 PM, Dan Bolser wrote:
>>
>> On 8 May 2013 16:46, Yury Katkov wrote:
>> > On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 4:04 AM, Dan Bolser wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi all,
On 8 May 2013 16:26, Jeroen De Dauw wrote:
> Hey,
>
>> It would
>> be great to see if we could loosen the coupling and start using some
>> better practices for MW code, but that is something that most of the
>> WMF-oriented developers aren't going to worry about.
>
> The issues described indicate
On 8 May 2013 16:46, Yury Katkov wrote:
> On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 4:04 AM, Dan Bolser wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm afraid I still haven't read the thread discussing LTS and the
>> clusterf resulting from a typical SMW/SF install requiri
Hi all,
I'm afraid I still haven't read the thread discussing LTS and the
clusterf resulting from a typical SMW/SF install requiring about
20 independently maintained but interrelated extensions (it's always
going to be hard!).
On this topic two ideas came to mind:
1) Would adopting this kin
m.
http://rhizospheregwt.appspot.com/#orgchart
Cheers,
Dan.
On 7 May 2013 12:32, Neill Mitchell wrote:
> Hi Dan.
>
> Exhibit is dead with any MW version > 1.15 and SMW 1.6+
>
> Yes, filtered is intended to replace it. What do you need it to do?
>
> Cheers
> Neill.
&g
Hi,
Which was the last version of Exhibit to work? I know Filtered is
designed to replace Exhibit, but our wiki is currently crippled by PHP
5.2 dependency, making anything 'new' unavailable ;-)
Cheers,
Dan.
--
Learn Gr
Any progress on this? I may have some limited funds available at some
point to work on this.
Can anyone add more examples here:
http://semantic-mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Filtered_format
Cheers,
Dan.
On 15 May 2012 17:21, Neill Mitchell wrote:
> Hi.
>
> The hard work was all done by Stephan Gambk
in SB
must be somewhere in between those two...
Could someone with more chops find and tag it? (And report how they did it?)
Many thanks,
Dan.
On 6 May 2013 11:54, Dan Bolser wrote:
> I found the version switch hidden in this commit:
>
> commit c1479f4d178dda6c65d84ec021b7a59143194141
&g
mp;can=1&q=%2A
Cheers,
Dan.
On 6 May 2013 10:47, Dan Bolser wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to roll back to SMW 1.7, and of course, I want to make sure
> I have a compatible suite of Semantic extensions. If I understand
> correctly, this is what SB is designed to do. However, I ca
ails about this and that it could all
sound a bit critical, but I'm just thinking that a little effort could
make a big difference here.
Many thanks,
Dan.
> -Yaron
>
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 8:34 AM, Dan Bolser wrote:
>>
>> I've just noticed these releases:
>> htt
How many users are on the SMW-Users list who are not on the SMW-Developers list?
I'm just wondering if we really need two separate lists (sorry, I'm
sure this has come up before!).
Many thanks,
Dan.
--
Introducing AppDy
Hi,
I'm trying to roll back to SMW 1.7, and of course, I want to make sure
I have a compatible suite of Semantic extensions. If I understand
correctly, this is what SB is designed to do. However, I can't find
which version of SB shipped with SMW 1.7 (and compatible extensions).
I can't find any ta
Hi,
Quick question: How can I migrate a 1.8 SMW database back to SMW 1.7?
I guess I could just re-install all SMW 1.7 tables and re-run
SMW_refreshData.php?
Any short-cut for doing that (which tables to remove)?
Background (if you're interested):
The PHP 5.3 dependency of SMW 1.8 is (currently
On 17 July 2012 14:14, Jeroen De Dauw wrote:
> Hey,
>
>
>> Shouldn't we hold these requirements in the extensions? [1]
>
> These docs are for MediaWiki 1.19. 1.20 does require 5.3 or later.
> Furthermore, I send a mail to the lists about using PHP 5.3 in the next
> version of SMW, and no one compl
n 5 May 2013 16:52, Dan Bolser wrote:
> I'm seeing this on many pages of my wiki (multiple times per page).
> Sometimes it 'clears up' after a reload on a given page, but shows up
> on un-cached pages (I think).
>
> Here are versions:
> http://seqanswers.com/wiki/Spe
I'm seeing this on many pages of my wiki (multiple times per page).
Sometimes it 'clears up' after a reload on a given page, but shows up
on un-cached pages (I think).
Here are versions:
http://seqanswers.com/wiki/Special:Version
Here is a good chance of seeing the warning:
http://seqanswers.com/
On 4 April 2013 16:12, James HK wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Most user on this list are probably not aware of the current
> discussion that takes place on Wikitech-l [1] about "How SMW might
> help mw.org/wikitech.org" but what caused a moment of silence was the
> following comment.
>
> "I don't support movin
Gerrit doesn't preclude using pull-requests:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6235379/how-to-send-pull-request-on-git
On 14 March 2013 14:05, Yury Katkov wrote:
> Hi guys!
>
> I see that many mediawiki extensions have their mirrors on github. Can we
> fork you there and use github mechanism of
.
On 11 March 2013 06:58, Yury Katkov wrote:
> Thanks Dan! That helps!
>
> I wonder are there any good practices to store the open source code that we
> depend on and sometimes modify a bit... Maybe git submodules can help here?
> -
> Yury Katkov, WikiVote
>
>
>
>
On 8 March 2013 10:24, Yury Katkov wrote:
> Hi guys!
>
> I'm quite ashamed to ask such a newbie questions but anyway: how do you
> usually merge your changes? So we're now depend on Forms 2.5.1 and have made
> some modifiactions there. We want to depend on Forms 2.5.2, patch it with
> our changes
d, then SB could also
be tagged.
Cheers,
Dan.
On 26 February 2013 13:24, Dan Bolser wrote:
> On 26 February 2013 13:19, Dan Bolser wrote:
>> I may be doing something wrong, but I don't see any tags for SB in git:
>>
>> git remote -v
>> origin
>> https
On 26 February 2013 13:19, Dan Bolser wrote:
> I may be doing something wrong, but I don't see any tags for SB in git:
>
> git remote -v
> origin
> https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/p/mediawiki/extensions/SemanticBundle.git
> (fetch)
> origin
> https://gerri
I may be doing something wrong, but I don't see any tags for SB in git:
git remote -v
origin https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/p/mediawiki/extensions/SemanticBundle.git
(fetch)
origin https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/p/mediawiki/extensions/SemanticBundle.git
(push)
git tag
# No output
I'm asking b
Is it impossible? My ED source has values that need processing, such
as x=J,K,L, where J, K and L and encoded values for the field x. I
want to store all results for all fields in an SIO using a template,
but I can't pass the ED to a template.
e.g. This:
{{#for_external_table: {{HTSDB: Mapper =
On 9 November 2011 05:45, Jeroen De Dauw wrote:
> Hey,
>> One way to do this would be to automatically give each property some
>> special properties, such that the property itself could be queried for its
>> set of unique values, and the number of times each value has been used.
>
> This will not
Great work! I really like this feature. It has been requested many
times, so it's really cool that its been done. Thanks for doing this.
We briefly discussed how this could be implemented a while back, and,
although the proposal back then may push the balance of implementation
in the direction of
I'd suggest building on (complying with) existing https authentication.
On 8 November 2011 09:51, Jeroen De Dauw wrote:
> Hey,
>
>> Which authentication mechanisms can be thought of/could be implemented to
>> enable something like this??
>
> Good question.
>
> You can't really do anything from in
ng as direct inline
> formatting of the results, but performance-wise, it's quite a bit more
> efficient than any of the three options mentioned before.
>
> -Yaron
>
> On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Dan Bolser wrote:
>> I like this idea too. However, I suspect it w
I can think of lots of options too...
multi value property (I know)
composite property
virtual page
internal page
internal object (I know)
Ultimately, I think "subobject" and "has subobject" win in my head
because of precedence. I don't think 'object' is too far from the
truth here, in so far as
format is a pain.
Cheers,
Dan.
On 28 October 2011 23:18, Jon Lang wrote:
> Dan Bolser wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Currently we have tabular format results and, if we want
>> customization, we have 'template' format results.
>> * Tabular format is g
Hi,
Currently we have tabular format results and, if we want
customization, we have 'template' format results.
* Tabular format is great, but is quite inflexible.
* Template format is very flexible, but complex, hard to develop and maintain.
I'd like to suggest a half way house for simple column
On 5 October 2011 08:21, Yury Katkov wrote:
> ===on your first issue: ===
>
> It's pretty hard to delete the text related to your semantic property. The
> property of the page may be from different kinds of sources.
> Suppose we have a property testprop on a page testpage. Where did it come
> fro
On 3 October 2011 16:48, Markus Krötzsch wrote:
> On 03/10/11 10:50, Dan Bolser wrote:
> ...
>>
>> Thanks Markus,
>>
>> Perhaps a very dumb question, but what advantages are there to using
>> subobjects over real pages?
>>
>> i.e. When is it re
On 3 October 2011 10:02, Markus Krötzsch wrote:
> Following up the discussions we had at SMWCon in Berlin, we have now
> implemented a new feature for "internal objects" in SMW. This email
> explains this feature and starts the discussion on some open questions
> for it to become stable.
>
>
> ==
the direct values, they
shouldn't use subproperties... IMHO.
Cheers,
Dan.
On 2 October 2011 21:17, Yury Katkov wrote:
> It seems that it's a planned feature
> Everyone who is interested in this new feature, please vote for this
> issue in Bugzilla:
>
> https://bugzil
On 1 October 2011 19:07, Yury Katkov wrote:
> Hi everyone, developers and users!
>
> ==Problem==
>
> The printout statements are not currently engaged in inference in
> Semantic MediaWiki.
> For example if I have a page Moskow with a property [[is capital
> of::Russia]], which is a subproperty of
On 1 October 2011 13:58, Markus Krötzsch wrote:
> On 01/10/11 11:17, Samuel Lampa wrote:
>>
>> On 10/01/2011 09:54 AM, Dan Bolser wrote:
>>>
>>> On 1 October 2011 02:50, Samuel Lampa wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 09/06/2011 04:13 PM, Markus Krötzsc
On 1 October 2011 02:50, Samuel Lampa wrote:
> On 09/06/2011 04:13 PM, Markus Krötzsch wrote:
>> One can of course always query for the rdfs:label with all data to have
>> some hope for getting a user-readable label, but this may not always
>> work. And then it might be that some external URIs re
On 7 September 2011 04:25, Laurent Alquier wrote:
> If you want to get into handling special properties, one complication comes
> from the fact that there are two places where SMW refreshes properties for a
> page :
> - when saving the page
> - during background jobs
> If you don't want to use wik
On 5 September 2011 23:14, Chris Davis wrote:
>> I can't comment in detail, but I think that having the ability to
>> query specific SPARQL endpoints and map the results to property values
>> would be a killer feature.
>
>> There is so much data on the semantic web, being able to navigate it
>> in
+1
Dan.
Don't panic. Don't be Google.
On 15 August 2011 20:52, Jeroen De Dauw wrote:
> +1 for installing SyntaxHighlight_GeSHi extension.
>
> --
> Jeroen De Dauw
> http://www.bn2vs.com
> Don't panic. Don't be evil.
> --
>
> --
I can't comment in detail, but I think that having the ability to
query specific SPARQL endpoints and map the results to property values
would be a killer feature.
There is so much data on the semantic web, being able to navigate it
in my wiki and being able to augment my wiki's content with it wo
Is this better on the developer list? Or is it just a dumb question?
Cheers,
Dan.
On 3 August 2011 09:50, Dan Bolser wrote:
> On 3 August 2011 08:50, Markus Krötzsch wrote:
>> The online documentation for SMW is being updated to completely cover
>> SMW 1.6.0. Two important addi
On 22 May 2011 16:10, Markus Krötzsch wrote:
> Dear SMW users and developers,
>
> work on SMW 1.6 has made tremendous progress in the past few weeks
> == Main changes for users ==
>
> * Significantly extended database backend support:
> SMW now works with PostgreSQL and with any RDF store that
This page: http://semantic-mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:BrowseData/Tips
Gives this fail:
Fatal error: Call to undefined method SMWWikiPageValue::getXSDValue()
in
/domains/semantic-mediawiki.org/www/w/extensions/SemanticDrilldown/includes/SD_Utils.inc
on line 134
Cheers,
Dan.
If you haven't alre
On 13 May 2011 10:26, Markus Krötzsch wrote:
> On 12/05/11 08:39, Joel Natividad wrote:
>> For our friends in Europe,
>> You may want to check out
>>
>> http://opendatachallenge.org
>>
>> I think SMW is just made to order for this challenge :)
>
> I had this on my radar before, but I do not think
er maintaining this package. If you check the relevant bug
> at
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=560773
>
> Another DD has already stated their ntention to adopt it. Probably
> worth chasing him.
>
> Cheers,
> John
>
> On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 04:20
On 5 May 2011 16:33, Jeroen De Dauw wrote:
> If the current mess gets fixed, that'd be awesome. If someone then takes the
> time to show me how to update these packages, I'm willing to maintain them,
> esp for SMW and related extensions.
Unfortunately, it doesn't seem simple (what is?). The manua
On 5 May 2011 16:33, Jeroen De Dauw wrote:
> Hey,
>
> (removed the user list from cc, as this is a dev topic)
>
>> The presence of an outdated and unloved package is almost worse than no
>> package at all
>
> I'd argue it IS worse.
>
>> For sysadmins there is a huge win when something is packaged.
On 5 May 2011 16:11, Jeroen De Dauw wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I actually had a look at the state of the packages a bit over a week back,
> and they are seriously outdated. So much that you really can't call it
> maintained any more. I poked some MW devs on the IRC about this, and
> basically no one cares
I just had this report from a MW maintainer:
I've already got SyntaxHighlight_GeSHi installed and working. For the
other extensions, I've got an interesting conundrum: to install
openid, I have to install a package called mediawiki-extensions-base,
but to install the semantic wiki ext
Anyone know / guess why a) the limit is 20, b) the query goes awry at the limit?
Cheers,
Dan.
On 11 March 2011 01:16, Dan Bolser wrote:
> Result: Recursion here isn't terrible for performance.
>
> Details:
>
> Yaron kindly set "SMWResultPrinter::$maxRecur
Is there any plan for a SMW meet-up on the Friday evening before the 18?
I'm in Amsterdam for a wedding on the 18th and leaving on the 19th,
however, if people are meeting up on the 17th I'd try to join you. I
thought I'd email to see if there were any plans developing ;-)
All the best,
Dan.
--
On 28 May 2010 14:20, Markus Krötzsch wrote:
> On Freitag, 28. Mai 2010, Dan Bolser wrote:
>> On 28 May 2010 09:55, Markus Krötzsch wrote:
>> > On Freitag, 28. Mai 2010, Dan Bolser wrote:
>> >> I guess this should be on the devel list
>> >>
>
On 28 May 2010 09:55, Markus Krötzsch wrote:
> On Freitag, 28. Mai 2010, Dan Bolser wrote:
>> I guess this should be on the devel list
>>
>> On 27 May 2010 15:14, Dan Bolser wrote:
>> > About the fix proposed here:
>> >
>> > http
Hi,
I find that, even when logged in, I need to solve a captcha to edit
pages on http://semantic-mediawiki.org
Can you please change the captcha config so that logged in users don't
need to solve captchas? I'm human I promise!
My favourite config is documented here:
http://www.mediawiki.org/wik
I guess this should be on the devel list
On 27 May 2010 15:14, Dan Bolser wrote:
> About the fix proposed here:
>
> https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23679
>
>
> Given that plain (unformatted) printout is just a special case of the way
> units
> are select
http://denise.dreamwidth.org/23600.html
--
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See wh
The extn. sounds cool. Where can we see a demo using SMW?
Cheers,
Dan.
2010/1/24 Laurent Alquier :
>
> Hi
>
> I managed to patch up the code of the FolkTagCloud extension in order to
> get a tag cloud display of semantic properties values.
>
> The page of the extension is :
> http://www.mediawik
Hi Jack,
Just to let you know, I logged a (badly written) bug about the
'further results...' failing for tables generated with template format
here:
http://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18911
(I should really rewrite that bug report!) One workaround that I tried
was to use the 'intro='
Hi guys,
Following the discussion about trying to use SMW/SF to help organize
the list of extension on MediaWiki.Org, I created the following bug
report to keep track of the required 'code review' and 'security
audit':
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21602
HTH,
Dan.
2009/8/2 Yaron Koren :
> Keeping with my preference for having property names be prepositional
> phrases, how about "Has improper value for"?
"Has improper value for" ++
Dan.
> I should note that I hope that properties with blank values don't get
> included in this accounting. Speaking of which
ing simple features.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Sergey
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Markus Krötzsch
> wrote:
>>
>> On Donnerstag, 2. Juli 2009, Dan Bolser wrote:
>> > 2009/7/1 Robert Murphy :
>> > > Maybe you should file it as
2009/7/1 Robert Murphy :
> Maybe you should file it as a bug/feature request...
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19477
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 5:53 AM, Dan Bolser wrote:
>>
>> I think that when using "format=template", there is no benefit from
&
've only ever filled 3, and two of those
were at least assigned, but I never got a reply to any.
Dan.
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 5:53 AM, Dan Bolser wrote:
>>
>> I think that when using "format=template", there is no benefit from
>> passing the resulting page
I think that when using "format=template", there is no benefit from
passing the resulting page titles as links.
Not passing the resulting page titles as links has no drawbacks (as
the link can easily be added back within the template).
Passing the link can cause problems that are tricky to debug
2009/5/25 Dan Bolser :
> Forwarded conversation
> From: Dan Bolser
> Date: 2009/5/20
> To: mar...@semantic-mediawiki.org
> Cc: semediawiki-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
> semediawiki-u...@lists.sourceforge.net
>
>
> 2009/5/17 Markus Krötzsch :
> hehe - sorry about th
2009/5/17 Markus Krötzsch :
> On Samstag, 9. Mai 2009, Dan Bolser wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm using the "intro=" and "outro=" query parameters to provide the
>> table header and footer to get tabular output with the
>> "forma
Hi,
I'm using the "intro=" and "outro=" query parameters to provide the
table header and footer to get tabular output with the
"format=template" in an ask query:
http://smw.referata.com/wiki/Talk:Use_the_ask_template_format_to_create_tabular_output
This is working great with a couple of caveats
2008/7/28 Markus Krötzsch :
> After returning from Wikimania in Alexandria, I can contribute my five
> piastres to close this issue:
>
> As was rightly remarked, SMW does not define the sorting behaviour if a
> property has many values (or no value). This is documented. If you want to
> define one
Sorry Valerio, I'm not really an expert. However, I thought the output
(below) would help someone on the list give you some better advice.
2009/3/20 Valerio M. Pelliccioni :
> Oh yes, Dan.
> I did it, more and more without any success.
> What I did in the meanwhile was to dig into the code and I'
2009/3/19 Valerio M. Pelliccioni :
> Hi everybody,
> after some tries with the DrillDown installation, and some filters
> configuration I discovered that my SMW lacks two (or more) tables
> because of an error message from DD Special:BrowseData page:
> smw_attributes and smw_relations.
> So, I made
2009/3/17 John McClure :
>
> Hi -
> I'm wondering if this is the right place to ask about what looks like a
> contradiction in smw, or maybe I'm not understanding the whole picture
> yet... It seems that a [[category]] on a page is equivalent to an rdf:type,
> but if it's on a category: page, then
2009/1/27 Yaron Koren :
> Well, the basic idea is that, as Markus and Denny have said, the plan is to
> eventually replace the double-brackets notation in SMW with calls to parser
> functions like #set and #declare, due to the double brackets being difficult
> to parse because of how MediaWiki pars
2009/1/26 Joel Natividad :
> Dan, For now, while we wait for a way to automatically enable all formats,
> you can just do this in LocalSettings.php:
> require_once("extensions/SemanticResultFormats/SRF_Settings.php");
> $srfgFormats = array('calendar', 'eventline', 'timeline', 'sum', 'average',
> '
2009/1/26 Rolf Lampa [RIL] :
> Yaron Koren skrev:
>> Okay, thanks. Well, there's no chance I'm going to implement this any
>> time soon, to answer your question.
> :(
>
> Is there a chance to get the (formula calculated) titles returned from
> the "{{{info" clause on a Semantic Form?
>
> The (final
Hi all,
Here is what I was thinking (sorry if it overlaps with the previous
discussion, because I'm finding that a bit too technical to follow
a.t.m. - I'll go over it again in more detail later.)
Lets stick with the simplest case imaginable for the time being, a
1..n relationship such as that pr
Alex
>
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 2:55 AM, Patrick Nagel
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> the following parts of this discussion make it clear once again, that
>> actually
>> usable many-valued properties are an important feature. The lack of it
>>
2009/1/20 Daniel Friesen :
> Agreed, the arraymaps should be part of SMW. For things like infoboxes,
> whether you are using SF or not, you still need to use the arraymap for
> annotating lists. So #arraymap is used in far more SMW cases than actual SF
> cases.
>
> Actually, on a note, it might be
Hi Semediawiki-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] has invited you to Spokeo,
which finds your friends' updates across the Web.
On average, Spokeo finds 87 friends across 30 different social
networks. See what Spokeo can find for you now!
Click
http://www.spokeo.com/public/join?c=b8
Hi, I recently installed Semantic MediaWiki (version 1.0-RC1) from
tar. Hopefully I didn't make a mistake during install, because I have
been having difficulty getting some of the documented features working
correctly.
I was following the instructions given on this manual page;
http://ontoworld.o
On 29/09/2007, S Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm responding, but I don't have the answers.
>
> Jeff Thompson wrote:
> > What are the plans in Semantic Mediawiki to capture citations? I ask
> > because,
> > for a "cited by" property, the subject is not the article, but a particular
> > asser
87 matches
Mail list logo
