Dear shinken developers,
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 07:24:11PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> as the package shinken has just been removed from the Debian archive
> unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry
> that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.
>
> Fo
Hello,
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 10:04:22AM -0400, Xavier Landreville wrote:
> Is there anyone working on a debian package? I'd hate to duplicate efforts.
there is a git repo of the people packaging for debian available
(git://anonscm.debian.org/pkg-shinken/shinken.git),
but:
$ python setup.py --c
Hello All,
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 12:27:17PM -0400, Sebastien Coavoux wrote:
> >> >>- Also, I think we don't use setuptools as we should. If you look at
> >> >>what ansible/salt do, they don't ship any files outside /usr/local/
> >> >> folder
> >> >>(using ie: sudo pip install salt).
Hello All,
On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 09:51:07AM +0800, Andy Xie wrote:
> currently, there are some docker container in dockerhub. Here is the url:
> https://registry.hub.docker.com/search?q=shinken
nice to know, thanks.
> > still issue on debian (I didn't test centos). But the Travis part is ok.
>
Hello All,
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 09:50:10PM +0100, nap wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Sven Nierlein wrote:
>
> > Hi Jean,
> >
> > I am missing an answer for the "What if such "lower" importance checks can
> > be hidden by default on the "services" view?"
> >
> > - i am using this i
Hello all,
On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 09:46:21AM +0100, nap wrote:
> Yes, we only announce it on IRC, because most of core devs where there.
> Next one (should be in november I think) will be announce there too :)
Thanks.
> > Shinken community feedback :
> > We got feedback from people that allow us
Hello Thibault,
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 02:56:09PM -0400, Thibault Cohen wrote:
> Hello everyone !
>
> I'm currently packaging Shinken 2.0.1 for Debian and this is
> practically done ! (I just have to fix some lintian errors ...)
Great news ! Are you developing the debian specific files in a git
Hello,
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 02:56:01AM +0100, David DURIEUX wrote:
> Hello,
>
> with the real complexity of setup.py, I have rewriten it few hours ago
> and commited it in repository.
>
> Can people test it and say me if he have problems?
>
> For informations, the setup.py is compatible Linu
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 05:41:55PM +0100, Rémi Palancher wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 15:47:48 +0100, nap wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Rémi Palancher wrote:
> > [...] For particular early adopters or developer needs, it is not
> > very hard
> > to set up infrastructure to auto
Hello,
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 08:47:11PM +0100, Frescha wrote:
> Hi,
> the next days I will check out the Cafe/Bar and ask about a possible table
> reservation.
>
> I would prefer the 20.03.14 at 6pm or 7pm. I think a 2-3 hours for the first
> meeting would be enough for the first time. What
Hello,
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 07:18:11PM +0100, Frescha wrote:
> Hi,
> how about in the end of march in Mannheim. I propose a small Cafe/Bar with
> good food. http://www.tomate-mannheim.de/
>
> Possible topics?
> * around of getting to know each other
> * introducing of a Shinken plugin for Su
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 08:56:28AM -0400, Sébastien Coavoux wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Are vote only in comments? :)
No, in the right section under "Choose your mascot!", select
A,B,C or D.
Have a nice weekend,
Hermann
--
Lea
Hello All,
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 09:24:07AM +0200, nap wrote:
> 2: there is no limit in objects numbers, and all objects are managed like
> the others, so I don't see a reason why you got a lock here. Can you send
> me your configuration or reproduce it in a test case so we can work on it?
aft
Hello again,
On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 01:59:05PM +0200, nap wrote:
> > Our approach with e.g. radius is to distribute the configuration in text
> > input form
> > to all servers and add generated configs locally, so even after losing
> > power and connectivity
> > there is a reasonable config local
Hello Jean,
On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 09:25:21AM +0200, nap wrote:
> We got:
> * flat configuration file : purely local, but easy to hack and to know
> which modules load
> * discovery : great for first discovery, but erase user modifications for
> regular scans (like new filesystem or new role)
Hello,
on Friday our shinken 1.4 installation failed after some time
running without problems. Contacts seemed to be somehow
lost in broker, so check_auth reported "Got None":
def check_auth(self, user, password):
print "Checking auth of", user # , password
c = self.datamgr.g
Hello,
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 05:01:14PM +0200, Olivier Hanesse wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It is a major change in Shinken Infrastructure, so why not naming it
> Shinken 2.0 ?
But only under the hood, so 1.6 seems ok. Keeps 2.0 for big new features ;-)
> Moving to HTTP is a good idea (be careful wit
Hello Jean,
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 03:32:49PM +0200, nap wrote:
> Arg, can be an option only available for some bottle backends. From now you
> can just remove the "** self.options", I'll try to add this only for
> backend that manage it.
first thanks for fixing getattr (counted on getattr behav
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 09:23:26AM +0200, nap wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 7:57 PM, Frescha wrote:
>
> > Yeah, its really a good idea. I am also for it.
> > Jean could you please found a organization for that. This could be a good
> > place for packs.
> >
> >
> > Hi,
>
> Yes, the github http
Hello,
managed today to get the shinken webui running with mod fastcgi throught
apache with a unix socket.
Not working is the setting "bindAddress" and "umask" in shinken-specific,
for the moment I patched the bindaddress (=socket path) directly into
shinken/webui/bottle.py, see below.
Please
Hello All,
for integration with mod-scgi (debian wheezy: libapache2-mod-scgi)
the appended patch is needed. It shouldn't harm anything else.
If someone want's to try, use in shinken-specific:
define module{
module_name WebUI
module_type webui
host 127.0
Hello Jean,
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 11:21:22AM +0100, nap wrote:
> > just an idea to put in there: Is it feasible to have different config
> > "languages" like the salt config management tool has ? Those can use at
> > least yaml, direct python code, jinja2 and xml.
> > One is the (settable) defau
Hello all,
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 09:42:36AM +0100, Olivier Hanesse wrote:
> * having macro variables whose values can change over the time :
>
> We just need to find a clear syntax for that :)
...
> > To define one, it's very easy :
> > *define checkway{
> >checkway_nameHuge_load_th
Hello,
On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 10:23:16AM +0100, nap wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 7:23 AM, David GUENAULT
> wrote:
>
> > well i agree with packaging (for industry class deployment) but i do not
> > think install script is uselless because it help setup a fully featured
> > solution in minutes
On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 11:14:18PM -0500, Francois Mikus wrote:
> Well... That is one key difference between rrd and whisper(graphite)
> databases.
>
> Whisper is one metric per file and one consolidation function. So you
> have to choose, min, max, avg, median, etc.
This is an interesting conc
On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 09:12:41AM -0500, Francois Mikus wrote:
> Hermann, there is already an existing Shinken module to send data to
> Graphite (carbon), have you looked at it?
Yes, when we started to test graphite as storage for data instead of
rrds. Before we used rrd, hence the name shinken2r
Hello Jean,
On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 10:03:12AM +0100, nap wrote:
> > Good test, and happy new year :)
Happy new year from here, too.
> some news about this. I'm cleaning the code a little bit, but I'm also
> adding a forecasting feature to this algorithm. Here are two screenshots :
> * source.pn
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 11:26:54PM -0400, Francois Mikus wrote:
> Well, we should have the test suite use some names using the hyphen
> character. That should tell us if we are ok.
>
> And manual testing for: notifications, graphite export, livestatus logs
> and livestatus states, webUI, bp_rule
Hello all,
as '-' is a very common character in hostnames - is there
any reason why it's mangled to '_' or could it be added as allowed
character for host and servicenames (with the patch below) ?
This would help when feeding the graphite-carbon system with other
sources.
Thanks,
greetings
H
Hello Jean,
one of our scripts uses the Config object of shinken,
which was hidden by the appended commit.
Can this be reverted or should we change the import statements in our
script ?
Thanks and good luck with the release,
Hermann
changeset: 4949:ccf92733961f
user:Naparuba
date:
Hello Jean,
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 11:29:34AM +0200, nap wrote:
> > AttributeError: 'IForArbiter' object has no attribute 'push_host_names'
>
> this new call (push_host_names) is for the new receiver direct_routing
> feature. Is your receiver daemon uptodate?
Yes, but one of the remote ones was
Hello,
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 04:36:04PM +0200, nap wrote:
> Some of the french members here prepared a surprise for the next week, and
> it should be better if the 1.2 is out before it ;)
> So please update your Shinken as soon as the RC is out, and give us your
> feelbacks :)
installed from gi
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 11:40:50AM +0200, David GUENAULT wrote:
> i also agree with minimal at 2.6
I'd like to vote for minimal 2.6 too - it's the first release
with the .format() power of python3. Our UDP sending module
(https://bitbucket.org/hlauer/shinken2rrd) is using this.
We are testing an
Hello Jean,
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 11:35:16AM +0100, nap wrote:
> > For sending performance data via a simple, configurable ascii protocol
> > we implemented two small modules here,
> > located at https://bitbucket.org/hlauer/shinken2rrd
> >
> > Feel free to include them, although they need at le
Hello Jean,
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 08:34:35AM +0100, nap wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The 1.0Rc1 is taggued :)
>
> You can download it at https://github.com/naparuba/shinken/tarball/1.0rc1.
>
> Please review it and warn us if there is any new bugs :)
installed 0.8.5 yesterday - now 1.0rc1 is running.
> Just pulled from the git repo to use the 0.5.6, but noticed
> this version is not tagged yet.
Sorry - forgot to change the git source from surceforge to:
git://github.com/naparuba/shinken.git
0.5.6 out ouf this repo is working fine so far.
Greetings
Hermann
--
Netzwerkadministration/Zentra
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 04:29:52PM +0200, nap wrote:
> > Is can see the version 0.5.6 has been released, but impossible to find the
> > Changelog in archive (who jump from 0.5.1 to 0.6) or on SF or GitHub.
>
> Yes, I mainly update the Changelog for huge version, not minors ones, so
> it's my fault
Hi all,
after comming back after a week I found the arbiter stopped
with the attached trackback at the end of the arbiter screen output
attached below.
Any idea what could be wrong ?
Thanks and greetings
Hermann
DBG: put conf to {'adapter': ,
'URI': ,
'URI': ,
'URI':
daemon.main()
Hello,
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 09:14:07PM +0100, nap wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 5:13 PM, Gerhard Lausser
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > > change this in the future, or even better, if it is possible
> > > to have distributed passive service checks in some form with
> > what exactly do you mean b
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 08:41:41PM +0100, nap wrote:
> >> define poller{
> >> poller_name poller-monitor
> >> address test
> >> port 7879
> >> poller_tags monitoring,_untagged_
> >> }
...
> I think the _untagued_ is simpler. It's not a real pr
Hello,
is something like the following poller tag definition
thinkable ?
define poller{
poller_name poller-monitor
address test
port 7879
poller_tags monitoring,_untagged_
}
This would avoid to run two pollers in small installations
wit
Hello,
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 02:14:33PM +0200, nap wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Hermann Lauer <
> hermann.la...@iwr.uni-heidelberg.de> wrote:
>
> > > > Do the new configuration feature you announced today also allow
> > > > autogeneration o
Hello,
On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 08:11:29AM +0100, nap wrote:
> I think it's an interesting idea. Why not put just an "on_error :
> 'kill|restart|bypass' state for the module configuration ?
>
> If it's in internal, the standard is kill. External can take this parameter
> and manage it if they want
On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 12:56:30PM +0100, nap wrote:
>
> Why not as an arbiter module? It can receive such things after all.
Nice idea, as the server is rather simple. It only needs to
sit on the host with the rrd files.
> On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 12:49 PM, Flyinvap wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Le 0
On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 03:23:38PM +0100, DEGREMONT Aurelien wrote:
> nap a ?crit :
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Now the satellites daemon can have a local log. It's disabled by
> > default, and the configuration is in the etc/*d.ini of course.
> >
> > use_local_log=0
> > local_log=%(workdir)s/pollerd.log
Hello Jean,
On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 10:52:19AM +0100, nap wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Venelin Petkov
> wrote:
> > But just parsing the perfdata isn't good enough? The format is quite
> standard (http://nagios.sourceforge.net/docs/3_0/perfdata.html).
writing a parser and all the cor
Hello all,
sorry for asking here: Tried 0.4 from git on friday and got
an exception while verifying the (old) configuration.
As a brave man I added it to trac:
http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/shinken/ticket/200
Could anyone see the problem instantaneously from the backtrace below
or should I
Hello,
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 01:02:52AM +0100, jpliste wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am new to this list. I am testing Shinken, with all modules on a
> single host all is OK and all checks working fine.
> I want now to test to distribute components to a new host to monitor a
> separate network. As only
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 02:45:21PM +0200, Gerhard Lausser wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > An example may help:
> >
> > define host{
> >use linux-server
> >host_namecompute1
> > }
> > define host{
> >use linux-server
> >host_namecompute2
> > Do the new configuration feature you announced today also allow
> > autogeneration of host sections (i.e. only naming hosts in a
> > hostgroups members list) together with the implemented
> > auto address setting ?
> >
> Hum.. I do not understand all here, especially the "(i.e. only naming host
Hi Jean,
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 03:35:15PM +0200, nap wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just push a new code that should handle it. I succeed in reproduce the bug
> (not always, but in some case, the broks were send in a false order from the
> broker daemon!). After correct it, I can't reproduce it, even by ki
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 04:57:45PM +0200, nap wrote:
> > > > > Can you retry with a broker in foreground or with the --debug
> > > > /tmp/somefile
> > > > > option? We can look at the 'deleteing host' and 'adding host' outputs
> > to
> > > > > show what is the problem.
> > > >
> > > > Will try the
Hello,
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 01:44:13PM +0200, nap wrote:
> > > Can you retry with a broker in foreground or with the --debug
> > /tmp/somefile
> > > option? We can look at the 'deleteing host' and 'adding host' outputs to
> > > show what is the problem.
> >
> > Will try the --debug option next
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 02:28:00PM +0200, nap wrote:
>
> The repopulation in the broker should be quite quick after a restart. How
> much time did you wait?
5 minutes or so.
> Can you retry with a broker in foreground or with the --debug /tmp/somefile
> option? We can look at the 'deleteing host
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 05:25:16PM +0200, nap wrote:
> >> 5) adding an additional command section (without using it) and restarting
> >> the arbiter works as expected: object.cache changes and increases
> >> only with the additional command section. Great.
>
> I just update the status module code.
Hello,
when using the nagios3 cgi interface and the status broker modules
with the same config file the warnings of shinken about object_cache_file
and status_file are a bit nasty, as they are needed by the nagios cgi
interface.
If the the nagios experts are shure nagios cgi is only needing thos
Hello,
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 08:35:53AM +0200, nap wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The configuration can be slitly changed when running, like changing
> command checks, but not a full reload (like with a HUP) or a new host.
>
> But the objects.dat is something strange, we can look for it. I fink
> it's not t
Dear developers,
are there any plans to allow configuration changes while running ?
At first I thought restarting the arbiter would be enough to get
a new config distributed to all other running daemons, but it seems
never to work and later I run into the merging bug posted on the list
of the ob
Hello all,
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 11:05:08AM +0200, nap wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> Let take some times to talk about the packages for Shinken and how to
> launch the application for the users.
>
>
> Package(s) =
> First of all how many packages? We've got differents part in t
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 03:02:19PM +0200, nap wrote:
> That look like a commit I make this morning. Can you look if you have
> the line below in the file config.py?
>
> self.hostgroups.create_reversed_list()
That line was in the shinken/config.py with that problem.
reverted to commit 1d60740b5d1
Hello,
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 01:03:26PM +0200, Gerhard Lausser wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i found out that, after the new directory layout from last week, downtimes
> and comments were not written correctly to the status.dat. It's fixed now,
> please update from git.
after pulling this change I first go
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 04:41:18PM +0200, Hermann Lauer wrote:
>
> Thanks to Gerhard for finding the problem and providing a good
> way for discovering further problems with the nagios cgi.
>
> Shinken itself is not finding that problems, maybe that could
> be improved somew
Hello,
- Forwarded message from Gerhard Lausser -
in objects.cache i found a duplicate contactgroup "admin", one with alias
"IWR Administrators" and the other with members "superadmin,dbrosseau".
Also, the contactgroup GroupeADavid's members are not found.
It looks like the iwr-config an
Hello Jean,
> Is it possible to have theses 2 files? (off-list at napar...@gmail.com
> if there are confidential data like IPs). It's strange that it talk
At the moment it's working and I didn't archive the files.
> about object.dat because it's generated once at the starting of the
> broker, an
Dear shinken users,
from time to time (probably after running longer) the nagios
web interface refuses to read the shinken produced object.cache
file:
Whoops!
Error: Could not read object configuration data!
Any ideas how to debug this (on the nagios cgi side)?
object.cache and status.data tim
65 matches
Mail list logo
