[sig-policy] Re: New proposal: prop-158-v001: IPv6 auto-allocation for each IPv4 request

Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team.. I would like to share key feedback in our community for prop-158,based on a meeting we organised on 31th Jan to discuss these proposals. This feedback is sent on my behalf, but please note that it is a summary

[sig-policy] Re: New proposal - prop-157-v001: Temporary IPv4 Transfers

Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team.. I would like to share key feedback in our community for prop-157,based on a meeting we organised on 31th Jan to discuss these proposals. This feedback is sent on my behalf, but please note that it is a summary

[sig-policy] Re: New version: prop-156-v002 Assignment of Temporary IP Resources

Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team.. I would like to share key feedback in our community for prop-156,based on a meeting we organised on 31th Jan to discuss these proposals. This feedback is sent on my behalf, but please note that it is a summary

[sig-policy] Re: New version: prop-154: Resizing of IPv4 assignment for the IXPs

Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team.. I would like to share key feedback in our community for prop-154,based on a meeting we organised on 31th Jan to discuss these proposals. This feedback is sent on my behalf, but please note that it is a summary

[sig-policy] Re: New version: prop-148 Clarification - Leasing of Resources is not Acceptable

r text in the address policy depending on its content. > > Could your provide a translation of that text, so we can better understand if > something may be adjusted from our side. > > > Regards, > Jordi > > @jordipalet > > > > El 1 sept 2023, a las 4:40, Sa

[sig-policy] Re: prop-154-v001: Resizing of IPv4 assignment for the IXPs

Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team. I would like to share key feedback in our community for prop-154, based on a meeting we organised on 30th Aug to discuss these proposals. Many Negative opinions were expressed about this proposal. (comment

[sig-policy] Re: prop-153-v001: Proposed changes to PDP

Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team. I would like to share key feedback in our community for prop-152, based on a meeting we organised on 30th Aug to discuss these proposals. Almostly support opinions were expressed about this proposal. (comment

[sig-policy] Re: Prop-152-v001: Reduce the IPv4 delegation from /23 to /24

Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team. I would like to share key feedback in our community for prop-152, based on a meeting we organised on 30th Aug to discuss these proposals. Almostly neutral opinions were expressed about this proposal. (comment

[sig-policy] Re: New version: prop-148 Clarification - Leasing of Resources is not Acceptable

Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team. I would like to express my gratitude to Policy-Sig Chair/Co-Chair and the APNIC Secretariat. In the past, policy proposals were posted to the SIG-Policy ML in batches after the proposal deadline four weeks before

[sig-policy] Re: prop-151-v001: Restricting non hierarchical as-set

Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team.. I would like to share key feedback in our community for prop-151, based on a meeting we organised on 15th Feb to discuss these proposals. Many participants support the intent of this proposal, but do not believe

[sig-policy] Re: New version: prop-150: ROA/whois object with Private,,Reserved and Unallocated (reserved/available) Origin ASN

Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team. I would like to share key feedback in our community for prop-150, based on a meeting we organised on 15th Feb to discuss these proposals. The Various opinions were expressed about this proposal. (comment

[sig-policy] Re: prop-149-v001: Change of maximum delegation for less than /21 total IPv4 holdings

Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team. I would like to share key feedback in our community for prop-149, based on a meeting we organised on 15th Feb to discuss these proposals. Negative opinion were expressed on this proposal. (comment details

[sig-policy] Re: prop-147-v003: Historical Resources Management

Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team. I would like to share key feedback in our community for prop-147, based on a meeting we organised on 15th Feb to discuss these proposals. Almost Japanese community members were expressed in favor of this proposal

Re: [sig-policy] prop-132-v001 AS0 for Bogons

Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team. I would like to share a feedback in our community for prop-132, based on a meeting we organized on 21th Aug to discuss these proposals. Please note that these discussion is based on the first Proposal, prop-132

Re: [sig-policy] prop-131-v001: Editorial changes in IPv6 Policy

Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team. I would like to share a feedback in our community for prop-131, based on a meeting we organized on 21th Aug to discuss these proposals. Many participants expressed a opposing for the proposal with reasons

Re: [sig-policy] Policy Proposal: prop-130-v001: Modification of transfer policies

Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team. I would like to share a feedback in our community for prop-130, based on a meeting we organized on 21th Aug to discuss these proposals. Many participants expressed a neutral for the proposal with reasons

Re: [sig-policy] prop-124-v006: Clarification on Sub-Assignments

Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team. I would like to share a feedback in our community for prop-124,based on a meeting we organized on 21th Aug to discuss these proposals. Many participants expressed a neutral for the proposal with reasons

Re: [sig-policy] Version 4 of prop-126 PDP Update

Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team. I would like to share a feedback in our community for prop-126, based on a meeting we organized on 21th Aug to discuss these proposals. Many participants expressed a supporting for the proposal with reasons

Re: [sig-policy] prop-129-v001: Abolish Waiting list for unmet IPv4 requests

Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team. I would like to share a feedback in our community for prop-129, based on a meeting we organized on 12th Feb to discuss these proposals. Substantial support expressed for the proposal with the reason

Re: [sig-policy] prop-128-v001: Multihoming not required for ASN

Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team. I would like to share a feedback in our community for prop-128, based on a meeting we organized on 12th Feb to discuss these proposals. Substantial support expressed, subject to not deleting the "it

Re: [sig-policy] Prop-127 announcement : Change maximum delegation size of 103/8 IPv4 address, pool to a /23

Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team. I would like to share a feedback in our community for prop-127, based on a meeting we organized on 12th Feb to discuss these proposals. Almost half of participants were oppose the proposal and almost other half

Re: [sig-policy] Version 3 - prop-126 PDP Update

Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team. I would like to share a feedback in our community for prop-126, based on a meeting we organized on 12th Feb to discuss these proposals. Many participants expressed a supporting for the proposal. But a few

Re: [sig-policy] prop-124-version 5: Clarification on IPv6 Sub-Assignments

Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team. I would like to share a feedback in our community for prop-124, based on a meeting we organized on 12th Feb to discuss these proposals. Many participants expressed a neutral for the proposal with reasons

Re: [sig-policy] prop-126-v001 : PDP Update

*Dear Colleagues,I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum.I would like to share key feedback in our community for prop-126,based on a meeting we organised on 22nd Aug to discuss these proposals.* *Many supporting opinions were expressed about the point of confirming consensus

Re: [sig-policy] prop-125-v001: Validation of "abuse-mailbox" and other IRT emails

*Dear Colleagues,I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum.I would like to share key feedback in our community for prop-125,based on a meeting we organised on 22nd Aug to discuss these proposals.Many supporting opinions were expressed on this proposal. - Agree, you should. - When mail

Re: [sig-policy] Prop124 version 4

*Dear Colleagues,I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum.I would like to share key feedback in our community for prop-124,based on a meeting we organised on 22nd Aug to discuss these proposals.Many supporting opinions were expressed on this proposal.However, also many concerning comment

Re: [sig-policy] A new version of the proposal "prop-118: No need policy in APNIC region"

*Dear Colleagues,I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum.I would like to share key feedback in our community for prop-118,based on a meeting we organised on 22nd Aug to discuss these proposals.Many supporting opinions were expressed on this proposal.However, many comments were expressed

Re: [sig-policy] prop-120-v002: Final /8 pool exhaustion plan

Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team. I would like to share a feedback in our community for prop-120, based on a meeting we organised on 31st Jan to discuss these proposals. Many supporting comment expressed on this proposal. Japanese community

Re: [sig-policy] sig-policy Digest, Vol 164, Issue 10

Sep 2017 should be limited to one. Would you please give us your opinion ? BTW, About 60%+ 103/8 has already allocated. Therefore, the consensus of prop-123 means a substantial abolition of prop-116. We need re-think why prop-116 was consensus. Thanks, Satoru Tsurumaki 2018-01-29 20:09 GMT+0

Re: [sig-policy] prop-123-v001: Modify 103/8 IPv4 transfer policy

? Regards, Satoru Tsurumaki JPOPF Steering Team (former JPNIC Policy Working Group) 2018-01-26 12:27 GMT+09:00 Bertrand Cherrier <b.cherr...@micrologic.nc>: > Dear SIG members, > > The proposal "prop-123-v001: Modify 103/8 IPv4 transfer policy" has >

Re: [sig-policy] New proposal prop-121: Updating "InitialIPv6 allocation"

osal prop-121: Updating "InitialIPv6 > allocation" > > Dear Colleagues, > > > I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Policy Working Group in Japan. > > I would like to share key feedback in our community for prop-121, > based on a meeting we organised on 5th Se

Re: [sig-policy] prop-119: Temporary transfers, to be discussed at APNIC 44 Polic y SIG

on feedback from the Japanese community. 2017-09-08 17:52 GMT+08:00 David Hilario <d.hila...@laruscloudservice.net>: > Dear Satoru, > > Thank you for conveying the feedback here. > > > On 8 September 2017 at 09:32, Satoru Tsurumaki > <satoru.tsurum...@g.softbank.co

Re: [sig-policy] New proposal prop-122-v001: Updating "Subsequent IPv6 allocation " policy

Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Policy Working Group in Japan. I would like to share key feedback in our community for prop-122, based on a meeting we organised on 5th Sep to discuss these proposals. Many opposing comments were expressed with the same reasons as for prop-121

Re: [sig-policy] New proposal prop-121: Updating "InitialIPv6 allocation"

Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Policy Working Group in Japan. I would like to share key feedback in our community for prop-121, based on a meeting we organised on 5th Sep to discuss these proposals. Many opposing comments were expressed on the proposal with reasons below

Re: [sig-policy] New proposal prop-120: Final /8 pool exhaustion plan

Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Policy Working Group in Japan. I would like to share key feedback in our community for prop-120, based on a meeting we organised on 5th Sep to discuss these proposals. Many support expressed on clarifying how IPv4 addresses should be distributed

Re: [sig-policy] [Sig-policy] New version of prop-116: Prohibit to transfer IPv4 addresses in the final /8 block

Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Policy Working Group in Japan. I would like to share key feedback in our community for prop-116, based on a meeting we organised on 5th Sep to discuss these proposals. Substantial support expressed for the proposal with reasons below. * Transfer

Re: [sig-policy] prop-119: Temporary transfers, to be discussed at APNIC 44 Polic y SIG

dly remove all the listing. REPEAT. agree. This proposal support the spammer and the LIR who support or earn income from the spammer. I'm afraid that those spammer and LIR can transfer the address resources more freely and frequency if both prop-119 and prop-118 will be a consensus. Satoru Tsur

Re: [sig-policy] prop-119: Temporary transfers, to be discussed at APNIC 44 Polic y SIG

way. After that, the source organization might be "laundering" the address from SPAM DB, then lease this address to another spammers. I think we should oppose the proposal which might support the spammer. regards, Satoru Tsurumaki 2017-08-09 15:16 GMT+09:00 chku <c...@twnic.net.