I've been living with rc-shim for several months now, and while it isn't
perfect, it's certainly taken a lot of the pain out of migration while
using SysV rc scripts. I'm planning on switching off of runit this summer
and moving to s6, so this is both a "proof in the pudding" moment for me
because
Le 21/04/2018 à 18:19, Guillaume Perréal a écrit :
Le 21/04/2018 à 12:28, Didier Kryn a écrit :
May I humbly ask why you don't start with Devuan (which is Debian
stripped out of systemd)? Of course it is less challenging than doing
the job on Debian, but it would be wholehartedly applauded
On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 4:27 AM, SZÉPE Viktor wrote:
>
> Actually my first step of setting up a production Debian-based server is
> reverting back to SysVinit
> https://github.com/szepeviktor/debian-server-tools/blob/
> master/debian-setup.sh#L88-L90
> Currently I haven't reached a single boot, s
Le 21/04/2018 à 12:28, Didier Kryn a écrit :
May I humbly ask why you don't start with Devuan (which is Debian
stripped out of systemd)? Of course it is less challenging than doing
the job on Debian, but it would be wholehartedly applauded and tested
by the Devuan community, while you shoul
Idézem/Quoting Didier Kryn :
Le 20/04/2018 à 07:48, SZÉPE Viktor a écrit :
Idézem/Quoting Colin Booth :
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 11:10:33PM +, Laurent Bercot wrote:
Have any started (thinking about) packaging skalibs, execline and s6
the Debian policy-obeying way?
What does that mean?
Le 20/04/2018 à 07:48, SZÉPE Viktor a écrit :
Idézem/Quoting Colin Booth :
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 11:10:33PM +, Laurent Bercot wrote:
> Have any started (thinking about) packaging skalibs, execline and s6
> the Debian policy-obeying way?
What does that mean? If it's just FHS, skarnet.or
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 07:48:23AM +0200, SZÉPE Viktor wrote:
> > ... into both .deb's and .rpm's using fpm without much fuss.
>
> That much fuss includes 859 lintian tags e.g. gcc hardening, rc scripts for
> essential Debian packages, a systemd->s6 migration utility etc.
> https://lintian.debian.
Idézem/Quoting Colin Booth :
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 11:10:33PM +, Laurent Bercot wrote:
> Have any started (thinking about) packaging skalibs, execline and s6
> the Debian policy-obeying way?
What does that mean? If it's just FHS, skarnet.org follows FHS by
default, so there's no problem
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 11:10:33PM +, Laurent Bercot wrote:
> > Have any started (thinking about) packaging skalibs, execline and s6
> > the Debian policy-obeying way?
>
> What does that mean? If it's just FHS, skarnet.org follows FHS by
> default, so there's no problem here. Are there other
It's probably not what you meant by 'obey', but I've been shoving skalibs,
execline, and s6 into both .deb's and .rpm's using fpm without much fuss.
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 4:10 PM, Laurent Bercot
wrote:
> Have any started (thinking about) packaging skalibs, execline and s6 the
>> Debian policy
Have any started (thinking about) packaging skalibs, execline and s6
the Debian policy-obeying way?
What does that mean? If it's just FHS, skarnet.org follows FHS by
default, so there's no problem here. Are there other constraints
restricting what a Debian package can do?
--
Laurent
11 matches
Mail list logo