Thanks for your persistence Ben,
I reduced the size of the array to a 2Gb RAID 1 and experienced the same
problem.
I've worked out that I can load more recent firmware using a more recent
version of Sun Common Array Manager. The firmware
load failed in RHEL so I'll have to wait until Sun has
Hi Nick,
Actually, I originally had 5x1Tb in a LVM group and that suited me fine. The
HBA didn't support RAID for some reason. The only
problem was that Fedora 11 udev tended to timeout when attempting to detect the
individual disks. The only way to solve the
problem was to plug in the SAS
Hi,
Thanks for the pointers.
Is it possible that the HBA driver loads the firmware onto the drives? I've
tried the harddrive vendor (Hitachi), but they don't
release firmware updates.
I reduced the size of the array to 4x2Tb RAID10 (4Tb redundant).
Perhaps I'll try a smaller size to see if
Hi,
I am attempting to run Fedora 13 on a SunFire X4140 with an external Sun
StorageTek enclosure with 7x2Tb disks. Fedora
13 boots of a single internal SAS drive.
The HBA is an Adaptec AAC-RAID (rev 09). I have successfully created a RAID
array using the adaptec BIOS. I have also
Just for fun, I'm setting up a FC10 machine with as an IPv6 router.
The tunnel device (tun0) is automatically created using a script (aiccu)
I want to allow other machines to use this box as a gateway, but I
think I have the config wrong
1: lo: LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP mtu 16436
inet6
I am really most concerned about all the side effects of filtering that we are yet to uncover.
For example:
If I hosted on a dynamic IP, although I have been assured that it is unlikely, how would I deal with the event that my IP has been blocked to other users? Could the federal government
My wife and I have a shared computer at home, however, I seem to be facing a loosing battle for her experiences with linux to remain pleasant. I am running fedora core 9 with additional packages from the Livna repository
Some nuances:
* We've not been able to find a way to purchase songs from
I use samba on a mixed OS network. We have several NAS devices and two
Fedora workstations which share drives using NAS.
I have configured the Fedora workstations to only announce on the local
subnet (/24) to prevent inadvertent connections from the wider organization.
I implement this by
Thanks for putting the January meeting online on so promptly. For me,
the material has sparked a few interesting conversations with friends
in the industry.
I've noticed how MS folk tout their openness as though they have
solved the interoperability problem in one fowl swoop. I wouldn't
I suspect that the cause is poor support for journalling. I created a
separate HFS+ partition with journalling turned off. This time I
didn't have to force rw mode, so I suspect it will be more stable.
I'll post back here if it dies again.
Thanks
Robbie
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's
Hello,
I've recently set up a Mac/Linux dual boot system. I mounted the HFS+ drive
using the experimental HFS driver in read/write mode so I could share my user
home between both operating systems. Unfortunately this corrupted my HFS file
system today and I had lots of lively messages coming
Hi,
I have a colleague from Uppsala University, Sweden. He uses ITK/VTK for
data processing and manipulation of Medical Images. He currently has a
post-doc position which is shared between UOW and a Sydney hospital.
He's informed me that UOW would not let him use his RedHat (Fedora Core
3)
12 matches
Mail list logo