Hey Alan you are missing the option Screw Autodesk I will stay with
Softimage until I believe there is something better.
So I didn't vote.
Cheers!
2014-03-04 10:37 GMT-06:00 Alan Fregtman alan.fregt...@gmail.com:
I've set up a poll out of curiosity...
*Where will you transition to when
No option for sticking with Softimage till the end?
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 5:37 PM, Alan Fregtman alan.fregt...@gmail.comwrote:
I've set up a poll out of curiosity...
*Where will you transition to when Softimage falls?* Vote!
http://strawpoll.me/1257710
(Multiple-choice allowed btw.)
I've set up a poll out of curiosity...
*Where will you transition to when Softimage falls?* Vote!
http://strawpoll.me/1257710
(Multiple-choice allowed btw.)
My question is where will you transition to. If you don't transition, no
need to vote.
I get that it hasn't fallen yet necessarily, but it's only a matter of time
for reasons revealed today. When it happens, where will you go? That is my
question.
I will stick with Soft for personal stuff too
I think Allan wants to know with the poll the migration to software that
will be available in the future, which is something everybody on the user
list should be interested. I think that, as a softimage user is pretty
important to see where all the majority of users or studios would migrate,
Well yes. Putting into that perspective the poll. It is fine then.
I will migrate when I find that something is better. But I believe that
adding such option will give a more clear result of what is going on with
us. And leaving out the stick to Softimage option kind of biases the
poll IMHO.
question is clear true but right now non of those really offers me anything
that I can use in daily work covering all are from modeling to rig
animation lighting and rendering.
anything form the list would mean either months of learning to be at even
close level to be able to make anything in
Houdini would be the clear choice. So now if SideFX can show some
safe-place-love toward the raped and abused... and give out a nice
cross-over discount for Houdini FX... :)
Daniel
VFXM
+1
2014-03-04 10:55 GMT-06:00 Mirko Jankovic mirkoj.anima...@gmail.com:
question is clear true but right now non of those really offers me
anything that I can use in daily work covering all are from modeling to rig
animation lighting and rendering.
anything form the list would mean either
If I were SideFX's Marketing team I would do a coupon code called like
XSILOVE that gives you a sweet discount on new licenses.
Wouldn't that be nice? :) Hope they're listening.
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Daniel H vfxc...@gmail.com wrote:
Houdini would be the clear choice. So now if
I will stick with SI for modeling. I think Maya still has to improve a lot
to match SI in that aspect. Modo seems like a good alternative for modeling
but I doubt it will offer more than the last Softimage any time soon.
I work for games but since I don't own a game publisher company, I really
I like how your proprietary tech option is in /quotation marks/.
Proprietary technology. LOL!!!
-Tim
On 3/4/2014 10:53 AM, Emilio Hernandez wrote:
Well yes. Putting into that perspective the poll. It is fine then.
I will migrate when I find that something is better. But I believe
that
+1 for sticking with Softimage as long as I can, probably 3-5 years. Then
we can have a poll :)
/Jens
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 6:03 PM, Martin Yara furik...@gmail.com wrote:
I will stick with SI for modeling. I think Maya still has to improve a lot
to match SI in that aspect. Modo seems like
XSILOVE Yes, that would be awesome! ...everything is cool when you're
part of a team...
Daniel
VFXM
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Alan Fregtman alan.fregt...@gmail.comwrote:
If I were SideFX's Marketing team I would do a coupon code called like
XSILOVE that gives you a sweet discount on
Yep. Or $4495 for a workstation license and then $2495 per year. For a
minute there it looked like Autodesk was doing something half reasonable
with the free transition offer to Softimage + Maya. But then I saw that
accepting that means that I would not be allowed to use Softimage at all
after
Subscription contract for a period beyond
that date. You will be able to continue to use Softimage but will forfeit any
future updates to either 3ds Max or Maya.
From: Ben Rogall
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2014 6:42 PM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: Softimage transition audience poll
Rogall
Sent: 04 March 2014 17:42
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: Softimage transition audience poll
Yep. Or $4495 for a workstation license and then $2495 per year. For a
minute there it looked like Autodesk was doing something half reasonable
with the free transition offer
but will forfeit any
future updates to either 3ds Max or Maya. /
//
//
*From:* Ben Rogall mailto:xsi_l...@shaders.moederogall.com
*Sent:* Tuesday, March 04, 2014 6:42 PM
*To:* softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
mailto:softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
*Subject:* Re: Softimage transition audience poll
Yep
Mostly a lack of respect.
From: Ben Rogall [xsi_l...@shaders.moederogall.com]
Sent: 04 March 2014 07:42 PM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: Softimage transition audience poll
Yep. Or $4495 for a workstation license and then $2495 per year
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Ben Rogall
xsi_l...@shaders.moederogall.com wrote:
Yep. Or $4495 for a workstation license and then $2495 per year. For a
minute there it looked like Autodesk was doing something half reasonable
with the free transition offer to Softimage + Maya. But then I
Davidson
angus.david...@wits.ac.zawrote:
Mostly a lack of respect.
--
*From:* Ben Rogall [xsi_l...@shaders.moederogall.com]
*Sent:* 04 March 2014 07:42 PM
*To:* softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
*Subject:* Re: Softimage transition audience poll
Yep. Or $4495
Rogall [xsi_l...@shaders.moederogall.com
mailto:xsi_l...@shaders.moederogall.com]
*Sent:* 04 March 2014 07:42 PM
*To:* softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
mailto:softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
*Subject:* Re: Softimage transition audience poll
Yep. Or $4495 for a workstation
Amen Vincent.
From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com
[mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Vincent Fortin
Sent: 4 mars 2014 14:11
To: softimage
Subject: Re: Softimage transition audience poll
This is just my 0.02c regarding Houdini pricing...
You can always
it should still work, you just stop renewing subscription ie. don't update
your licenses for 2017 versions of maya or max
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Francois Lord flordli...@gmail.com wrote:
I posted my comment about Maya being appealing BEFORE I saw the clause
that Softimage would
at 12:59 PM, Angus Davidson angus.david...@wits.ac.za
wrote:
Mostly a lack of respect.
--
*From:* Ben Rogall [xsi_l...@shaders.moederogall.com]
*Sent:* 04 March 2014 07:42 PM
*To:* softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
*Subject:* Re: Softimage transition audience
enforced everywhere though.
From: adrian wyer
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2014 6:51 PM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: RE: Softimage transition audience poll
im guessing they don't want you to have 2 production apps for the price of one,
basically admitting that a two year old Soft
licenses.
It wasn't enforced everywhere though.
*From:* adrian wyer adrian.w...@fluid-pictures.com
*Sent:* Tuesday, March 04, 2014 6:51 PM
*To:* softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
*Subject:* RE: Softimage transition audience poll
im guessing they don't want you to have 2 production apps
*Sent:* Tuesday, March 04, 2014 6:51 PM
*To:* softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
*Subject:* RE: Softimage transition audience poll
im guessing they don't want you to have 2 production apps for the price
of one, basically admitting that a two year old Soft will be AT LEAST as
productive as Maya
will be able to continue to use
Softimage but will forfeit any future updates to either 3ds Max or Maya. *
*From:* Ben Rogall xsi_l...@shaders.moederogall.com
*Sent:* Tuesday, March 04, 2014 6:42 PM
*To:* softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
*Subject:* Re: Softimage transition audience poll
Yep
...@shaders.moederogall.com ]
Sent: 04 March 2014 07:42 PM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
mailto:softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: Softimage transition audience poll
Yep. Or $4495 for a workstation license and then $2495 per year. For a
minute there it looked like
those are some nice tools no matter what application it is in.
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 2:38 PM, pedro santos probi...@gmail.com wrote:
LightWave comes around as outdated, but LWCAD might catter some people
doing speed modeling all day long.
31 matches
Mail list logo
