Hi Fred,
Please note the quotes on stateless in Alain's mail.
Some techniques are not as stateless as is claimed.
Please see the chair's slides in IETF 81.
Regards,
Behcet
On Sep 7, 2011, at 1:58 PM, Alain Durand wrote:
Fred:
The way I phrased the call for the interim meeting on
Hi Fred,
Please note the quotes on stateless in Alain's mail.
Some techniques are not as stateless as is claimed.
Please see the chair's slides in IETF 81.
Regards,
Behcet
On Sep 7, 2011, at 1:58 PM, Alain Durand wrote:
Fred:
The way I phrased the call for the interim meeting
I think it would be useful to reframe the discussion away from
stateless/stateful and more towards the issues that operators are interested
in: capital investment and ongoing operational expense. stateless/stateful
is related to those expense issues but there is not, for any given operator,
Hi Ralph,
Fully agree. From operator aspect, we do not care about whether it is a
stateful or a totally stateless one. We are just interested in a good
solution which is easy to use, operate and cost less. So any solution,
either stateless or less stateful , will be welcome if they can meet our
Fred:
The way I phrased the call for the interim meeting on the mailling list might
have created some unwanted confusion.
Yong and I are going to publish the agenda for the interim meeting very soon.
There will be ample time to discuss the various propositions on the table in
the 'stateless'
On Sep 7, 2011, at 1:58 PM, Alain Durand wrote:
Fred:
The way I phrased the call for the interim meeting on the mailling list might
have created some unwanted confusion.
Yong and I are going to publish the agenda for the interim meeting very soon.
There will be ample time to discuss
