In your previous mail you wrote:
This is an issue common to all stateless solutions, including deterministic
NAT with (anaycast) IPv4 address pool.
= +1!
In fact, it is an issue common to all solutions implying mandatory
filtering on transport fields (aka layer 4) including ports.
Regards
In your previous mail you wrote:
In this context, the important consideration is AFAIK that it is
completely acceptable to lose fragmented packets that, with bad
luck, happen to be routed via distinct BRs when there is a route
change. Frequent route changes would have many more severe
Fan; Softwires
Objet : Re: [Softwires] Fragmentation in sdnat-02
2012/3/21, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com mohamed.boucad...@orange.com:
Dear Washam,
This is an issue common to all stateless solutions,
including deterministic
NAT with (anaycast) IPv4 address pool.
FWIW, we recorded
Mohamed OLNC/NAD/TIP
Cc : Washam Fan; Softwires
Objet : Re: [Softwires] Fragmentation in sdnat-02
2012/3/21, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com
mohamed.boucad...@orange.com:
Dear Washam,
This is an issue common to all stateless solutions,
including deterministic
NAT with (anaycast) IPv4 address
]
Envoyé : vendredi 23 mars 2012 10:02
À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed OLNC/NAD/TIP
Cc : GangChen; Softwires
Objet : Re: [Softwires] Fragmentation in sdnat-02
Hi, Med,
Thanks for this question.
1. As we know, all fragments of a packet from a given
off-domain host to a given in-domain IPv4
Hi, Washam,
Le 2012-03-23 à 03:08, Washam Fan a écrit :
There is no text saying 4rd-u BRs are anycasted to IPv4 network in the
first place. Remi, could you clarify on this?
Thanks,
washam
Not sure to understand the question.
IPv4 routing toward BRs is based on IPv4 prefixes (which are
: BOUCADAIR Mohamed OLNC/NAD/TIP
Cc : Washam Fan; Softwires
Objet : Re: [Softwires] Fragmentation in sdnat-02
2012/3/21, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com mohamed.boucad...@orange.com:
Dear Washam,
This is an issue common to all stateless solutions,
including deterministic
NAT with (anaycast) IPv4
,
Med
-Message d'origine-
De : GangChen [mailto:phdg...@gmail.com]
Envoyé : jeudi 22 mars 2012 08:33
À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed OLNC/NAD/TIP
Cc : Washam Fan; Softwires
Objet : Re: [Softwires] Fragmentation in sdnat-02
2012/3/21, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com mohamed.boucad...@orange.com:
Dear
Dear Washam,
This is an issue common to all stateless solutions, including deterministic NAT
with (anaycast) IPv4 address pool.
FWIW, we recorded this issue here:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dec-stateless-4v6-04#section-5.15.2.
As a solution to this issue, we proposed to implement the