It's not up to Lucene and Solr, as it is an Apache Infrastructure thing. It is
also unclear as to provenance w/ GIT. So, even for all of GITs benefits, it's
a non-starter at this point Foundation wise, so no need for a flamewar at all.
For the record, yes, I deal with dozens of patches at a
Looks like we are ready to go to merge the Lucene and Solr dev mailing lists.
The new list will be d...@lucene.apache.org. All existing subscribers will
automatically be subscribed to the new list. For more info, see
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2567.
-Grant
.
Thank you
Martin
--
Grant Ingersoll
http://www.lucidimagination.com/
Search the Lucene ecosystem using Solr/Lucene:
http://www.lucidimagination.com/search
AFAICT, those are just coding styles. It would be nice to have the project
files setup somehow too.
On Apr 14, 2010, at 2:40 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: I think it would be good to put these up on the Wiki.
We have Eclipse and IDEA configs on the wiki, we just need users of
those
furthermore.
That's about it.
Any ideas? Any help will be appreciated.
Thank you
Martin
--
Grant Ingersoll
http://www.lucidimagination.com/
Search the Lucene ecosystem using Solr/Lucene:
http://www.lucidimagination.com/search
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1878?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12856415#action_12856415
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-1878:
---
Why would the need to be Javascript? You
You should also see SOLR-1834. More later.
On Apr 6, 2010, at 9:24 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
Hi,
This post pertains to the integration between Lucene Connectors Framework and
Solr.
I don't know a ton about Solr, but one of the engineers here at MetaCarta has
become quite familiar with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12853376#action_12853376
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-1568:
---
bq. changing SpatialOptions w/o breaking back
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12853380#action_12853380
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-1568:
---
even better. Patch soon
Implement Spatial
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12853406#action_12853406
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-1568:
---
No, you are right. I wasn't thinking clearly
Any reason why we are storing the double value for the ConstValueSource? I
imagine it saves a cast in an inner loop, right? I kind of would like a Const
that has the full double value. For now, I'm going to add a constructor for
it. Over time, this goes to the issue of allowing for more
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll updated SOLR-1568:
--
Attachment: SOLR-1568.patch
small updates, started working on the multi-field solution. Almost
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll updated SOLR-1568:
--
Attachment: SOLR-1568.patch
Unit test that shows problems at the pole.
Implement Spatial
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1819?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12852801#action_12852801
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-1819:
---
Looks like Tika has an RC out. I'll give
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll updated SOLR-1568:
--
Attachment: SOLR-1568.patch
Got some tests and most of the rework from Yonik's comments. Some
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll resolved SOLR-1586.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Create Spatial Point FieldTypes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12852808#action_12852808
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-773:
--
Dan, sfilt can take a units measurement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12852809#action_12852809
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-773:
--
Status update:
SOLR-1568, which is the last big
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1622?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12852810#action_12852810
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-1622:
---
Some notes from IRC:
-cool - if you go
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12852009#action_12852009
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-1568:
---
Thanks for the thorough feedback, Yonik
On Mar 30, 2010, at 8:33 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 8:06 AM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
We have two choices:
* we could treat this stuff as impl details, and add protwords.txt support
to all stemming factories. we could just wrap the filter with a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1849?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll resolved SOLR-1849.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.5
ant luke target in Solr build no longer works
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1849?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll closed SOLR-1849.
-
ant luke target in Solr build no longer works
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1848?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12851141#action_12851141
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-1848:
---
I was just trying to solve something I find
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1804?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12850204#action_12850204
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-1804:
---
We should be able to go through with this now
Add example Query page to the example
-
Key: SOLR-1848
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1848
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Grant Ingersoll
Priority
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1848?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12850226#action_12850226
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-1848:
---
Make that http://localhost:8983/solr/example
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1848?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12850254#action_12850254
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-1848:
---
B/c you don't always have access to those
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1848?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12850263#action_12850263
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-1848:
---
Seriously, Yonik? This is worth
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1848?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12850272#action_12850272
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-1848:
---
Whatever. Do as you wish.
Add example
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1848?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12850272#action_12850272
]
Grant Ingersoll edited comment on SOLR-1848 at 3/26/10 6:17 PM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1849?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12850357#action_12850357
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-1849:
---
For the record, the current workaround
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1849?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll updated SOLR-1849:
--
Description:
Here's a fix:
{code}
property name=luke.version value=1.0.0/
available file
ant luke target in Solr build no longer works
-
Key: SOLR-1849
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1849
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Grant Ingersoll
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll updated SOLR-1568:
--
Attachment: SOLR-1568.patch
Compiles and is much closer, but still doesn't work exactly right
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2567
On Mar 22, 2010, at 11:44 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
Shall we merge the dev mailing lists? This should reduce the cross-posting
and can be completely automated (other than you may have to update your
client-side filters) and was part
On Mar 22, 2010, at 8:27 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
Hi all,
the discussion where to do the development after the merge, now gets actual:
Currently a lusolr test-trunk is done as a branch inside solr
(https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/solr/branches/newtrunk). The
question is, where
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
--
Grant Ingersoll
http://www.lucidimagination.com/
Search the Lucene ecosystem using Solr/Lucene:
http://www.lucidimagination.com/search
Quick Status on where we are at:
The new trunk for the merge is now open:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/trunk/ All committers should have
the same rights that they had before.
Please do all development on those.
The new mailing list has been requested:
On Mar 23, 2010, at 10:09 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
3. Other nightly build stuff. My cron tabs, etc. I will update them to
point at the new trunk.
OK, I updated my cron tab for the site check out of Lucene. Not sure who
handles Solr.
Shall we merge the dev mailing lists? This should reduce the cross-posting and
can be completely automated (other than you may have to update your client-side
filters) and was part of the plan to merge dev efforts.
I'd propose it be called lucene-solr-...@l.a.o. I can put in an issue for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1838?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12848175#action_12848175
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-1838:
---
What's your input URL? It looks to me like
On Mar 22, 2010, at 12:43 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote:
Logistically, how would this work?
would d...@lucene.apache.org be an alias for java-dev and solr-dev? or
a whole new list?
I thought of d...@l.a.o, but we still have other dev lists under the PMC, so
didn't want to imply it was the only
On Mar 17, 2010, at 9:41 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 9:16 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote:
I tend to agree w/ Hoss here. I don't think we have to be the same version
numbers and I don't think we absolutely have to do lockstep releases.
No one said
On Mar 18, 2010, at 2:06 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Michael McCandless
luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote:
Ahh, OK.
Meaning Solr will have to remove deprecated support, which means
Solr's next released version would be a major release? Ie 2.0?
But we need
On Mar 18, 2010, at 2:49 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: Sorry - I should have quoted it.
: You cited user confusion, and I was giving an example of how it was
: very easy to explain... an example of what I'd put in the release
: notes to explain it.
Ahhh... sorry, yes i did in fact
I tend to agree w/ Hoss here. I don't think we have to be the same version
numbers and I don't think we absolutely have to do lockstep releases.
On Mar 17, 2010, at 8:38 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: In the interest of moving forward, perhaps we should just focus on the
: immediate next
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Grant Ingersoll
Priority: Minor
For debugging purposes, it would be great if the RunExecutableListener had the
means to log the output of the script that is being run, including both the
error stream and the output
On Mar 16, 2010, at 11:00 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
Here is a very rough list of what makes sense to me:
- since lucene is on a new major version, the next solr release
containing that sould have a new major version number
- this does not preclude further releases on 1.x
- for simplicity,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1804?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12845453#action_12845453
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-1804:
---
Robert, instead of tracking it down by brute
Per the vote on general@ to merge committers, I've given Lucene and Solr
committers access to the two trunks.
-Grant
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12844083#action_12844083
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-1316:
---
What's the status on this?
Create
On Mar 11, 2010, at 6:30 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
Interesting looking stuff Marcus!
Seems sort of related to stat.facet (calc stats on unique facet values)
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/StatsComponent
And https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1622
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 5:49 PM,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1813?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll reassigned SOLR-1813:
-
Assignee: Grant Ingersoll
Support Arabic PDF extraction
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1813?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll resolved SOLR-1813.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.5
Support Arabic PDF extraction
On Mar 8, 2010, at 12:45 AM, David Smiley @MITRE.org wrote:
Hello folks,
I'm trying to follow all this spatial work going on right now and it's
tough. I'd just like to try it out. I'm on trunk but some of the examples
on the SpatialSearch wiki page error (Unknown function point in
=_val_:recip(dist(2, store,
point(34.0232,-81.0664)),1,1,0)fl=*,score
What's the error? Did you start with a clean index? I haven't actually tried
the example in a while.
I'm on the very latest trunk from minutes ago, and I did a clean before
building Solr.
Grant Ingersoll-6 wrote
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12842491#action_12842491
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-1297:
---
bq. parseSort needs to actually parse
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1622?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12842082#action_12842082
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-1622:
---
Sure, if we can get a patch
Upgrade Carrot2 to 3.2.0
Key: SOLR-1804
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1804
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: contrib - Clustering
Reporter: Grant Ingersoll
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll updated SOLR-1568:
--
Attachment: SOLR-1568.patch
More progress. Don't think it even compiles, but putting it up
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12836394#action_12836394
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-1297:
---
Not following. What do I need to fix
On Feb 18, 2010, at 1:54 PM, patrick o'leary wrote:
Cool, we want to examine certain fields of a docset which currently is a
multivalued field, obviously only the first value gets loaded into field
cache.
But if a poly field that can be loaded into FC, then that will work, we can
extend
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12835796#action_12835796
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-1297:
---
See the processSort() method in QueryParsing
For sorting or just in general?
Sorting currently is not supported for PointType, etc. (although it probably
could be if someone wanted to define it, although I'm not a 100% sure what it
would mean in all cases).
In reality, Poly Fields are just semantic sugar around other fields, at least
Reporter: Grant Ingersoll
Priority: Trivial
As the title says. Here's the fix:
{code}
Index: DistanceUtils.java
===
--- DistanceUtils.java (revision 911529)
+++ DistanceUtils.java (working copy)
@@ -140,7 +140,7
Haste makes waste. I'll check in a test for all this stuff too in the near
future, but that test is too intertwined with other changes at the moment.
On Feb 18, 2010, at 2:56 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: + idex = end;
typo? ... it's causing a compile error.
-Hoss
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1302?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12834940#action_12834940
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-1302:
---
Yep, good catch Shalin. You want to fix
On Feb 16, 2010, at 1:36 PM, Fuad Efendi wrote:
Hi Dev,
I've read very interesting interview with Ryan,
http://www.lucidimagination.com/Community/Hear-from-the-Experts/Podcasts-and
-Videos/Interview-Ryan-McKinley
Another finding is
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-773
Yep, all in trunk
On Feb 16, 2010, at 4:41 PM, Fuad Efendi wrote:
Most of SOLR-773 is incorporated into trunk at this point w/ the
exception of Cartesian Tier filtering (and, more generically,
intelligent field type specific spatial filtering via SOLR-1568). I
hope to complete that in the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1738?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll resolved SOLR-1738.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision 910806.
Upgrade to Tika 0.6
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12832008#action_12832008
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-773:
--
Just an update here on other work related
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12831611#action_12831611
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-1568:
---
Actually, in thinking some more about
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12831140#action_12831140
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-1568:
---
So, one of the things I'm not sure on here
In looking at the code, I see:
code
try {
short val = Short.parseShort(s);
writer.writeShort(name, val);
} catch (NumberFormatException e){
// can't parse - write out the contents as a string so nothing is lost and
// clients don't get a parse error.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll updated SOLR-1568:
--
Attachment: SOLR-1568.patch
A totally NON WORKING patch. The only thing really defined
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12805511#action_12805511
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-1163:
---
Uri,
Is this patch still up to date
Upgrade to Tika 0.6
---
Key: SOLR-1738
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1738
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Grant Ingersoll
Assignee: Grant Ingersoll
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12804759#action_12804759
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-1568:
---
bq. And how would that be specified out
On Jan 22, 2010, at 9:16 AM, Jan Høydahl / Cominvent wrote:
On 12. jan. 2010, at 16.27, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
I think it's good to link to outside publications, and it doesn't seem like a
problem to me that it's a related product. News snippets linking to magazine
articles (especially
I'd look at the properties setup in the Ant build.xml test target to see what's
missing. I don't use Eclipse, so that is the only advice I have. For the
tests, I believe the solr.solr.home dir needs to be the one under the src test
dir.
On Jan 20, 2010, at 12:27 AM, Siv Anette Fjellkårstad
Deep Paging and Large Results Improvements
--
Key: SOLR-1726
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1726
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Grant Ingersoll
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1301?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12800720#action_12800720
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-1301:
---
Seems like this would make the most sense
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1301?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12800723#action_12800723
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-1301:
---
bq. Furthermore, by using
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1301?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12800748#action_12800748
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-1301:
---
bq. Hmm, I don't think this would make sense
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1301?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12800760#action_12800760
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-1301:
---
Don't confuse the ZK stuff for search w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1301?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12800785#action_12800785
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-1301:
---
I don't follow how sending docs to a suite
at sigram dot com
--
Grant Ingersoll
http://www.lucidimagination.com/
Search the Lucene ecosystem using Solr/Lucene:
http://www.lucidimagination.com/search
can reindex 2 terabytes of data in half a day vs weeks or more
with 4 Solr masters has compelling advantages.
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote:
I can see why that is a win over the existing, but I still don't get why it
wouldn't be faster just
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12799959#action_12799959
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-773:
--
Sorry, meant w/o LocalSolr. Most of LocalSolr
On Jan 12, 2010, at 5:45 AM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
Hey gang,
I'd like to put an image and link to our LucidWorks for Solr Certified Distro
Reference Guide on the Solr front page, and wondering if there were any
objections.
To toss out my only objection with my Apache hat on (yes, I'm
On Jan 12, 2010, at 9:42 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 7:09 AM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote:
I do worry that people will start asking questions about LucidWorks on
solr-user@, which I'm not sure is appropriate, so we should monitor that
fairly carefully
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12799533#action_12799533
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-773:
--
Brian,
Have you tried what's in trunk of Solr
Externally Generated Filters
Key: SOLR-1715
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1715
Project: Solr
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: search
Reporter: Grant Ingersoll
/browse/SOLR-1713
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: contrib - Clustering
Reporter: Grant Ingersoll
It would be nice if, in the Carrot2 clustering, we could only return 10 rows as
part of the query, but cluster on more. Alternatively
On Jan 8, 2010, at 11:17 AM, Robert Muir wrote:
Hello,
I have been running some tests with english and I noticed that Solr
uses the very slow Porter2 snowball stemmer by default.
In LUCENE-2194 i have proposed a patch to speed this up, of course it
will never be picked up by solr due to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1704?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12798264#action_12798264
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-1704:
---
Is there an actual use for them or are we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1680?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12797666#action_12797666
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-1680:
---
Why not broaden this and allow people to pass
On Jan 5, 2010, at 1:56 AM, Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् wrote:
This looks like a hack. It currently only uses highlighter for
prefetching docs and fields . There is no standard way of other
components to take part in this.
Possibly, but highlighting is one of the more expensive things to do
On Jan 5, 2010, at 6:52 AM, Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् wrote:
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote:
On Jan 5, 2010, at 1:56 AM, Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् wrote:
This looks like a hack. It currently only uses highlighter for
prefetching docs and fields
1 - 100 of 1390 matches
Mail list logo
