can we get this person blocked?
--
John Blythe
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 1:05 PM ART GALLERY wrote:
> check out the videos on this website TROO.TUBE don't be such a
> sheep/zombie/loser/NPC. Much love!
> https://troo.tube/videos/watch/aaa64864-52ee-4201-922f-41300032f219
>
> On M
t; including Think Like a Relevance Engineer, Hello LTR and NLP) -
> hopefully this will give you enough information for budgeting.
>
> Speakers get a small discount too!
>
> Cheers
>
> Charlie
>
> On 27/01/2020 22:21, John Blythe wrote:
> > Hey Doug. Do you
gt; >
> >
>
> --
> *Doug Turnbull **| CTO* | OpenSource Connections
> <http://opensourceconnections.com>, LLC | 240.476.9983
> Author: Relevant Search <http://manning.com/turnbull>
> This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is considered to be
> Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, regardless
> of whether attachments are marked as such.
>
--
John Blythe
thanks for the quick response! that was my inkling from what i've read thus
far, but was curious if any benefits could make it potentially worthwhile.
interested in other "gotchas" the nesting may cause us to incur.
thanks again!
--
John Blythe
On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 10:23 AM Eric
]
child1: {tranx4}
could be up to several hundred child docs per entity, though usually will
be double digits only (per entity), sometimes as low as < 10.
hope this makes sense. thanks for any insight!
best,
--
John Blythe
you can update your filter query to be a facet query, this will apply the
query to the resulting facet set instead of the Communities field itself.
--
John Blythe
On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 4:15 PM Hanjan, Harinder
wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I am doing faceting on a field which has multip
on a
dynamically set limit?
Thanks for any thoughts!
--
John Blythe
*does* require it.
any low hanging fruit ideas we could try out to help resolve this?
thanks!
--
John Blythe
thanks, shawn. yep, i saw the multi term synonym discussion when googling
around a bit after your first reply. pretty jazzed about finally getting to
tinker w that instead of creating our regex ducktape solution
for_multi_term_synonyms!
thanks again-
--
John Blythe
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 2:15
r results as expected, too. from the bit of
reading i did on the spanquery stuff i was thinking that maybe it was
related to positioning issues, specifically with 'sterile'. in the Analysis
tab, however, it's in position 6 in both indexing and querying output.
thanks for any thoughts or assists here!
best,
--
John Blythe
be the value add on fq + cache=false variation?
thanks for the help!
--
John Blythe
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 1:02 PM Erick Erickson
wrote:
> Looks like your SKU field is points-based? Strings would probably be
> better, if you switched to points-based it's new code.
>
> And maxBo
of times (maybe 600? idk).
no mention of maxBooleanClause issues specifically in the output, shows as
a stack overflow error.
is this something we can solve in our solr/cloud/zk configuration or is it
somewhere else to be solved?
thanks!
--
John Blythe
batty by
the analysis vs. query results though, so looking forward to playing w that
some more. for our immediate purposes, however, i think this solves it!
--
John Blythe
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 1:35 AM Preeti Bhat
wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> Please check the solrQueryParser option, it wa
.
i'm left scratching my head at this point. i'm guessing it's from the
lucene parser? hoping to get some clarity from you guys!
thanks!
--
John Blythe
ah, great thought. didn't even think of that. we already have a couple
ngram-based fields. will send over to the stakeholder who was attempting
this.
thanks!
--
John Blythe
On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 11:31 PM Erick Erickson
wrote:
> First of all, wildcards are evil. Be sure that the rea
w our
server configuration or is there some solr/cloud config'ing that we could
work on that would allow better response to these sorts of queries (though
it'd be at a cost, i'd imagine!).
thanks for any insight!
best,
--
John Blythe
e a slave instance and
> > fire it up. Also, load benchmarking is easier when indexing is on a
> > separate instance.
> >
> > In prod, we have 45 Solr hosts in four clusters.
> >
> > wunder
> > Walter Underwood
> > wun...@wunderwood.org
> >
a “standard” (read: non-cloud) local solr environment locally for our
development workflow and using cloud only for our remote environments.
Curious to know how wise or stupid that play would be.
Thanks for any info!
--
John Blythe
migrating to cloud, but have also found that it's not entirely
necessary (i can't yet speak to the cost/benefit of using the extension
when we deploy to cloud)
best of luck-
--
John Blythe
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 11:57 AM Christian Spitzlay <
christian.spitz...@biologis.com> wrote:
> Hi,
what are the benefits of
> switching to it?
>
> Thanks!
> TZ
>
--
John Blythe
great. thanks, erick!
--
John Blythe
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 12:16 PM, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> bq: are you simply flagging the fact that we wouldn't direct the queries
> to A
> v. B v. C since SolrCloud will make the decisions itself as to which part
the background
will point to the ELB the slaves are sitting behind. we'll also begin
setting up a simple solrcloud instance to toy with per your suggestion
above. inb4 tons more questions on my part :)
thanks!
--
John Blythe
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 11:14 AM, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail
for writing and user access in
NRT events, but slaves for the heavier backend processing. Thoughts?
- anyone do consulting on this that would be interested in chatting?
Thanks again!
On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 18:18 Shawn Heisey <apa...@elyograg.org> wrote:
> On 4/9/2018 12:15 PM, John Bly
couple seconds for 4 replicas.
that said, i'm going *entirely* off of assumption at this point and wanted
to check in w you all to see any nuances, gotchas, hidden landmines, etc.
that we should be considering before rolling things out.
thanks for any info!
--
John Blythe
> data or it won’t.
>
> Thanks
>
> Sid
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Jan 8, 2018, at 4:38 PM, John Blythe <johnbly...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > you could use the keepwords functionality. have a field that only keeps
> > profanity and then y
you could use the keepwords functionality. have a field that only keeps
profanity and then you can query against that field having its default
value vs. profane text
--
John Blythe
On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 3:12 PM, Sadiki Latty <sla...@uottawa.ca> wrote:
> Hey
>
> I would like to
ah, thanks for the link.
--
John Blythe
On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 9:23 AM, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Check. The problem is they don't encode the exact length. I _think_
> this patch shows you'd be OK with shorter lengths, but check:
> https://issues.apache.
to be counted as a
match.
--
John Blythe
On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 6:22 AM, alessandro.benedetti <a.benede...@sease.io>
wrote:
> Are the norms a good approximation for you ?
> If you preserve norms at indexing time ( it is a configuration that you can
> operate in the schema.xml) you ca
field to be indexed with the length of what i know will end
up being the indexed value's length
am i missing out on an easier, more straight forward solution?
thanks!
--
John Blythe
/S will work for you.
>
> But otherwise I'd be using SolrCloud.
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
> On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 1:48 PM, John Blythe <johnbly...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > thanks for the responses, guys.
> >
> > erick: we do need NRT in several cases. also in need of
up the machine if there isn't a jvm load issue we're currently
experiencing?
i can def provide more info that could help in the discussion. help me know
the best way / stuff to send if you can please.
thanks again for the help guys-
--
John Blythe
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 10:27 AM, Erick
igs to make sure we trim any fat we can. also wanting to get
optimization scheduled more regularly to help out w segmentation and
garbage heap. not sure how far those two alone will get us, though.
thanks for any thoughts!
--
John Blythe
hi all,
i'm attempting to define some entities in a keepwords file that a group of
fields will use as other fields are copied into them.
my index analyzer is defined with a KeyWord tokenizer followed by the
Keepword filter and a LowerCase for the finale.
my query analyzer uses WhiteSpace for
haha, can't have that now!
--
*John Blythe*
Product Manager & Lead Developer
251.605.3071 | j...@curvolabs.com
www.curvolabs.com
58 Adams Ave
Evansville, IN 47713
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 2:44 PM, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Thanks for closing this out, I
Looks like part of our nightly processing was restarting the solr server
before all indexing was done bc of using a blunt object approach of doing
so at designated times, doh!
On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 9:35 PM John Blythe <j...@curvolabs.com> wrote:
> Thanks Erick. I don't think all of
nd you kill Solr with evil intent. But that's a long chain
> of "ifs"
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 6:02 AM, John Blythe <j...@curvolabs.com> wrote:
> > hi all.
> >
> > i have a core that contains about 22 million documents.
hi all.
i have a core that contains about 22 million documents. when the solr
server is restarted it drops to 200-400k. the dashbaord says that it's both
optimized and current.
is there config issues i need to address in solr or the server? not really
sure where to begin in hunting this down.
will check it out, thanks-
--
*John Blythe*
Product Manager & Lead Developer
251.605.3071 | j...@curvolabs.com
www.curvolabs.com
58 Adams Ave
Evansville, IN 47713
On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 12:37 PM, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Have you looked at the JSON facet
hi all.
i'm attempting to find similar purchases for a user. the volume of purchase
helps dictate the price point that they can expect. as such, i'm attempting
to determine the sum of the quantity field across all purchases per user.
i've got something like this as of yet:
facet=on&
>
hey erik, totally unaware of those two. we're able to retrieve metadata
about the query itself that way?
--
*John Blythe*
Product Manager & Lead Developer
251.605.3071 | j...@curvolabs.com
www.curvolabs.com
58 Adams Ave
Evansville, IN 47713
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Erik Hat
dorian - yup!
mikhail - interesting, will definitely check it out.
thanks-
--
*John Blythe*
Product Manager & Lead Developer
251.605.3071 | j...@curvolabs.com
www.curvolabs.com
58 Adams Ave
Evansville, IN 47713
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 1:16 PM, Dorian Hoxha <dorian.ho...@gmail.com
-
--
*John Blythe*
Product Manager & Lead Developer
251.605.3071 | j...@curvolabs.com
www.curvolabs.com
58 Adams Ave
Evansville, IN 47713
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 11:37 AM, David Hastings <
hastings.recurs...@gmail.com> wrote:
> what do you mean "hit?" As in the user clicked it?
&
hey all. i'm sending data out that could represent a purchased item or a
competitive alternative. when the results are returned i'm needing to know
which of the two were hit so i can serve up the *other*.
i can make a blunt instrument in the application layer to simply look for a
match between
you can view some of my analyses here that has caused me grief and
confusion: http://imgur.com/a/Fcht3
here is a debug output:
"rawquerystring":"\"ZIMMER:ZIMMER US\"",
"querystring":"\"ZIMMER:ZIMMER US\"",
"parsedquery":"(+DisjunctionMaxQuery((manufacturer_syn:\"zimmer
zimmer\" |
vendor'), stop filter, lower case, stem.
in your mentioned strategy, what is the "id:" representative of?
thanks!
--
*John Blythe*
Product Manager & Lead Developer
251.605.3071 | j...@curvolabs.com
www.curvolabs.com
58 Adams Ave
Evansville, IN 47713
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 4:
more, i see Analysis chain functioning just
fine but the query itself getting 0 hits.
think TermComponents is the best option at this point or something else
given the above filler info?
--
*John Blythe*
Product Manager & Lead Developer
251.605.3071 | j...@curvolabs.com
www.curvolabs.com
58
hi everyone.
i recently wrote in ('analysis matching, query not') but never heard back
so wanted to follow up. i'm at my wit's end currently. i have several
fields that are showing matches in the analysis tab. when i dumb down the
string sent over to query it still gives me issues in some field
hi all.
i'm experiencing a head scratcher. i've got some queries that aren't
matching despite seeing them do so in the Analysis window. i'm wondering if
it's due to multi-term differences between Analysis and raw queries.
i'm querying something like this: ...fq=manufacturer:("VENDOR:VENDOR US")
gt; It deals with how the analyzer chain can now be applied in Streaming
> Expressions. It will be part of the 6.6 release and is in master and
> branch_6x already.
>
> Joel Bernstein
> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
>
> On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 5:23 PM, Rick Leir <rl...@leirtech.com>
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Field+Type+Definitions+and+Properties
>
> On 2017-03-31 01:55 PM, John Blythe wrote:
> > hey all
> >
> > i'm wanting to store one of my field's analyzed token for retrieval. is
> > there any way to do this?
hey all
i'm wanting to store one of my field's analyzed token for retrieval. is
there any way to do this? the preliminary googling i'd done had discussions
from 2007-2010, i didn't notice anything very recent touching on the
concept.
thanks-
all good info, appreciate it from you both
--
*John Blythe*
Product Manager & Lead Developer
251.605.3071 | j...@curvolabs.com
www.curvolabs.com
58 Adams Ave
Evansville, IN 47713
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 8:54 AM, Shawn Heisey <apa...@elyograg.org> wrote:
> On 3/27/2017 5:51 AM
?
--
--
*John Blythe*
Product Manager & Lead Developer
251.605.3071 | j...@curvolabs.com
www.curvolabs.com
58 Adams Ave
Evansville, IN 47713
gt;
> Best,
> Sanjana
>
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 12:30 PM, John Blythe <j...@curvolabs.com> wrote:
>
> > I use the keyword tokenizer and then pattern replace to transform multi
> > words into underscore connected tokens. For instance, "Burger Joint"
.
> >
> > That's actually a good option but I would need the category text on the
> > field so I can facet on the field and get every category and the number.
> >
> > On 26 March 2017 at 18:27, John Blythe <j...@curvolabs.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Y
; If the recipient of this Communication is not the intended recipient, or
> the employee or agent responsible for delivering this Communication to the
> intended recipient, you are notified that any dissemination, distribution
> or copying of this Communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this Communication in error, please notify the sender immediately
> by phone or email and permanently delete this Communication from your
> computer without making a copy. Thank you.
>
--
--
*John Blythe*
Product Manager & Lead Developer
251.605.3071 | j...@curvolabs.com
www.curvolabs.com
58 Adams Ave
Evansville, IN 47713
gt;
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Classify-document-using-bag-of-words-tp4326865.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
--
*John Blythe*
Product Manager & Lead Developer
251.605.3071 | j...@curvolabs.com
www.curvolabs.com
58 Adams Ave
Evansville, IN 47713
ired="false"/> in there already...
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How-on-EARTH-do-I-remove-s-in-schema-file-tp4325709p4325856.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
-
o I set the Tag field then too? I think that
> is the problem, correct?
>
> Sorry, but I just inherited this recently...
>
>
>
> From: John Blythe [via Lucene] <ml-node+s472066n4325844...@n3.nabble.com>
> Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2017 9:17:52 AM
&
ther
fields. you can't update your "text" field's definitions and expect "tag"
to inherit them, they'll need to be set as well
--
*John Blythe*
Product Manager & Lead Developer
251.605.3071 | j...@curvolabs.com
www.curvolabs.com
58 Adams Ave
Evansville, IN 47713
On S
> <https://we.tl/OskBwQwWAo> DOWNLOAD HERE*
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How-on-EARTH-do-I-remove-s-in-schema-file-tp4325709p4325841.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
--
*John B
hi all,
i'm having a hard time w understanding why i'm not getting hits on a
manufacturer field that i recently updated.
i get the following results, the top row being the index analysis and the
second the query.
RDTF
mentor
advanced
sterilize
RDTF
mentor
advanced
sterilize
yet when the
hi all.
how would you handle a query like "johnson AND johnson"? i don't want
something that has "author: linden b. johnson" to hit, only things that
actually have two occurrences.
currently using standard handler, not e/dismax. only thing i can think of
currently is to migrate to dismax and
sure if this is still relevant, but I use the json.facet parameter
> with SolrJ:
>
> query.add("json.facet", "{\"ninety\":\"percentile(value,90)\"}");
>
> - Bram
>
--
--
*John Blythe*
Product Manager & Lead Developer
251.605.3071 | j...@curvolabs.com
www.curvolabs.com
58 Adams Ave
Evansville, IN 47713
, and then determine what's what. i may be asking too much
from solr, though.
i certainly don't want a query for an answer here, not looking for a
handout, but would love to walk through towards a solution if it is indeed
possible to satisfy the above reqs.
thanks for any thoughts!
--
*John Blythe*
olr/Faceting#Faceting-CombiningStatsComponentWithPivots
>
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Faceting#Faceting-LocalParametersforFaceting
>
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/The+Stats+Component#TheStatsComponent-LocalParameters
>
>
>
>
>
hi all
i'm having an issue with an attempt to assign a key to a facet.pivot while
simultaneously referencing one of my stat fields.
i've got something like this:
stats.field={!tag=pivot_stats}lastPrice&
> ...
> facet.pivot={!key=pivot} {!stats=pivot_stats}buyer,vendor& ...
i've attempted it
hi everyone. hope you all had a great christmas!
i'm having trouble converting an example mysql script into a solr query.
here's my preliminary query:
select vendorItem, min(unitPrice), max(unitPrice), -(min(unitPrice) -
> max(unitPrice)) as `diff`
> from transactions
> where orgId IN (x,y,z)
>
g
> http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
>
>
> > On Dec 19, 2016, at 12:51 PM, John Blythe <j...@curvolabs.com> wrote:
> >
> > gotcha. yup, that was the back up plan so i think i'll go that route for
> > now.
> >
> > thanks fo
gotcha. yup, that was the back up plan so i think i'll go that route for
now.
thanks for the info!
best,
--
*John Blythe*
Product Manager & Lead Developer
251.605.3071 | j...@curvolabs.com
www.curvolabs.com
58 Adams Ave
Evansville, IN 47713
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 3:41 PM, Toke Eskildse
the range itself rather than the concentration of distinct
values?
thanks for any continued insight here!
--
*John Blythe*
Product Manager & Lead Developer
251.605.3071 | j...@curvolabs.com
www.curvolabs.com
58 Adams Ave
Evansville, IN 47713
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Toke
hi, all.
i've begun recruiting solr stats for some nifty little insights for our
users' data. it seems to be running just fine in most cases, but i have
noticed that there is a fringe group of results that seem to have incorrect
data.
for instance, one query returns the following output;
entirely different approaches to scaling out. very much helpful to see
how off balance i was on that assumption!
thanks shawn-
--
*John Blythe*
Product Manager & Lead Developer
251.605.3071 | j...@curvolabs.com
www.curvolabs.com
58 Adams Ave
Evansville, IN 47713
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 3:3
on solrcloud? seems like it to me, but hope to confirm that before
investing time in the wrong direction.
thanks!
--
*John Blythe*
Product Manager & Lead Developer
251.605.3071 | j...@curvolabs.com
www.curvolabs.com
58 Adams Ave
Evansville, IN 47713
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 1:59 PM, Erick Eric
thanks again, erick!
--
*John Blythe*
Product Manager & Lead Developer
251.605.3071 | j...@curvolabs.com
www.curvolabs.com
58 Adams Ave
Evansville, IN 47713
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 11:38 AM, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> It's not quite clear to me whether you'
good morning everyone.
i've got a crowing number of cores that various parts of our application
are relying upon. i'm having difficulty figuring out the best way to
continue expanding for both sake of scale and convenience.
i need two extra versions of each core due to our demo instance and our
Ahh, makes sense. Thanks for the clarity, Hoss.
Best-
--
*John Blythe*
Product Manager & Lead Developer
251.605.3071 | j...@curvolabs.com
www.curvolabs.com
58 Adams Ave
Evansville, IN 47713
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 5:05 PM, Chris Hostetter <hossman_luc...@fucit.org>
wrote:
&g
hi all.
i'm outputting our data to xml format for solr to consume. i have several
fields storing dollar values as tdouble. they don't always exist in the
outputted rows, however, at which point they throw an error and fail at
indexing because the field is seen as an empty string (the log message:
i'd love to be a part. in a bit of a huge crunch tho at present so i'm not
certain how viable an option it will be for me in the near term.
conceptually tho i'm all for it.
--
*John Blythe*
Product Manager & Lead Developer
251.605.3071 | j...@curvolabs.com
www.curvolabs.com
58 Adams
we use something in between: fq=fieldName[* TO *]
--
*John Blythe*
Product Manager & Lead Developer
251.605.3071 | j...@curvolabs.com
www.curvolabs.com
58 Adams Ave
Evansville, IN 47713
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 10:17 AM, Valentina Cavazza <valent...@step-net.it>
wrote:
>
copy in your analyzer from your schema.xml
--
*John Blythe*
Product Manager & Lead Developer
251.605.3071 | j...@curvolabs.com
www.curvolabs.com
58 Adams Ave
Evansville, IN 47713
On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 8:10 AM, Surender <surender.si...@rsystems.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
can you share a link, i'd be interested in checking it out.
thanks-
--
*John Blythe*
Product Manager & Lead Developer
251.605.3071 | j...@curvolabs.com
www.curvolabs.com
58 Adams Ave
Evansville, IN 47713
On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 4:32 PM, Yangrui Guo <guoyang...@gmail.com> wrot
ahh, bummer!
yup, will do the work before producing the query.
thanks, erik!
--
*John Blythe*
Product Manager & Lead Developer
251.605.3071 | j...@curvolabs.com
www.curvolabs.com
58 Adams Ave
Evansville, IN 47713
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 11:39 AM, Erik Hatcher <erik.hatc...@gmail.com
hi all,
i'm querying a pricing benchmark data set with product level detail from a
customer's recent purchases. to help refine things, i'm attempting to keep
the low benchmark price within a 3x and 1/3x range of the currently paid
price.
so, for instance, if i've been buying Foo at $100, I don't
xpectation and
reality when it comes to running your searches. but the existing data can
in fact continue onward w/o being reindexed at your own peril.
--
*John Blythe*
Product Manager & Lead Developer
251.605.3071 | j...@curvolabs.com
www.curvolabs.com
58 Adams Ave
Evansville, IN 47713
On Wed
awesome, will definitely pick up a copy. booking my ticket to revolution
before the next early bird special lapses, see some of you there!
--
*John Blythe*
Product Manager & Lead Developer
251.605.3071 | j...@curvolabs.com
www.curvolabs.com
58 Adams Ave
Evansville, IN 47713
On Tue, Ju
if we
have a match. we use parallel requests of 100 at a time.
solr isn't built for this sort of purpose specifically, i'm pretty sure,
but even so i'm imagining/hoping there is a way to give it a bit more
processing power.
thanks for any continued discussion!
--
*John Blythe*
Product Manager
hi all,
having lots of processing happening using multiple solr cores to do some
data linkage with our customers' transactional data. it runs pretty slowly
at the moment. we were wondering if there were some solr or jetty tunings
that we could implement to help make it more powerful and
it a whirl
--
*John Blythe*
Product Manager & Lead Developer
251.605.3071 | j...@curvolabs.com
www.curvolabs.com
58 Adams Ave
Evansville, IN 47713
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 4:27 AM, Georg Sorst <georg.so...@gmail.com> wrote:
> We've had good experiences with Solarium, so it's probably w
We had previously done something of the sort. With some sources of truth type
of cores we would do initial searches on customer transaction data before
fetching the related information from those "truth" tables. We would use the
various pertinent fields from results #1 to find related data in
data that the DIH is currently straining under due to the plethora of open
connections.
thanks for all the thoughts and sparks flying around on this one, guys!
best,
--
*John Blythe*
Product Manager & Lead Developer
251.605.3071 | j...@curvolabs.com
www.curvolabs.com
58 Adams Ave
Evansv
oo gotcha. cool, will make sure to check it out and bounce any related
questions through here.
thanks!
best,
--
*John Blythe*
Product Manager & Lead Developer
251.605.3071 | j...@curvolabs.com
www.curvolabs.com
58 Adams Ave
Evansville, IN 47713
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 1:45 PM, E
hi all,
i've got layered entities in my solr import. it's calling on some
transactional data from a MySQL instance. there are two fields that are
used to then lookup other information from other tables via their related
UIDs, one of which has its own child entity w yet another select statement
to
never mind, the issue ended up being that i had the copyField for that uom
field in two places and hadn't realized it, doh!
--
*John Blythe*
Product Manager & Lead Developer
251.605.3071 | j...@curvolabs.com
www.curvolabs.com
58 Adams Ave
Evansville, IN 47713
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 9:0
hi all,
i'm going mad over something that seems incredibly simple. in an attempt to
maintain some order to my growing data, i've begun to employ dynamicFields.
basic stuff here, just using *_s, *_d, etc. for my strings, doubles, and
other common datatypes.
i have these stored but not indexed.
gotcha, thanks for the response. will check {!boost} out for now and start
working on moving our current query builders to a dismax/edismax
configuration.
best,
--
*John Blythe*
Product Manager & Lead Developer
251.605.3071 | j...@curvolabs.com
www.curvolabs.com
58 Adams Ave
Evansv
be
similar, but 1) i'd like to be certain before proceeding, 2) i'd prefer
even more to stick w my vanilla query processing instead of migrating to
dismax, at least for the near term.
thanks for any pointers
best,
--
John Blythe
hey all,
is there any out of the box way to use your stop words to completely skip a
document? if something has X in its description when being indexed i just
want to ignore it altogether / when something is searched with X then go
ahead and automatically return 0 results. quick context: using
gotcha. thanks for the tips guys
best,
--
*John Blythe*
Product Manager & Lead Developer
251.605.3071 | j...@curvolabs.com
www.curvolabs.com
58 Adams Ave
Evansville, IN 47713
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Alessandro Benedetti <
abenede...@apache.org> wrote:
> Copyfie
makes sense. could i set up a simple regex filter in a placeholder field of
sorts and then copy that field into my tdouble field?
--
*John Blythe*
Product Manager & Lead Developer
251.605.3071 | j...@curvolabs.com
www.curvolabs.com
58 Adams Ave
Evansville, IN 47713
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 a
1 - 100 of 142 matches
Mail list logo