i'm really confused:|
i'm really anxious about cost of update like count.
and as you said:
you indexed like_count field .and i think it cost alot to update and index
again docs.
because like count change more and more
so isn't better to indede="false" that this field name??!!
On Tue, Sep 1, 2015
So you want to be able to sort by the "number of likes" value for a
post?
What version of Solr are you using? How many posts do you have?
There's a neat feature in Solr 5.2.1 (I'm pretty sure it is there, not
5.3) called score joins. Using that you can have two cores, one
containing your posts,
you don't need to use a dynamic field, just a normal field will work for
you. But, you *will* want to index it, and you may benefit from
docValues, so:
Upayavira
On Tue, Sep 1, 2015, at 10:59 AM, sara hajili wrote:
> my solr version is 5.2.1
> i have a question.
> if i create 2 core .one for
hi.
at first i.m sorry for my bad english!
i have a social app.i want to use solr for searching in this app.
i have many document (in my case people text that posted on my social app).
and i indexed this.
but i'm have 1 issue and it is :
i have very doc(post) and they have a property "like" is it
my solr version is 5.2.1
i have a question.
if i create 2 core .one for post and one for like . i must index like count?
i mean in schema for like core i must write:
am i true?
On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 2:42 AM, Upayavira wrote:
> So you want to be able to sort by the "number
http://blog.griddynamics.com/2015/08/scoring-join-party-in-solr-53.html
shows how to keep updates in a separate core. Notice that it is an
intermediate-level article for query syntax.
For persian text analysis, there is a pre-built analyser defiition in
the techproducts example, start from that.
i used pre-built persian analyzer but it isn't enough for me.
this work just for search exacly indexed work!
like search 'go' and search result is 'go'
as i said in english we have stemming,synonym,etc filters that help us to
have flexible search.
and i want some filter for persian.
that pre-built
and another question is:
my docs are persian and i use text_fa for fieldType but i wanna to have a
persian textfield that handle search problem such as stemming.
word distance,synonyms etc
like english types.
as i said i handle "میخواهم " and "خواستن" and so on.
can you suggest me a fieldtype for
If Solr's persian configuration is not sufficient, you could look into
commercial implementation from Basis Tech (I haven't tested it):
http://www.basistech.com/text-analytics/rosette/base-linguistics/for-arabic/
(says it supports persian at the bottom of the page).
I would also open a JIRA with