Hello,
I'm testing block join in solr 4.6.1 and wondering, is it possible to
get facets for fields in subdocuments with number of hits based on ROOT
documents?
See example below:
doc
documentPartROOT/documentPart
texttesting 123/text
titletitle/test
groupGRP/group
Quick follow up on my question below and if anyone is using Group.facets in a
sharded solr setup ?
Based on further testing, the group.facets counts dont seem reliable at all
for lesser popular items in the facet list.
--
View this message in context:
Hello Henning,
There is no open source facet component for child level of block-join.
There is no even open jira for this.
Don.t think it helps.
11.02.2014 12:22 пользователь Henning Ivan Solberg h...@lovdata.no
написал:
Hello,
I'm testing block join in solr 4.6.1 and wondering, is it
Hi,
I have an application with an embedded Solr instance (and I want to
keep it embedded) and so far I have been setting up my Solr
installation programmatically using folder paths to specify where the
specific container or core configs are.
I have used the CoreContainer methods createAndLoad
Hi;
I've written a code that I can update a file to Zookeeper for SlorCloud.
Currently I have many configurations at Zookeeper for SolrCloud. I want to
update synonyms.txt file so I should know the currently linked
configuration (I will update the synonyms.txt file under appropriate
configuration
For a particular collection or core? There should be a collection.configName
property specified for the core or collection which tells you which ZK config
directory is being used.
Alan Woodward
www.flax.co.uk
On 11 Feb 2014, at 11:49, Furkan KAMACI wrote:
Hi;
I've written a code that I
I am looking it for a particular collection.
2014-02-11 13:55 GMT+02:00 Alan Woodward a...@flax.co.uk:
For a particular collection or core? There should be a
collection.configName property specified for the core or collection which
tells you which ZK config directory is being used.
Alan
Hi;
OK, I've checked the source code and implemented that:
public String readConfigName(SolrZkClient zkClient, String collection)
throws KeeperException, InterruptedException {
String configName = null;
String path = ZkStateReader.COLLECTIONS_ZKNODE + / + collection;
I'd like to thank you for lending a hand on my query time problem with
SolrCloud. By switching to a single shard with replicas setup, I've reduced
my query time to 18 msec. My full ingestion of 300k+ documents went down
from 2 hours 50 minutes to 1 hour 40 minutes. There are some code changes
that
HI,
I am new to SOLR , we have CRM data for Contacts and Companies which are in
millions, we have switched to SOLR for fast search results.
PROBLEM: We have large inclusion and exclusion lists with names of companies
or contacts.
Ex: Include or Exclude : company A Company B Company C
Hi,
my solr-request contains the following filter-query:
fq=((-(field1:value1)))+OR+(field2:value2).
I expect solr deliver documents matching to ((-(field1:value1))) and
documents matching to (field2:value2).
But solr deliver only documents, that are the result of (field2:value2).
I
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CommonQueryParameters#debugQuery
and
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CommonQueryParameters#explainOther
usually help so much
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 7:57 PM, Johannes Siegert
johannes.sieg...@marktjagd.de wrote:
Hi,
my solr-request contains the following
Hi Erick,
Slower queries for getting facets can be tolerated, as long as they don't
affect those without facets. The requirement is for a separate query which
can get me both term vector and facet counts.
One issue I am facing is that, for a search query I only want the term
vectors and facet
With so many parentheses in there, I wonder what you are really trying to
do Try expressing your query in simple English first so that we can
understand your goal.
But generally, a purely negative nested query must have a *:* term to apply
the exclusion against:
fq=((*:*
Hmmm, I'm still a little puzzled BTW. 300K documents, unless they're
huge, shouldn't be taking 100 minutes. I can index 11M documents on
my laptop (Wikipedia dump) in 45 minutes for instance Of course
that's a single core, not cloud and not replicas...
So possibly it' on the data acquisition
right, 10K Boolean clauses are not very efficient. You actually can
up the limit here, but still...
Consider a post filter, here's a place to start:
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/4_3_1/solr-core/org/apache/solr/search/PostFilter.html
Best,
Erick
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 6:47 AM, rajeev.nadgauda
Solr/Lucene is not strictly Boolean logic, this trips up a lot
of people.
Excellent blog on the subject here:
http://searchhub.org/dev/2011/12/28/why-not-and-or-and-not/
Best,
Erick
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 8:22 AM, Jack Krupansky j...@basetechnology.comwrote:
With so many parentheses in
On 2/11/2014 3:27 AM, Jäkel, Guido wrote:
Dear Shawn,
On 2/9/2014 11:41 PM, Arun Rangarajan wrote:
I have a 28 GB Solr 4.6 index with 45 segments. Optimize failed with an
'out of memory' error. Is optimize really necessary, since I read that
lucene is able to handle multiple segments well
Hi Jack,
thanks!
fq=((*:* -(field1:value1)))+OR+(field2:value2).
This is the solution.
Johannes
Am 11.02.2014 17:22, schrieb Jack Krupansky:
With so many parentheses in there, I wonder what you are really trying
to do Try expressing your query in simple English first so that we
can
Dear Shawn,
Thanks for your reply. For now, I did merges in steps with maxSegments
param (using HOST:PORT/CORE/update?optimize=truemaxSegments=10). First I
merged the 45 segments to 10, and then from 10 to 5. (Merging from 5 to 2
again caused out-of-memory exception.) Now I have a 5-segment index
I’m working on a port of a Solr service to SolrCloud. (Targeting v4.6.0 at
present.) The old query style relied on using /solr/select?qt=foo to select the
proper requestHandler. I know handleSelect=true is deprecated now, but it’d be
pretty handy for testing to be able to be backwards
Without falling into the x/y problem area, I'll explain what I want to
do: I would like to group my result set by a field, f1 and within each
group, I'd like to boost the score of the most appropriate member of
the group so it appears first in the doc list.
The most appropriate member is
On 2/11/2014 10:21 AM, Jeff Wartes wrote:
I’m working on a port of a Solr service to SolrCloud. (Targeting v4.6.0 at
present.) The old query style relied on using /solr/select?qt=foo to select the
proper requestHandler. I know handleSelect=true is deprecated now, but it’d be
pretty handy for
Got it in one. Thanks!
On 2/11/14, 9:50 AM, Shawn Heisey s...@elyograg.org wrote:
On 2/11/2014 10:21 AM, Jeff Wartes wrote:
I¹m working on a port of a Solr service to SolrCloud. (Targeting v4.6.0
at present.) The old query style relied on using /solr/select?qt=foo to
select the proper
Hello Wiki admin,
I would like to some value links. Can you please add me, my user name is
Baruch Labunski
Thank You,
Baruch!
On Thursday, January 16, 2014 2:12:32 PM, Baruch bar...@rogers.com wrote:
Hello Wiki admin,
I would like to some value links. Can you please add me, my user
It's a custom ingestion process. It does a big DB query and then inserts
stuff in batches. The batch size is tuneable.
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.comwrote:
Hmmm, I'm still a little puzzled BTW. 300K documents, unless they're
huge, shouldn't be taking
Jeff,
I believe the shards.qt parameter is what you're looking for. For example
when using the /elevate handler with SolrCloud I use the following url to
tell Solr to use the /elevate handler on the shards:
http://localhost:8983/solr/collection1/elevate?q=ipodwt=jsonindent=trueshards.qt=/elevate
Hi Jeff, it is not with elevated, I am talking in the link of Relevancy /
Boost/ Score.
Select productid from products where SKU = 101
Select Productid from products where ManufactureSKU = 101
Select Productid from product where SKU Like 101%
Select Productid from Product where ManufactureSKU
I have a strange issue with Autosuggest.
Whenever I query for a keyword along with numbers (leading) it returns the
suggestion corresponding to the alphabets (ignoring the numbers). I was
under assumption that it will return an empty result back. I am not sure
what I am doing wrong. Can someone
Eric,
Thanks for your reply. I should have given a better context. I'm currently
running an incremental crawl daily on this particular source and indexing
the documents. Incremental crawl looks for any change since last crawl date
based on the document publish date. But, there's no way for me
Hi Otis,
Just to confirm, the 3 servers you mean here are 2 for shards/nodes and 1 for
Zookeeper. Is that correct?
Thanks,
Susheel
-Original Message-
From: Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:otis.gospodne...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, January 24, 2014 5:21 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Hi Susheel,
No, we wouldn't want to go with just 1 ZK. :)
Otis
--
Performance Monitoring * Log Analytics * Search Analytics
Solr Elasticsearch Support * http://sematext.com/
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 5:18 PM, Susheel Kumar
susheel.ku...@thedigitalgroup.net wrote:
Hi Otis,
Just to confirm,
Thanks, Otis for quick reply. So for ZK do you recommend separate servers and
if so how many for initial Solr cloud cluster setup.
-Original Message-
From: Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:otis.gospodne...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 4:21 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Ok, I was wrong here. I can always set the indextimestamp field with current
time (NOW) for every atomic update. On a similar note, is there any
performance constraint with updates compared to add ?
--
View this message in context:
ZK needs a quorum to keep functional so 3 servers handles one failure. 5
handles 2 node failures. If you Solr with 1 replica per shard then stick to
3 ZK. If you use 2 replicas use 5 ZK
Solr = 4.6.1, attached solrcloud admin console view
Zookeeper 3.4.5 = 3 node ensemble
In my test setup, I have 3 Node SolrCloud setup with 2 shard. Today we had
power failure and all node went down.
I started 3 node zookeeper ensemble first then followed with 3 node
solrcloud, and one of
On 2/11/2014 2:37 PM, shamik wrote:
Eric,
Thanks for your reply. I should have given a better context. I'm currently
running an incremental crawl daily on this particular source and indexing
the documents. Incremental crawl looks for any change since last crawl date
based on the document
Whether you use the same machines as Solr or separate machines is a matter
suited to taste.
If you are the CTO, then you should make this decision. If not, inform
management that risk conditions are greater when you share function and control
on a single piece of hardware. A single failure
On 2/11/2014 3:28 PM, Susheel Kumar wrote:
Thanks, Otis for quick reply. So for ZK do you recommend separate servers and
if so how many for initial Solr cloud cluster setup.
In a minimal 3-server setup, all servers would run zookeeper and two of
them would also run Solr.With this setup, you
I've tried the new SuggestComponent, however it doesn't work quite as
expected. It returns the full field value rather than a list of corrections
for the specific term. I can see how SuggestComponent would be excellent
for phrase suggestions and document lookups, but it doesn't seem to be
suitable
Ah, I think the term frequency is only available for the Spellcheckers
rather than the Suggesters - so I tried a DirectSolrSpellChecker. This gave
me good spelling suggestions for misspelt terms, but if the term is spelled
correctly I, again, get no term information and correctlySpelled is false.
Hello Dear,
I have 1000 GB of data that I want to index.
Assuming I have enough space for storing the indexes in a single machine.
*I would like to get an idea about Solr performance for searching an item
from a huge data set.
Do I need to use shards for improving the Solr search efficiency or it
Baruch:
Is that your Wiki ID? We need that. But sure, we'll be happy to add you to
the list...
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Baruch bar...@rogers.com wrote:
Hello Wiki admin,
I would like to some value links. Can you please add me, my user name is
Baruch Labunski
Thank You,
So my guess is you're spending by far the largest portion of your time doing
the DB query(ies), which makes sense
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 11:50 AM, Joel Cohen joel.co...@bluefly.com wrote:
It's a custom ingestion process. It does a big DB query and then inserts
stuff in batches. The batch
Hmmm, the example you post seems correct to me, the returned
suggestion is really close to the term. What are you expecting here?
The example is inconsistent with
it returns the suggestion corresponding to the alphabets (ignoring the
numbers)
It looks like it's considering the numbers just fine,
Update and add are basically the same thing if there's an existing document.
There will be some performance consequence since you're getting the stored
fields on the server as opposed to getting the full input from the external
source
and handing it to Solr. However, I know of at least one
Can't answer that, there are just too many variables. Here's a helpful
resource:
http://searchhub.org/dev/2012/07/23/sizing-hardware-in-the-abstract-why-we-dont-have-a-definitive-answer/
Best,
Erick
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 5:23 PM, neerajp neeraj_star2...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hello Dear,
I have
Hi Durgam,
You are asking a hard question. Yes, the idea looks interesting as an
experiment. Possibly even useful in some ways. And I love the fact
that you are eating your own dogfood (running Solr). And the interface
looks nice (I guess this is your hosted Nimeyo offering underneath).
Yet, I
Hi Anand.
Solr's JOIN query, {!join}, constant-scores. It's simpler and faster and
more memory efficient (particularly the worse-case memory use) to implement
the JOIN query without scoring, so that's why. Of course, you might want it
to score and pay whatever penalty is involved. For that
Thanks David, really helpful response.
You mentioned that if we have to add scoring support in solr then a
possible approach would be to add a custom QueryParser, which might be
taking Lucene's JOIN module.
Curious, if it is possible instead to enhance existing solr's
JoinQParserPlugin
Hi,
BBoxStrategy is still only in “trunk” (not the 4x branch). And
furthermore… the Solr portion, a FieldType, is over in
Spatial-Solr-Sandbox —
https://github.com/ryantxu/spatial-solr-sandbox/blob/master/LSE/src/main/ja
va/org/apache/solr/spatial/pending/BBoxFieldType.java It should be quite
Hi
I downloaded solr and without any changes in directory structure i just
followed the solr wiki and tried to import mysql table but unable to do...
Actualy Im using the directory as is in example folder but copied the
contrib jar files and lib tags here and there where required..
Please help in
What's unable to do actually translates to? Are you having troubles
writing a particular config file? Are you getting an error message?
Are you getting only some of the data in?
Tell us exactly where you are stuck. Better, google first for exactly
what you are stuck with, maybe it's already been
Thanks Eric and Shawn, appreciate your help.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Indexing-question-on-individual-field-update-tp4116605p4116831.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
54 matches
Mail list logo
