> Francois
>
>
>
> *From: *Greg Mirsky
> *Date: *Thursday, 7 October 2021 at 20:15
> *To: *Francois Clad (fclad)
> *Cc: *Robert Raszuk , Ron Bonica 40juniper@dmarc.ietf.org>, James Guichard <
> james.n.guich...@futurewei.com>, SPRING WG ,
> spring-cha
(For clarity: I’m wearing no hats other than “WG contributor”.)
As noted in
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/5HF4wM5ZDcw5DeL_klXmKf1UP0E/, I’m
opposed to adoption until the issue raised there has been addressed. (Repeating
the point here to aid in issue tracking.)
Regards,
—John
<mailto:james.n.guich...@futurewei.com>
Date: 2021-10-01 22:04
To: SPRING WG<mailto:spring@ietf.org>
CC: spring-cha...@ietf.org<mailto:spring-cha...@ietf.org>
Subject: [spring] WG Adoption call for
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression/
Dear WG:
The
Hi ALL，
After a long-term discussion in the WG, we have reached this point today
I support the adoption of CSID draft, which describes an efficient solution of
SRv6 compression.
I understand the document defines several Flavors, and I think it is just like
the normal flavors defined in
Hi ALL，
After a long-term discussion in the WG, we have reached this point today
I support the adoption of CSID draft, which describes an efficient solution of
SRv6 compression.
I understand the document defines several Flavors, and I think it is just like
the normal flavors defined in
Dear WG, WG Chairs,
I support the adoption of draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression.
I have been working on SRv6 for different research project over the last
years.
The flavors defined in the CSID draft are complaint with RFC8986 and builds
on top of the single SRv6 dataplane.
Thanks
successfully
Thanks & Regards,
Shay
发件人: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org<mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org>] 代表
James Guichard
发送时间: 2021年10月1日 22:05
收件人: SPRING WG mailto:spring@ietf.org>>
抄送: spring-cha...@ietf.org<mailto:spring-cha...@ietf.org>
主题: [spring] WG
Hi all,
I support the adoption of this draft which goes in line with the
conclusions of the DT analysis, as the basis for a compression solution
defined by the WG.
I'm planning to perform interop tests in the forthcoming months, so further
operational feedback can be provided afterwards.
Best
maintain a single SRv6 based data plane.
Thanks.
Guixin Bao
Baidu Network Chief Architect
发件人: spring 代表 James Guichard
日期: 2021年10月1日 星期五 22:04
收件人: SPRING WG
抄送: "spring-cha...@ietf.org"
主题: [spring] WG Adoption call for
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-filsfilscheng-sprin
ix of REPLACE-CSID, NEXT-CSID and non-compressed "Classic" SRv6 - and all
> interops have ended successfully
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Shay
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *发件人:* spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] *代表 *James Guichard
> *发送时间:* 2021年10月1日 22:05
&g
g>
mailto:spring-cha...@ietf.org>>
Subject: [spring] WG Adoption call for
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression/
Dear WG:
The chairs would like to express their appreciation for all the responses
received to our emails with reference to how th
Dear WG and the WG Chairs,
The draft
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression/
maintain a single SRv6 based data plane.
Thanks.
Guixin Bao
Baidu Network Chief Architect
发件人: spring 代表 James Guichard
日期: 2021年10月1日 星期五 22:04
收件人: SPRING WG
抄送: "spring-cha...@ietf.org"
主题: [spring] WG Adoption call for
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-filsfilscheng-sprin
2021年10月1日 22:05
*收件人:* SPRING WG
*抄送:* spring-cha...@ietf.org
*主题:* [spring] WG Adoption call for
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression/
Dear WG:
The chairs would like to express their appreciation for all the responses
received to our emails with
Hi,
I support the adoption of this draft.
While SRv6 has high potential, for a simple operation such as TE the
high packet length overhead of SRv6 has been an issue for operators.
This draft resolves this issue and (I believe) a necessary feature for
operators, so we would like to support
Dear WG,
I support the adoption of draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression.
Based on my understanding, NEXT and REPLACE flavors defined in this draft can
meet with RFC8986. Also, there are multiple implementations today like Arrcus
and VPP as well. I really appreciate the huge efforts
AM
To: SPRING WG
Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] WG Adoption call for
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression/
Dear WG:
The chairs would like to express their appreciation for all the responses
received to our emails with reference to how
:05
*收件人:*SPRING WG
*抄送:*spring-cha...@ietf.org
*主题:*[spring] WG Adoption call for
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression/
Dear WG:
The chairs would like to express their appreciation for all the
responses received to our emails with reference to how
: [spring] WG Adoption call for
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression/
Dear WG:
The chairs would like to express their appreciation for all the responses
received to our emails with reference to how the working group wishes to move
forward with respect
support the adoption of this draft. Thanks.B.R.Yongqing Zhu
zhu...@chinatelecom.cn
From: James Guichard
Date: 2021-10-01 22:04
To: SPRING WG
CC: spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] WG Adoption call for
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression/
Dear WG
To: SPRING WG
Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [EXT] [spring] WG Adoption call for
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression/
External Email
Dear WG:
The chairs would like to express their appreciation for all
Dear Chairs and WG,
As a co-author of this document, I would like to thank all participants in
the discussion. All those discussions, comments and suggestions are of great
value to us.
It was unexpected that so many IETFers could join the discussion. It is
amazing. It also made me realize
james.n.guich...@futurewei.com>>, SPRING
WG mailto:spring@ietf.org>>,
spring-cha...@ietf.org<mailto:spring-cha...@ietf.org>
mailto:spring-cha...@ietf.org>>
Subject: Re: [spring] WG Adoption call for
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-sr
: WG Adoption call for
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression/
Hi Francois,
Thanks for your responses. Please see inline..
From: Francois Clad (fclad)
Date: Friday, October 8, 2021 at 1:14 PM
To: Tarek Saad , James Guichard
, SPRING WG
Cc: spring-cha
Dear SPRING Working Group,
I support the adoption of draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression.
The SID compression mechanism described in the document will help adopting SRv6
more efficiently when having multiple SIDs with small payload, in a way
consistent with a single and already
, which is IMHO the right step
for the future
Kind Regards,
Severin
From: spring on behalf of James Guichard
Sent: Friday, October 1, 2021 4:04 PM
To: SPRING WG
Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] WG Adoption call for
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc
October 2021 16:04
To: SPRING WG
Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] WG Adoption call for
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression/
Dear WG:
The chairs would like to express their appreciation for all the responses
received to our emails
Reshma Sudarshan
Director of Applications Engineering, ENA | CG | NEX
Intel Corporation
From: spring On Behalf Of James Guichard
Sent: Friday, October 1, 2021 7:05 AM
To: SPRING WG
Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] WG Adoption call for
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-filsfil
Dear WG, WG chairs,
I support the adoption of CSID draft
(draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression).
Over the past years, I have been working extensively on the SRv6 stack in the
Linux kernel.
I have contributed to the Linux kernel by introducing new SRv6 features as well
as optimizing
I support the adoption of draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression.
I have been working together with my team at the university of Rome Tor Vergata
on SRv6 support in the Linux kernel.
The CSID draft builds on RFC8986 and defines two new flavors.
We supported these two flavors in the
Dear J. Guichard, Spring WG and Spring Chairs
we support the adoption of draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression. To
the best of our knowledge, CSID is single SRv6 based data plane that defines
next and replace flavors to End, End.X, and End.T SIDs and it is consistent
with RFC8996
WG
Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] WG Adoption call for
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression/
Dear WG:
The chairs would like to express their appreciation for all the responses
received to our emails with reference to how the working group
Hi Chairs,
I would not consider new flavors to the existing endpoint behaviors as
multiple data planes. At least that's not what I thought of when responding
to the earlier poll. Either way, this I-D is a good base for making
progress. In fact, making sure that the I-D is in WG control is a much
. Therefore, I support the
adoption.
Regards,
Haibo
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of James Guichard
Sent: Friday, October 1, 2021 10:05 PM
To: SPRING WG
Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] WG Adoption call for
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-filsfilscheng
Dear SPRING WG,
I support this adoption for draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression.
After I read the draft with the related DT documents, I understand that NEXT
and REPLACE flavors comply with RFC8986, and satisfied all the requirements at
high level. I really appreciate all DT
Adoption call for
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression/
Dear WG:
The chairs would like to express their appreciation for all the responses
received to our emails with reference to how the working group wishes to move
forward with respect to a solution
://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression/
Dear WG:
The chairs would like to express their appreciation for all the responses
received to our emails with reference to how the working group wishes to move
forward with respect to a solution for SRv6 compression
I support the WG adoption of draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression.
My research activity is related on leveraging SRv6 to implement a containerized
SFC on Kubernetes.
The new flavors added to the SR endpoint behaviors will be useful to this
scope, simplifying the processing on each
Dear Chairs,
I object to the WG adopting this draft.
If SIDs are IPv6 addresses, then this draft is fundamentally relying
on encoding a segment list of SIDs (with a common high order prefix),
and therefore a list of multiple IPv6 addresses, in the IPv6
Destination Address field.
Clearly the
, 2021 10:05 AM
To: SPRING WG
Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] WG Adoption call for
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression/
Dear WG:
The chairs would like to express their appreciation for all the responses
received to our emails with reference
To: SPRING WG
Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] WG Adoption call for
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression/
Dear WG:
The chairs would like to express their appreciation for all the responses
received to our emails with reference
of scenarios. Best Wishes!Jianhua Liuhttp://www.fiberhome.com
From: spring on behalf of James Guichard
Date: Friday, October 1, 2021 at 4:05 PM
To: SPRING WG
Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] WG Adoption call for https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh
Dear all,
I support the adoption of this draft.
I am Marco Bonola, senior researcher at CNIT (Italy), and I have
recently worked on the SRv6 dataplane in the context of SmartNIC and
in-Kernel acceleration. The new flavor designed in this draft compiles
with the SRv6 dataplane and can be
Hi WG,
I support the adoption of CSID draft.
I have been working on developing a Kubernetes network datapath solution
using the SRv6 network programming defined in RFC8986.
I would like to thank the DT team for the hard work over the past months.
The DT analysis doc shows the CSID solution
I would like to express my support for the Compressed SRv6 Segment List
Encoding in SRH draft. As an architect for one of the world’s largest
Solutions providers, we have quite a bit of interest in this solution. I have
been involved in SR since 2013 and have been following SRv6
- Mail original -
> De: "James Guichard"
> À: "SPRING WG List"
> Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org
> Envoyé: Vendredi 1 Octobre 2021 16:04:48
> Objet: [spring] WG Adoption call for
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-filsfilscheng-s
I support the adoption of CSID draft.
CSID draft defines next and replace behaviors that are consistent with the SRv6
network programming RFC8996.
We've verified the solution with partners in Intel Tofino programmable switch
chipset.
Regards,
Haitao
On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 7:05 AM James
n behalf of "Zafar Ali (zali)"
>
> Date: Monday, October 4, 2021 at 8:50 AM
> To: James Guichard , SPRING WG
>
> Cc: "Zafar Ali (zali)" , "spring-cha...@ietf.org"
>
> Subject: Re: [spring] WG Adoption call for
> https://datatracker.ie
With regards to the chair's question, CSID is based on the single SRv6
based data plane. The addition of flavors for SRv6 compression does not
mean the draft is defining multiple data planes. This is because, if we go
with that logic, RFC8986, which is a product of the Spring WG has already
] WG Adoption call for
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression/
[External Email. Be cautious of content]
Dear WG:
The chairs would like to express their appreciation for all the responses
received to our emails with reference to how the working group
-cha...@ietf.org; Zafar Ali (zali)
Subject: Re: [spring] WG Adoption call for
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression/
Dear WG and the WG Chairs,
Network programming model (RFC8986) defines multiple flavors for End, End.X,
and End.T SIDs. CSID draft builds
call for
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression/
Dear WG:
The chairs would like to express their appreciation for all the responses
received to our emails with reference to how the working group wishes to move
forward with respect to a solution for
From: James Guichard
Date: 2021-10-01 22:04
To: SPRING WG
CC: spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] WG Adoption call for
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression/
Dear WG:
The chairs would like to express their appreciation for all the responses
rece
I support the adoption of the draft by the SPRING WG to continue the
work on it.
The draft adds new flavors to the SR endpoint behaviors for the support
of the SRv6 Segment-List compression in conformance with the RFC 8754
and the RFC 8986.
thanks,
Peter
On 01/10/2021 16:04, James
PRING WG
Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] WG Adoption call for
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression/
Dear WG:
The chairs would like to express their appreciation for all the responses
received to our emails with reference to how the w
enough to be adopted by the WG, as the baseline for
further development.
Cheers,
Tianran
发件人: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 James Guichard
发送时间: 2021年10月1日 22:05
收件人: SPRING WG
抄送: spring-cha...@ietf.org
主题: [spring] WG Adoption call for
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft
with RFC8986 and I therefore support the WG adoption of the draft.
Best Regards,
Laurent
From: spring on behalf of James Guichard
Date: Friday, October 1, 2021 at 4:05 PM
To: SPRING WG
Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] WG Adoption call for
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft
October 4, 2021 at 8:50 AM
To: James Guichard , SPRING WG
Cc: "Zafar Ali (zali)" , "spring-cha...@ietf.org"
Subject: Re: [spring] WG Adoption call for
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression/
Dear WG and the chairs,
I strongly su
authorized officer. In no event
will this email or its content be construed as a written approval.
From: spring On Behalf Of James Guichard
Sent: Friday, October 1, 2021 3:05 PM
To: SPRING WG
Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] WG Adoption call for
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft
of Tarek Saad
Date: Friday, 8 October 2021 at 06:06
To: James Guichard , SPRING WG
Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [spring] WG Adoption call for
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression/
Hi all,
I’ve read this draft. It is proposing 2 different
.
Thanks for the Chairs to handle this, it is indeed a very difficult work.
BR
AS
From: spring On Behalf Of James Guichard
Sent: Friday, October 1, 2021 4:05 PM
To: SPRING WG
Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] WG Adoption call for
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-filsfilscheng-spring
: Friday, October 1, 2021 10:05 PM
To: SPRING WG
Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] WG Adoption call for
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression/
Dear WG:
The chairs would like to express their appreciation for all the responses
received to our
...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of James Guichard
Sent: Friday, October 1, 2021 10:05 PM
To: SPRING WG
Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] WG Adoption call for
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression/
Dear WG:
The chairs would like to express
: Friday, October 1, 2021 at 10:05 AM
To: SPRING WG
Cc: "spring-cha...@ietf.org"
Subject: [EXT][spring] WG Adoption call for
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression/
Dear WG:
The chairs would like to express their appreciation for all the
r 2021 at 20:15
> *To: *Francois Clad (fclad)
> *Cc: *Robert Raszuk , Ron Bonica 40juniper@dmarc.ietf.org>, James Guichard <
> james.n.guich...@futurewei.com>, SPRING WG ,
> spring-cha...@ietf.org
> *Subject: *Re: [spring] WG Adoption call for
> https://datatracker.
From: spring on behalf of James Guichard
Date: Friday, October 1, 2021 at 7:04 AM
To: SPRING WG
Cc: "spring-cha...@ietf.org"
Subject: [spring] WG Adoption call for
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression/
Dear WG:
The chairs would like
I object the adoption of this document
-Parag
From: spring On Behalf Of James Guichard
Sent: Friday, October 1, 2021 7:35 PM
To: SPRING WG
Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] WG Adoption call for
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression
on behalf of James Guichard
Date: Friday, October 1, 2021 at 10:05 AM
To: SPRING WG
Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] WG Adoption call for
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression/
Dear WG:
The chairs would like to express their appreciation for all
,
spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [spring] WG Adoption call for
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression/
Hi Francois,
thank you for your detailed response and confirming that C-SIDs of different
flavors/behavior may be present in the same SRH and even
at 23:21
> *To: *James Guichard , SPRING WG <
> spring@ietf.org>
> *Cc: *spring-cha...@ietf.org
> *Subject: *Re: WG Adoption call for
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression/
> Sorry – but – I’m a little confused here.
>
>
Kompella ; SPRING WG ;
spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [spring] WG Adoption call for
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression/
I also object to WG chairs who are also co-authors of a draft participating in
the process of advancing the draft through
Guichard ; SPRING WG
Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: RE: WG Adoption call for
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression/
Figured I would weigh in here once again - and try and summarize the way I see
things.
1. The working group found consensus
: spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] WG Adoption call for
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression/
Dear WG:
The chairs would like to express their appreciation for all the responses
received to our emails with reference to how the working group wishes
Hello Chairs,
This document describes 3 behaviours for SID and this in contradiction to what
was discussed on SPRING alias about adopting one behaviour for which there was
overwhelming response.
I strongly object the adoption of this draft.
srihari…
On 01/10/21, 7:35 PM spring on behalf of
Hello everyone,
as I see it, the document fits well into the framework of RFC8986, it
solved the problem, and does so in an efficient manner. Thus I support
the adoption of this document.
Best rergards, Martin
Am 01.10.21 um 16:04 schrieb James Guichard:
Dear WG:
The chairs would like to
Hi WG, WG chairs,
I support the WG adoption of the draft.
I have been working with SRv6 as part of my PhD. My team focuses on SRv6
implementation in Linux and other open source stacks like VPP, eBPF and others.
The CSID draft is compliant with RFC 8986. We read the documents from the
design
for
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression/
Dear WG:
The chairs would like to express their appreciation for all the responses
received to our emails with reference to how the working group wishes to move
forward with respect to a solution for SRv6
.org/doc/draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression/
Dear WG:
The chairs would like to express their appreciation for all the responses
received to our emails with reference to how the working group wishes to move
forward with respect to a solution for SRv6 compression.
The appa
on behalf of James Guichard
Date: Friday, October 1, 2021 at 10:05 AM
To: SPRING WG
Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] WG Adoption call for
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression/
Dear WG:
The chairs would like to express their appreciation for all
://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression/
Dear WG:
The chairs would like to express their appreciation for all the responses
received to our emails with reference to how the working group wishes to move
forward with respect to a solution for SRv6 compression.
The apparent
I also object to WG chairs who are also co-authors of a draft participating in
the process of advancing the draft through the WG process, whether it is WG
adoption, WGLC or IETF LC.
Look up “recuse” in the dictionary.
:K
> On Oct 1, 2021, at 07:04, James Guichard
> wrote:
>
> Dear WG:
>
I object to the adoption of this document in its current form.
—Colby
>> Dear WG:
>>
>> The chairs would like to express their appreciation for all the responses
>> received to our emails with reference to how the working group wishes to
>> move forward with respect to a solution for SRv6
I object to the adoption of this document as it currently stands.
:K
> On Oct 1, 2021, at 07:04, James Guichard
> wrote:
>
> Dear WG:
>
> The chairs would like to express their appreciation for all the responses
> received to our emails with reference to how the working group wishes to
: Friday, October 1, 2021 at 10:05 AM
To: SPRING WG
Cc: "spring-cha...@ietf.org"
Subject: [EXT][spring] WG Adoption call for
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression/
Dear WG:
The chairs would like to express their appreciation for all the
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Greg Mirsky
> *Date: *Wednesday, 6 October 2021 at 19:19
> *To: *Francois Clad (fclad)
> *Cc: *Robert Raszuk , Ron Bonica 40juniper....@dmarc.ietf.org>, James Guichard <
> james.n.guich...@futurewei.com>, SPRING WG ,
> spring-cha...@iet
ard
; SPRING WG
Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [spring] WG Adoption call for
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression/
[External Email. Be cautious of content]
If we take a look at the summary table in slide 17 in the DT presentation
Ron
Juniper Business Use Only
From: Darren Dukes (ddukes)
Sent: Tuesday, October 5, 2021 11:58 PM
To: Robert Raszuk ; Ron Bonica
Cc: James Guichard ; SPRING WG
; spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [spring] WG Adoption call for
https://
to:spring-cha...@ietf.org>
mailto:spring-cha...@ietf.org>>
Subject: Re: [spring] WG Adoption call for
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression/
Hi Robert,
as I understand it, you believe everything that is written in the draft. I hope
you can hel
Hi,
I support the adoption of draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression
the draft is compliant with the RFC 8986 and adds two new flavors to the
End behavior
with my research team, I've been working on the design and
implementation of the SRv6 network programming model (RFC 8986) on
://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression/
Dear WG:
The chairs would like to express their appreciation for all the responses
received to our emails with reference to how the working group wishes to move
forward with respect to a solution for SRv6 compression.
The apparent
:* Tuesday, October 5, 2021 10:53 PM
*To:* James Guichard ; SPRING WG
*Cc:* spring-cha...@ietf.org
*Subject:* Re: [spring] WG Adoption call for
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression/
*[External Email. Be cautious of content]*
I support the adoption
rom: *spring on behalf of Greg Mirsky <
> gregimir...@gmail.com>
> *Date: *Tuesday, 5 October 2021 at 23:37
> *To: *Robert Raszuk
> *Cc: *Ron Bonica , James Guichard <
> james.n.guich...@futurewei.com>, SPRING WG ,
> spring-cha...@ietf.org
> *Subject: *Re: [spring
Only
From: spring On Behalf Of Ahmed Bashandy
Sent: Tuesday, October 5, 2021 10:53 PM
To: James Guichard ; SPRING WG
Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [spring] WG Adoption call for
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression/
[External Email. B
Mirsky
Date: Tuesday, 5 October 2021 at 23:37
To: Robert Raszuk
Cc: Ron Bonica , James Guichard
, SPRING WG ,
spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [spring] WG Adoption call for
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression/
Hi Robert,
as I understand it, you
Friday, October 1, 2021 10:05 AM
To: SPRING WG mailto:spring@ietf.org>>
Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org<mailto:spring-cha...@ietf.org>
Subject: [spring] WG Adoption call for
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression/
[External Email. Be cautious of
I support the WG adoption of the CSID draft.
I understand that CSID draft defines multiple SRv6 behaviors, but they are
based on a single SRv6 data plane solution.
Kind regards,
Antonio Cianfrani
Il giorno mer 6 ott 2021 alle ore 06:30 Darren Dukes (ddukes) ha scritto:
> I support the WG
I support the WG adoption of this draft.
I’ve spent a year and a half with the design team studying requirements and
analyzing all solutions to SRv6 SID list compression with multiple WG reviews
and many hours of work. The CSID proposal is the strongest, and fully based on
the SRv6 data
Adding to this Robert, indeed SRv6 defines many behaviors. The question asked
about a single ‘behavior’ could really only be interpreted as asking about
single ‘solution’, as you understood, since a single ‘behavior’ in SRv6 is
non-sensical. The requirements draft section 4.2 alone requires
I support the adoption of this document.
* The network programming model (RFC8986) defines multiple behaviors,
CSID is just adding the next and replace flavors
* The draft proposes a single SRv6 based data plane that defines next
and replace behaviors. IMO that is consistent with RFC8986
Hi Robert,
that is a more elegant way to mitigate the problem. But the fact that you
need to use the control or management plane to disseminate the mapping
between the particular flavor and corresponding prefix still tells me that
in the data plane these flavors are distinct and incompatible
1 - 100 of 141 matches
Mail list logo
