RE: 13D buildings

2008-08-08 Thread Russell
Thanks for the response Thom and the mention of those little add-ons I may encounter. Russell Rewis Brown Automatic Sprinklers, Inc. 107C Hemlock Street Valdosta, Georgia 31601 229-244-8130 [EMAIL PROTECTED] "No limit on height, and no limit on area, in 13D, however some jurisdictions require a

RE: 13D buildings

2008-08-08 Thread John Drucker
Where the system is not required for an allowable height or area increase per 2006 IBC 504.2, 506.3. In the case of the IRC, NJ establishes 2 story and 4800 sf floor for VB construction, or 3 story 4800 sf for VA construction, or 3 story VB construction with supervised 13R system. Just in case a

Re: HSW Spacing when installed under bay door

2008-08-08 Thread IPA
Indeed! Thank you very much! On 8/8/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > See if this is what you're after: > > NFPA-13, 2007 edition, 8.7.3.1.7 states: > > Where sidewall standard spray sprinklers are installed to protect areas > below overhead doors > within ordinary hazard occ

RE: 13D buildings

2008-08-08 Thread Thom McMahon
No limit on height, and no limit on area, in 13D, however some jurisdictions require a 3 or 4 head design over x sqft total area. And some require 4 heads @0.1 if slope exceeds 8/12. It's just jurisdiction created. We currently have a 13D duplex with the top floor 45'-0" above the lowest entry lev

Re: HSW Spacing when installed under bay door

2008-08-08 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
See if this is what you're after: NFPA-13, 2007 edition, 8.7.3.1.7 states: Where sidewall standard spray sprinklers are installed to protect areas below overhead doors within ordinary hazard occupancy spaces or rooms, protection area and maximum sprinkler spacing for light hazard as specified

HSW Spacing when installed under bay door

2008-08-08 Thread IPA
Quick question: When you use a single horizontal sidewall sprinkler to cover the area under an open overhead door would you still use the spacing for whatever occupancy is below? If, let's say, this is an Ord Group II hazard this would limit a sidewall sprinkler to 10'x10' - and if I have a 10 ft.

RE: 13D buildings

2008-08-08 Thread Russell
Yeah, I went there first and found that 13D was not modified so that just throws me back to interpreting NFPA. They have; however, modified 13R to spell out Day Care specifically so that limits the floors. But I need to not confine myself to just Georgia at this time. Thanks for the suggestion. Ru

RE: 13D buildings

2008-08-08 Thread Russell
Excellent. Now I can move on. A big thanks to Steven, Richard and George for your input. Russell Rewis ___ Sprinklerforum mailing list Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum To Unsubscribe, s

RE: 13D buildings

2008-08-08 Thread Bobby McCullough
Russell: You may want to look at 120-3-3, the State modifications to 13R: http://georgiafiresprinkler.org/downloads/pdf/Georgia120-3-3-013107.pdf I believe a day care with more than 12 "clients" requires a 13R system. Bobby McCullough Atlanta Sprinkler Inspection

RE: 13D buildings

2008-08-08 Thread George Church
Right. And I have run into locales where a #13D is acceptable for a day care, egress is the only concern. In the first that comes to mind, we sprinklered portions of a church used as daycare, along with the egress corridors, with #13D and a 2-head flow, #13D tank and pump. There is no restriction

RE: 13D buildings

2008-08-08 Thread Russell
Sorry, I mis-wrote when I wrote "This suggests to me that it can have more floors if the system is supplied by a tank as the sole supply." I meant to write "This suggests to me that it can have more floors if the sole supply is NOT a tank". Anyway, I would think that there would be some floor limit

RE: 13D buildings

2008-08-08 Thread Smith, Steven D. (CSFD)
Double check the occupancy classification. If it's still considered an R3 (single family), then 13D should be ok. If a different occupancy classification such as an "I" then it's no longer considered a single family but a commercial hence a full 13 system may be required. The local building and/or

RE: 13D buildings

2008-08-08 Thread George Church
Re-read the supply section; you can reduce the duration from 10 to 7 minutes if you have a single story house <2,000 SF. Nothing to do with the scope of the standard. I saw nothing in the scope of the standard offering evidence of a restriction, hence the discussions on this Forum of 20,000 SF hom

RE: 13D buildings

2008-08-08 Thread Russell
I need to add that the building is used as a daycare. In my state the entire building can be 13D and designed as one dwelling unit. Russell Rewis Brown Automatic Sprinklers, Inc. 107C Hemlock Street Valdosta, Georgia 31601 229-244-8130 [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Russell, as long as you stay within the

RE: 13D buildings

2008-08-08 Thread Richard Carr
Russell, as long as you stay within the "one and two family dwelling" I don't think there is a story limit to a 13D system, I have done 3-story 13D. Richard Carr, SET Design Manager Associated Sprinkler Co., LLC 336.373.3901 ext 217 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROT

13D buildings

2008-08-08 Thread Russell
I need help finding something again. Becoming a habit lately. How many stories can a 13D building have? The only reference to this is in the water supply section under tanks as the sole supply where it states that one of the requirements is the building cannot be more than one story. This suggests

RE: Backflows

2008-08-08 Thread George Church
Do you mean flexible hoses running to the sprinkler heads? If so, I can't imagine the cost dif between the original innovator version and the cheapest UL-Listed Only version you could find would be a factor of x2, not x4. If not, either the market over your way is completely different distributi