Re: Combustible Concealed Space-Area Reduction

2016-10-14 Thread Roland Huggins
o:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org > <mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org>] On Behalf Of Roland > Huggins > Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 11:15 AM > To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org > <mailto:sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org> &g

Re: Combustible Concealed Space-Area Reduction

2016-10-14 Thread Roland Huggins
um-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org > <mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org>] On Behalf Of John > Corcoran > Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 8:56 AM > To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org > <mailto:sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org> > S

RE: Combustible Concealed Space-Area Reduction

2016-10-14 Thread Taylor Schumacher
14, 2016 8:56 AM To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org Subject: RE: Combustible Concealed Space-Area Reduction Some input from our tech team: While NFPA 13 "requires" that specially tested and listed sprinklers be used in combustible concealed spaces 36" and less, the

RE: Combustible Concealed Space-Area Reduction

2016-10-14 Thread John Corcoran
orum@lists.firesprinkler.org<mailto:sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org> Subject: Re: Combustible Concealed Space-Area Reduction I think he is saying that his concealed space is >36" in depth. If so, then specially listed are not mandated. If so, I have always used the QR reduction for 10' ceiling

Re: Combustible Concealed Space-Area Reduction

2016-10-14 Thread Ben Young
Behalf Of *Travis Mack, SET > *Sent:* Thursday, October 13, 2016 5:51 PM > *To:* sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org > *Subject:* Re: Combustible Concealed Space-Area Reduction > > > > I think he is saying that his concealed space is >36" in depth. If so, >

RE: Combustible Concealed Space-Area Reduction

2016-10-13 Thread Cliff Whitfield
rforum [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Taylor Schumacher Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2016 4:55 PM To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org <mailto:sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org> Subject: Combustible Concealed Space-Area Reduction Good afternoon forum, I'm lookin

Re: Combustible Concealed Space-Area Reduction

2016-10-13 Thread Travis Mack, SET
macher *Sent:* Thursday, October 13, 2016 4:55 PM *To:* sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org *Subject:* Combustible Concealed Space-Area Reduction Good afternoon forum, I’m looking to apply the remote area reduction per 11.2.3.2.3.1 in NFPA 13 2010 to a floor truss space over 36” using quick respon

RE: Combustible Concealed Space-Area Reduction

2016-10-13 Thread Cliff Whitfield
Schumacher Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2016 4:55 PM To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org Subject: Combustible Concealed Space-Area Reduction Good afternoon forum, I'm looking to apply the remote area reduction per 11.2.3.2.3.1 in NFPA 13 2010 to a floor truss space over 36" using

Combustible Concealed Space-Area Reduction

2016-10-13 Thread Taylor Schumacher
Good afternoon forum, I'm looking to apply the remote area reduction per 11.2.3.2.3.1 in NFPA 13 2010 to a floor truss space over 36" using quick response, standard spray sprinklers. Could anyone tell me if my assumptions are right? TAYLOR SCHUMACHER, CET Security Fire Sprinkler P