24, 2010 12:56 PM
> To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
> Subject: RE: FM-200 System
>
> I will be robbing this thought some day, nice. Got to think about putting it
> right in our letterhead.
>
> Sentry Fire - Your Green Contractor - We use only Dihydrogen Oxide, the be
Believe it or not, this was one of only a couple that listed Inhalation as a
hazard for acute or chronic overexposurethe rest said not applicable...
Material Safety Data Sheet - Water
I. PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION
Manufacturer's Name: MOTHER NATURE
Address: Everywhere, The World
Business Tele.
tuff, keep it coming.
Chris
-Original Message-
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Hewitt
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 12:21 PM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: FM-200 System
Hydrogen hydrox
-
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of John Drucker
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 12:18 PM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: FM-200 System
dihydrogen monoxide
-Original Message-
From
dihydrogen monoxide
-Original Message-
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Chris Cahill
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 12:56 PM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: FM-200 System
I will be robbing
: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Ron Greenman
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 11:46 AM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: Re: FM-200 System
Just tell the IT guy that the fire protection in his 120 sqft is being
provided
where allowed."
>
> Hope that helps,
>
> John Drucker, CET
> Fire Protection Subcode Official
> Fire/Building/Electrical Inspector
> Fire Marshals Office
> Borough of Red Bank, NJ
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: sprinklerforum-boun...@fires
Fire Marshals Office
Borough of Red Bank, NJ
-Original Message-
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Jim Davidson
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 11:47 AM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: FM-200
The biggest issue I see is that if you DON"T install some type of sprinkler
protection, then you arch may not be allowed to use any of the exceptions or
reductions to construction wall ratings ect. Since we usually get into the
job too late to have them re-adjust all their design they've done using
2010 9:45 AM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: FM-200 System
Further to this is a requirement that technical documentation shall be
furnished to the AHJ.
Interesting when you're looking at a clean agent in lieu of a sprinkler
system.
Has anyone developed a technical documenta
In our area the AHJ considers FM-200 a customer option for fire protection.
They do not want to go into a building that is not completly sprinklered to
fight a fire. They do require all NFPA testing and check out for FM-200 if
installed.
> From: br...@firstdefensefire.com
> To: sprinklerforum
ginal Message-
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Ron Greenman
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 10:29 AM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: Re: FM-200 System
Just make sure that they know the facts and happily accep
day, March 24, 2010 9:48 AM
> To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
> Subject: RE: FM-200 System
>
> You don't need tech docs if you leave the sprinklers in. Who cares if the
> clean agent will work in that case. Worst case it does nothing to the fire.
> I can't think of a
nklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Chris Cahill
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 9:48 AM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: FM-200 System
You don't need tech docs if you leave the sprinklers in. Who cares if the
clean agent wi
Waverly, MN 55390
-Original Message-
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of George Church
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 8:46 AM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: FM-200 System
Further to this is a requir
riginal Message-
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of John Drucker
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 8:37 AM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: FM-200 System
2006 IBC/IFC
[F] 904.2 Where required. "Automa
2006 IBC/IFC
[F] 904.2 Where required. "Automatic fire-extinguishing systems
installed as an alternative to the required automatic sprinkler systems
of Section 903 shall be approved by the fire code official. Automatic
fire-extinguishing systems shall not be considered alternatives for the
purpose
No. But if the building is required to be sprinklered throughout it may need
to have sprinklers within the room as well as the FM-200. In some cases
Architects may opt to have sprinklers installed in order to take advantage of
certain allowances for height or area. If they use the sprinkler
18 matches
Mail list logo
