I am working on a group home which is being designed as NFPA 13R (2010). The
owner is requiring instutional sprinklers in the bedrooms only. I cannot find
any institutional residential sprinklers, so we are going to have to use
commercial QR instutional sprinklers. Section 6.2.1.3.1 states
I am working on a project with a small spray booth with an exhaust duct coming
out vertically and up through the roof. I need to install a dry sprinkler in
the duct. SHould this be a horizontal sidewall or would a pendent be
sufficient. I am dealing with a low water pressure sit
Outlook for iOS (https://aka.ms/o0ukef)
>
>
>
> From: Sprinklerforumon
> behalf of Fpdcdesign
> Sent: Wednesday, February 7, 2018 1:34:13 PM
> To: Sprinklerforum
> Subject: Sprinkler in vertical duct
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
It's a tough call without seeming the drawing and/or visiting the building.
Without NFPA 13 (or other technical source) guidance, it comes down to
engineering judgement.
Todd G Williams, PE
Fire Protection Design/Consulting
Stonington, CT
860-535-2080 (tel:860-535-208
aves Lives
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >
> > On Feb 7, 2018, at 6:43 AM, Fpdcdesign > (mailto:fpdcdes...@gmail.com)> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I am working on a group home
What is the surrounding occupancy?
Todd G Williams, PE
Fire Protection Design/Consulting
Stonington, CT
860-535-2080 (tel:860-535-2080) (ofc)
860-553-3553 (tel:860-553-3553) (fax)
860-608-4559 (tel:860-608-4559) (cell)
>
> On Feb 14, 2018 at 10:50 AM, mail
I’ve always looked at it as Extra Hazard II. A lot of things on that list
seemed to fit. I don’t know the specifics so it is tough to tell. It’s not
Irwin Yachts, is it?
Todd G Williams, PE
Fire Protection Design/Consulting
Stonington, CT
860-535-2080 (ofc)
860-55
A client of mine is trying to set up a water test and an official said that
their proposal is not acceptable because the hydrants don't meet the "300 ft
rule". Apparently something about hydrants used for a test cannot be any closer
than 300 ft. I have not heard of this and could find no r
LP an EMCOR Company
> 7614 Opportunity Drive • Fort Wayne, IN • 46825
> direct 260.487.7824 / cell 260.417.0625 / fax 260.487.7991
> email mmo...@shambaugh.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Fpdcdesign
> To: Sprinklerforum
> Date: 02/28/2018 08:08 PM
&
Reed,
6.7.7.1.3. (2007). Carries through in later versions (as far as I looked). I
ran I. To a similar situation recently and we had to change to 13
Todd G Williams, PE
Fire Protection Design/Consulting
Stonington, CT
860-535-2080 (ofc)
860-553-3553 (fax)
860-608-455
This follows up on a thread I started earlier.
What is a good/beast app for marking up PDF plan files with an Apple Pencil?
Todd G Williams, PE
Fire Protection Design/Consulting
Stonington, CT
860-535-2080 (tel:860-535-2080) (ofc)
860-553-3553 (tel:860-553-3553) (fax)
8
I have been asked to look at a job which is a remodel of a school cafeteria
(seating area only). The specs call for an Ordinary hazard design.
Approximately 60% of the space has 1 ft deep vertical sound dampeners at
various spacing and elevations. Section 8.6.5.2.2 of NFPA 13 (2010)
They are putting additional insulation below the insulated roof panels?
Todd G Williams, PE
Fire Protection Design/Consulting
Stonington, CT
860-535-2080 (ofc)
860-553-3553 (fax)
860-608-4559 (cell)
>
> On Mar 14, 2018 at 10:30 AM, mailto:fsl...@msn.com)>
events that are not related to school operations.
>
> Steve L.
>
>
>
> Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
>
>
> Original message
> From: Fpdcdesign
> Date: 3/14/18 7:08 AM (GMT-08:00)
> To: Sprinklerforum
> Su
-3553 (fax)
860-608-4559 (cell)
>
> On Mar 14, 2018 at 11:33 AM, mailto:fsl...@msn.com)> wrote:
>
>
>
> No
>
>
>
> From: Sprinklerforumon
> behalf of Fpdcdesign
> Sent: Wednesday, March
I’ve always done the 250@100.
Todd G Williams, PE
Fire Protection Design/Consulting
Stonington, CT
860-535-2080 (ofc)
860-553-3553 (fax)
860-608-4559 (cell)
>
> On Mar 15, 2018 at 3:23 PM, mailto:tm...@mfpdesign.com)>
> wrote:
>
>
I haven’t run into a situation where we have been allowed to tap off a
sprinkler system. All of then ones I have seen require a new feed from the
riser and a full standpipe calc.
Todd G Williams, PE
Fire Protection Design/Consulting
Stonington, CT
860-535-2080 (ofc)
Is he aware that he is going to need a pump if he does not come off a public
supply?
Todd G Williams, PE
Fire Protection Design/Consulting
Stonington, CT
860-535-2080 (ofc)
860-553-3553 (fax)
860-608-4559 (cell)
>
> On Mar 19, 2018 at 9:
Are the containers pressurized?
Todd G Williams, PE
Fire Protection Design/Consulting
Stonington, CT
860-535-2080 (ofc)
860-553-3553 (fax)
860-608-4559 (cell)
>
> On Mar 20, 2018 at 3:46 PM, mailto:rongreen...@gmail.com)>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> Not to so
This may be one of those situations where it doesn’t say you can’t do it
instead of saying you can. Ask the AHJ for his/her code reference.
Todd G Williams, PE
Fire Protection Design/Consulting
Stonington, CT
860-535-2080 (ofc)
860-553-3553 (fax)
860-608-4559
I think 1996. It’s in 1999 and wasn’t marked new but not in the 1994 edition.
(1996 is missing from my collection)
Todd G Williams, PE
Fire Protection Design/Consulting
Stonington, CT
860-535-2080 (ofc)
860-553-3553 (fax)
860-608-4559 (cell)
>
gt; craig.pr...@ch2m.com (mailto:craig.pr...@ch2m.com) | www.jacobs.com
> (http://www.jacobs.com/)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Sprinklerforum
> [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of
> Fpdcdesign
It was easier when they used to have pintels.
Todd G Williams, PE
Fire Protection Design/Consulting
Stonington, CT
860-535-2080 (ofc)
860-553-3553 (fax)
860-608-4559 (cell)
>
> On Mar 28, 2018 at 1:33 PM, (mailto:jdenha...@stricklandfir
If you replaced the solutions with one that was rated for and tests at
-15degF, what would be the impairment?
Todd G Williams, PE
Fire Protection Design/Consulting
Stonington, CT
860-535-2080 (ofc)
860-553-3553 (fax)
860-608-4559 (cell)
>
> On Mar 29, 2018
>
> Ph: 828-284-4772
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> cl...@fire-design.com (mailto:cl...@fire-design.com)
>
>
>
> www.fire-design.com (http://www.fire-design.com/)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Fire retardant lumber may have an impact (I’ve had them use it in the past).
Not sure if the cabling creates a hazard, however.
Todd G Williams, PE
Fire Protection Design/Consulting
Stonington, CT
860-535-2080 (ofc)
860-553-3553 (fax)
860-608-4559 (cell)
If the platform is 16” high, my guess would be that it has a 3/4” deck on 2x8
joists. That would leave less than 8” between the bottom of joists and the
floor. If this is an existing platform, that is going to be very difficult to
install and maintain sprinklers in that space. Would
Frozen water or solution blocking flow could be considered an impairment.
Todd G Williams, PE
Fire Protection Design/Consulting
Stonington, CT
860-535-2080 (ofc)
860-553-3553 (fax)
860-608-4559 (cell)
>
> On Mar 29, 2018 at 12:26 PM, mailto:danett...@att.
SFPE hosted a webinar yesterday on Globe’s new attic protection scheme. They
had some great video that explained a lot of what is being talked about here.
Todd G Williams, PE
Fire Protection Design/Consulting
Stonington, CT
860-535-2080 (ofc)
860-553-3553 (fax)
>
>
>
> Thanks for reply Todd.
> If somebody asked me, "should the 8' rule be applied for parallel to
> the slope when the channels run end to end" I would have to say, "no,
> because the book don't tell me so".
> I
Is there a reliable table for the weight of water filled pipe for vertical
loading (as in a straight hanger)? Table A.9.3.5.6 is for determining
horizontal loading, per the heading.
Todd G Williams, PE
Fire Protection Design/Consulting
Stonington, CT
860-535-2080 (ofc)
8
Wouldn’t the trailer storage bring it up to EH2?
Todd G Williams, PE
Fire Protection Design/Consulting
Stonington, CT
860-535-2080 (ofc)
860-553-3553 (fax)
860-608-4559 (cell)
>
> On May 17, 2018 at 9:47 AM, mailto:john.ir...@dynafire.com)>
ake their part of load every 25'?
>
> ...why is Pipe Main being pushed out? on the sloped roof
>
> ... lots of weight being carried by the Main Pipe and or at bottom of Riser,
>
>
>
> Chuck Bamford SET
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 7:0
Concealer?
>
> On May 25, 2018 at 3:12 PM, mailto:mphill...@jjkllc.com)>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Not sure of the problem or the particulars.
>
>
>
> Have used these during construction before putting the system in final
> service.
>
>
Remember, the Appendix is not part of the standard, unless the appendices are
specifically brought in by the Code.
That section is purposely vague because the term “limited combustible” is open
to interpretation since each situation is different. That needs to be an
agreeme
FM Global (at least used to) insure Jack Daniels. They have had to deal with
this before. See what you can find out there.
Todd G Williams, PE
Fire Protection Design/Consulting
Stonington, CT
860-535-2080 (ofc)
860-553-3553 (fax)
860-608-4559 (cell)
Make sure they have restrictions on things like rubber tires, flammable
liquids, etc.
Todd G Williams, PE
Fire Protection Design/Consulting
Stonington, CT
860-535-2080 (ofc)
860-553-3553 (fax)
860-608-4559 (cell)
>
> On Jul 26, 2018 at 3:31 PM, mailto:atir
Read him the first sentence in 8.2.1
>
> On Jul 31, 2018 at 12:05 PM, mailto:tm...@mfpdesign.com)>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> I have a relatively simple project that is being made quite challenging by a
> 3rd party plan reviewer.There have bee
Maybe senior means he’s using a 1970s edition of 13
>
> On Jul 31, 2018 at 12:30 PM, mailto:tm...@mfpdesign.com)>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> Yes.I checked.There is nothing like that.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Travis Mack
I could do a Veep thing. Is ther a marina nearby?
Todd G Williams, PE
Fire Protection Design/Consulting
Stonington, CT
860-535-2080 (ofc)
860-553-3553 (fax)
860-608-4559 (cell)
>
> On Aug 3, 2018 at 1:42 PM, (mailto:st...@protectiondesign.
What is the exact wording of the reduction requirement?
Todd G Williams, PE
Fire Protection Design/Consulting
Stonington, CT
860-535-2080 (ofc)
860-553-3553 (fax)
860-608-4559 (cell)
>
> On Aug 8, 2018 at 5:03 PM, mailto:tm...@mfpdesign.com
48f108d4df580e77%7C14e5497c16da42e69ffa77d19bafe511%7C0%7C0%7C636379016677342180&sdata=tT5E7LsZjSmyreKi4gDCa70EWN%2BZodi%2FhbeCbHNRijI%3D&reserved=0)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> “The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of low price
> is forgotten
I am looking at a place with hot tubs and spas (empty) stored 4 high. The
exteriors area wood and the tubs are a reinforced plastic. Any experience or
thoughts on commodity classification? I am looking into if they are using Trex
or other artificial lumber on some of the exteriors.
Any idea of the original design criteria?
>
> On Sep 5, 2018 at 8:25 PM, (mailto:raroi...@kfi-eng.com)> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> I have a building that doesn’t require standpipes based on height, but it
> does require a Class III automatic standpipe s
A relief vale would be a good place to start. That could tell you if it is a
pressure or temperature problem.
>
> On Sep 13, 2018 at 6:29 PM, (mailto:larry.stew...@earthlink.net)> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> Blown heads have been located at
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Sprinklerforum
> [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of
> Fpdcdesign
> Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2018 5:31 PM
> To: Sprinklerforum
> Subject: Re: Sprinkler heads popping off randomly
>
>
>
> Office: (763) 425-1001 x2
>
>
>
> Cell: (612) 759-5556
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org]
> On Behalf Of Fpdcdesign
> Sent: Thursda
I have had companies purchase recording thermometers to figure out ceiling
temperatures. Set them up and let them do their job for a week
>
> On Sep 18, 2018 at 9:12 PM, (mailto:larry.stew...@earthlink.net)> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> Well, I
I am looking at a project which is the conversion of an old mill. The spec
calls for exposure protection on the windows in some areas. One issue I am
running into is that the exposure protection table (7.8.8.4 - 2010) only covers
up to 12’-0” wide windows. I have several that range f
> [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of
> Fpdcdesign
> Sent: Monday, September 24, 2018 9:39 AM
> To: Sprinklerforum
> Subject: Exposure protection of large windows.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I am
;
>
>
>
>
>
> SL
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From:Sprinklerforum
> [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of
> Fpdcdesign
> Sent: Monday, September 24, 2018 9:59 AM
> To: Sprinklerforum
> Subje
and setbacks to property lines and not means
> of way?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Sprinklerforum On
> Behalf Of Fpdcdesign
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2018 2:52 PM
> To: Sprinklerforum
> Subject: Re: Exposure
Wax coated. Perhaps some of the pvc coated but you would need to check
>
> On Oct 2, 2018 at 2:05 PM, mailto:da...@aaafp.com)> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> Yes.NFPA 13 (2016) 6.2.6.1
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Sprinklerf
I was contacted by a company who is planning on storing ATVs WITH FUEL in
racks to 12 ft. Each ATV will have 3-6 gallons of gas. Any thoughts on a
commodity classification?
Todd G Williams, PE
Fire Protection Design/Consulting
Stonington, CT
860-535-2080 (ofc)
860-553-35
If the enclosure is part of the building envelope, then it should be
sprinklered
Are the stairs combustible?
Todd G Williams, PE
Fire Protection Design/Consulting
Stonington, CT
860-535-2080 (ofc)
860-553-3553 (fax)
860-608-4559 (cell)
>
> On Oct 17,
leads to a side observation. We provide sprinklers for balconies and
> below combustible overhangs that are over 4 feet wide. And won't that be
> outside the building envelope? So would not sprinklering outside the building
> envelope be a valid argument?
>
>
>
>
&g
7;t thought of it as that way, that is why
> I'm asking.
>
> Tony
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 7:39 AM Fpdcdesign (mailto:fpdcdes...@gmail.com)> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Remember, these stairs are a
I’m with you at 130
Todd G Williams, PE
Fire Protection Design/Consulting
Stonington, CT
860-535-2080 (ofc)
860-553-3553 (fax)
860-608-4559 (cell)
>
> On Oct 18, 2018 at 4:06 PM, mailto:tm...@mfpdesign.com)>
> wrote:
>
>
>
The insulation eliminates the channeling effect of the joist spaces
Todd G Williams, PE
Fire Protection Design/Consulting
Stonington, CT
860-535-2080 (ofc)
860-553-3553 (fax)
860-608-4559 (cell)
>
> On Oct 18, 2018 at 4:35 PM, mailto:tm...@
How do they intend to secure the insulation?
Todd G Williams, PE
Fire Protection Design/Consulting
Stonington, CT
860-535-2080 (ofc)
860-553-3553 (fax)
860-608-4559 (cell)
>
> On Oct 23, 2018 at 10:48 AM, (mailto:kmontgom...@aerofire.co
Are they going to be stacking the mats in the off season?
>
> On Oct 25, 2018 at 10:37 AM, mailto:rongreen...@gmail.com)>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> I wonder if the fuel load from those rubber/plasticine mats is greater than
> that of the carpeting and furnishi
ces would
> certainly present a broader spectrum of cause and origin scenarios, no?
>I’m pretty comfy with light hazard if the room is just a room, mats and
> all.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> SL
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Steve, I think the gist of this is intended use vs actual use. One layer of
floor mats is not that big a deal. A 7 ft stack of mats in a room during the
summer is. I have seen a lot of stuff in school athletic facilities moved
around and and stored to the point where LH is not really
ed to mats on the floor, mats on the walls, mats rolled up and stored
> in the room, in the adjacent room … it became an accessory occupancy to a
> wrestling mat factory.I wrestled for 3 years; except for guys three
> and four classes heavier rubbing my face into the mat li
What are the floor tiles made of?
>
> On Nov 5, 2018 at 4:08 PM, mailto:jir...@quickresponsefl.com)>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> Building height = 29’
>
>
>
> Let’s say storage to 25’ (single or double rows, open grate)
>
>
>
> Floor tiles in plas
I am working on an existing two story plus attic wood frame building. The
engineer is requiring zone control assemblies (butterfly valve plus riser
manifold) for every level including the attic. I have designed it so there is a
bull head tee at the top of a 4” riser with the assembli
6 Barren Road
> >
> >
> >
> > East Stroudsburg, PA 18302
> >
> >
> >
> > Office: 973-670-2627
> >
> >
> >
> > m...@knssprinkler.com (mailto:m...@knssprinkler.com)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 36 Barren Road
> >
> >
> >
> > East Stroudsburg, PA 18302
> >
> >
> >
> > Office: 973-670-2627
> >
> >
> >
> > m...@knssprinkler.com (mailto:
It probably should be a glass bulb sprinkler. Not sure if the solder has any
magnetic properties
Todd G Williams, PE
Fire Protection Design/Consulting
Stonington, CT
860-535-2080 (ofc)
860-553-3553 (fax)
860-608-4559 (cell)
>
> On Nov 13, 2
I did a suystem recently using the NFPA criteria that Larry cited. However, I
would contact FM and ask them for guidance
Todd G Williams, PE
Fire Protection Design/Consulting
Stonington, CT
860-535-2080 (ofc)
860-553-3553 (fax)
860-608-4559 (cell)
In the collective experience, does anyone besides the structural engineer
determine Seismic Design Category to see if seismic restraint is required? I am
working on a gut and replace in an existing building where I called for seismic
and the contractor is pushing back.
Todd G
gt;
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Sprinklerforum On
> Behalf Of Fpdcdesign
> Sent: Monday, December 03, 2018 5:16 PM
> To: Sprinklerforum
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Determining seismic design category.
>
>
>
>
>
>
https://earthquake.usgs.gov/designmaps/us/application.php
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 4:16 PM Fpdcdesign (mailto:fpdcdes...@gmail.com)> wrote:
>
>
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
address, just need soil type or
> use default.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> https://earthquake.usgs.gov/designmaps/us/application.php
> (https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__earthquake.usgs.gov_designmaps_us_application.php&d
Not necessarily but you do need to comply with the the section in 13 for
positioning and obstruction of sidewall sprinklers.
Todd G Williams, PE
Fire Protection Design/Consulting
Stonington, CT
860-535-2080 (ofc)
860-553-3553 (fax)
860-608-4559 (cell)
>
>
It has been a while since I have had to size a bladder tank for water hammer.
This one is to be installed between a backflow preventer and a fire pump.
Required by the local water company. Any good resources for sizing this?
___
I am working on a system in early 1900s building with typical mill
construction with large wood beams and a wood deck. In some areas they are
dropping ceilings below. The ceiling heights have been changing and may now
create a space less than 36”. I called for standard upright sprink
Roland.
“Likely intent” can be a slippery slope. Unless you look at the research that
was behind the development of the standard to come up with your position, it is
a guess. If we had to do that research for every interpretation of a standard,
nothing would get done. In this
Also remember that Codes area also a minimum and not an absolute criteria
Todd G Williams, PE
Fire Protection Design/Consulting
Stonington, CT
860-535-2080 (ofc)
860-553-3553 (fax)
860-608-4559 (cell)
>
> On Jan 4, 2019 at 11:34 AM, <å... .
WHy not use a K5.6 residential sprinkler?
Todd G Williams, PE
Fire Protection Design/Consulting
Stonington, CT
860-535-2080 (ofc)
860-553-3553 (fax)
860-608-4559 (cell)
>
> On Jan 7, 2019 at 12:53 PM, (mailto:st...@protectiondesign.com)>
...under the growing tables
>
> On Jan 8, 2019 at 8:35 PM, mailto:e...@bamfordfire.com)> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> Good considerations, Steve.Also, consider any misc storage of items used
> in the greenhouse such as wood/plastic pallets, fertilizer
Rack storage?
>
> On Feb 21, 2019 at 12:21 PM, (mailto:jcrawf...@phaserfire.ca)> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> I have been asked to look at a new building for boat storage but cannot seem
> to find any guidance, has anyone done a boat storage building that can point
Look at NFPA 232 for Records Storage
Todd G Williams, PE
Fire Protection Design/Consulting
Stonington, CT
860-535-2080 (ofc)
860-553-3553 (fax)
860-608-4559 (cell)
>
> On Mar 1, 2019 at 2:35 PM, mailto:fsl...@msn.com)> wrote:
>
>
>
> Yes
>
>
>
Have been having some issues with sending to the Forum. bear with me
Todd G Williams, PE
Fire Protection Design/Consulting
Stonington, CT
860-535-2080 (ofc)
860-553-3553 (fax)
860-608-4559 (cell)
___
Sprinklerforu
;
>
>
>
>
>
> 117 Old Stage Rd. - Essex Jct., VT. 05452
>
>
>
> CELL: (802) 373-0638 TEL: (802) 434-2968
>
>
>
> tston...@comcast.net (mailto:tston...@comcast.net)
>
>
>
>
>
&
The ceiling clouds are going to act like giant heat collectors and we all know
how well they work. The only ceiling jet is going to be at the roof and the
clouds will act as obstructions to discharge. Unless you go to some type of
open deluge system, this may fall into the “not able
(mailto:mphe...@aerofire.com)> wrote:
>
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Your spell checker is broken also. ;-)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Mark at Aero
> >
> >
> >
> > 602 820-7894
> >
> &
It is not. There has been a lot of time and money put into this but no one has
found any correlation.
Todd G Williams, PE
Fire Protection Design/Consulting
Stonington, CT
860-535-2080 (ofc)
860-553-3553 (fax)
860-608-4559 (cell)
>
> On M
Yes, I’m using the “A” word. I have a client that is asking be about using the
new Tyco antifreeze solution for a project. Reading through the literature, it
states that it is not good for temperatures below -10F. My question is where do
we find information to determine what is the p
>
>
>
>
>
> G. Tim Stone Consulting, LLC
>
>
>
> NICET Level III Engineering Technician
>
>
>
> Fire Protection Sprinkler Design
>
>
>
> and Consulting Services
>
>
>
>
>
>
It seems sealing it would be a .lot cheaper than a 3500 gpm pump
Todd G Williams, PE
Fire Protection Design/Consulting
Stonington, CT
860-535-2080 (ofc)
860-553-3553 (fax)
860-608-4559 (cell)
>
> On Mar 22, 2019 at 9:53 AM, (mailto:tim.eas...@holston-aap.c
There is Handbook commentary about the need for overlap in ESFR protection.
Todd G Williams, PE
Fire Protection Design/Consulting
Stonington, CT
860-535-2080 (ofc)
860-553-3553 (fax)
860-608-4559 (cell)
>
> On Apr 1, 2019 at 11:22 AM, ma
There is a magic number of 40degF that shows up a lot in 13 for wet vs dry. I
use the same for determining dry pendent vs wet. Under 40degF COOLER, DRY
PENDENT.
Todd G Williams, PE
Fire Protection Design/Consulting
Stonington, CT
860-535-2080 (ofc)
860-553-3553 (f
>
> John
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> John August Denhardt, P.E.
>
>
>
> 301.343.1457 - Mobile
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Sprinklerforum On
> Behalf Of Fpdcdesign
> Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2019 8:23 PM
> To: Spr
I believe FM Global has standards for rolled carpet. That could give you a
start.
Todd G Williams, PE
Fire Protection Design/Consulting
Stonington, CT
860-535-2080 (ofc)
860-553-3553 (fax)
860-608-4559 (cell)
>
> On Apr 30, 2019 at 1:59 AM, mailto:apsen...
Watch saw dust control
>
> On May 9, 2019 at 2:35 PM, (mailto:collinfire...@gmail.com)> wrote:
>
>
>
> I'm working on a truss manufacturing plant where all the raw materials are
> outside and only assembly is taking place indoors in the sprinklered
> building. I'm
Methinks it is no longer a servery.
Todd G Williams, PE
Fire Protection Design/Consulting
Stonington, CT
860-535-2080 (ofc)
860-553-3553 (fax)
860-608-4559 (cell)
>
> On May 14, 2019 at 4:10 PM, mailto:d...@afpi.us)> wrote:
>
>
>
Based on hydraulics and tap sizes allowed by water purveyor.
>
> On Jun 4, 2019 at 1:56 PM, mailto:craig.pr...@jacobs.com)>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> All it says in 13R is that if the line is over 4” apply NFPA 24, if under4”
> NFPA 24 is not nece
Check FM Global
>
> On Jun 7, 2019 at 11:14 AM, mailto:jgam...@lssofsheridan.com)>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> Anyone have some insight / guidance on Fire Sprinkler concerns for areas
> dedicated to ammo production.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> TIA
>
>
>
>
>
>
Does Revit have a similar program?
>
> On Jun 19, 2019 at 12:39 PM, mailto:jvankol...@mfpc.us)> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> Before we upgraded we used “Any PDF to DWG Converter” defiantly no where as
> good as the Autocad built-in one but it will work in
1 - 100 of 473 matches
Mail list logo
