RE: New PMD and Checkstyle tasks

2003-03-06 Thread David Graham
At the bottom of every email sent to the list is a link to unsubscribe. It can't get any easier/clearer than that. David From: "Dasgupta, Diptiman (Cognizant)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject:

RE: My dilema: Much improved version of requiredif ready, 1.1 or 1.2?

2003-03-06 Thread David Graham
James, I haven't even been able to figure out requiredif! I think your feature is great but we need to show some discipline and maintain the 1.1 freeze. IMO, this should be a definite addition for 1.2. I have no idea about the issues with JavaCC. Does it mean that there's no source file, jus

Re: Html taglib indexed+mapactionform bug?

2003-03-05 Thread David Graham
Is "_" the right notation? I've never seen that and would expect it to be [] instead. David From: "Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Html taglib indexed+mapactionform bug? Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2003 23:06:54 -0600 I wan

Re: Build broken?

2003-03-05 Thread David Graham
t I see warnings all over Eclipse about it. -- James Mitchell Web Developer/Struts Evangelist http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/ "People demand freedom of speech to make up for the freedom of thought which they avoid." - Soren Aabye Kierkegaard (1813-1855) -----Original Message-

RE: Build broken?

2003-03-05 Thread David Graham
dom of speech to make up for the freedom of thought which they avoid." - Soren Aabye Kierkegaard (1813-1855) > -Original Message- > From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 11:33 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Build

RE: Build broken?

2003-03-05 Thread David Graham
thought which they avoid." - Soren Aabye Kierkegaard (1813-1855) > -Original Message- > From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 11:25 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Build broken? > > > When I try to build S

Build broken?

2003-03-05 Thread David Graham
When I try to build Struts I get this error: [javac] C:\eclipse\workspace\jakarta-struts\src\share\org\apache\struts\taglib\nested\NestedPropertyTag.java:121: cannot resolve symbol [javac] symbol : variable EVAL_BODY_AGAIN [javac] location: class org.apache.struts.taglib.nested.NestedProp

Remove DBCP dependency for 1.2?

2003-03-05 Thread David Graham
Struts has 6 open bug reports, many of which I'm prepared to mark as later. What's disheartening is the large number of open bugs on the dependent packages we use from commons. We need DBCP for 1.1 to maintain backwards compatibility with deprecated 1.0 APIs but we don't need it for 1.2 (when

RE: Using tiles def in global forwards broken?

2003-03-05 Thread David Graham
t this the wrong way. With the exception of the default page, every page in my application is referenced through tiles definitions. Is there another way to take the default request/page and call your default page using a tiles definition? I am trying to avoid putting tiles tags in the jsp itself.

RE: Using tiles def in global forwards broken?

2003-03-05 Thread David Graham
: jakarta-struts-1.1-rc1 In Welcome page (default page): <%@ taglib uri="struts-logic" prefix="logic"%> In Struts config: ... ... value="/WEB-INF/tiles-defs.xml"/> In tiles-de

Re: Using tiles def in global forwards broken?

2003-03-05 Thread David Graham
Works fine for me. David From: "White, Joshua A (CASD, IT)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Using tiles def in global forwards broken? Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2003 14:40:22 -0500 Chucks book contains an e

RE: Some taglibs are missing a few common attributes.

2003-03-05 Thread David Graham
That seems a little disconcerting. Edgar > -Original Message- > From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 9:41 AM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: Re: Some taglibs are missing a few common attributes

Re: Some taglibs are missing a few common attributes.

2003-03-05 Thread David Graham
I definitely don't think we should support replacement args because then the html tags turn into messaging tags. A bundle attribute might be nice but the bean:message or preferably fmt:message tags are more flexible. David From: "James Mitchell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Struts Develope

Re: Short term plans

2003-03-03 Thread David Graham
Summing up, is it fair to say that "an enhancement request which comes with a patch (and possibly some test cases) will be given relatively higher priority, regardless whether its functionality overlaps with other technologies"? (And "persistence counts as well.") I personally won't commit any c

Re: ReloadableMessageResources

2003-03-03 Thread David Graham
We'll be moving the message resources functionality into commons-resources for 1.2 so you should probably fit your class into that code instead of Struts code that will be going away. I'm interested in your class because reloading the app server to see message changes is a nuisance I could live

RE: Commons Validator

2003-03-02 Thread David Graham
ate: Sun, 2 Mar 2003 18:52:38 -0500 What's the fix? James This mailbox protected from junk email by Matador from MailFrontier, Inc. http://info.mailfrontier.com > -Original Message- > From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTE

Re: Slow encode method -- patch included

2003-03-02 Thread David Graham
03 12:22:01 -0800 Thanks for applying the patch. Questions below: David Graham wrote: I've made the changes. A couple things: 1. Please post patches to bugzilla tickets. Where is the bugzilla? I can't find a link to it at the website 2. We adhere to the standard Java coding guideli

Commons Validator

2003-03-01 Thread David Graham
Would it bother any of you validator folks if I added myself to the status file of commons validator and committed a fix? I thought it would be polite to ask first :-). Dave _ MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/utilRequestUtils.java

2003-03-01 Thread David Graham
How is it any different than the way it was implemented before? If it doesn't find the 1.4 method it uses the 1.3 method. David From: "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: cv

Re: Slow encode method -- patch included

2003-03-01 Thread David Graham
I've made the changes. A couple things: 1. Please post patches to bugzilla tickets. 2. We adhere to the standard Java coding guidelines which prohibit underscores except in constants. 3. Your if statement should have been (encode != null) David From: Luiz-Otavio Zorzella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Short term plans

2003-03-01 Thread David Graham
How about we solve the 7 remaining 1.1 bugs first ;-). Dave From: Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Short term plans Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2003 17:56:04 -0500 Craig R. McClanahan wrote: M

Re: Short term plans

2003-03-01 Thread David Graham
The test I use is this: Does the requested feature exist in JSTL? If so, don't duplicate the effort in Struts. This is not just my opinion, it has been discussed among the committers before. I don't think people requesting enhancements or patches realize the amount of effort required to get i

Re: Short term plans

2003-03-01 Thread David Graham
1.2. Alternative? Struts 1.2 in 18 months? .V Craig R. McClanahan wrote: On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, David Graham wrote: Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 17:50:08 -0700 From: David Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re:

Struts-EL package

2003-02-28 Thread David Graham
Currently, the struts-el tags live in the org.apache.strutsel.taglib.* package. At some point, I think they need to be moved to org.apache.struts.taglib.el.* to match the rest of the taglibs. Maybe they could even be under their respective non-el taglibs (ie. org.apache.struts.taglib.bean.el)

RE: consultants and poweredby removal

2003-02-28 Thread David Graham
d. I was thinking about something with a declarative search criteria or pattern. -- James Mitchell Web Developer/Struts Evangelist http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/ "People demand freedom of speech to make up for the freedom of thought which they avoid." - Soren Aabye Kierkegaard (1813-1855)

Re: Short term plans

2003-02-28 Thread David Graham
uts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Short term plans Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 19:46:27 -0800 (PST) On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, David Graham wrote: > Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 17:50:08 -0700 > From: David Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL

Tiles still in the contrib directory

2003-02-28 Thread David Graham
I just noticed that Tiles code is duplicated under the contrib directory. Shouldn't this be removed now that Tiles is integrated into Struts? David _ Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. http://join.msn

consultants and poweredby removal

2003-02-28 Thread David Graham
We no longer actively maintain the consultants and poweredby pages. What does everyone think about removing them? We still get requests to be added to those pages so I think it would be good to get rid of them. David _ The ne

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17368] - multiple does not populate formbean under jdk1.3

2003-02-28 Thread David Graham
I need some help solving this issue. I don't know where to look for the problem. Is this an issue with Sun's 1.3.1 jdk, BeanUtils, or Struts. There are 2 workarounds: 1. Use Java 1.4 2. Don't provide an indexed getter method on the ActionForm Help? David http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/doc/userGuide struts-html.xml

2003-02-28 Thread David Graham
It is valid xml unless there is a dtd that says all text must be in a tag. I think it's ok. David From: "Martin Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/doc/userGuide struts-html.xml Date:

Re: Short term plans

2003-02-28 Thread David Graham
The taglibs are a heavily used feature. We get a lot of bug reports on them so the tests are badly needed. There is no doubt that we should use JSTL but at this point not everyone has that option. David With respect, consider how much time struts-devs should spend on tags, I kind of agree wi

Re: Short term plans

2003-02-28 Thread David Graham
Sounds great James! Thanks a bunch for doing the tests. David From: "James Mitchell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Short term plans Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 16:58:33 -0500 Committers/Developers

Re: Should html:file tag have a value attribute?

2003-02-28 Thread David Graham
It shows a warning message saying that the file input was filled without any action of the user, and lets you choose to submit it or not. Thanks for the info. I knew Opera wouldn't let me down :-). David _ Tired of spam? Get advan

RE: Should html:file tag have a value attribute?

2003-02-28 Thread David Graham
ate: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 14:21:36 -0500 Does it submit the file if you just hit submit? -- James Mitchell Web Developer/Struts Evangelist http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/ > -Original Message- > From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 2:19 PM

RE: Should html:file tag have a value attribute?

2003-02-28 Thread David Graham
Opera does display the value attribute's text in the browser window; however, when you open the file chooser on the field, that value is not used at all. David From: "Karr, David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL P

Re: Dependent Packages in Struts 1.1

2003-02-28 Thread David Graham
I don't think we need an RC that just updates the dependant libraries to released versions. IMO, we do need an RC2 though, which may include more released libraries. David From: "Martin Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] S

Re: Dependent Packages in Struts 1.1

2003-02-28 Thread David Graham
Final releases for dependant libraries will be distributed with 1.1 final. Currently we're using nightlies. David From: Mark Abbott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: De

RE: [patch] tiles-documentation import statement cleanup

2003-02-26 Thread David Graham
elines? thanks, Andy -Original Message- From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 11:45 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [patch] tiles-documentation import statement cleanup Patches should be posted to a bugzilla ticket. Cleaning up imports is

Re: [patch] tiles-documentation import statement cleanup

2003-02-26 Thread David Graham
Patches should be posted to a bugzilla ticket. Cleaning up imports is not high on my list of todos for getting 1.1 released. David From: "Andrew Freeman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts-Dev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [patch] tiles-docu

Re: Bug #17156 Validate Integer?

2003-02-26 Thread David Graham
in with convertNull set to true as an ActionServlet parameter. If it then works, we can just document the condition. Since numerics are not recommended for ActionForms, we don't need to solution to be particularly elegant =:0) -Ted. David Graham wrote: That bug states that validate required does

RE: Design clarification for locale handling

2003-02-26 Thread David Graham
That's not a bug, it's a usage limitation. An app that does not use sessions is considered a special case so we're not bending over backwards to support it. We realize the tag shouldn't be creating sessions but can't change it because of backward compatibility problems. David From: "Mitche

Re: Design clarification for locale handling

2003-02-26 Thread David Graham
Even if no requests ever get processed by ActionServlet, having HtmlTag just use RequestUtils.retrieveUserLocale will still do the right thing (i.e. return a locale based on the Accept-Language header, or the default locale for the server). I don't see how that would break localization behavior.

Re: Design clarification for locale handling

2003-02-26 Thread David Graham
The HTML tag does its own locale-setting (and therefore session creation) because some people still set their apps up to all URLs directly to JSP pages (bypassing the controller servlet, so that the locale setup it does is also skipped). Removing this would break the localization behavior of any

Re: Design clarification for locale handling

2003-02-26 Thread David Graham
I'm not sure backwards compatibility would really be impacted. Unless you can show that backwards compatibility *definitely* won't be impacted, we can't change the behavior. Subclassing the tag for your specific use is what open source is all about. David __

Re: Design clarification for locale handling

2003-02-26 Thread David Graham
I agree with you that the html tag should not be performing the logic it does now; however, we can't change behavior that people may be relying on. Keep in mind that your app is a special case where you're not using sessions. If many other apps weren't using sessions we would have had many mo

Bug #17156 Validate Integer?

2003-02-25 Thread David Graham
That bug states that validate required does not work with an ActionForm property with type java.lang.Integer. Indeed, I tested this with the struts-validator webapp's type form and required doesn't seem to run for that field when I changed it from String to Integer. What does happen is that a

RE: committers attention - just a few moments...

2003-02-25 Thread David Graham
I also agree with David. The responses I've seen to your fix indicate that it worked. I think it would be appropriate to commit the fixes now for release in 1.1. I think an RC2 that included your fix would be appropriate after we deal with the rest of the open bugs on RC1. David From: "Ka

Re: Dependent Packages in Struts 1.1

2003-02-25 Thread David Graham
Yes. Since announcing the Beta, there has been an uptick in user activity, so there are a number of bugs that need to be addressed. Unfortunately, FileUpload seems to be a one man show (me) at the moment, with the original contributors being conspicuously absent. It looks like there are 2 outstand

Re: Dependent Packages in Struts 1.1

2003-02-25 Thread David Graham
nt Packages in Struts 1.1 Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 10:17:21 -0800 (PST) On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, David Graham wrote: > Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 11:09:10 -0700 > From: David Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Dependent Packages in Struts 1.1

2003-02-25 Thread David Graham
So dbcp, pool, and fileupload still need work. Arron fixed an important bug with the nested taglib but he recommended that we not include the fix in 1.1 because it touched a lot of the nested tags. Are we sure we don't want to include that fix in 1.1? The nested tags are badly broken in Tomca

Re: David Graham, 1.1 RC1 MVC

2003-02-25 Thread David Graham
; To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: David Graham, 1.1 RC1 MVC Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 09:02:54 -0500 While *we all* put a lot of time and effort into getting 1.1 ready for its first release candidate, it seems to me that David Graham really came through for us over the last few weeks (months, eve

Re: new variation on old question

2003-02-24 Thread David Graham
Not good. There are 7 open bug reports to deal with and I'd like to give people a bit more time to test their apps on the RCs. David From: Thomas L Roche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: new variation on old question Dat

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/configControllerConfig.java

2003-02-24 Thread David Graham
I don't see how this is at all related to the cvs commit of ControllerConfig documentation changes. Please post this question to struts-user. David Hi, we are using struts into our new project, for that one of our requirement is In html we need to display dynamic fileds based on user selecti

RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Struts 1.1 Release Candidate 1 released

2003-02-24 Thread David Graham
ommons-dbcp.jar - 1.1-dev commons-digester.jar - 1.5-dev Craig McClanahan also made reference to this need a couple of months ago: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg53818.html JOHN -Original Message- From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, Februa

RE: RC1 release and Commons Logging 1.0.2

2003-02-24 Thread David Graham
ry Ashley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: 'Struts Developers List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: RC1 release and Commons Logging 1.0.2 Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 11:28:50 -0600 David Graham wrote: >Gary, &g

RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Struts 1.1 Release Candidate 1 released

2003-02-24 Thread David Graham
Struts releases always use released versions of dependant libraries. David From: "Hohlen, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Struts 1.1 Release Ca

RE: RC1 release and Commons Logging 1.0.2

2003-02-24 Thread David Graham
Gary, You are not obligated to contribute to Struts in any way and have a right to express your opinion. You said that 2 "releases" of Struts depend on nightly builds; however, betas and release candidates are not releases. When Struts 1.1 Final is released it will only depend on released vers

Re: Nested V2? - (fixed the Tomcat 4.1.18 problem)...

2003-02-23 Thread David Graham
Too unstable for 1.1 so close to release, but too important to let it slip for over a year for it to come out. I don't think we'll ever wait a year again to release a version. My preference is to release 1.2 as the bug fix release for 1.1 with a few other enhancements instead of 1.1.1. David

Re: [PROPOSAL] Add Exception Handling to ActionForwards

2003-02-21 Thread David Graham
I tried implementing a simpler solution for Tiles controllers by customizing the RequestProcessor. I discovered that the tag also calls the controller and just displays exceptions to the user. I'm a little unsure about what to do at this point... David I'll start with a specific situation:

required?

2003-02-20 Thread David Graham
Why is the key attribute on the struts-config.xml element required? It seems like it should be optional as I have yet to use this in any of my exception handlers. Thanks, Dave _ The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 mon

RE: [PROPOSAL] Add Exception Handling to ActionForwards

2003-02-20 Thread David Graham
sed by DB interaction couldn't be handled gracefully-- i.e., the exceptions would be thrown prior to the execute() method. This case seems to be another of the type addressed by this proposal-- am I right? > -Original Message- > From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[PROPOSAL] Add Exception Handling to ActionForwards

2003-02-20 Thread David Graham
I'll start with a specific situation: Tiles allows you to configure a Controller class on a tile that gets executed whenever that tile gets used. This is most commonly used to prepare data for the tile from some datasource. However, the declarative exception handling feature does not apply to

RequestProcessor.processActionForward() ?

2003-02-20 Thread David Graham
Should RequestProcessor.processActionForward() be deprecated? It just delegates the call to processForwardConfig and the javadoc indicates it could be deprecated. David _ The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 mont

Re: 1.1b3 Release Build?

2003-02-19 Thread David Graham
The issue is not the mirror sites, it's listing a beta as a release distribution. David From: "Martin Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 1.1b3 Release Build? Date: Wed, 19 F

Re: 1.1b3 Release Build?

2003-02-19 Thread David Graham
list > http://www.open-tools.org/ > > "The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who > cannot read them." > - Mark Twain (1835-1910) > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL P

1.1b3 Release Build?

2003-02-19 Thread David Graham
Why is Struts 1.1b3 listed under release builds on the jakarta binary download page? Betas are not releases so this concerns me. David _ Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=fe

Re: Bug #17113

2003-02-18 Thread David Graham
I'm not Craig but I agree with you ;-). The behavior should be the same as the ActionServlet's locale parameter. One reason we may not have noticed any problems is that also performs this behavior. Dave From: Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROT

RE: Bugzilla Voting

2003-02-17 Thread David Graham
OTECTED]] Sent: sabado, 15 de fevereiro de 2003 08:06 To: Struts Developers List Subject: Bugzilla Voting David Graham wrote: > AFAIK, we don't use the voting feature to determine which things to > fix. It might be used if people started to use it. We do have developers come along fro

Re: It's Valentine's Day, where are we?

2003-02-14 Thread David Graham
In researching the SwitchAction bug I couldn't find any place that sets a ModuleConfig object into the ServletContext. SwitchAction relies on RequestUtils.selectModule() to actually switch the ModuleConfig. selectModule() relies on a ModuleConfig being in the ServletContext. I did a search on

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/htmlMessagesTag.java

2003-02-14 Thread David Graham
Sorry, I don't follow what you're saying. Are you talking about the log variable being protected, using the wrong class in getLog(), using the wrong message key? David From: Robert Leland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Struts Developers List <[

Re: It's Valentine's Day, where are we?

2003-02-14 Thread David Graham
16603 forwardPattern should support different module 16916 using incorrect bean This is probably serious enough to block 1.1. I don't know enough about it to fix it though. 16946 SwitchAction not setting context properly for tiles There's a work around for this. 17018 Constant usage

RE: [Bug 12573] - Handling of HTML-Checkboxes and (dynamic) FormBeans result infalse values

2003-02-14 Thread David Graham
ry checkbox being on the jsp page. Edgar > -Original Message- > From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 11:30 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Bug 12573] - Handling of HTML-Checkboxes and > (dynamic) FormBeans result i

Re: Re:[Bug 12573] - Handling of HTML-Checkboxes and (dynamic) FormBeans resultin false values

2003-02-14 Thread David Graham
List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Re:[Bug 12573] - Handling of HTML-Checkboxes and (dynamic) FormBeans result in false values Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 17:38:47 +0100 My apologies for the wrong information David Graham wrote : > AFAIK, we don't us

Re: [Bug 12573] - Handling of HTML-Checkboxes and (dynamic) FormBeans result infalse values

2003-02-14 Thread David Graham
That may be how some browsers submit the form but AFAIK there is nothing in the HTTP spec that guarantees this ordering. David From: "Emmanuel Feller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [Bug 1

Re: Re:[Bug 12573] - Handling of HTML-Checkboxes and (dynamic) FormBeans resultin false values

2003-02-14 Thread David Graham
AFAIK, we don't use the voting feature to determine which things to fix. David From: "Antoine Levy-Lambert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Re:[Bug 12573] - Han

RE: Forcing or replacing a request processor version 1.1 beta3 -

2003-02-14 Thread David Graham
In other words I want to save users time from defining it in XML config file. Then you'll probably need to modify the Struts source and distribute a custom version. IMO, it's a lot of work for no benefit. It takes about 30 seconds to copy and paste the request processor definition into strut

RE: Forcing or replacing a request processor version 1.1 beta3 -

2003-02-14 Thread David Graham
I certainly could do that and I am doing that, but I want to force the custom request processor, because I am package Struts as part of Expresso? What do you mean by force? If you mean that you don't want your client to be able to change the request processor, I think that's a bad idea. Why n

Re: Forcing or replacing a request processor version 1.1 beta3 -

2003-02-13 Thread David Graham
I do not want to change the configuration for all time. I alway want to suggest at initialisation that object class B should be used instead A and do that programmatically. Well, you can specify your own config objects on some struts-config.xml elements at deployment. Couldn't you write a confi

Re: Forcing or replacing a request processor version 1.1 beta3 -

2003-02-12 Thread David Graham
If not synchronizing is the only reason for freezing the config, then we may want to reconsider that decision. Is there really a noticable performance improvement by not synchronizing? It makes sense that the config objects are frozen because then they reflect exactly what's in the config file

Re: New Tests

2003-02-12 Thread David Graham
> Ideally, tests shouldn't rely on other components that could be broken > because then you don't know why the test failed. I don't understand what you mean by other components that could be broken. If tests rely on more than one component, then they can fail for unexpected reasons. Sometimes

Re: New Tests

2003-02-12 Thread David Graham
Not exactly, 'running' the tests is the only thing that will take longer. Building will actually be quicker with approach #2, because there's less code to compile. Also, since I'm writing these from scratch (not changing anything that exists), either technique will increase test time. Don't t

Re: formbean use

2003-02-12 Thread David Graham
Please post this question to the struts-user mailing list. struts-dev is for issues relating to the development of Struts itself. Thanks, David From: "Jean Fotovat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subj

Re: New Tests

2003-02-12 Thread David Graham
While testing in a real jsp makes a kind of sense it may not be the best solution. 1. The build will take a lot longer which really hurts productivity when testing changes. 2. The jsp test is now dependent on other Struts tags' behavior. What if one those tags is broken? The goal of testin

Re: Forcing or replacing a request processor version 1.1 beta3

2003-02-11 Thread David Graham
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Forcing or replacing a request processor version 1.1 beta3 Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 00:52:51 + David Graham wrote: Why you don't want to set the RequestProcessor in the struts-config.xml file? David Because I want to distribute Expresso Framework with the

Re: Forcing or replacing a request processor version 1.1 beta3

2003-02-11 Thread David Graham
Why you don't want to set the RequestProcessor in the struts-config.xml file? David From: "Peter A. Pilgrim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Struts Dev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Forcing or replacing a request processor version 1.1 beta3 Date: W

RE: TLD and class mismatch in struts-nested.

2003-02-11 Thread David Graham
It's even easier when you put all those taglib declarations into one file and include that in every jsp :-). David From: "John Espey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: TLD and class mismatch

Re: taglib purpose?

2003-02-11 Thread David Graham
So nested and struts-el provide the same functionality in different ways. It seems like we're having a lot of taglib problems lately and the amount of time required for the people that didn't write them to fix them is large. David The nested tag library uses BeanUtils syntax for it property a

Re: TLD and class mismatch in struts-nested.

2003-02-11 Thread David Graham
I couldn't find those 2 attributes in the nested tld for the form tag. David From: Bernard GRANDJEAN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: Bruno POMMEREL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: TLD and class mismatch in struts-nested. Date: T

taglib purpose?

2003-02-11 Thread David Graham
In reviewing bug 16916 I started wondering what the purpose of the nested taglib is. It seems like its functionality is handled by struts-el tags and the EL syntax they provide. That bug deals with Tomcat 4.1.18 which supports the EL so the need for nested goes away. Am I missing something?

Re: JAR Licenses in Apache Software Distributions

2003-02-10 Thread David Graham
+1 on removing it from the distro. David From: "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: JAR Licenses in Apache Software Distributions Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 11:23:36 -0800 (PST) If you're subscribed to the

Re: [Bugzilla #16603] Discussion Please

2003-02-08 Thread David Graham
My understanding of modules is that they're independent pieces that can plug into any Struts app. They can point to external resources if they want but don't need to. Based on that, I believe all resources for a module should live in the same module root directory. You shouldn't have some jsp

Re: [Proposal] Migrate to Dependency on commons-resources

2003-02-06 Thread David Graham
arly complete and changes in that area look unlikely) If the answer to a) or b) is no, I'm open to suggestions of other things to work on. I have some time available now, have benefited from Struts, and would like to contribute. Steve At 08:16 AM 2/6/2003 -0700, David Graham wrote: We'll b

Re: [Proposal] Migrate to Dependency on commons-resources

2003-02-06 Thread David Graham
We'll be doing that for 1.2. David From: Steve Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Proposal] Migrate to Dependency on commons-resources Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2003 01:5

Re: [PATCH] Add BigDecimal/Integer converters with default values toinitOther() when (convertNull)

2003-02-05 Thread David Graham
Please attach this patch to the corresponding bugzilla ticket. Thanks, David From: "Brian Alexander Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [PATCH] Add BigDecimal/Integer converters with default va

Re: exit stratefy was Plans for the upcoming 2/14 soft deadline

2003-02-05 Thread David Graham
for the upcoming 2/14 soft deadline > > You said: > "until 2.0 - no filters, el". > > My assumption was that html-el would ship in 1.2, but you said no el > until 2.0. I asked has this been decided, becuase I missed it. > Either way, I think html-el should be in 1.2

Re: exit stratefy was Plans for the upcoming 2/14 soft deadline

2003-02-05 Thread David Graham
, but you said no el until 2.0. I asked has this been decided, becuase I missed it. Either way, I think html-el should be in 1.2! .V David Graham wrote: What do you mean by HTML-EL? We have Struts-EL in the contrib directory that mirrors the html taglib except with el support. David From: "V

Last Bug!

2003-02-05 Thread David Graham
The last bug we have for 1.1 is stumping me. o.a.s.validator.FieldChecks validation methods call Resources.getActionError(request... Resources.getActionError() calls Resources.getMessageResources(request) There are several versions of Resources.getMessageResources(), one that takes a request a

Re: exit stratefy was Plans for the upcoming 2/14 soft deadline

2003-02-05 Thread David Graham
Re: exit stratefy was Plans for the upcoming 2/14 soft deadline Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 19:35:57 -0500 No HTML-EL in 1.2? Is that final? .V "David Graham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > The templates taglib is alread

ModuleConfigImpl holds reference to factory

2003-02-04 Thread David Graham
ModuleConfigImpl implements Serializable but the ModuleConfigFactory interface does not. ModuleConfigImpl has a member variable that stores its factory but never actually uses that variable. We have 2 options: 1. Remove the factory variable from ModuleConfigImpl and the constructor that sets

Re: exit strategy was Plans for the upcoming 2/14 soft deadline

2003-02-04 Thread David Graham
It would take a lot of convincing for me to put my name on anything that doesn't go through a *proper* release candidate phase. RC means (to me) that we think all bugs are fixed and this is a last chance for users to test their apps with it and find any remaining errors. Damaging the jakarta r

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >