Yep. It was a joke.(I hope!)
March is quite a long time from now, and I think they dont have all that
many bugs left to correct (you can see the list of open bugs in Bugzilla (if
you can figure out how to search the darn thing effectively!)) so with luck
it would be ready sometime before then?
I think the same:-)
A beta 3 would help us with the customer.
Thomas
At 11:08 17.10.2002 +0100, Vilya Harvey wrote:
Because of all these having been incorporated, I think Struts is now way
past something that should have been called a 1.1 release. According to
the
...
Well, a little
Because of all these having been incorporated, I think Struts is now way
past something that should have been called a 1.1 release. According to
the
...
Well, a little perspective is necessary here -- Tiles and Validator
have been in the 1.1 mix since well before 1.1.b2. I do believe that
Subject: RE: Struts 1.1 Release
Ye gods!
Here we go again:
snip
The 12th of April 2156 at 15:28 in the afternoon.
Or perhaps even sooner if its ready before then... ;-)
/snip
Hey Craig? Any chance we can get my more specific answer for this question
Boudrant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 15:51
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [OT] RE: Struts 1.1 Release
Perhaps Big Brother can autoreply mail contains STRUTS 1.1 RELEASE DATE ;)
--- micael [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : Anyone wonder why all of a
sudden
Guys,
Before I say anything more, I'd just like to say that it's great to see the discussion
taking place here...
From: Joe Germuska [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 16 October 2002 00:35
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: What it will take for a 1.1 release... (was RE: Struts 1.1
Release
From: Joe Germuska [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
...
From that, you'd think a 1.1 release was just around the corner!!
However, it's not going to be that easy. My Bugzilla query turns up
39 non-Enhancement open bugs against Struts. Some of these are very
old and may no longer be relevant.
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 10:44 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: RE: Struts 1.1 Release
I am rather of the opinion that the struts versioning nomenclature is a
wee bit on the humble side. This beta release of 1.1 is pretty stable. I
dont see why you cant just loosen up your
Really 1.1 is so much better then 1.02 that you should be calling it
2.0
when it is released (and the current beta releases should be something
like 1.99)
Of course Java is at 1.4.1. How similar is 1.4 to 1.0? And why do they
call 1.2+ Java 2? Why didn't they just call it Java 2.0?
On Wed, 16 Oct 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 09:21:04 -0500
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Struts 1.1 Release
Really 1.1 is so much better then 1.02 that you should be calling it
2.0
attachments.
-Original Message-
From: James Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 16 October 2002 05:47
To: Struts Users Mailing List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Struts 1.1 Release
It wouldn't matter if it was plastered on the main struts page (WITH
BLINKING TEXT), someone would still
but I want to emphasize the fact that 1.0 based apps should
generally run fine in 1.1 unless you're doing some really intricate
things.
That's a good point. You'd hate to imply to 1.0.2 users that their
stuff won't run on the next version.
For future versions of Struts, I'd likely support
]
Subject: RE: Struts 1.1 Release
Really 1.1 is so much better then 1.02 that you should be calling it
2.0
when it is released (and the current beta releases should be something
like 1.99)
Of course Java is at 1.4.1. How similar is 1.4 to 1.0? And why do they
call 1.2+ Java 2? Why didn't
Were you subscribed to the mailing list earlier today when this was discussed?
Struts 1.1 will be released when it's released. Period. No variation from that.
That said, even the beta versions of Struts far exceed other software in terms of
usefulness and reliability, so don't worry about
Wow, 2 of these questions in one day!
Please don't ask this again, search the archives or the jakarta site for the
release policy.
David
From: Bachan Sadanandan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OK guys, be gentle...
-Original Message-
From: Bachan Sadanandan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 4:54 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Struts 1.1 Release
Hi all,
Any idea when Struts 1.1 would be ready for Production .???
Thanks !
Bachan
--
To
Thanks .I wanted to know how stable it is .???
Thanks for your feedback...
-Original Message-
From: Chap October 15, 2002 2:58 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: RE: Struts 1.1 Release
Were you subscribed to the mailing list earlier today when this was discussed?
Struts 1.1
Any idea when Struts 1.1 would be ready for Production .???
Is this like when the guy asks for water in the movie 'Coyote Ugly'? ;)
http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/userGuide/kickstart.html#release
--
Wendy
: Struts 1.1 Release
Were you subscribed to the mailing list earlier today when
this was discussed?
Struts 1.1 will be released when it's released. Period. No
variation from that.
That said, even the beta versions of Struts far exceed other
software in terms of usefulness and reliability, so
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Struts 1.1 Release
I totally understand and agree with the release policy, but I think it's worth
remembering that a lot of these questions are driven by the constraints of users'
environments - e.g. in corporate environments like ours, there any many people
I totally understand and agree with the release policy, but I think it's
worth remembering that a lot of these
questions are driven by the constraints of users' environments - e.g. in
corporate environments like ours, there
any many people like myself continually fighting to get great
On Tue, 15 Oct 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 18:46:01 -0400
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Struts 1.1 Release
I totally understand and agree
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I totally understand and agree with the release policy, but I think it's
worth remembering that a lot of these
questions are driven by the constraints of users' environments - e.g. in
corporate environments like ours, there
any many people like myself
IMO, That could not possibly be a source of failure. I and others had
1.02 projects just fine! Statistically 80% of projects fail due to
requirements, so that would be my first guess. (More numbers? most
projects fail period, and that 99% of code in production is written by
1% of
sounding version numbers. :-)
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of V. Cekvenich
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 08:36
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Struts 1.1 Release
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I totally understand and agree with the release policy
Ye gods!
Here we go again:
snip
The 12th of April 2156 at 15:28 in the afternoon.
Or perhaps even sooner if its ready before then... ;-)
/snip
Hey Craig? Any chance we can get my more specific answer for this question
into the FAQ?
-Original Message-
From: Bachan Sadanandan
, October 16, 2002 12:46 AM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: RE: Struts 1.1 Release
Ye gods!
Here we go again:
snip
The 12th of April 2156 at 15:28 in the afternoon.
Or perhaps even sooner if its ready before then... ;-)
/snip
Hey Craig? Any chance we can get my more specific answer
-tools.org
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Hill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 12:46 AM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: RE: Struts 1.1 Release
Ye gods!
Here we go again:
snip
The 12th of April 2156 at 15:28 in the afternoon
28 matches
Mail list logo
