I hope this anwers your question,
Simon
Unfortunately it does not. What I wanted to know whether I will be able
to use the latest Sugar on my XO-1 ever. It boots the kernel with 802 so
it is a working Linux distribution. If somehow I copy the latest Sugar
over the old Sugar (0.82 I
On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 15:42 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
[adding sugar-devel again to CC]
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 14:36, Marten Vijn i...@martenvijn.nl wrote:
On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 11:49 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 11:34, NoiseEHC noise...@freemail.hu wrote:
cut
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 16:25, Marten Vijn i...@martenvijn.nl wrote:
On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 15:42 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
[adding sugar-devel again to CC]
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 14:36, Marten Vijn i...@martenvijn.nl wrote:
On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 11:49 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Mon,
[...]
That's why people are barking at the wrong tree when they say that
Sugar developers should port Sugar to whatever system. The skills
involved are very different from upstream work and if coders are not
coding we won't have anything new to ship.
If barking ever applies me to please let
On 05/25/2009 11:51 AM, Walter Bender wrote:
Tomeu was quicker in his response than me...
As Simon said, the current plan for *both* the XO-1 and the XO-1.5 in
regard to Sugar support is to build upon the work that OLPC and the
Fedora communities are doing towards getting a stock Fedora
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 08:51:22PM +0200, Simon Schampijer wrote:
On 05/22/2009 05:31 PM, James Simmons wrote:
I didn't see Aleksey's espeak gstreamer plugin included in the roadmap.
This is needed for text to speech with highlighting support for Read
Etexts, and is being included in
I didn't see Aleksey's espeak gstreamer plugin included in the roadmap. This
is needed for text to speech with highlighting support for Read Etexts, and is
being included in SoaS now. I'm looking forward to having a version of Sugar I
can install on my XO where this is included.
James
Are there any plans to port Sugar to the XO-1 or will it be the job of
OLPC so it will be effectively abandoned?
Simon Schampijer wrote:
Attendees: Tomeu, Aleksey, Walter, Sayamindu, Simon
Retrospect: We have been brainstorming on the Goals of the 0.86 release.
The Output can be seen at
Hi Noise.
There is and there will be (i presume), a collaboration between the two
teams (OLPC and Sugarlabs), to port sugar to the XO 1.5.
but details on how this will be done are still missing.
Rafael Ortiz
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 11:43 AM, NoiseEHC noise...@freemail.hu wrote:
Are there
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 6:43 PM, NoiseEHC noise...@freemail.hu wrote:
Are there any plans to port Sugar to the XO-1 or will it be the job of
OLPC so it will be effectively abandoned?
Sugar sits on top of standard linux distributions.
The challenge in this instance is on the shoulders of the
On 05/22/2009 07:06 PM, David Farning wrote:
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 6:43 PM, NoiseEHCnoise...@freemail.hu wrote:
Are there any plans to port Sugar to the XO-1 or will it be the job of
OLPC so it will be effectively abandoned?
Sugar sits on top of standard linux distributions.
The
On 05/22/2009 05:31 PM, James Simmons wrote:
I didn't see Aleksey's espeak gstreamer plugin included in the roadmap. This
is needed for text to speech with highlighting support for Read Etexts, and
is being included in SoaS now. I'm looking forward to having a version of
Sugar I can
NoiseEHC wrote:
Are there any plans to port Sugar to the XO-1 or will it be the job of
OLPC so it will be effectively abandoned?
Do you mean the XO-1 or XO-1.5, specifically? Also, I hope you are aware of
http://blog.printf.net/articles/2009/05/16/the-olpc-xo-1-5-and-fedora-11
which states
13 matches
Mail list logo
