Toad wrote:
Curious. What build are you running?
5074 (as I mentioned lower in the email)
- System is Linux Gentoo 1.4, 256 Mb Ram, Java is Sun JKD 1.4.2
- Network is cable, 1000 kbs down. 200 kbs up...
- Freenet version is 5074
--
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 11:00:21AM -0800, Joe Blow wrote:
I do have a NAT box, but the listen port is forwarded.
And, my pants are pulled down on the box I'm running
freenet on (everything set to ACCEPT). Besides I when
I plugged the cable modem into the freenet box
(bypassing the NAT
will running the freenet node over extended periods of time increase the
reliability of the cached seed nodes. I seem to be in a very unstable
part of the network and I can only seem to get like a 1% success rate on
accesses. The majority of attempt restart at some stage and other nodes
just
Hi, support team!
First of all, I would like to thank the whole
freenet team for developing Fred. I wish you good luck in the further
development :)
Now to the problem:
I have two computers - one with WinXP (old, needs a
reinstall) and an another with fresh win98. Both have the same JRE
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 08:37:34PM -0800, Galen wrote:
Hi,
I think I have a relatively decent idea of how freenet works. And if I
had a nice broadband connection I could dedicate to freenet, I'd be
delighted and I don't think I'd have problems. But for now, my results
with freenet have
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 11:54:59AM -0800, Christopher Brian Jack wrote:
will running the freenet node over extended periods of time increase the
reliability of the cached seed nodes. I seem to be in a very unstable
part of the network and I can only seem to get like a 1% success rate on
On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 06:35:41PM +0100, Troed S?ngberg wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jan 2004 09:01:29 -0800 (PST), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Running build 5063; anybody have any idea why my node is rejecting all
incoming requests?
Current estimated load 100% [QueryRejecting all incoming
In connection with what Ian said about the hierarchy of classes of
freenet nodes (those in seednodes.ref
and the ones in these nodes routing tables, etc)
I think seednodes.ref should not be overwritten unless there is a
network reset.
After some days uptime, the routing table adjusts to some
On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 11:34:07PM +0100, no_dammagE wrote:
Hi, support team!
First of all, I would like to thank the whole freenet team for developing Fred. I
wish you good luck in the further development :)
Now to the problem:
I have two computers - one with WinXP (old, needs a
duh, guys, I'm a newbie +- so I can only make observations so here:
(note: order does not indicate weight nor priority)
1. Get a female to work on this thing.
2. At least run permanent node.
3. DSL ain't no faster when it hits the freenet bogs.
4. The last 3 or 4+ builds have gotten slower and
Toad wrote:
Does it know what its external IP address is? If not, it will not work
very well i.e. it will not get external traffic and therefore will not
learn quickly (well, quicker) where things are.
How can one find out what freenet thinks its IP address is?
The system my freenet node runs on
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 12:19:21PM +0100, Ruben Garcia wrote:
In connection with what Ian said about the hierarchy of classes of
freenet nodes (those in seednodes.ref
and the ones in these nodes routing tables, etc)
I think seednodes.ref should not be overwritten unless there is a
network
Toad wrote:
Does it know what its external IP address is? If not, it will not work
very well i.e. it will not get external traffic and therefore will not
learn quickly (well, quicker) where things are.
How can one find out what freenet thinks its IP address is?
The system my freenet node runs on
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 04:02:35AM -0800, miguel wrote:
duh, guys, I'm a newbie +- so I can only make observations so here:
(note: order does not indicate weight nor priority)
1. Get a female to work on this thing.
2. At least run permanent node.
3. DSL ain't no faster when it hits the
On Wed, 10 Mar 2004 12:37:34 +, Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
4. The last 3 or 4+ builds have gotten slower and dumber.
Why thank you for that informative, empirically backed and helpful bug
report.
My experience is the opposite of his, but I guess you know that the last
stable builds have
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 02:21:19PM +0100, Troed S?ngberg wrote:
On Wed, 10 Mar 2004 12:37:34 +, Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
4. The last 3 or 4+ builds have gotten slower and dumber.
Why thank you for that informative, empirically backed and helpful bug
report.
My experience is the
Toad writes:
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 02:21:19PM +0100, Troed S?ngberg wrote:
My experience is the opposite of his, but I guess you know that the last
stable builds have been really good already ..
They have? In what sense? All I hear are complaints... and I usually run
unstable, because it's
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 08:57:55AM -0500, Joe Drew wrote:
Toad writes:
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 02:21:19PM +0100, Troed S?ngberg wrote:
My experience is the opposite of his, but I guess you know that the last
stable builds have been really good already ..
They have? In what sense? All I
You don't get lots of RNFs?
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 08:57:55AM -0500, Joe Drew wrote:
Toad writes:
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 02:21:19PM +0100, Troed S?ngberg wrote:
My experience is the opposite of his, but I guess you know that the last
stable builds have been really good already ..
Toad writes:
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 08:57:55AM -0500, Joe Drew wrote:
With the the latest stable builds, my java hanging problems have gone
away (I figure that they were in an infinite loop trying to garbage collect
due to the leaks; it's a bug in the jvm, certainly, but it seems it's been
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 09:31:37AM -0500, Joe Drew wrote:
Toad writes:
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 08:57:55AM -0500, Joe Drew wrote:
With the the latest stable builds, my java hanging problems have gone
away (I figure that they were in an infinite loop trying to garbage
collect due to the
On Wed, 2004-03-10 at 13:32, Toad wrote:
The routing table will not be overwritten unless either:
a) The seednodes.ref is more recent than the routing table OR
b) The routing table is trashed, for example because all the nodes in it
are incompatible with the current code after a network
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 03:41:02PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2004-03-10 at 13:32, Toad wrote:
The routing table will not be overwritten unless either:
a) The seednodes.ref is more recent than the routing table OR
b) The routing table is trashed, for example because all
On Wed, 10 Mar 2004 13:44:08 +, Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They have? In what sense? All I hear are complaints... and I usually run
unstable, because it's what gets hacked on mostly...
The huge memory leak is fixed, and transfer speeds has gone up :)
Regarding RNFs .. well, maybe - I
Toad schrieb:
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 02:21:19PM +0100, Troed S?ngberg wrote:
My experience is the opposite of his, but I guess you know that the last
stable builds have been really good already ..
They have? In what sense? All I hear are complaints... and I usually run
unstable, because it's
Yup you are right. Freenet is working better than ever right now.
I have a poor 56k connection. I run a transient node on a machine
of 650Mhz and windows xp...stable and unstable both fred versions.
I am downloading files all the time. For example I downloaded two 14GB
files that were inserted
Hi,
In linux :
I was able to re-seed my node by first running
% ./update.sh
and then touching the seednodes.ref.
% touch seednodes.ref
*** This will replace your routing table when you start your node again ***
Anyway, now all icons load on web interface and things are really looking
Is your dialup connection unmetered? If so, you may be able to run a
permanent node. Even if you can't, I suggest you run Frost (with a
smallish number of threads perhaps), it is good at generating traffic,
to help the node learn about the network. In a few days, the node may
learn enough to get
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 09:50:08PM +0500, Aman Pervaiz wrote:
Yup you are right. Freenet is working better than ever right now.
I have a poor 56k connection. I run a transient node on a machine
of 650Mhz and windows xp...stable and unstable both fred versions.
I am downloading files all the
On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, Toad wrote:
[ranty stuff edited out]
My experience is the opposite of his, but I guess you know that the last
stable builds have been really good already ..
They have? In what sense? All I hear are complaints... and I usually run
unstable, because it's what gets
I have a similar machine with Win2K and dialup, and can't get anywhere.
I'm not surprised that I can't retrieve much freesite content, although
surprisingly I can get a fair number of Frost messages.
What baffled me is that I was unable to insert a small (1.9 meg) file with
FUQID. After
On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, Christopher Brian Jack wrote:
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 19:49:20 -0800 (PST)
From: Christopher Brian Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Freenet Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: This error is showing up in my logs a LOT
How can I fix this error that's showing up in
On 11-Mar-2004 Christopher Brian Jack wrote:
How can I fix this error that's showing up in my logs very repetitively:
Mar 10, 2004 2:33:00 AM (freenet.node.IPAddressDetector, QThread-89,
ERROR): SocketException t$
java.net.SocketException: Bad address
at
I used to get these with an earlier version of the Sun JDK. Which version are
you using?
I'm running FreeBSD here, too (I noticed you mentioned it in another thread).
The latest port revision is jdk-1.4.2p6_4. I'd strongly recommend upgrading.
It's not nearly as laborious a process once
I used to get these with an earlier version of the Sun JDK. Which version are
you using?
I'm running FreeBSD here, too (I noticed you mentioned it in another thread).
The latest port revision is jdk-1.4.2p6_4. I'd strongly recommend upgrading.
It's not nearly as laborious a process once
Would you possibly agree with this, There is no known way to meaningfully
evaluate the performance of freenet?
[Original Message]
From: Conrad Sabatier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vinyl1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 3/9/2004 7:28:55 AM
Subject: Re: [freenet-support] freenet
36 matches
Mail list logo
