On Thursday 08 July 2010 15:11:42 you wrote:
> Dennis Nezic schreef:
>
> > I'm almost certain that error message has nothing to do with FMS :b.
> > One of the good things about FMS is it run as a completely separate
> > process (and more reliably :b). Usually when I used to get "Internal
> > error
On Thursday 08 July 2010 12:05:48 Jep wrote:
> As I'm used to by now, it took multiple efforts to get the new Freenet
> version 1259 to connect to strangers; it seems to require a complete new
> install from scratch and no less will do.
> No way of updating works for me, FN has been whirling all
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 6:29 AM, Matthew Toseland
wrote:
> You installed it on the same day and yet the certificate was corrupted?
>
> I wonder if the certificate is wrong in the wininstaller?
>
Yes it is, I emailed you about it.
If you look at the wininstaller the startssl.pem file contains
rep
Spam detection software, running on the system "freenetproject.org", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that sy
You installed it on the same day and yet the certificate was corrupted?
I wonder if the certificate is wrong in the wininstaller?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
h
Spam detection software, running on the system "freenetproject.org", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that sy
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 6:21 PM, Juiceman wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 6:50 AM, Jep wrote:
>> Got a freenet node running for no less than a full week and even the auto
>> update did its job for the first time. Up til now I had to un- and
>> reinstall.
>> It disconnected me still, but deleting n
Spam detection software, running on the system "freenetproject.org", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that sy
Spam detection software, running on the system "freenetproject.org", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that sy
Spam detection software, running on the system "freenetproject.org", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that sy
Spam detection software, running on the system "freenetproject.org", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that sy
On Thu, 08 Jul 2010 13:05:48 +0200, Jep wrote:
> As I'm used to by now, it took multiple efforts to get the new
> Freenet version 1259 to connect to strangers; it seems to require a
> complete new install from scratch and no less will do.
> No way of updating works for me, FN has been whirling all
Jep schreef:
[FMS crashed FN, probably due to mail server interface]
A yet new way of the node disconnecting. I was used to Frost remembering
what I was downloading, but now also starting Frost crashes it.
I'll try it again with all downz/uploads removed.
As I'm used to by now, it took multiple efforts to get the new Freenet
version 1259 to connect to strangers; it seems to require a complete new
install from scratch and no less will do.
No way of updating works for me, FN has been whirling all night in a
loop of restarting the old version and fi
Juiceman schreef:
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 6:50 AM, Jep wrote:
Got a freenet node running for no less than a full week and even the auto
update did its job for the first time. Up til now I had to un- and
reinstall.
It disconnected me still, but deleting node.db4o and persistent-temp while
restart
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 6:50 AM, Jep wrote:
> Got a freenet node running for no less than a full week and even the auto
> update did its job for the first time. Up til now I had to un- and
> reinstall.
> It disconnected me still, but deleting node.db4o and persistent-temp while
> restarting FN was
Matthew Toseland schreef:
On Sunday 04 July 2010 13:37:06 Jep wrote:
Dennis Nezic schreef:
On Sat, 03 Jul 2010 22:08:52 +0200, Jep wrote:
On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 12:50:00 +0200, Jep wrote:
Got a freenet node running for no less than a full week and even
the auto update did its job for the first t
On Sunday 04 July 2010 13:37:06 Jep wrote:
> Dennis Nezic schreef:
> > On Sat, 03 Jul 2010 22:08:52 +0200, Jep wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 12:50:00 +0200, Jep wrote:
> Got a freenet node running for no less than a full week and even
> the auto update did its job for the first time. U
On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 8:37 AM, Jep wrote:
> Dennis Nezic schreef:
>>
>> On Sat, 03 Jul 2010 22:08:52 +0200, Jep wrote:
On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 12:50:00 +0200, Jep wrote:
>
> Got a freenet node running for no less than a full week and even
> the auto update did its job for the fi
Dennis Nezic schreef:
On Sat, 03 Jul 2010 22:08:52 +0200, Jep wrote:
On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 12:50:00 +0200, Jep wrote:
Got a freenet node running for no less than a full week and even
the auto update did its job for the first time. Up til now I had
to un- and reinstall.
It disconnected me still, b
On Sat, 03 Jul 2010 22:08:52 +0200, Jep wrote:
> > On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 12:50:00 +0200, Jep wrote:
> >> Got a freenet node running for no less than a full week and even
> >> the auto update did its job for the first time. Up til now I had
> >> to un- and reinstall.
> >> It disconnected me still, but
On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 12:50:00 +0200, Jep wrote:
Got a freenet node running for no less than a full week and even the
auto update did its job for the first time. Up til now I had to un-
and reinstall.
It disconnected me still, but deleting node.db4o and persistent-temp
while restarting FN was eno
What's the name of that java profiling program that profiles which
functions all the cpu work is going into? :P
(Also, during the high-cpu periods, how much memory (out of your 512mb)
is being used?)
On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 12:50:00 +0200, Jep wrote:
> Got a freenet node running for no less than a f
Got a freenet node running for no less than a full week and even the
auto update did its job for the first time. Up til now I had to un- and
reinstall.
It disconnected me still, but deleting node.db4o and persistent-temp
while restarting FN was enough to reconnect.
I noticed it helps somewhat
24 matches
Mail list logo
