On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 14:56:23 +0100
Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is no difference. But the stats on the homepage are *low level*
> inserts,
> being passed through your node. On the downloads/uploads page, we are talking
> about high level inserts originated by you.
OK, di
On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 14:56:23 +0100
Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> . I 'think' I have understood
>> some concepts but don't take my word for revealed truth. At least not until
>> someone more competent confirms what I say (or calls it BS).
>
> And most of it is. :)
>
> There is
time.
>
> With Best Regards,
> Andrew Surzhenko
>
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20080923/0c030066/attachment.pgp>
now if you find an answer...
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20080923/46cbfb17/attachment.pgp>
at I say (or calls it BS).
And most of it is. :)
There is no difference. But the stats on the homepage are *low level* inserts,
being passed through your node. On the downloads/uploads page, we are talking
about high level inserts originated by you.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20080923/0c77b0bd/attachment.pgp>
ment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20080923/8cb56f8f/attachment.pgp>
On Friday 12 September 2008 17:03, Andrew Surzhenko wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm a developer from Ukraine.
> I have to create small Freenet client (file sharing only), but it seems that
it is problem to find Freenet protocol specification.
> Can you tell me, is it closed protocol, or where can I find
On Monday 22 September 2008 10:44, skx wrote:
> How can I get Freenet to start when system starts?
>
> I tried Freenet_enable="YES" in rc.conf and @reboot entries in crontab but
> it seems that Freenet starts too early and it is missing dependencies.
>
> Then I wrote my own script to run run.s
On Tuesday 23 September 2008 05:29, Luke771 wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 16:56:13 -0700
> gofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > My terminology was wrong: I should have said 'inserts', not 'uploads'.
>
> for the most part we use the two terms interchangeably
>
> >Under 'Current Activity' I see
On Sunday 21 September 2008 03:16, Art Charbonneau wrote:
> On my freenet homepage I noticed in the stats that 5 uploads were active
even though I had not initiated any uploads. Is this normal, or is something
amiss?
>
> Also, when Firefox (ver 3.02) comes up, there is no menu item 'Tools', so
On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 16:56:13 -0700
gofer wrote:
> My terminology was wrong: I should have said 'inserts', not 'uploads'.
for the most part we use the two terms interchangeably
>Under 'Current Activity' I see 'Inserts', 'Requests', and 'Transferring
>Requests'.
Ah, that's what you meant?
I th
On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 17:05:35 -0400
urza9814 at gmail.com wrote:
>On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 10:16 PM, Art Charbonneau wrote:
>> On my freenet homepage I noticed in the stats that 5 uploads were active
>> even though I had not initiated any uploads. Is this normal, or is something
>> amiss?
> Yes,
On Sat, 20 Sep 2008 19:16:19 -0700
Art Charbonneau wrote:
> On my freenet homepage I noticed in the stats that 5 uploads were active even
> though I had not initiated any uploads. Is this normal, or is something amiss?
You sure you didnt start the uploads from another app, like Thaw?
--
13 matches
Mail list logo
