If you pester anyone too much it can be self defeating. Perhaps
unintentionally as they consume much time deleting your messages from their
files. Or intentionally if they choose to block the excesses traffic.
>
> "We should all start pestering the hell outta both Ian and Toad to get
open-net de
> "There are four boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot,
jury,
> ammo. Use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt
I'm quite familiar with the other folks mentioned. As a genealogist, this
Ed Howdershelt interests me very much. Could you point me to more
information regarding him? One o
nobody at geonosis.homelinux.net wrote:
> Please, Do NOT suggest switching to Linux, I've tried it and my hardware will
> not support it's demands. Again, this is a matter of money that unlike SOME
> people, I don't have a hell
>
I suggest linux. There are many versions of it, some of them d
On 30 Aug 2006 04:50:23 -, Anonymous via Panta Rhei
Perhaps I was not sufficiently clear. Linux is not an acceptable answer.
Machine limitations are a major part of that, but other considerations
that I am not at liberty to discuss are also a factor.
Changing OS is not an option no matter
On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 07:25:16 -0400, you wrote:
>
> On Wednesday 23 August 2006 15:19, Matthew Toseland wrote:
>
> > - Don't start the updater if the wrapper is broken
>
> I have problems with this one. I do not run the wrapper - I do want freenet
> to
> download new stable versions and then quit.
Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20060829/e348bf35/attachment.pgp>
y - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20060829/15fb2097/attachment.pgp>
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 22:39:59 +0200, you wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Please, Do NOT suggest switching to Linux, I've tried it and my hardware
> > will not
> > support it's demands. Again, this is a matter of money that unlike SOME
> > people, I
> > don't have a hell
> >
> I suggest
5 and 0, 7]
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 22:54:12 -0400, you wrote:
>
> If you pester anyone too much it can be self defeating. Perhaps
> unintentionally as they consume much time deleting your messages from their
> files. Or intentionally if they choose to block the excesses traffic.
Tell you
rg/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
> Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
--
Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20060829/1726e9e5/attachment.pgp>
is impossible. Our Boss says so.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20060829/d2e4ec78/attachment.pgp>
oject.org
> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
> Unsubscribe at
> http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
> Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20060829/b34d6ee7/attachment.html>
No.
Quantum cryptography, key distribution, etc. all rely on the ability
of communicators to exchange objects like qbits or entangled photons.
Properly designed, this provides a guarantee (backed by the
Uncertainty Principle) that the communication can't be intercepted.
Needless to say, I can't s
ttp://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20060829/b8aa7f05/attachment.pgp>
-BEGIN TYPE III ANONYMOUS MESSAGE-
Message-type: plaintext
this tech, or an algo based on it?
Quantum cryptographic data network created
http://www.dailyindia.com/show/55384.php/Quantum-cryptographic-data-network-created
EVANSTON, Ill., Aug. 28 (UPI) -- U.S. scientists have demonstrat
If you pester anyone too much it can be self defeating. Perhaps
unintentionally as they consume much time deleting your messages from their
files. Or intentionally if they choose to block the excesses traffic.
>
> "We should all start pestering the hell outta both Ian and Toad to get
open-net de
Sorry. http://freenetproject.org/lists.html provides a list of all the
mailing lists; click on Chat, then subscribe your email address.
On Sun, Aug 27, 2006 at 02:18:49PM -0400, Nicholas Sturm wrote:
> I guess you could move it to a place where many of us don't know how to get
> too. So much has
Fair enough. Running a node involves trusting people. Running an opennet
node involves trusting total strangers. We can improve on our security
against treachery to a degree, so that you don't have to trust your
peers quite as much, but the more powerful techniques for improving
security, such as p
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please, Do NOT suggest switching to Linux, I've tried it and my hardware will
not support it's demands. Again, this is a matter of money that unlike SOME
people, I don't have a hell
I suggest linux. There are many versions of it, some of them designed to
run on ve
Messages from non-subscribers are moderated manually. I was away over
the weekend so the messages didn't get approved until today. Maybe I
should have checked the actual content of the messages...
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 09:11:03PM +0200, Ortwin Regel wrote:
> Please stop this spam, you fucking id
This is not true. A global darknet is feasible, as I have explained:
National barriers, and even language barriers are by no means absolute,
and to the extent that they affect the network they can be dealt with.
If Freenet provides something of value, we can make a large darknet.
AND IF IT ISN'T T
On Sat, 26 Aug 2006, Ian Clarke wrote:
>On 24 Aug 2006, at 12:01, urza9814 at gmail.com wrote:
>> Freenet 0.5 is an opennet. You connect to any random node that happens
>> to be on. Freenet 0.7 doesn't have this yet. In 0.7, there is no main
>> network. There might be now, but the idea of the way
Store files simply cannot be converted as you suggest, because their
contents are encrypted; you can download a site from 0.5 and insert it
into 0.7, if you know the key. You will probably have to generate a new
SSK keypair. You might even be able to spider 0.5 and insert the sites
(with new SSK ke
Please stop this spam, you fucking idiots... :-/On 29 Aug 2006 13:10:13 -, Fake Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:On Sat, 26 Aug 2006, Ian Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:>On 24 Aug 2006, at 12:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:>> Freenet 0.5 is an opennet. You connect to any random node that happens
On Sat, 26 Aug 2006, Ian Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 24 Aug 2006, at 12:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Freenet 0.5 is an opennet. You connect to any random node that happens
>> to be on. Freenet 0.7 doesn't have this yet. In 0.7, there is no main
>> network. There might be now, but the i
This is a Type III anonymous message, sent to you by the Mixminion
server at laforge.system-e.dk. If you do not want to receive
anonymous messages, please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more
information about anonymity, see http://www.mixminion.net/.
-BEGIN TYPE III ANONYMOUS MESSAGE-
Mes
On Sat, 26 Aug 2006, Ian Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 24 Aug 2006, at 12:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Freenet 0.5 is an opennet. You connect to any random node that happens
>> to be on. Freenet 0.7 doesn't have this yet. In 0.7, there is no main
>> network. There might be now, but the i
On Sat, 26 Aug 2006, Ian Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 24 Aug 2006, at 12:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Freenet 0.5 is an opennet. You connect to any random node that happens
>> to be on. Freenet 0.7 doesn't have this yet. In 0.7, there is no main
>> network. There might be now, but the i
On Sat, 26 Aug 2006, Ian Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 24 Aug 2006, at 12:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Freenet 0.5 is an opennet. You connect to any random node that happens
>> to be on. Freenet 0.7 doesn't have this yet. In 0.7, there is no main
>> network. There might be now, but the i
Freenet 0.7 is nothing more than yet another in a series of Freenet
failures-in-waiting until it proves itself, IMHO, by emerging out of alpha
with open-net.
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freene
On Sat, 26 Aug 2006, Ian Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 24 Aug 2006, at 12:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Freenet 0.5 is an opennet. You connect to any random node that happens
>> to be on. Freenet 0.7 doesn't have this yet. In 0.7, there is no main
>> network. There might be now, but the i
-BEGIN TYPE III ANONYMOUS MESSAGE-
Message-type: plaintext
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Through the opennet. Which won't exist for, like, a year.
>Hmmm.
>
>On 8/26/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >>Freenet 0.5 is an opennet. You connect to any ra
This is a Type III anonymous message, sent to you by the Winston Smith
Project Nefarion mixminion server at nefarion.winstonsmith.info. If
you do not want to receive anonymous messages, please contact pbox-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] For more information about anonymity, see
https://www.winstonsmith.info/pw
This is a Type III anonymous message, sent to you by the Mixminion
server at laforge.system-e.dk. If you do not want to receive
anonymous messages, please contact simono at system-e.dk. For more
information about anonymity, see http://www.mixminion.net/.
-BEGIN TYPE III ANONYMOUS MESSAGE
This is a Type III anonymous message, sent to you by the Winston Smith
Project Geonosis mixminion server at geonosis.winstonsmith.info. If
you do not want to receive anonymous messages, please contact pbox-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] For information about anonymity, see
https://www.winstonsmith.info/pws or
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 15:19, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> - Don't start the updater if the wrapper is broken
I have problems with this one. I do not run the wrapper - I do want freenet to
download new stable versions and then quit.
I have the java command that starts freenet in a loop and
Don't feed the troll
>Freenet 0.7 is nothing more than yet another in a series of Freenet
>failures-in-waiting until it proves itself, IMHO, by emerging out of alpha
>with open-net.
>
>
>___
>Support mailing list
>Support at freenetproject.org
>http://n
Don't feed the troll
>Freenet 0.7 is nothing more than yet another in a series of Freenet
>failures-in-waiting until it proves itself, IMHO, by emerging out of alpha
>with open-net.
>
>
>___
>Support mailing list
>Support@freenetproject.org
>http://news
On Sat, 26 Aug 2006, Ian Clarke wrote:
>On 24 Aug 2006, at 12:01, urza9814 at gmail.com wrote:
>> Freenet 0.5 is an opennet. You connect to any random node that happens
>> to be on. Freenet 0.7 doesn't have this yet. In 0.7, there is no main
>> network. There might be now, but the idea of the way
Freenet 0.7 is nothing more than yet another in a series of Freenet
failures-in-waiting until it proves itself, IMHO, by emerging out of alpha
with open-net.
40 matches
Mail list logo
