[freenet-support] Bug or Feature?

2004-01-02 Thread Rudolf Krist
Hello,
after I have upgraded my node to the Build 6415, the routing table only 
contained nodes with the Build Nr. >= 6415. Is that a new feature? Or 
was it not intended?

Regards
Rudi
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support


[freenet-support] How to increase JVM max allocateable memory

2004-02-11 Thread Rudolf Krist
Hi,

my Node reports that the "Maximum memory the JVM will allocate"	is set 
to 130.112 KiB (my System has got 512 MB RAM). My Question is, is that 
limit not too low? And if it is, how can I increase this limit?

Do I have to change the FLaunch.ini file? And when I have to change it, 
what I must change there. The content of my current FLaunch.ini you will 
see below. Is there some documentation about this file?

My system details:
CPU: PIII 933
RAM: 512 MB
OS: WinXP Pro
JVM: 1.4.1_02-b06
Freenet: Fred,0.5,STABLE-1.50,5068, CVS:1.90.2.50.2.95
*** FLaunch.ini ***
[Freenet Launcher]
#JavaExec=C:\apps\devel\jbuilder\jdk1.4\jre\bin\java.exe
#Javaw=C:\apps\devel\jbuilder\jdk1.4\jre\bin\javaw.exe
JavaExec=C:\Program Files\Java\j2re1.4.2_03\bin\java.exe
Javaw=C:\Program Files\Java\j2re1.4.2_03\bin\javaw.exe
Jflags=-Xmx320m
Priority=4294967295
PriorityClass=16384
JavaMem=default
fservew_exec=JavaExec
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


[freenet-support] Re: How to increase JVM max allocateable memory

2004-02-12 Thread Rudolf Krist
Niklas Bergh wrote:
> Set JavaMem to 256M or similar. Run java -X for documentation on that
> parameter.
>
> Hmmm.. Looks like 'Jflags=-Xmx320m' really should have handled this
> if..
> At least if it is used and if it was set to '-Xmx320M'...
JavaMem works, I asked because some months ago I had the same problem, 
and then this option didn't work, so I started the node manually with 
java.exe -Xmx320m -jar freenet.jar. But later the node didn't work when 
I started it manually (Build ~6396)...
Thanks

Rudi
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


[freenet-support] freenet 5069 bug report - upload files nearly impossible (FEC)

2004-02-18 Thread Rudolf Krist
I'm not able to upload files (> 5MB) into stable-network.

Details
Since some weeks I try to upload some healing blocks into stable 
network, on average the FEC-block size is 256 KB. Normally I use FUQID 
1.3, but because it transfered < 0.1 KB/s and reported a lot of "Insert 
thread failed. Retrying..." in the log, I also tried it directly with 
FProxy with the same result.

When I set the Insertion-Thread-Number to a higher value than 5 the 
"Current messageSendTimeRequest" value in "General Information" of the 
web interface gets greater than 200%-300%. The maximum was 1%-15000% 
when I set the thread number to 30. The "Transfers active" value grows 
also from ~20-30 to ~180. Fproxy mostly reported "ROUTE NOT FOUND" on 
blocks where inserting was failed. Also the "Instantaneous local 
traffic" decreases significately.

Heal HTL: 15
delete key from local node vefore inserting is checked
The upstream bandwith usage is ~ 1 - 12500 B/sec. (12000 Maximum)
Typically my node is running for periods of 3 - 10 h a day.
Plattform: WinXP Pro
JVM: 1.4.2_03-b02
Freenet: Fred,0.5,STABLE-1.50,5069,CVS:1.90.2.50.2.96
Detailed System Information:

Plattform: WinXP Pro, Pentium 3, 933 MHz, 512 MB RAM
JVM: Sun, 1.4.2_03-b02
Freenet: Fred,0.5,STABLE-1.50,5069,CVS:1.90.2.50.2.96
Internet Connection: DSL: 768 kbit downstream / 128 kbit upstream
Data Store: 7 GiB, Percent used: 95
Mean Ustream Traffic: 1 - 12500 bytes/second
unstable.ref: 2004-02-15
Typically number of connections: 100 - 180
diff default.ini/freenet.ini:
ipAddress=XXX
listenPort=XXX
fcpHosts=127.0.0.1,localhost
doAnnounce=yes
storeSize=7168M
inputBandwidthLimit=7
outputBandwidthLimit=12000
logLevel=Normal
rtMaxRefs=51
rtMaxNodes=51
maxHopsToLive=25
maximumThreads=130
tempDir=XXX
mainport.params.servlet.1.params.passThroughMimeTypes=text/plain,image/jpeg,image/gif,image/png
Regards
Rudi
# Some Statistics
# 
# Node ran 1 h before I started an upload with 30 Threads
# now it runs ~3 h
# --
Routing Table status: 18.02.2004 11:27:28 

Number of node references   51
Attempted to contact node references17
Contacted node references   48
Connections with Successful Transfers   21
Backed off nodes17
Connection Attempts 1646
Successful Connections  1527
Lowest max estimated search time0ms
Lowest max estimated DNF time   0ms
Lowest global search time estimate  289962ms
Highest global search time estimate 460245ms
Lowest global transfer rate estimate2.318 bytes/second
Highest global transfer rate estimate   3.643 bytes/second
Lowest one hop probability of DNF   0,98
Highest one hop probability of DNF  0,99
Lowest one hop probability of transfer failure  0,79
Highest one hop probability of transfer failure 0,92
Single hop probability of QueryRejected 0.29645163211077075
Single hop average time for QueryRejected   87863.09895443736
Single hop probability of early timeout 0.6783154528702626
Single hop average time for early timeout   24009.760728425113
Single hop probability of search timeout0.9186481377761555
Single hop average time for search timeout  316643.7063678293
Total number of requests that didn't QR 23767
Total number of reqests that timed out before a QR or Accepted  6676
Implementation  freenet.node.rt.NGRoutingTable
#...
#
#-- Load
#
Current routingTime 0ms
Current messageSendTimeRequest  7220ms
Pooled threads running jobs 5 (3,8%)
Pooled threads which are idle   25
Current upstream bandwidth usage11215 bytes/second (93,5%)
Reason for refusing connections:avgMessageSendTimeRequest(7220,250) > 
successfulSendTimeCutoff(2000,000)
Reason for QueryRejecting requests: Estimated load (100%) > overloadHigh 
(80%)Estimated load (100%) > overloadHigh (80%)
It's normal for the node to sometimes reject connections or requests for a 
limited period. If you're seeing rejections continuously the node is overloaded or 
something is wrong (i.e. a bug).
Current estimated load for QueryReject purposes 100%
Current estimated load for rate limiting722% [Rejecting incoming connections 
and requests!]
Reason for load:Load due to thread limit = 3,8%
Load due to routingTime = 0% = 0% / 100.000% <= overloadLow (50%)
Load due to messageSendTimeRequest = 722% = 722.025% / 100.000% > overloadLow (50%)
Load due to output bandwidth limiting = 93,5% because outputBytes(672911) > limit 
(576000,009 ) = outLimitCutoff (0,8) * outputBandwidthLimit (12000) * 60
Estimated external pSearchFailed (based only on QueryRejections due to load):   
0.9998
Current estimated requests per hour (based on last 10 mins):5772.0
Current global quota (requests per hour):   799.4182883301385
Current recommended request interval sent to client nodes   2.147483647E9ms
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http

[freenet-support] Ditto: Harmless at this stage, but annoying

2004-03-13 Thread Rudolf Krist
Nicholas Sturm schrieb:
The attachment shows a plaque (window?, but no frame or sash so how could
it be a window) appeared in the middle of my desk and has not gone away
after about 8 hours.  Looks like it would still be using resources, but I
have no idea if it did it's work.
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


[freenet-support] %initialRequestHTL=25

2004-03-13 Thread Rudolf Krist
Hi!

In my freenet.ini File I have found the option %initialRequestHTL=25, % 
means that this option is commented out. But I thought, that the options 
that are commented out initially with %, are defaults, so I wounder if 
the value of 25 as default for this option is not too high? When 
coevally the the maxHopsToLive option is set to 15?

Rudi
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


[freenet-support] Error Report, 60006, start failed, reseeding

2004-03-13 Thread Rudolf Krist
Starting of an unstable node failed (reseeding)

Details
I have got 2 computers in a small network. On one pc I already run a 
unstable node for a long time. Now I wanted to setup an a second node on 
an other pc, so I installed an stable node with freenet-webinstall.exe 
there. I also downloaded the noderefs.txt(?minCP=0.05&minConnections=1) 
from my running node and saved it in freenet-node folder of the other 
node as seednodes.ref. Then I replaced the freenet.jar file with the 
unstable one and started freenet.exe. The result was a 
java.lang.NullPointerException, for more details see the attached cutout 
of the logfile.

I also tried out to save the seednodes.ref as PC ASCII Format, or 
download the seednodes from the webserver, nothing was helpful.

This behaviour is always reproduceable. Stable jar-file starts without 
any problems.

Plattform: WinXP Pro
JVM: 1.4.2_03-b02
Freenet: Fred,0.6,1.50,60006,CVS:1.704
Reproduce Steps:
1. Install stable node with freenet-webinstall.exe
2. Replace freenet.jar with freenet-unstable-latest.jar
3. Run freenet.exe
RESULT:
Starting fails, java.lang.NullPointerException
Detailed System Information:

Plattform: WinXP Pro, AMD Athlon, 500, 256 MB RAM
JVM: Sun, 1.4.2_03-b02
Freenet: Fred,0.6,1.50,60006,CVS:1.704
Internet Connection: DSL: 768 kbit downstream / 128 kbit upstream
Data Store: 1 GiB, Percent used: 0
diff default.ini/freenet.ini:
ipAddress=XXX
listenPort=XXX
fcpHosts=127.0.0.1,localhost
doAnnounce=yes
storeSize=1024M
inputBandwidthLimit=7
outputBandwidthLimit=8000
logLevel=Error
rtMaxRefs=51
rtMaxNodes=102
maximumThreads=130
Regards
Rudi


freenet.log.bz2
Description: Binary data
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[freenet-support] Re: Error Report, 60006, start failed, reseeding

2004-03-13 Thread Rudolf Krist
Starting of an unstable node failed (reseeding)
[...]
Freenet: Fred,0.6,1.50,60006,CVS:1.704
[...]
I also tested the builds 60005 and 60002, 60005 has shown the same 
behaviour, 60002 started successfully.
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


[freenet-support] Bug Report - win32 - freenet.exe - logFile=*path* not handled

2004-03-18 Thread Rudolf Krist
I have changed the "logFile" option in the freenet.ini file to an other 
path. But when I click on "View Logfile ..." in the context menu of the 
blue freenet symbol, freenet.exe still shows me the old unused 
freenet.log in the freenet directory.
Rudi
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


[freenet-support] 60016 - no upstream bandwidth usage??

2004-03-20 Thread Rudolf Krist
Hello,
2.5 hours ago I updated my node to the build 60016, and started it. Till 
now it has NO upload traffic (~300 bytes/sec). Normally my node is 
running ~10 Hours a day, since ~5 months. The node normally needs to 
reach my upload bandwidth limit (13 KB/s) within ~10 minutes after it 
was started.

some stats:
Connections open (Inbound/Outbound/Limit)   101 (27/74/512)
Total amount of data transmitted/received   4.822 KiB/3.644 KiB
Current upstream bandwidth usage257 bytes/second
Instantaneous local traffic:4738,139 queries per hour
diff default.ini freenet.ini
ipAddress=XXX
listenPort=XXX
fcpHosts=XXX
doAnnounce=yes
diagnosticsPath=x:\xx\stats
storeFile=x:\xx\storage
storeSize=20480M
routingDir=x:\xx\routing-data
inputBandwidthLimit=7
outputBandwidthLimit=13000
logLevel=Normal
logFile=x:\xx\freenet.log
rtMaxRefs=70
rtMaxNodes=102
maxHopsToLive=15
initialRequestHTL=10
maximumThreads=150
tempDir=x:\xx\freenet\
mainport.params.servlet.1.params.passThroughMimeTypes=text/plain,image/jpeg,image/gif,image/png
Need more data?


freenet.log.gz
Description: application/gzip
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[freenet-support] Re: 60016 - no upstream bandwidth usage - lots of RNF

2004-03-20 Thread Rudolf Krist
When I try to get a DBR Freesite (like DFI) I always get a RNF, I tried 
a lot of them from the History of my Browser.
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


[freenet-support] Re: 60016 - no upstream bandwidth usage??

2004-03-20 Thread Rudolf Krist
some more stats (3h 39min running)

TypeSent (failed)/Received (failed)
DataNotFound353 (0)/4 (0)
InsertReply 7 (0)/0 (0)
StoreData   9 (0)/2 (0)
Accepted4060 (2)/17 (0)
NodeAnnouncement2 (1)/1 (0)
QueryRestarted  3 (0)/6 (0)
InsertRequest   0 (1749)/131 (0)
DataReply   10 (0)/2 (0)
DataInsert  0 (0)/73 (0)
QueryRejected   5850 (337)/35 (0)
DataRequest 48 (67778)/6580 (0)
QueryAborted0 (0)/6 (0)
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


[freenet-support] Re: 60016 - no upstream bandwidth usage??

2004-03-20 Thread Rudolf Krist
After 11 hours web interface still reported 19 bytes/second
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


[freenet-support] Build 60020 - Bug Report - broken builtin client??

2004-03-22 Thread Rudolf Krist
X:\xxx\freenet_node>java -cp freenet.jar freenet.client.cli.Main
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NullPointerException
at 
freenet.support.FileLoggerHook.setInterval(FileLoggerHook.java:102)
at freenet.Core.setupLogger(Core.java:774)
at freenet.client.cli.CLI.loadLogger(CLI.java:347)
at freenet.client.cli.CLI.(CLI.java:256)
at freenet.client.cli.Main.main(Main.java:11)

The same happens when I call it with any parameters.

need more info?
Rudi
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


[freenet-support] Build 60020 - Bug Report - Web Interface report private key instead of public one

2004-03-22 Thread Rudolf Krist
I just inserted a ~50 MiB file, using F-Proxy. After the successful 
insertion F-Proxy showed me the following page:
The Insert Request finished sucessfully.

Final URI: freenet:SSK@/
Request Finished: Mo, 22 Mrz 2004 16:03:46 CET
...
Doesn't Fproxy have to report the final uri with the public key?
* First, the reported uri doesn't work.
* And second, users could give in that way their private away, when they 
use this functality of the fproxy, so that other guys may modify their data.

Rudi
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


[freenet-support] Re: Pictures aren´t displayed

2004-03-24 Thread Rudolf Krist
Michael Stather schrieb:

[...]
using the newest version, when letting the client run for about 5 
minutes to connect and then opening an index page from the "gateway 
page", the page
loads immediately but the pictures aren´t displayed. One or two from the 
300 ones are loaded but the rest not.
This appears with every freenet page I view. Is this a network issue?
Maybe http://freenetproject.org -> FAQ -> Why does Freenet only download 
1 or 2 files at a time?
will help.

___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


[freenet-support] Re: Bug Report - unstable 60029(60043) - Routing Summary doesn't work

2004-04-05 Thread Rudolf Krist
On Freenet gateway the link "Routing Summary" 
(/servlet/nodestatus/routing.html), found on "Node Status Interface 
(/servlet/nodestatus/) doesn't work.
Still no change -- build 60043

When you don't need this feature, why the link is still on the page?
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


[freenet-support] Current proportion of requests being accepted: 0, 660

2004-04-08 Thread Rudolf Krist
Using unstable build 60058

Since I set the the number of download threads from 50 to 70 in FUQID
the proportion value began to decrease. Now ~ 2 hours running with 70
threads it is at 0,660 and seems to stay at this level.
here are some settings of my node:
outputBandwidthLimit=13001
maxNodeConnections=300
inputBandwidthLimit=7
I set the thread number to 70 because of the 7 KB/second input
Bandwidth limit in average only 40% are used, rarely there were some
peaks up to ~ 60% of the limit, even after I set the thread number to 70.
Why did the proportion of requests, being accepted, decrease?

___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


[freenet-support] Re: What does a map-file look like?

2004-04-08 Thread Rudolf Krist
Garb schrieb:
Then I heard something about a “MAP”-file, which I am lead to assume 
could be the solution to all my problems – or at least the ones not 
related to girls or money. It appears to be some sort of cross-reference 
between the real-world file-names and the URIs, but I have thus far been 
unable to find out exactly what it looks like or how to make them.
When you use FIW, there you will find a feature called 
"MetaDataBrowser", I'm not sure if that will help you, but there you 
could enter a freesite uri, like 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/fuqid/10, to see what the mapfile of 
the freesite contains.

___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


[freenet-support] Re: What does a map-file look like?

2004-04-09 Thread Rudolf Krist
Garb schrieb:
Then I heard something about a "MAP"-file, which I am lead to assume 
could be the solution to all my problems - or at least the ones not 
related to girls or money. It appears to be some sort of cross-reference 
between the real-world file-names and the URIs, but I have thus far been 
unable to find out exactly what it looks like or how to make them.

When you use FIW, there you will find a feature called 
"MetaDataBrowser", I'm not sure if that will help you, but there you 
could enter a freesite uri, like 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/fuqid/10, to see what the mapfile of 
the freesite contains.
You are right - that certainly seems to be exactly what I am looking for (if
we exclude J.Lo's private phone number...). But where is that information
actually located? It is not in the HTML-source of the page. Could it be in a
special file with a name that FIW can somehow deduce from the URI of the
main page?
OK I will try to explain, what I have understood:
Let us take a mapfile, for example 
SSK[-AT-]CKesZYUJWn2GMvoif1R4SDbujIgPAgM/fuqid/10
and look into it. (Using FIW)

FIW outputs:
Time taken: 180
Version
Revision=1
EndPart
Document
Redirect.Target=freenet:CHK[-AT-]HDF~aaiE-kN4esHi7UHlaqb8wa4OAwI,UPPC82Q30Ni-ncWdLtiYBg
Name=index.html
Info.Format=text/html
EndPart
Document
Redirect.Target=freenet:CHK[-AT-]~ZzKVquUvXfnbaI5bR12wvu99-4LAwI,~QYjCzYNT6E~kVIbxF7DoA
Name=activelink.png
Info.Format=image/png
EndPart
Document
Redirect.Target=freenet:CHK[-AT-]avFnLFBKJLvl0MLrDqsLwfAbGwsUAwI,urShiYLrLx2DmIWsVvGtBw
Name=FUQID-1.3.zip
Info.Format=binary/zip-compressed
EndPart
Document
Redirect.Target=freenet:SSK[-AT-]CKesZYUJWn2GMvoif1R4SDbujIgPAgM/fuqid/11
Name=.next
Info.Format=text/html
EndPart
Document
Redirect.Target=freenet:CHK[-AT-]HDF~aaiE-kN4esHi7UHlaqb8wa4OAwI,UPPC82Q30Ni-ncWdLtiYBg
Info.Format=text/html
End
--
RawDataLength=0
Now I copy the content beginning with the line which contains "Version" 
and ending with the empty line after "End", then go to "Upload a file or 
NIM" in FIW enter in the Field "Key" any key (CHK[-AT-], 
SSK[-AT-]/sitename, KSK[-AT-]) then select the 
radio button Raw metadata and paste into the text-area the copied text 
and lets upload. So you will create a freesite that has the same 
contents as the FUQID Freesite. You also can upload some other 
html-files as CHKs and replace the entries in the mapfile. In this way 
you can create a freesite manually.

Then you should look what happens when you enter some other keys in the 
URI line of the MetaDataBrowser. Some text-files, some binary files, 
some small (< 1KB) files, some big files (> 500KB, < 1MB) and some 
splitfiles.

I hope that all the questions will be answered after these small 
experiments.

___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


[freenet-support] Re: Build 5077, problems with routing summary and log rotating

2004-04-27 Thread Rudolf Krist
Toad schrieb:

On Sun, Apr 25, 2004 at 04:30:29PM +0200, Marc wrote:

Hi,

when I try to view 
(the routing summary), I get nothing back. But in freenet.log I find the
following:


D'oh. Will be fixed in 5078.

It doesn't work in unstable builds too.

see:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.devel/12545/
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.devel/12833/
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.devel/12830/
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support/3853/
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


[freenet-support] Re: Stable build 5082

2004-05-16 Thread Rudolf Krist
Toad schrieb:
Details of this build:
Various bug fixes, some of them pretty serious. Comes to a fairly small
amount of actual code though. Lots more changes are being tested and 
debugged on unstable.
* Rate limiting was almost completely broken due to a stupid bug. Fixed
  it.
* Major routing fix: many of our running averages were, for various
  reasons, at 0. or so. With the current running average
  implementation for probabilities, the result of this is that the
  running average will never change (because the closer it is to 0.0 or
  1.0, the less sensitive it is). We were supposed to be doing bounds
  checking to ensure that this wasn't a problem; there was a bug in the
  bounds checking :(. The result of this bug was that some of the major
  factors in the NGRouting calculation were very often completely wrong!
  The current implementation is suboptimal, there is a replacement 
  being tested on unstable, but the code merged in this build should be
  much better than the previous builds!
How could that happen???
It is the same problem you had in the unstable branch, isn't it?
So why did the modification, which have caused the problem in unstable, 
get into the code of the stable branch, before it was tested for a 
longer period (at least a day or two) in the unstable network? For what 
are you running the unstable network?
I DO NOT UNDERSTAND IT!

* Fixed a NullPointerException that would cause the web interface to
  stop working after a while.
* Show some more useful detail next to probability running averages on
  the per node pages linked from the routing table page.
* Don't leak a temp file when an insert fails.
* A minor optimization in DSAPublicKey.equals(), and some minor code
  style changes.
Regards
Rudi
--
Rudolf Krist
PGP Key Id: 0x5C1708B8
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


[freenet-support] Re: Stable build 5086 and major vulnerability fix

2004-07-24 Thread Rudolf Krist
I have also only been able to download the 5085 build (today c. 10:00 am)
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


[freenet-support] Weekend releases!?

2004-07-26 Thread Rudolf Krist
Hello Toad!
I think that it is a very bad Idea to publish a new official build, when 
in one day or two you will go to weekend, especially if it is a stable 
build! When there is a serious bug, it will take much longer to solve 
the problem. And the network can rather go broken, like -- I think -- it 
happens now! The longer my node runs, the more RNFs I get. Im using the 
8086 build.

Connections open (Inbound/Outbound/Limit)   54 (13/41/150)
before update(8085/8086) I usually had a value about 140
http://localhost:/servlet/nodestatus/version_data.txt
# Histogram of node versions in fred's Routing table
# 25.07.2004 19:18:20
# nodes: 291
Fred,0.5,STABLE-1.50,5084   135
Fred,0.5,STABLE-1.50,5085   82
Fred,0.5,STABLE-1.50,5086   74
When you think that you are ready to publish a new build, it is 
Thursday, Friday or Saturday and you know that you want to have some 
free days, without development/support, maybe it will by better to wait 
until it is Monday to publish the new stable build?!

Regards
Rudi
--
Rudolf Krist
Mail: rudi.krist -at+ web.de
PGP Key Id: 0x5C1708B8
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]