Re: [freenet-support] BUG: Freenet does not respect size limit for datastore

2009-12-27 Thread SmallSister development
Evan Daniel wrote: Persistent-temp is not part of the datastore, and is not expected to stay within the datastore size limit. It's used to hold data from partially completed downloads. In theory, it will only grow to be slightly larger than your total queue size. However, there appear to

Re: [freenet-support] BUG: Freenet does not respect size limit for datastore

2009-12-25 Thread SmallSister development
Dennis Nezic wrote: On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 23:03:25 +0100, SmallSister development wrote: Dennis Nezic wrote: On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 13:28:36 +0100, SmallSister development wrote: 2) Error message on the file sharing pages: Internal error Internal error Return to queue page. [The queue page

[freenet-support] BUG: Freenet does not respect size limit for datastore

2009-12-24 Thread SmallSister development
I found that Freenet (Build #1239) happily expands the datastore over the configured size limit. (Disk space is the limit...) This leads to very interesting behaviour when the file system gets full and I would like your help to solve the following two issues: 1) Error message on all pages: The

Re: [freenet-support] BUG: Freenet does not respect size limit for datastore

2009-12-24 Thread SmallSister development
Dennis Nezic wrote: On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 13:28:36 +0100, SmallSister development wrote: 2) Error message on the file sharing pages: Internal error Internal error Return to queue page. [The queue page gives this error message too] I have posted about this bug as far back as June 12th '09

Re: [freenet-support] Privacy (Was: No subject)

2009-10-11 Thread SmallSister development
VolodyA! V Anarhist wrote: This point has already been answered, but i feel that there is a point that can be made here by answering it again. When you fetch something from the regular internet, the request is easily traceable back to you. The warning that you see tells you that for that

Re: [freenet-support] Remove all identifying content from posted files (especially audio)

2009-09-14 Thread SmallSister development
VolodyA! V Anarhist wrote: Brian Mearns wrote: On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 6:54 AM, SmallSister development smallsis...@xs4all.nl wrote: Brian Mearns wrote: I understand the basic architecture of Freenet and how it protects contributors, but I'm concerned that the files themselves might contain

Re: [freenet-support] Remove all identifying content from posted files (especially audio)

2009-09-10 Thread SmallSister development
Brian Mearns wrote: I understand the basic architecture of Freenet and how it protects contributors, but I'm concerned that the files themselves might contain identifying information about the source of the file. In particular, for audio files such as MP3, Ogg Vorbis, and Flac. Does

Re: [freenet-support] Auto-update key blown according to 1 peer(s)!

2009-05-24 Thread SmallSister development
theymos wrote: I just got this message. What do I do? Auto-update key blown according to 1 peer(s)! One or more of your peers says that the auto-update key is blown! This means that an attacker may know the private key for the auto-update system and can therefore cause your node to run

[freenet-support] Auto-update key blown according to 1 peer(s)!

2009-05-22 Thread SmallSister development
One or more of your peers says that the auto-update key is blown! This means that an attacker may know the private key for the auto-update system and can therefore cause your node to run code of his choice (if you update)! The auto-update system has been disabled. It is also possible that

[freenet-support] How to remove an opennet peer?

2009-02-13 Thread SmallSister development
Matthew Toseland wrote: >>>>> On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:45:29 +0100, SmallSister development wrote: >>>>>> I get the error message: >>>>>>> One or more of your node's peers have never connected in the two >>>>>>> weeks sinc

Re: [freenet-support] How to remove an opennet peer?

2009-02-13 Thread SmallSister development
Matthew Toseland wrote: On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:45:29 +0100, SmallSister development wrote: I get the error message: One or more of your node's peers have never connected in the two weeks since they were added. Consider removing them since they are marginally affecting performance (wasting

[freenet-support] How to remove an opennet peer?

2009-02-12 Thread SmallSister development
Luke771 wrote: > On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:42:46 -0500 > Dennis Nezic wrote: > >> On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:45:29 +0100, SmallSister development wrote: >>> I get the error message: >>>> One or more of your node's peers have never connected in the two >>>>

[freenet-support] How to remove an opennet peer?

2009-02-12 Thread SmallSister development
I get the error message: > One or more of your node's peers have never connected in the two > weeks since they were added. Consider removing them since they are > marginally affecting performance (wasting packets talking to nodes > that aren't there). A quick investigation identified the culprit:

[freenet-support] How to remove an opennet peer?

2009-02-12 Thread SmallSister development
I get the error message: One or more of your node's peers have never connected in the two weeks since they were added. Consider removing them since they are marginally affecting performance (wasting packets talking to nodes that aren't there). A quick investigation identified the culprit: an

Re: [freenet-support] How to remove an opennet peer?

2009-02-12 Thread SmallSister development
Luke771 wrote: On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:42:46 -0500 Dennis Nezic denn...@dennisn.dyndns.org wrote: On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:45:29 +0100, SmallSister development wrote: I get the error message: One or more of your node's peers have never connected in the two weeks since they were added

[freenet-support] What did you do to the Update Now button in 1195?

2009-01-13 Thread SmallSister development
Apparently build 1196 has been pushed out; the common A new stable version of Freenet is available message box has appeared on the message list. Unfortunately the Update Now button in the box only brings me to the proxy home page and does not seem to do anything but bringing me to the freenet

Re: [freenet-support] What did you do to the Update Now button in 1195?

2009-01-13 Thread SmallSister development
for about 15 minutes, 1195 downloaded within a few minutes). Then I ran update.sh, which went without trouble execpt for the fact that the node did not restart by itself, I had to kill it. Now I'm connected to 1 opennet peer. On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 9:48 AM, SmallSister development

[freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1194

2008-12-24 Thread SmallSister development
Matthew Toseland wrote: > Freenet 0.7 build 1194 is now available. Please upgrade, this will be > mandatory on Friday. Some fairly substantial changes: It looks like the infamous "# peers forcibly disconnected" bug is gone in this release, thanks and congratulations! (I see far less package

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1194

2008-12-24 Thread SmallSister development
Matthew Toseland wrote: Freenet 0.7 build 1194 is now available. Please upgrade, this will be mandatory on Friday. Some fairly substantial changes: It looks like the infamous # peers forcibly disconnected bug is gone in this release, thanks and congratulations! (I see far less package handling

[freenet-support] Probably a bug

2008-12-06 Thread SmallSister development
Sorry Matthew, within an hour of restarting my node I got my first disconnect. I am running 1188, and it seems all peers are running that same version. I got several copies of this error message in my logs: Dec 06, 2008 10:48:30:870 (freenet.node.PacketTracker, UdpSocketHandler for port

Re: [freenet-support] Probably a bug

2008-12-06 Thread SmallSister development
Sorry Matthew, within an hour of restarting my node I got my first disconnect. I am running 1188, and it seems all peers are running that same version. I got several copies of this error message in my logs: Dec 06, 2008 10:48:30:870 (freenet.node.PacketTracker, UdpSocketHandler for port

[freenet-support] A 1180 non-starter

2008-11-19 Thread SmallSister development
Freenet 1180 refuses to start; here is an extract from the wrapper.log file: STATUS | wrapper | 2008/11/19 10:06:54 | Launching a JVM... ERROR | wrapper | 2008/11/19 10:06:54 | JVM exited while loading the application. INFO | jvm 5| 2008/11/19 10:06:54 | Exception in thread "main"

[freenet-support] A 1180 non-starter

2008-11-19 Thread SmallSister development
Freenet 1180 refuses to start; here is an extract from the wrapper.log file: STATUS | wrapper | 2008/11/19 10:06:54 | Launching a JVM... ERROR | wrapper | 2008/11/19 10:06:54 | JVM exited while loading the application. INFO | jvm 5| 2008/11/19 10:06:54 | Exception in thread main

[freenet-support] Broken freesites in #1178

2008-11-16 Thread SmallSister development
Hello, I've noted that freesites that are recently updated (The Ultimate FreeNet Index) appear broken. My personal freesite (that was inserted with jSite after the announcement of the "tar.gz" sites) shows the same problem. Peter.

[freenet-support] Broken freesites in #1178

2008-11-16 Thread SmallSister development
Hello, I've noted that freesites that are recently updated (The Ultimate FreeNet Index) appear broken. My personal freesite (that was inserted with jSite after the announcement of the tar.gz sites) shows the same problem. Peter. ___ Support mailing