2 of your peers are having severe problems (not acknowledging packets even
after 10 minutes). This is probably due to a bug in the code. If this
happens a lot, please add your information to the report on the bug tracker
at https://bugs.freenetproject.org/view.php?id=2692 or send it to the
support
On Monday 25 May 2009 07:28:33 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i wrote:
I also have the same message with another IP.
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 1:26 AM, SmallSister development
smallsis...@xs4all.nl wrote:
theymos wrote:
I just got this message. What do I do?
Auto-update key blown according to
On Monday 17 November 2008 20:55:25 bbackde at googlemail.com wrote:
> Another thing: anyone also noticed that starting with 1178 freesites
> like the Frost freesite or Toads blog are not longer retrievable?
> I get a temporary files error ... maybe this is already fixed with 1179.
>
Yes had that
On Monday 17 November 2008 20:27:13 Peter J. wrote:
> On Saturday 15 November 2008 18:37:20 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > Correct. This should go away after 1178 is mandatory on Sunday, provided
> > you restart your node at that point. However, the trend so far suggests
> >
On Saturday 15 November 2008 18:37:20 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Correct. This should go away after 1178 is mandatory on Sunday, provided
> you restart your node at that point. However, the trend so far suggests
> that it won't go away and is still present. :< In any case we need to be
> told if it
On Saturday 15 November 2008 18:37:20 Matthew Toseland wrote:
Correct. This should go away after 1178 is mandatory on Sunday, provided
you restart your node at that point. However, the trend so far suggests
that it won't go away and is still present. : In any case we need to be
told if it
On Monday 17 November 2008 20:27:13 Peter J. wrote:
On Saturday 15 November 2008 18:37:20 Matthew Toseland wrote:
Correct. This should go away after 1178 is mandatory on Sunday, provided
you restart your node at that point. However, the trend so far suggests
that it won't go away
On Monday 17 November 2008 20:55:25 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another thing: anyone also noticed that starting with 1178 freesites
like the Frost freesite or Toads blog are not longer retrievable?
I get a temporary files error ... maybe this is already fixed with 1179.
Yes had that also with
On Saturday 15 November 2008 09:48:26 Peter J. wrote:
> On Saturday 15 November 2008 01:05:57 Mike Cook wrote:
> > 2 of your peers are having severe problems (not acknowledging packets
> > even after 10 minutes). This is probably due to a bug in the code. Please
> > repor
On Saturday 15 November 2008 01:05:57 Mike Cook wrote:
> 2 of your peers are having severe problems (not acknowledging packets even
> after 10 minutes). This is probably due to a bug in the code. Please report
> it to us at the bug tracker at https://bugs.freenetproject.org/ or at
> support at
On Saturday 15 November 2008 01:05:57 Mike Cook wrote:
2 of your peers are having severe problems (not acknowledging packets even
after 10 minutes). This is probably due to a bug in the code. Please report
it to us at the bug tracker at https://bugs.freenetproject.org/ or at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Saturday 15 November 2008 09:48:26 Peter J. wrote:
On Saturday 15 November 2008 01:05:57 Mike Cook wrote:
2 of your peers are having severe problems (not acknowledging packets
even after 10 minutes). This is probably due to a bug in the code. Please
report it to us at the bug tracker
On Saturday 06 September 2008 20:46:25 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Saturday 06 September 2008 18:56, Peter J. wrote:
> > 3. That could explain alot:
> > download: aprox. 3.3 Gib
> > upload ? ? : aprox. 2.4 Gib
>
> That's a fair amount too. The downl
On Saturday 06 September 2008 20:46:25 Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Saturday 06 September 2008 18:56, Peter J. wrote:
snip
3. That could explain alot:
download: aprox. 3.3 Gib
upload : aprox. 2.4 Gib
That's a fair amount too. The downloads will use a significant amount
On Saturday 06 September 2008 19:32:30 Matthew Toseland wrote:
>
> 3 questions:
> 1. Please post your freenet.ini. What's the database memory usage limit
> setting set to?
> 2. What's the node's memory limit set to?
> 3. How much stuff do you have on the queue? Approximate total bytes to
>
On Saturday 06 September 2008 18:56:41 Peter J. wrote:
> On Saturday 06 September 2008 17:49:07 Mr. Flibble wrote:
> > I'm seeing the following (just by accident - I haven't really had time to
> > use freenet since the last update):
> >
> > INFO | jvm 5 | 2008/09/06 16:
On Saturday 06 September 2008 17:49:07 Mr. Flibble wrote:
> I'm seeing the following (just by accident - I haven't really had time to
> use freenet since the last update):
>
> INFO | jvm 5 | 2008/09/06 16:34:33 | Key 4745216/5346530 OK (308 dupes, 0
> failures)
>
> Should I be concerned about
On Saturday 06 September 2008 17:49:07 Mr. Flibble wrote:
I'm seeing the following (just by accident - I haven't really had time to
use freenet since the last update):
INFO | jvm 5 | 2008/09/06 16:34:33 | Key 4745216/5346530 OK (308 dupes, 0
failures)
snip loglines
Should I be concerned
On Saturday 06 September 2008 18:56:41 Peter J. wrote:
On Saturday 06 September 2008 17:49:07 Mr. Flibble wrote:
I'm seeing the following (just by accident - I haven't really had time to
use freenet since the last update):
INFO | jvm 5 | 2008/09/06 16:34:33 | Key 4745216/5346530 OK (308
Ok thanx. But the attached file seems corrupt and is only 1k big. Is it
downloadable from somewhere ?
On Dec 8, 2007 3:43 PM, Jack O'Lantern wrote:
> --- "Bergman, Karl J" wrote:
> > And this noname file is applied how?
>
> Backup your old freenet.jar and freenet-ext.
And this noname file is applied how?
Cheers.
Karl
On Dec 3, 2007 9:52 PM, Mr. Flibble
wrote:
> > --- "Mr. Flibble" wrote:
> > > Where can I get this patch (well, the new freenet.jar) for 0.5 then?
> > > http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/ doesn't seem to do a lot
> > > nowadays
> >
> >
Ok thanx. But the attached file seems corrupt and is only 1k big. Is it
downloadable from somewhere ?
On Dec 8, 2007 3:43 PM, Jack O'Lantern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Bergman, Karl J [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And this noname file is applied how?
Backup your old freenet.jar and freenet
able to
configure and set the program to run itself as a service but i don't know
why.
Regards
PS. Sorry my english
http://graphics.hotmail.com/greypixel.gif; width="100%"
vspace=9>
Alberto J. Rubert Escuder
http://graphics.hotmail.com/greypixel.gif;
width="100%" vs
haven't answered my other questions.
Bouke J. Henstra wrote:
Welcome to Darwin!
My-Computer:~ Bob$ chmod +x run.sh
chmod: run.sh: No such file or directory
My-Computer:~ Bob$ ./1run.sh start
-bash: ./1run.sh: No such file or directory
All the files from
./run.sh start
: No such file or directory
try the following:
cd into the freenet directory
chmod +x run.sh
./run.sh start
--
On Tue, 2006-12-26 at 08:14 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't install FN on Mac OS X 10.4.9.
I unzipped the archive into a folder, but when I type
Welcome to Darwin!
My-Computer:~ Bob$ chmod +x run.sh
chmod: run.sh: No such file or directory
My-Computer:~ Bob$ ./1run.sh start
-bash: ./1run.sh: No such file or directory
All the files from the .tar file ARE on my HD, Location is
~Users/Bob/Backup Items/Software/Freenet/freenet07
Did
archive. The permissions needed no changing, and then I
> pasted the commands into Terminal. Didn't work.
> Besides, you still haven't answered my other questions.
>
>
>
>
> Bouke J. Henstra wrote:
> > > Welcome to Darwin!
> > > My-Computer:~
> Welcome to Darwin!
> My-Computer:~ Bob$ chmod +x run.sh
> chmod: run.sh: No such file or directory
> My-Computer:~ Bob$ ./1run.sh start
> -bash: ./1run.sh: No such file or directory
> All the files from the .tar file ARE on my HD, Location is
> ~Users/Bob/Backup
> ./run.sh start
> : No such file or directory
try the following:
cd into the freenet directory
chmod +x run.sh
./run.sh start
--
On Tue, 2006-12-26 at 08:14 -0800, oregonrebel at gmail.com wrote:
> I can't install FN on Mac OS X 10.4.9.
> I unzipped the archive into a folder, but when I
ject file: No such file or directory
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Problem is, I have libc.so.6. It's under /lib/
> > >> --
> > >>
> > >> > >href="http://www.spreadfirefox.com/?q=affiliatesid=0t=57
> "> > >&
IL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe -- Matthew J Toseland -
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEl/BOHzsuOmVUoi0RAkHaAJ9
I just downloaded and installed Freenet and am unable to download the readme
file to figure it out. I keep getting Route Not Found and Couldn't Retrieve
Key errors.
?
:-)
--
Conrad J. Sabatier [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- In Unix veritas
#!/usr/local/bin/bash
#
# get_splitfile -- download an FEC splitfile
#
# usage: get_splitfile key output_filename
#
# Uses a separate thread for each of the splitfile's segments to improve
# throughput
#
# Requires: fcpget (freenet
Oops, forgot to include a third, supporting script
(FECSegmentSplitFile, attached here).
On 12-Aug-2005 Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
You may be interested in a pair of bash scripts I wrote to help with
large splitfile downloads.
The first, get_splitfile, will try indefinitely to fetch
Due to a computer crash I had to switch to a new one.
When I try to start up freenet all I get is:
Loading native...
Attempting to load freenet/support/CPUInformation/libjcpuid-x86-linux.so
Written to /tmp/jcpuid45173lib.tmp: 55692
INFO: Native CPUID library
On 25-Jul-2005 Matthew Toseland wrote:
Recently dodo has been having problems. The lists should work now.
Yes, it looks like things are back to normal again now. Thanks for
taking care of this so quickly!
--
Conrad J. Sabatier [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- In Unix veritas
keys just because I had relocated them, but even go so far
as to delete them all, too.
Very strange behavior, if you ask me. Certainly a major violation of
the famouse POLA that's bandied about frequenty on the FreeBSD mailing
lists.
How bizarre! :-)
--
Conrad J. Sabatier [EMAIL PROTECTED
I'm currently in the process of compiling and installing the GCC suite
version 4.1. Has anyone yet tried compiling Freenet using this version
of GCJ? If so, how successful was it?
--
Conrad J. Sabatier [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- In Unix veritas
___
Support
Hello,
I try to install freenet with Yum.
= yum install fred.noarch
I'm getting the following error messages:
= Downloading Packages:
= (1/3): fec-1.0.3-2.noarch 100% |=| 93 kB00:00
= (2/3): fred-0.5-5101.noar 100% |=| 3.2 MB00:04
=
by this issue:
http://secunia.com/multiple_browsers_window_injection_vulnerability_test/
A workaround for Mozilla-based browsers is available.
http://www.freebsd.org/ports/portaudit/b0911985-6e2a-11d9-9557-000a95bc6fae.html
--
Conrad J. Sabatier [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- In Unix veritas
, and the one unstable nodes actually were using.
Those of you running dual-network nodes should start seeing better
results now, as more and more stable users update their nodes to include
this latest update. Sorry for not taking care of this sooner!
--
Conrad J. Sabatier [EMAIL PROTECTED
popular DBR sites may actually
benefit from deeper insertion.
It's not a perfect science; there are really no hard-and-fast rules.
Just common sense and good judgement, basically, combined with how long
you're willing to wait for your inserts to complete. :-)
HTH
--
Conrad J. Sabatier [EMAIL
/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
--
Conrad J. Sabatier [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- In Unix veritas
Help:
I recently leaned of the Freenet Project and would
like to assist by becoming a node and/or contributing financially.
I installed the program on two machines with
dedicated broadband access; one at home and one at work. Both have been
running for about two days now, but I have very
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 00:40:28 -0600, Conrad J. Sabatier
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's something very peculiar going on here. I've only received a
handful of messages in a single list (devl) since subscribing. Just
out of curiosity, I went back to the mailman interface and
resubscribed
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 05:59:56 -0800, Sonax [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 17:37:27 -0800
From: Todd Walton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [freenet-support] ANNOUNCE: DFI (Dolphin's Freenet
Index) is now back online!
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 01:06:46 + (UTC), Conrad J
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 03:39:21 -0600, S [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 00:05:52 -0600
Conrad J. Sabatier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is anyone else having problems with the lists?
Here is what showed up on my end for devel only, local January 13th:
mysql SELECT senders.sender
rather smallish, but we should be seeing it grow with each passing day as my
node's routing improves and the spider successfully locates more and more
sites.
Please try to bear with us during this early phasing back in of the site.
Thanks!
--
Conrad J. Sabatier [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- In Unix veritas
/to/your/java/includes ../../gmp-4.1.3/configure
If you need any more help, let us know. Hope this helps.
--
Conrad J. Sabatier [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- In Unix veritas
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org
with the lists at this time?
--
Conrad J. Sabatier [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- In Unix veritas
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Alex R. Mosteo support@freenetproject.org wrote:
Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/DFI//
I just completed my first successful insert of DFI today since returning to
freenet just yesterday. Please try using it so that it will begin to
propagate again
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Someone support@freenetproject.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Conrad J. Sabatier schrieb:
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]/DFI//
|
| I just completed my first successful insert of DFI today since returning to
| freenet just yesterday. Please try using
problems with the lists?
--
Conrad J. Sabatier [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- In Unix veritas
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo
was already subscribed.
Very odd.
--
Conrad J. Sabatier -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- In Unix veritas
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin
On Thu, 2004-09-02 at 12:24, Heine Laursen wrote:
Open connections say's
Connections open (Inbound/Outbound/Limit)
92 (55/37/200)
Transfers active (Transmitting/Receiving) 96 (30/66)
Data waiting to be transmitted/received 83 KiB/None
Amount of data transmitted/received over
On Wed, 2004-09-01 at 22:14, Heine Laursen wrote:
I'm sure you are trying to do your best. But i'm growing tired of trying
to connect to freenet.
Do you leave your node running 24/7?
How big is your datastore? (Huge datastore means your node gets a
reputation for being able to satisfy
On Wed, 2004-08-04 at 16:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure where your 'village' is but here it works much
the same way actually. But the problem is that there is no
machine that can just tell us what your intent was. So what
your intent was has to be inferred from your actions and
On Wed, 2004-08-04 at 16:35, Toad wrote:
On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 04:31:11PM -0400, Edward J. Huff wrote:
On Wed, 2004-08-04 at 16:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure where your 'village' is but here it works much
the same way actually. But the problem
I also see RNF problems on 5088.
Over the past 12 hours:
1547 requests for CHK keys started. Most of these should exist.
440 Data Not Found.
31 successful.
1072 Route Not Found
4 were in progress at the time.
On Sun, 2004-08-01 at 10:30, Heine Laursen wrote:
Mika Hirvonen wrote:
Heine
On Wed, 2004-07-28 at 06:06, Jano wrote:
Solved it changing the -Xmx128m to -Xmx256m.
I suppose this can be a general problem, I'm running stable without any
tweaks since a month or so.
In the good side, two minutes running and I can see all the activelinks,
where the previous build
transmitted/received over currently open connections 162 MiB/118 MiB
Total amount of data transmitted/received 231 MiB/149 MiB
Uptime 5 hours 43 minutes
Current upstream bandwidth usage 13865 bytes/second (138.6%)
On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 08:32:12AM -0400, Edward J. Huff wrote:
On Wed, 2004-07-28
On Tue, 2004-06-01 at 14:28, tripolar wrote:
Hello
I have been using Gmane to search the freenet archives with no luck??
httpnews.gmane.orggmane.network.freenet.support
I have put in
java lang exception
java.io.IOException: Too many open files
java.io.IOException
without any hits.
Any
On Wed, 2004-05-26 at 09:08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
version 0.5.2.8 on win2k server and I install it by just clicking on freenet-
webinstall.exe .
What build number? That sounds like a very old version. You need to
upgrade it to build number 5082. See instructions for upgrading on the
On Tue, 2004-05-18 at 11:17, Toad wrote:
On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 12:53:08PM -0700, Christopher Brian Jack wrote:
Please, please, please FIX this and allow direct MTA connections from
subscribed members only. Having to go thru the ISP mail server is a MAJOR
privacy concern for me (I know
On Mon, 2004-05-17 at 15:53, Christopher Brian Jack wrote:
Please, please, please FIX this and allow direct MTA connections from
subscribed members only.
Testing to see if I can send mail in. My email is hosted on
my own server. I have a send permitted from record in the
DNS for my domain.
Subscription Name: Freenet Project MembershipSubscription Number:
S-6G704031JR625064Y
Thank you,
I will at a later opportunity try to become a
member.
BR,
~A
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 2004-03-07 at 19:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Joe
I have a similar situation to you. I first started using Freenet a few
months ago. I use Fuqid to retrieve content.
When I first set it up Freenet actually worked. Today, however, I have a
queue of partially retrieved items
On Sun, 2004-02-01 at 01:28, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just made a update to 6457, and now my node is some kind of doomed...
:/ For some reason the node removed all entrys from the routing table
and also does not get any new entrys. At least it did not stop
working, since it gets enough
Build 6449 has been out for several days, 6450 just became available
yesterday, yet my routing table still has quite a few nodes running 6448.
What's up with that?
--
Conrad Sabatier [EMAIL PROTECTED] - In Unix veritas
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 04:05:08AM -0600, S wrote:
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004 21:58:08 -0600
Conrad J. Sabatier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 11:33:58PM +, Toad wrote:
What happens when you try to insert? The usual very very very long
verification times?
Just
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 09:27:06AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would be very happy if you can publish a complete listing
of tweaking you've done to your freenet.conf to optimize
insertion; your complete reasoning doing each change
would be very interesting too
Well, I haven't really
On Tue, 2004-01-20 at 09:18, Doug wrote:
I have installed Sun's 1.4.1 version of Java, then ran the start
script and get a Done response. Then nice - Java not found.
Possibly due to my inexperience with Linux, but can anyone
prompt me along? It doesn't appear that Java is running.
Either
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 11:33:58PM +, Toad wrote:
What happens when you try to insert? The usual very very very long
verification times?
Just thought I'd chime in on this subject. Most recently, I'm finding
inserts are working much better. I have DFI's insert scheduled to begin two
I upgraded my Sun JDK today via FreeBSD's ports collection. Building the
entire beast from source. Took longer than expected. I probably should
have just killed everything else instead of letting fred and other stuff run
as usual the whole time.
Anyway, it's finally done, fred was just
Sorry about DFI not being inserted earlier today as usual. Last night, just
out of curiosity, I added -Xprof to the script that generates the new index
and forgot to remove it later. As a result, the scheduled update run today
got totally bogged down and nothing ever did get inserted.
On Fri, 2004-01-09 at 14:32, Niklas Bergh wrote:
Freenet stable build 5052 is now available.
Changelog:
* tfAbsoluteMaxThreads config parameter added.
tfAbsoluteMaxThreads will allow you to limit maximum number of
threads the YThreadFactory will spawn. Default value is 500 threads.
On Fri, 2004-01-02 at 12:14, Rudolf Krist wrote:
Hello,
after I have upgraded my node to the Build 6415, the routing table only
contained nodes with the Build Nr. = 6415. Is that a new feature? Or
was it not intended?
Yes, users of the unstable build are expected to upgrade daily.
-- Ed
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 12:11:45PM +0100, news.gmane.org wrote:
Great, but can you please attach the both keys as a text file because gmane
screwed up everything :-)
I've attached the original key to this mail. Hopefully, the new one isn't
really needed.
I must confess, I've been remiss in
Here are a couple of little scripts I put together today. They should both
be placed in your main freenet dir to work properly (or adjust the paths
yourself in the scripts).
The first, addnodes.sh, downloads your noderefs.txt file and then adds any
new nodes it finds in it to seednodes.ref.
Well, it looks like I managed to hopelessly screw up DFI. :-)
Still trying to get it straightened out, but in the meantime (and
possibly/probably for all future uses), I've reinserted it under a new key,
which appears to be working normally. It will be great if the original key
eventually
D'oh! Why didn't I think of trying this before?
maximumThreads=0
targetMaxThreads=512
This seems to be rendering the desired behavior with YThreads now, i.e., the
factory is still generating threads beyond the target limit as needed, but
the target limit *is* being factored in for estimating
What is going on lately with the noderefs files on the snapshots site?
--
Conrad Sabatier [EMAIL PROTECTED] - In Unix veritas
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
I've finally gotten around to adding a NIM feedback form to DFI
([EMAIL PROTECTED]/DFI//), so if anyone has any comments,
please feel free.
I'm still in the process of refining the spider and its results. One thing
I've done recently, which I'm not sure is a good idea or not, is to ignore
CHK
. Get the latest seednodes.ref file
http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/seednodes.ref
and replace your copy of seednodes.ref.
Right now there are 69 distinct nodes listed there.
--
Edward J. Huff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
After a lot of trial-and-error (and a few stupid blunders), the spider-based
index of unstable sites I've been working on is now looking pretty darn
good, if I do say so myself.
The new key is: [EMAIL PROTECTED]/DFI//
Hopefully, the more people use/bookmark this thing, the better it will work.
On Mon, 2003-11-24 at 10:34, Aureliano Rama wrote:
I think as well that he should get a new copy of freenet.jar, that
surely doesn't hurt nor cancel any previous setting as long as he
doesn't overwrite the config file.
However it's a bit strange that a disk full could lead to a damaged
jar.
On Sun, 2003-11-16 at 03:37, Kevin Bennett wrote:
I only used the -a switch. If I add -n as well it becomes:
TCP 0.0.0.0:49247 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING.
and many
TCP myIP:49247foreignIP:port ESTABLISHED
...
I suppose that 0.0.0.0:0 means the same thing as
0.0.0.0:*,
On Sat, 2003-11-15 at 14:06, Kevin Bennett wrote:
According to netstat -a, 49247 is listening:
TCPmyhostname:49247 myhostname:0 LISTENING
TCPmyhostname:49247 myhostname:0 LISTENING
TCPmyhostname:49247 myhostname:0
On Fri, 2003-11-14 at 18:47, Shen Ming Xuan wrote:
Hello,
I have just downloaded installed Freenet 0.5.2.7, started it and got this
error on freenet startup:
-
Could not initialize network I/O system! Exiting
On Sun, 2003-11-09 at 05:08, Tapio Valli wrote:
Hi,
I am upgraded to the latest stable build today and now when I try to
connect to my node via local client browser to :, all I get is
a blank page and following ERRORS in the freenet.log :
Nov 9, 2003 12:00:03 PM
On Sat, 2003-11-08 at 23:05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is from my log
**
Reducing rtMaxNodes to 15 - was too high for maxNodeConnections 60 because
we keep an idle conn open to each node.
Nov 8, 2003 10:38:01 AM (freenet.node.Node, main, ERROR): Reducing
rtMaxNodes to 15 -
On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 19:27, Phil Rabne wrote:
I tried inserting the suggested two lines as follows after the #!bin/sh comment:
PATH=/philtr/j2sdk_nb/j2sdk1.4.2./jre/bin/java:$PATH
export PATH
Of course I'm assuming that 'jre' stands for, java runtime environment
(of
Hello
i have the freenet internet web interface
running
But what next?
if i click on request freesite by URI
i get meggage as below:
also GPL does not work
What i do wrong?
help files are not complete
help please
mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
thank you
Network Error
Couldn't retrieve key:
93 matches
Mail list logo
