On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 12:33 AM, Lenny five2one.le...@gmail.com wrote:
It's 530 (bytes?)
(and yet for 50kpps I had around 150Mb of traffic. Is this possible?)
http://www.ccievault.net/index.php/tools says it's possible
--Bill
Right, sorry, forgot to multiply by 8:)
Anyway, thank you for all the support,
I guess I should search for the new server then.
Lenny.
Bill Marquette wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 12:33 AM, Lenny five2one.le...@gmail.com wrote:
It's 530 (bytes?)
(and yet for 50kpps I had around
A friend of mine will test this apic.disable with his WG config...
Hope it helps...
Regards,
Martin !
Von: Dimitri Rodis [mailto:dimit...@integritasystems.com]
Gesendet: Montag, 23. März 2009 05:39
An: support@pfsense.com
Betreff: [pfSense Support] ACPI/APIC in loader.conf - watchdog timeouts
I got offered a Sun Fire X2200 with Opteron Dual Core 2210(that's 1.8GHz).
Will that do it? (for ~150kpps)
Lenny.
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 8:59 AM, Lenny five2one.le...@gmail.com wrote:
Right, sorry, forgot to multiply by 8:)
Anyway, thank you for all the support,
I guess I should
Hi Folks,
I have 2 WAN's (WAN1 - production and WAN2 - backup) and I need to set them
as fail over (when WAN1 goes down WAN2 takes the traffic and when WAN1 goes
up again it will takes the traffic). Both are DHCP.
I have followed this procedure in 2 machines (PC and WRAP) without success:
Alexsander Loula wrote:
Hi Folks,
I have 2 WAN's (WAN1 - production and WAN2 - backup) and I need to set
them as fail over (when WAN1 goes down WAN2 takes the traffic and when
WAN1 goes up again it will takes the traffic). Both are DHCP.
I have followed this procedure in 2 machines (PC and
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 8:30 AM, Lenny five2one.le...@gmail.com wrote:
I got offered a Sun Fire X2200 with Opteron Dual Core 2210(that's 1.8GHz).
Will that do it? (for ~150kpps)
Double check the NICs in that box. I believe they're broadcom and
nvidia (yes, Sun does a mix and match on the same
Alexsander Loula wrote:
Hi Folks,
I have 2 WAN's (WAN1 - production and WAN2 - backup) and I need to set
them as fail over (when WAN1 goes down WAN2 takes the traffic and when
WAN1 goes up again it will takes the traffic). Both are DHCP.
Do you have dual router setup or are those WAN's
If you have two PF machines (One for each ADSL) you can use CARP to get the
failover you require.
Otherwise failover between to WANs on the same Pf machine is covered in the
load balancing.
Rob
- Original Message -
From: Veiko Kukk veiko.k...@krediidipank.ee
To:
This is my current setup:
I'm not using CARP, only the Load Balance service (pools).
2009/3/23 Robert Mortimer rmorti...@bluechiptechnology.co.uk
If you have two PF machines (One for each ADSL) you can use CARP to get the
failover you require.
Otherwise failover between to WANs on the
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 8:30 AM, Lenny five2one.le...@gmail.com wrote:
I got offered a Sun Fire X2200 with Opteron Dual Core 2210(that's 1.8GHz).
Will that do it? (for ~150kpps)
Stick with boxes that feature EM (Intel) NICS.
Scott
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Alexsander Loula alex.lo...@gmail.com wrote:
This is my current setup:
I'm not using CARP, only the Load Balance service (pools).
Are the gateways the same? If so, that won't work as it balances by
gateway IP, you need an intermediate NAT device on one.
No, I have two completely different gateways. One is 200.XXX.XXX.XXX and the
other is 192.XXX.XXX.XXX.
2009/3/23 Chris Buechler c...@pfsense.org
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Alexsander Loula alex.lo...@gmail.com
wrote:
This is my current setup:
I'm not using CARP, only the Load
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 1:02 AM, Dimitri Rodis
dimit...@integritasystems.com wrote:
Do you think this has any potential relevance to the firebox watchdog
timeouts? Obviously I am going to test it and simply observe the results--
not too hard to reproduce the issue.
It could.
Also, there
So, the hint.apic.0.disabled=1 seems to have _significantly_ reduced the
watchdog timeouts, but they are not completely gone, and the ones that are
happening now seem to happen somewhat randomly. Browsing through the GUI
does not seem to cause issues any more. I will continue with the SMP kernel
Alex, I share your pain. I'm not a pf guru, but I can't seem to get this
working either...
I have managed to get the Load Balancer Status to turn Green/Yellow/Red as
expected when I unplug a connection. But the internet get's all wonky... as if
DNS isn't working, old records seem to work, some
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 10:13 PM, Chuck Mariotti cmario...@xunity.com wrote:
Alex, I share your pain. I’m not a pf guru, but I can’t seem to get this
working either…
I have managed to get the Load Balancer Status to turn Green/Yellow/Red as
expected when I unplug a connection. But the
17 matches
Mail list logo
